PHIL 012 2/14/2001 Logical Equivalence & Translation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CS1502 Formal Methods in Computer Science Lecture Notes 3 Consequence Rules Boolean Connectives.
Advertisements

Introduction to Theorem Proving
Computability and Complexity 8-1 Computability and Complexity Andrei Bulatov Logic Reminder.
Syllabus Every Week: 2 Hourly Exams +Final - as noted on Syllabus
Propositional Logic. Negation Given a proposition p, negation of p is the ‘not’ of p.
1 Section 1.2 Propositional Equivalences. 2 Equivalent Propositions Have the same truth table Can be used interchangeably For example, exclusive or and.
Predicates and Quantifiers
Propositional Logic Review
Conjunctions, Disjunctions, and Negations Symbolic Logic 2/12/2001.
Course Outline Book: Discrete Mathematics by K. P. Bogart Topics:
CS1502 Formal Methods in Computer Science
Propositional Equivalences
Math 240: Transition to Advanced Math Deductive reasoning: logic is used to draw conclusions based on statements accepted as true. Thus conclusions are.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 3.7 Switching Circuits.
2.2 Statements, Connectives, and Quantifiers
Logic Disjunction A disjunction is a compound statement formed by combining two simple sentences using the word “OR”. A disjunction is true when at.
Function Symbols & Arithmetic PHIL012 January 22, 2001.
1 CMSC 250 Discrete Structures CMSC 250 Lecture 1.
CS 381 DISCRETE STRUCTURES Gongjun Yan Aug 25, November 2015Introduction & Propositional Logic 1.
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Expressions (Propositional formulas or forms) Instructor: Hayk Melikya
Thinking Mathematically
Extra slides for Chapter 3: Propositional Calculus & Normal Forms Based on Prof. Lila Kari’s slides For CS2209A, 2009 By Dr. Charles Ling;
Chapter 2 Logic 2.1 Statements 2.2 The Negation of a Statement 2.3 The Disjunction and Conjunction of Statements 2.4 The Implication 2.5 More on Implications.
What is Reasoning  Logical reasoning is the process of drawing conclusions from premises using rules of inference.  These inference rules are results.
CS2351 Artificial Intelligence Bhaskar.V Class Notes on Knowledge Representation - Logical Agents.
9.2 Compound Sentences Standard 5.0, 24.0 Standard 5.0, 24.0 Two Key Terms Two Key Terms.
Warm-Up Let A = {0,1,3,8}, B = {2,4,5,6,7,9}, and C = {0,1,8}. 4 minutes Find the following sets.
Symbolic Logic The Following slide were written using materials from the Book: The Following slide were written using materials from the Book: Discrete.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Lecture 2 Propositional Calculus.
Section 1.4. Propositional Functions Propositional functions become propositions (and have truth values) when their variables are each replaced by a value.
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 By Dr. Dalia M. Gil, Ph.D.
CS-7081 Application - 1. CS-7082 Example - 2 CS-7083 Simplifying a Statement – 3.
 Conjunctive Normal Form: A logic form must satisfy one of the following conditions 1) It must be a single variable (A) 2) It must be the negation of.
Simple Logic.
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
AND.
CSNB 143 Discrete Mathematical Structures
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Truth Tables and Equivalent Statements
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Citra Noviyasari, S.Si, MT
CHAPTER 2 Boolean Algebra
Classwork/Homework Classwork – Page 90 (11 – 49 odd)
{P} ⊦ Q if and only if {P} ╞ Q
Proposition & Predicates
The Boolean Connectives
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
Information Technology Department
7.1 Rules of Implication I Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Propositional Equivalences
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
TRUTH TABLES.
(1.4) An Introduction to Logic
Lecture 2: Propositional Equivalences
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 2: Propositional Logic
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
CSE 321 Discrete Structures
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
MAT 3100 Introduction to Proof
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 2: Propositional Logic
Section 3.7 Switching Circuits
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
Reasoning with the Propositional Calculus
Logic Logic is a discipline that studies the principles and methods used to construct valid arguments. An argument is a related sequence of statements.
Statements and Logical Connectives
2-2 Logic Vocab Statement: A sentence that is either true or false
Presentation transcript:

PHIL 012 2/14/2001 Logical Equivalence & Translation

Outline Announcements Logical Equivalence Association, Idempotence, & Commutativity Double Negation DeMorgan’s Theorems Translation Hand Back Tests

Announcements Reminder about new homework policy. Check schedule to see what homework is due via disk & hardcopy on Monday. Test solutions are online. UTS is mailing scanner results. Test forms handed back after class.

Logical Equivalence Two statements are said to be logically equivalents of one another IFF they have the same truth value in every world. The symbol for logical equivalence is , though some texts use . Note that  is not a logical connective.

Rules: Association Suppose that P, Q, & R are statements... (P ^ Q ^ R)  (P ^ Q) ^ R  P ^ (Q ^ R) It is not the case, however, that (P ^ Q) v R  P ^ (Q v R) Association works only if the connectives are all the same. You will not need to cite association.

Rules: Idempotence If a conjunction has a repeated conjunct, then the repeated conjunct may be removed without changing truth value. Idempotence of ^: P ^ Q ^ P  P ^ Q and (P ^ Q) ^ (R ^ S) ^ (P ^ S)  P ^ Q ^ R ^ S

Rules: Idempotence If a disjunction has a repeated disjunct, then the repeated conjunct may be removed without changing truth value. Idempotence of v: P v Q v P  P v Q and (P v Q) v (R v S) v (P v S)  P v Q v R v S

Commutativity ^ and v are Commutative. This means that the arrangement of a sequence of conjuncts or disjuncts does not affect truth value. So, P ^ Q ^ R  P ^ R ^ Q and P v Q v R  P v R v Q

Double Negation  P  P and, in general, an even number of  preserves truth value whereas an odd number of  flips truth value. So, if P is TRUE,  P will also be TRUE whereas  P will be FALSE.

DeMorgan’s Theorems  is not distributive. So, it is not the case that  (P ^ Q)   P ^  Q However, DeMorgan’s Theorems state that  (P ^ Q)   P v  Q and  (P v Q)   P ^  Q

DeMorgan’s Theorems So, DeMorgan’s Theorems allow us to –switch back and forth between ^ and v –reduce an expression to a series of literals A literal is either P or  P, in contrast with, for example,  (P ^ Q). That is, a literal is an atomic sentence or its negation.

Simplification Examples

Translation In general, any translation that has the same truth value in all possible worlds is a good translation. However, some translations are better than others in that they preserve word order.

Translation Either Mary is not Home or Susan is not Happy.  Happy(Susan) v  Home(Mary) = good  (Home(Mary) ^ Happy(Susan)) = good  Home(Mary) v  Happy(Susan) = best All preserve truth value, but the last is best because it preserves word order.

Questions

Hand Back Tests