Team 3 ATV Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability and Safety Analysis. Abstract Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of the.
Advertisements

V i t a l i s ECE Spring 2013 TEAM 13 Presenter: Yi Shen Wireless Biometric Sensor Team Members: Aakash Lamba Di Mo Shantanu Joshi Yi Shen Reliability.
Team 4: Shicheng Guo, Kyle Haver, Ethan Price, Wesley Tso.
Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister, Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips Group Nine Reliability and Safety Analysis DART.
Team 8:Recon Robot Safety and Reliability Analysis Abhinav Valluru (presenter) Vinit bhamburdekar Arjun Bajaj Aabhas Sharma.
RELIABILITY & SAFETY ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY: ANDREW BATEK Team # 15: Acoustic Storm Interweaving the impressive visual power of electricity and the visceral.
Team 13 John Ashmore, Brian Bell, Jason Giles, Jing Li.
MARCELO L. BRANDON G. ADITYA B. NIKHIL S. THE INCREDIBLE HUD.
TEAM BRIGHTRIDERS Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis “We put the SOUL in SOULAR racing”
ECE 477 R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 5 – myATM Xue Yuan Wong.
Defender Safety and Reliability Analysis Kirk Iler Brian Bentz Stephen Wolf Fuhe Xu.
Daryl SielaffBen McQuiston Will McKennaDavid Hartman Functional Blocks and FMECA Chart.
Team 01 : QuadSquad Safety and Reliability Andrew Boldt 11/6/2013 the ECE quadcopter senior design Purdue University1.
Technical Communication Skills Practicum (TCSP) Presented by Nuhairi & Azad Team 10: “Hazard Rover” 2/21/2007.
Wall-E Prototype I Team 1 Xin Jin
o Portable low-cost aerial drone that can be used for reconnaissance o Relay real-time video and data, like location, heading, battery life o Take high-resolution.
Technical Communication Skills Practicum (TCSP) Presented by Nuhairi & Azad Team 10: “Hazard Rover” 2/21/2007.
Kian Hui Wong Chia Siong Goh Wan Qi Choo Jun Jun Peh Presenter: Kian Hui Wong.
ECE 477 Group 3 The Gauntlet George Hadley Kelli Hacker Sean Ma Jacob Champion.
Pop’em Drop’em Robots TCSP #8 – Reliability & Safety Analysis Duncan Swartz.
Group 11. CriticalityFailure EffectMax Probability HighInjury to user may occur. LowLoss of some or all functions of the device. Customer dissatisfaction.
P ROJECT PRINT TCSP 8 – R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 8 – Siddharth Bhosale.
1 PRELIMINARY PCB LAYOUT Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV) Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
Text Message DJ – Reliability & Safety Team 22 Garrett Strzelecki The Text Message DJ allows party guests the opportunity to choose which songs they want.
Team 13 Michael Stuckenschneider Loren Garby Arin Chakraverty Janell Niekamp.
TCSP – Reliability and Safety. Reliability Analysis Major component chosen for analysis:Major component chosen for analysis: Switching Regulators (LM2679SD-5.0,
Group 12 – H.E.A.D Gear Maximum Power Point Tracker Reliability and Safety Analysis Harsha Eric Atandra Daniel Vengapaty Aasen Burman Da Silva.
Reliability Analysis - Overview 4 main components considered Glove Micro - PIC24FJ128GA310 Base Micro - PIC18F87K90 3.3V Power Supply - CC3-0503SR-E 5V.
Solar Telematics System
Madalina Vintila David Wilkinson Michelle Zhang Zac Greenawalt.
Team 9 - Scribacious Rabble Safety and Reliability Analysis Mitchell Erdbruegger (presenting) Paul Rosswurm William Hess Ben Kobin.
RCD Laser System Corey Lane, Ryan Scott, Danny Barjum.
Grant Thomas Anthony Fennell Justin Pancake Chris McCord TABLEGAMES UNLIMITED.
ALEX BUSCHKOETTER ALEX GLENN KIMBERLY SOONG PETRA MUSTAFA Group 4: 3MS.
FLAC Audio Player Brett Mravec with Isaac Jones Greg McCoy Danielle Miller Team 9.
Matt Waldersen (Presenting) TJ Strzelecki Rick Schuman Krishna Jharjaria.
Bryan McDonnel Michael Mize Ryan Taylor (presenter) Miles Whittaker
The “Drink Mixer” Reliability and SafetyAnalysis.
Technical Communications Practicum: Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis SmartShopper Jeff Richards, John Sweeney, Stevi Wood and Tera Wong.
FEST ECE 477 Fall 2011 TEAM 5 Gloria Budiman Alexander Kidarsa Christopher Sakalis Vishal Gala.
Team 5 Reliability & Safety TCSP. High Criticality = λ < Low Criticality = λ < High Criticality determined by constant vehicular movement.
Wall-E Prototype I TCSP #8 Safety and Reliability Analysis Team 1 Xin Jin Ranmin Chen Hang Xie Zelun Tie.
Home Enhancement Suite Presenter: Allen Humphreys William Bouchonnet, Daniel Sabo, Nathan Irvin.
Steve Andre Eric Glover Shaun Greene Russell Willmot.
Software Narrative Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV) Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
Electronic Cornhole Team 7 Safety/Reliability Analysis Jimmy Tsao Tom Collopy Andrew Reder Ryan Scheckelhoff.
Josh Marchi, Jeff King, Paul Rosenberger, Dan Chambers – RM&S Analysis–
Team01: Zelun Tie The design project Wall-E Prototype I is an intelligent automated trash collecting robot with obstacle detection capability. The robot.
Technical Communication Skills Practicum (TCSP) Presented by Team 10: “Hazard Rover” 2/21/2007.
Fly Spy – Group 12 Reliability and Safety Analysis Heather Barrett.
Presented by Jun Yao Dummy Arm Team 4 Chuan He Yuntian Lu Wudi Zhou Jun Yao.
DOODLE DRIVE Presenter: Peachanok Lertkajornkitti Team 6 Reliability and Safety Analysis.
Phillip Byers Jonathan Mulvaine Josh Schortgen Michael Broski TEAM BOAR.
SWISH SLEEVE Safety and Reliability Analysis Stephen MacNeil, Michael Kobit, Sriharsh Achukola, Augustus Hong.
P-REV Michael Connaboy Stephen Schiffli Ram Hudiara Win Than Aung.
Criticality measures Low  General annoyance – screen stops working, buttons don’t work  λ < High  Parts get hot, catch fire, and/or explode 
Safety and Reliability Analysis
Autonomous Rescue Vehicle (Team 10)
Packaging Specifications & Design
Team 16 : Project Minotaur Presenter : John Hubberts
Reliability and Safety Analysis
Safety and Reliability
Reliability & Safety Analysis
Preliminary PCB Layout and Design: Team 16
Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV)
Team We Ate 9 FMECA Worksheet.
Reliability and Safety Analysis
The Two Wheel Deal Group 12 Greg Eakins Eric Geier Pete Dudash
Reliability & Safety Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Team 3 ATV Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers

