New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Analysis Fundamentals and Application Robert L. Griffin International Plant Protection Convention Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.
Advertisements

1 EPAs 2008 Report on the Environment Denice M. Shaw, PhD U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental.
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
History of Critical Loads meetings – how have we gotten to this point? Andrzej Bytnerowicz 1, Rich Fisher 2 and Al Riebau 3 USDA Forest Service 1 Pacific.
Risk and RACI: Defining Clear Roles
Strategic Environmental Assessment of Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework Strategic Environmental Assessment of Scotland’s.
Societal Impacts of Weather and Climate at NCAR July 27, 2005 Susi Moser, ISSE Jeff Lazo, RAL, ISSE Presentation to the NCAR Executive Committee and Strategic.
EISWG The Environmental Information Services Working Group of the NOAA Science Advisory Board Raymond J. Ban April 22, 2009.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
Recommendations to Inform Development of a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Watershed Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Simcoe.
Air Quality and Land Use Planning Land Use Consultants 11 th March 2008 Susanne Underwood.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Capacity Enhancement for Air Quality Management John E. Hay Senior Advisor UNEP ROAP & IETC.
Environmental Decision-Making The Past is Prologue to the Future.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Enhancing Local Land Use Decisions through the Evaluation and Use of Web-based Tools Enhancing Local Land Use Decisions through the Evaluation and Use.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
Dual Use Research of Concern Boston University and Boston Medical Center.
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
DEC Marine WALIS Marine Group 24 September 2009 Mark Sheridan.
Planning and Environment Linkages: Overview and Examples TRB Workshop on Environmental Analysis January 13, 2008 Michael Culp and Rob Ritter FHWA Office.
EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George Gray, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator EPA Office of Research.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Enhancing Local Land Use Decisions through the Evaluation and Use of Web-based Tools Enhancing Local Land Use Decisions through the Evaluation and Use.
NWS Social Science Activities David Caldwell, Director NWS Office of Climate, Weather and Water & Jennifer M. Sprague NWS Social Science Focal Point OFCM.
Division Of Early Warning And Assessment MODULE 5: PEER REVIEW.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Science and Technology for the Post-2015 DRR framework - EFDRR discussion Professor Virginia Murray. Vice-chair UNISDR Science and Technical Advisory Group.
Ozone National Air Quality Standard Review WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Boise, Idaho September 2006.
1 New NAAQS Review Process Briefing for EPA Staff Kevin Teichman, ORD and Lydia Wegman, OAQPS April 5, 2007.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
EPA’s Role in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)
Approaches and Mainstreaming of Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Europe International workshop “Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to climate change.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research DOE Workshop on Community Modeling and Long-term Predictions of the Integrated Water.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Redesigning FSIS Outreach to Meet Current Needs of Small and Very Small Plants.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division S.T. Rao Director, NERL/AMAD U.S.
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
Comments on the Research of Dr. Bob Musselman (Atmospheric Deposition Research) Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L. & Associates Helena, Montana August 10, 2005.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Introduction to SEPA The Scottish Environment Agency For CaSPr Waste Workshop Glasgow 19 October 2006 Claudette Hudes NetRegs Team Leader.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
St. John’s, Antigua May What is STAP? In 1994, the GEF Instrument sets up STAP – “UNEP shall establish, in consultation with UNDP and the World.
DoD Comments to NRC Committee on Improvements to EPA Risk Analysis Yvonne P. Walker, MS, MSE, CIH Director, Environmental Programs Navy Environmental Health.
1 Physical and Social Sciences Research Task Team: Final Report Alexander E. MacDonald NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory July 25, 2006 A Presentation.
Australia’s Import Risk Analysis Process Compared and Contrasted Mary Harwood Executive Manager Biosecurity Australia.
Overview of Pesticides and Toxics Research Programs: Safe Pesticides/Safe Products and Endocrine Disruptors Elaine Z. Francis, Ph.D. National Program Director,
NOAA Social Science Initiative Rodney Weiher Chief Economist Program Planning and Integration NOAA SAB Washington DC March 16, 2004.
Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.
