MOE/PIR Sub-team: Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative 30 Sep 08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beta Testing: The Contractor’s Perspective Trns·port User Group Meeting October 2005.
Advertisements

Application Workshop – Session Four June 7, 2011.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study
Project Scope Management
About Waterloo website Project report June Outline Overview of process Project deliverables Lessons learned.
Click your mouse button to advance the frames.. Coaches/Team Moms Getting Started.
Trusted IT Group. The challenge: 40 active, concurrent IT projects  Unsatisfactory Project Delivery.
International Business and Technology Consultants AMS confidential & proprietary SPS Help Desk Presentation Army User’s Conference June 2002.
Title 40/CCA Advisory Committee 13 MAY UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Advisory Committee 22 Agenda for 5/13/09 TIMETOPICDETAILSFACILITATOR 10 minRecap.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study
Reporting to Management Using Microsoft Project and EPM Derek Loar, Pcubed.
Why is BCL Needed? BCL addresses long-standing challenges that have impacted the delivery of business capabilities The DepSecDef directed increasing the.
Recap from last week Understand organizations, including the four frames, organizational structures. Explain why stakeholder management and top management.
Project Management Process Groups
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Working Team ACIMD 1 DoD Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative Global Information Grid (GIG) Architecture/(Information Support Plan (ISP)
A Combat Support Agency Defense Information Systems Agency UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Spectrum Access: The Tools to Connect GEMSIS 15 Aug 2011.
DoD Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative Working Team Meeting 6 Nov 08.
DoD Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative Sub-Team Update: How to Identify a LSS Improvement Opportunity (Project) 7 NOV 2008.
Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative Working Team Meeting 2 Sep 08 (Updated 15 Sep 08 by T. Minor)
TITLE 40 CCA Outcome Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) Revision of mission-related and administrative processes (BPR) Post Implementation Review (PIR) Briefing.
Lecture 3 Title: Information Technology Project Methodology By: Mr Hashem Alaidaros MIS 434.
3 1 Project Success Factors u Project management important for success of system development project u 2000 Standish Group Study l Only 28% of system development.
Rebecca Nickleson, MS, CRA Assistant Director Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
1 Presented to: Mr. Dave Wennergren (NII/DoD CIO) Dr. Nancy Spruill (OUSD/AT&L) May 5, 2009 Title 40/CCA Certification and Confirmation Process Improvement.
CCA LSS Team #2 Post Implementation Review (PIR) Kick-off Meeting 13 Jan 2009 CS4 Room 310 Small V3.
Master Recreation Plan Program-Level Management Plan  What is a Program Management Plan?  How is it developed?  What’s next?
1IT Project Management, Third Edition Chapter 3 Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study.
Lecture 2_2 The Project Management Process J. S. Chou, P.E., Ph.D. Assistant Professor.
D Appendix D.11. Toward Net-Centric Acquisition Oversight A Proposal for an Acquisition Community of Interest (COI) MID 905 Streamlined Acquisition.
Power to the Edge MDAP and IT/NSS Requirement to Develop Outcome Measures of Effectiveness and Conduct PDPR/PIR Leonard Sadauskas DASD(DCIO) CP/O
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
Connecting People With Information 1 DoD Enterprise Software Initiative  Alignment with High-Level Goals –Transform Enterprise Management –Strategic Sourcing.
Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative Working Team Meeting Updates 23 Sep 08.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda May 16, 2012 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Open Window Updates Questions and Answers.
Introducing the National Guard Performance Appraisal Application (PAA) This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Release 3 – Workshop August 16, 2007.
Timeline and Milestones. The first step to any plan is thinking about a timeline. You want to know what needs to get done and when, to ensure that you.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda May 19, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
Software Quality Assurance SOFTWARE DEFECT. Defect Repair Defect Repair is a process of repairing the defective part or replacing it, as needed. For example,
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda February 11, 2010 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
CCA LSS Support Slides1 Draft The Defense Acquisition Management Framework. Post Implementation Review (PIR) Capability Needs Satisfaction & Benefits.
DoD Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative Working Group Update: Identified Potential Projects 18 NOV 2008.
NSA MOE-PIR Outcome Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) and their Measure During a Post Implementation Review (PIR) Leonard Sadauskas OASD(CIO) CP&O.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda February 16, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update Group Exercise.
UNITED IN SERVICE TO OUR NATION UNCLASSIFIED Filter Tasks and Requirements.
Power to the Edge A Net-Centric DoD NII/DoD CIO IT Acquisition Management Transformation Rapid Improvement Team (RIT) Principals Meeting November 18, 2003.
Power to the Edge A Net-Centric DoD NII/DoD CIO Appendix D.13 RIT Pilot Use of the Internet to Streamline the IT Acquisition Process Screen Shots.
1 Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study 1.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Implementation Strategy July 2002
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study
Introducing the National Guard Performance Appraisal Application (PAA)
Defining the Activities
UNITED IN SERVICE TO OUR NATION
NesCom PAR Review Period Comment Dialog
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups: A Case Study
Mark Robinson FINANCE DIVISION SUPPORT
CFR Enhancement Session
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Mark Robinson FINANCE DIVISION SUPPORT
Presentation transcript:

