Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Give an Effective 2ar. 1. Think About the Big Picture  Remember: focus on offense – defend your house  Isolate 1 or 2 Impacts  Decide on impacts.
Advertisements

(Counter) Plans Because they didn’t limit the topic.
Matt Gomez Debating the Disadvantage (DA). 4 Part One: What is a Disadvantage?
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
 The plan says “United States”. The CP replaces that with the word “global” and the net benefit is a critique of ethno-centrism.  2AC says “perm: do.
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
Advanced cp competition exercises
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Cross Examination (CX) Debate
Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.
Debating Case and Disadvantages CODI 2014 Lecture 1.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
TOPICALITY James Stevenson, with due credit to Mike Hester.
 A counterplan is a competitive policy option to the affirmative plan.
The 1ar: Debate’s Paramedic Get the patient to the hospital…alive.
What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…
Counterplan Lecture GDI 2013 Austin Layton Note: This PowerPoint can be accessed on the PaDS website.
Politics. How to pick your disad 1. Link Debate – certain affs just go a certain way. Gotta win that. In my mind, need to win its unpopular or get another.
 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012
By Beth Mendenhall. Introduction Why you should listen Please ask questions.
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Debate II: Speaker Responsibilities
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
Introduction to Debate -Affirmative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L.
Counterplans Debate Central Workshop August 30, 2008.
How to Debate Disadvantages. Selecting disadvantages to run  Be strategic in selecting them—a few things to remember—  Don’t run multiple disadvantages.
Intro to Critiques. Fiat The assumption in the debate game that we pretend the plan gets passed by the USFG. Then, we can debate out the Costs (DA’s)
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
Counterplans on the Topic The Honorable James R. Stevenson, Ph.D, J.D., M.D., Th.D., A.F., A.D.N.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions. The negative strategy.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend.
INTRO TO COUNTERPLANS!. WHAT IS A CP? A net beneficial alternative proposal to the Plan Competitive with the Plan Strategic if… The Aff is huge The SQ.
The Affirmative And Stock Issues By: Matt Miller.
Advanced Debate Friday, August 21,  Speaking Drills  Counterplans  Work on cases  Exam 1: Next Friday Preview.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Debating the case.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Disadvantages “Advanced” theory.
Intro to Counterplans Casey Parsons. Introduction to Counterplans Thus far in debate, we have assumed that the neg defends the status quo In the vast.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
How to Debate Disadvantages. DA Uniqueness: Status of a key issue in the SQ – Example: The economy is improving Link: how the plan disrupts the SQ – Example:
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
Counterplans. Counterplan Burdens Competitiveness To be competitive, CP must be: – Mutually exclusive – Net beneficial Topicality – Traditional theory.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Topicality “That sounds good. That’s a good skill to have.” –Julia Marshall “Naw. Advantages don’t matter when it comes to Topicality.” –Humza Tahir.
Chapter 16,17,18 Negative Terms. Debate Terms-Negative Must directly clash with the affirmative Must directly clash with the affirmative Negative wins.
Affirmative Casing Strategies. Characteristics of Great ACs 1.Argument Quality 2.Persuasive Rhetoric 3.Strategic vision.
Matt Gomez.  What will occur in the status quo  Factors for good uniqueness  Post-dating – things change  Brink – why is the squo good but not guaranteed.
FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.
BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE
Affirmative vs. negative
KRITIKS Melissa Witt.
Introduction to the Negative
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
WELCOME TO DEBATE! Negative Basics.
Basics of Debate Damien Debate.
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
Debate: The Basics.
Negative Strategies.
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Plans in LD No Limits Debate Camp.
Presentation transcript:

Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007

ResearchWritingAnswering

What to look for when researching Depth of the literature Quality of the writing Affirmative bias Specific solvency advocate(s) Sustainability Strong Literature Base

What to look for when researching Flexibility Policy vs. Critique Multiple scenarios Powerful Interesting to you Interesting Harms Area

What to look for when researching Start in the library – books are vital One source at a time Follow authors, footnotes, think tanks, etc Take notes, keep track of search terms Source Mining

What to look for when researching Cut the negative against your case (DA’s & CP’s, K’s) Use NEG authors as search terms Assume you aren’t the only person that thought of your AFF – be prepared “You gotta be negative sometimes”

What to look for when researching Is the AFF offensive vs. key negative arguments? Can the AFF control the uniqueness? Is your agent necessary and sufficient to solve? Think strategically

ResearchWritingAnswering

Form and Strategy Sort evidence by area of the AFF (advantages, solvency, inherency/uniqueness) What will you include? What is ready for the 1AC? Create an outline for the 1AC – think about possible alternative versions Resist the urge to write the plan…yet Organize

Form and Strategy Preempt common answers in the 1AC Impact your arguments Control the uniqueness Anticipate counter plans Average length of 4-6 cards Advantages

Form and Strategy More specific the better – don’t settle Read evidence for specific advantages and internal links Anticipate common answers and counter plans Use evidence as the template for the plan Solvency

Form and Strategy Simple is better – one sentence is ideal PICs Links Start with evidence – what do your advocates recommend? Be specific about actors & mechanisms Be prepared to defend everything in the plan Be prepared to defend that the plan is topical Writing the Plan

Form and Strategy Observation 1 – Inherency/Description of the Status Quo Observation 2 – Advantages Observation 3 - Solvency Basic 1AC Outline

ResearchWritingAnswering

Answering Negative Arguments Predict negative arguments (you did the research, right?) and write answers BEFORE the debate. Research issue specific elements of NEG arguments Think strategically – what will the 1AR say? What about the 2AR? Preparation and Anticipation

Answering Negative Arguments Block to the socks! Write answers to everything Mix offense and defense Use the 1AC (don’t you like your partner?) Bury winners Don’t stop at the 2AC – prepare for the rebuttals Frontlines and Backlines