CITEL – San Salvador | 16 April | Electromagnetic Fields: A WHO Perspective Dr E. van Deventer.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
Draft Report Overview: March 20, 2003 Prepared for: Planning Team Meeting Western Regional Air Partnership Presented by: Doug Jeavons — BBC Research &
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Facilitating Global Markets: NIST Dialogue with Regulators Mary Saunders Chief, Standards.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
EPA Global Change Research Program A TEN YEAR PLAN Presentation to 13 th Symposium on Global Change Studies Janet L. Gamble, Ph.D. National Center for.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
ReVA Regional Vulnerability Assessment Moving from monitoring status and trends to targeting risk management activities.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Suggestion for next steps for PGA for REDD+ in Vietnam
System Analysis Advisory Committee Conclusions of the RPM Review Panel
Presentation transcript:

New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees reporting to the Administrator. Advisory projects involving ecological science are underway in each. The Council Provides advice on the Agency’s major analysis of costs and benefits associated with implementing the Clean Air Act. To strengthen the Agency's capabilities for assessing ecological benefits of air pollutants, the SAB Staff Office established an Ecological Effects Subcommittee in April Members have expertise in air pollution- related ecological sciences relevant to terrestrial and aquatic systems. CASAC Advises the Agency on health and ecological assessments related to Criteria Air Pollutants. The SAB Staff Office is forming a new Ozone Review Panel that will include expertise in ecological effects and resource valuation. Expertise will be needed to address: patterns of exposure to ozone and/or other photochemical oxidants of ornamental and/or agricultural plants and/or natural ecosystems and their components; effects of ozone and other photochemical oxidants on natural ecosystems (especially terrestrial) and their components (both flora and fauna), ranging from biochemical/sub- cellular effects and identification of indicators of pathophysiological effects at the individual plant level, to effects on species and populations, on up to include impacts on increasingly more complex (e.g., landscape) levels of ecosystem organization. SAB Advisory Panel on EPA’s Report on the Environment (met in March 2004) The Science Advisory Board (SAB) provided advice on the Agency’s draft Report on the Environment. The SAB advisory panel reviewed the approach and process used to develop the draft Report on the Environment. In addition, the panel reviewed the scientific and technical soundness of the indicators, data, and conclusions in the Report. The SAB also provided advice to enhance the presentation of information in the Report. The advisory panel found the Report on the Environment to be a critically important document, and provided recommendations that will be used to improve future versions of the Report to make it more useful to EPA and other intended audiences. Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services (Estimated Project Completion: September 2005) Charge to the Committee from the SAB's Executive Committee: the Committee will assess Agency needs and the state of the art and science of valuing protection of ecological systems and services, and then will identify key areas for improving knowledge, methodologies, practice, and research. Specific types of EPA needs for advice include:  Needs for benefit assessments supporting regulations protecting ecological systems and services.  Regional needs for assessing and communicating the value of protecting ecological systems and services.  Needs for assessing and communicating to Congress, the Executive Branch, and the public the value of EPA's programs protecting ecological systems and services under the Government Performance and Results Act.  Needs for information products communicating to the general public about the benefits of EPA regulatory decisions protecting ecological systems and benefits of voluntary actions protecting them. Planned Activities  Advising the Agency on its plan to develop a "Strategic Plan for Ecological Benefits."  Providing advice to EPA offices and Regions interested in the Committee's advice on specific issues.  Hosting workshops on science-based approaches to valuing the protection of ecological systems and services used by groups outside EPA.  At the conclusion of the two-year initiative, issuing a final report. SAB Review of the Region 5 Critical Ecosystem Assessment Model (CrEAM) The SAB is establishing a Panel to review the model developed by the Region 5 Critical Ecosystems Team to predict the ecological significance of undeveloped land using ecological theory, existing data sets, and geographic information system (GIS) technology. The model has been used to predict locations of ecosystems of high ecological significance in the Region. The Panel will provide advice on the scientific validity of the conceptual framework and methodology used to identify ecologically significant ecosystems, and on the scientific defensibility of the results generated from CrEAM queries. Consultation on the Application of the Regional Vulnerability Assessment (ReVA) Integration Tool and Underlying Methods for Multi-Scale Decision Making The SAB is establishing a Panel to provide advice to the Office of Research and Development on the ReVA tool. The goal of ReVA is to develop and demonstrate an approach to comprehensive, regional-scale assessment that effectively informs decision- makers as to the magnitude, extent, distribution, and uncertainty of current and anticipated environmental vulnerabilities. Vulnerability, in this context, is defined as the risk of serious degradation of the ecological goods and services that are valued by society. The SAB Panel will conduct a scientific review of the underlying methods and evaluate the integration tool for use by clients in decision-making at local to regional scales, including targeting current and future vulnerabilities.