MOE/PIR Sub-team: Title 40/CCA LSS Initiative 30 Sep 08

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 2 Proposed Agenda Sub-team member coordinates (names provided separately) Review of MOE and PIR statutory & regulatory language (Title 40/CCA, 3170, 5000) Assigned questions for sub-team to answer –Some answers in SIPOC What are the going-in issues in MOEs and PIR –What is our deliverable? How will we work (F2F, on line, time to meet) to answer the questions –IT-CoP screen shots Next Steps

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 3 MOE + PIR Sub-team OrganizationName Phone Air Force (CIO) Army CIO/G6 BTA DoD CIO ITI&CP Joint Staff J6 Joint Staff J8 NII AT&L SSE DON Acquisition

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 4 Questions for Title 40/CCA Sub-teams Who are the customers? What are their requirements? Are they measurable? How were the customer requirements determined? What are the key success factors for requirement being achieved? What is a requirements defect (what can go wrong)? What is the impact of requirement on the program, customer, and its relationship to acquisition process? What is the process/work flow to determine compliance? Who are the key stakeholders? How will they be involved in the project? Who should be on the team? What have been the key lessons learned to date (if any)? What kinds of barriers/obstacles will need assistance to be removed? DATA What are the top 3 issues experienced by those completing the requirement across the product life cycle? How often does the issue occur? What entity/agency causes the issue? How often does the entity cause the same issue? What effect does the issue have on the work being conducted (how is the issue felt?) How long does it take to correct the issue?

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 5 What is our deliverable? Depends on the task No conclusion but task is to answer the question

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 6 SIPOC Map S uppliers I nputs P rocess O utputs C ustomers CCA compliant ICD KMDS KMDS SIPR Web site JCIDS Components DoD CIO/NII Components CBA Team Review Phase 1 CBA doc Submit Comment KMDS Notifies POC Adjudicate comment Tel/ / person Verify in CRM Repeat in phase 2 FCB WG Review Verify in approved ICD Input Metrics Process Metrics Output Metrics Quality Speed Cost Input process is controlled by CJCSI # Critical comments detected % CCA MOE Compliant ICD Adjudication time is driven by the level of effort X DoD CIO/NII gov and contract FTEs % CCA compliant ICDs % of approved ICDs to MS B % MS B Programs Fielded % Evaluated successfully fielded % capability delivered on schedule Total IT/NSS Cost overrun Improve CIO/NII pre-MS A CCA Compliance and Oversight Process

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 7 Going-in MOE & PIR Issues (brainstorm mode) Education – most CBA teams don’t know that a PIR is needed Most teams work within the small picture, not the big strategic pix Need data on the % of programs that have a PIR plan and have conducted PIRs Need PIR process and metrics History on the “presumed” language in table E.4; could not figure it out so we threw in presumed. (Other AT&L views “ I am not going to subject my programs to a PIR”) Discussion about the findings of the past 30 months regarding MOE’s

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 8 How will we work (F2F, on line, time to meet) MOE + PIR Sub-team page on IT-CoP: All will explore the IT-CoP but until it becomes useful, Len will send out an to all sub-team members When you enter the MOE+PIR page as a member, subscribe to it (bread crumbs in blue near the top of the page) and you will be notified of new materials and/or changes or answers to questions and so forth. The subscription can be edited any time.

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 9

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 10

UNCLASSIFIED Title 40/CCA Core Team ACIMD 11 Action Items/Next Steps Review the MOE/BPR/PIR briefing Answer the questions Ed posed and post your responses on the sub- team page and/or to all. Suspense COB Friday 3 October. All review Monday 6 Oct and discuss during the sub-team portion of meeting on the 7 th.