International Waters Program: New Opportunities for the World Bank June 2005
A Long-Term Interest World Bank Worked Extensively on the Management of International Waters Prior to Establishment of the GEF Major pre-GEF programs included the Mediterranean Sea and Baltic Sea Our Environment Network has Viewed Freshwater, Coastal and Marine Resources as a Management Continuum, but this Has Not Been Fully Translated into Bank Water Resources Management Operations
A Long-Term Interest Current Portfolio Extends across All Regions and Totals Some $1.8 Billion (pipeline = $1.9 Billion) (see table) Focus is on Consolidating Actions into Multi-Phased Programs and in Strategic Partnerships
Recent Developments GEF IV Replenishment is Uncertain in Terms of Scope and Level of Funding Limited Access to GEF Funds Under International Waters Window Is Anticipated – Relative to Need and Historical Levels A Significant Mortgage Exists on the Proposed International Waters Allocation from Currently Approved Programs and Multi-Tranche Projects
Recent Developments Greater Emphasis from GEF Donors on Using the Funds More Effectively Pressure is Coming from Some GEF Donors to Move to Performance Based Allocation of Funds Paris Declaration – Phase Out, Over Time, Use of Project Management Units and Project Implementation Units – Need to Evaluate When This Would Be Appropriate for Future Regional/Multi-Country Projects
Monitoring and Evaluation Increased Priority Being Given to Independent Evaluation within the GEF Structure Evaluation is Giving Emphasis to Outcomes and Impacts from GEF Resources Need to Benefit from Review of Evaluation Studies, Including the Program Study on International Waters (2004)
An Integrated Approach Important for World Bank Supported International Waters Programs and Projects to Inter-Link with Other Focal Areas and Bank Supported-Investments Key Opportunities Exist for Linkages: Biodiversity Climate Change POPs Land Degradation
An Integrated Approach Allows Bank to Focus on Land, Water, Biodiversity Interface That Has Been Central to TDAs and SAPs and to Consolidate in a Programmatic Approach Facilitates Addressing Emerging Issues of Land Degradation, Climate Change and POPs Recognizes Need to Strengthen Cooperation with UNDP and UNEP
Use of Recent Studies GEF Supported Global International Waters Assessment (GIWA) Report of the Lake Basin Management Initiative (October 2005) Proposed Groundwater Assessment Non-GEF Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Integration Into Bank Processes Planning and Resource Allocation Regional/Country Ownership Country Assistance Strategies DPLs (Cameroon Forestry Project) Country Water Resources Strategies Country Environmental Analysis Use of Bank Staff Importance of Continuity for Management and Advocacy
Operational Issues for Linkages Develop a Shared Vision with the GEF and other IAs for a New Approach Sharing Resources Will be Demanding Importance of Incentives for Programs and Projects Focused on Linkages Need to Minimize Transaction Costs Avoid Multiple Review by Multiple Focal Areas Need to Avoid Multiple STAP Reviews
Perspectives on Linkages Christophe Crepin – Regional Coordination Across the Portfolio Land Degradation interlinkages Coastal and Marine interlinkages