High Criticality A failure that has the potential to injure the user or others Medium Criticality A failure that can permanently damage components of the device Low Criticality A failure that would change the functionality of the device or affect its performance

Devices prone to fail Freescale 9S12C32 microcontrollers Murata OKR-T 5V switching regulator BQ2002 Batter charging IC L298 dual H-Bridge

μController 1 Failure No.Failure ModePossible CausesFailure EffectsMethod of Detection CriticalityRe ma rks A1PWM signal failure Failure of HC9S12C32 pins PT0-PT3. The camera servos will not work.ObservationMedium A2SCI failureFailure of the HC9S12C32 pins TX and RX. Unable to communicate to atom board. ObservationMedium A3Failure of range sensors Failure of the HC9S12C32 ATD pins AN3- AN5 Unable detect obstacles. Can result in injury of others. ObservationHigh A4Failure to Reset or run Failure of R9 or Pushbutton The microcontroller is unable to reset or is being constantly reset ObservationMedium A5Failure of SPIFailure of HC9S12C32 SPI pins PM2-PM5 Unable to read the accelerometer data. Will make the calculation of the current location less accurate ObservationLow A6Failure of TimerFailure of HC9S12C32 timer pins PT6- PT7 Unable to determine the speed and direction of the robot ObservationMedium

μController 2 Failure No.Failure ModePossible CausesFailure EffectsMethod of Detection CriticalityRemarks B1Failure of Motor logic signals Failure of the HC9S12C32 AN0-AN3 pins Unable to control the movement of the robot. ObservationHigh B2SCI failureFailure of the HC9S12C32 pins TX and RX. Unable to communicate to atom board. ObservationMedium B3SPI FailureFailure of the HC9S12C32 pins PM2-PM5 or failure of Compass Unable to determine the direction of movement of the robot ObservationLow B4Failure to ResetFailure of R9 or Pushbutton The microcontroller is unable to reset or is being constantly reset ObservationMedium B5Failure of PWM signal Failure of the HC9S12C32 pins PT0-PT1 The motors are not able to stop ObservationHigh

μController Parameter nameDescriptionValueComments regarding choice of parameter value, especially if you had to make assumptions. C1Die complexity.14CMOS, 8-Bit πTπT Temperature coeff..71Assume linear temp of 50 C C2Package Failure Rate Pins, Nonhermetic πEπE Environmental Factor4.0Ground Mobile πQπQ Quality Factor10Commercially Manufactured component πLπL Learning Factor1More than 2 years in production λPλP Part Failure Rate1.594Failures /10^6 hours MTTF Hours = 71.5 Years

Murata OKR-T 5V Regulator Failure No.Failure ModePossible CausesFailure EffectsMethod of Detection CriticalityRemarks D1Vout < 5VR15 fails and causes an open circuit The servos, sensors and microcontrollers do not function ObservationMedium D2Vout >5VR15 fails and shorts The sensors and microcontroller might be damaged ObservationMedium D3Vout 5V Failure of OKR- T switching regulator UnpredictableObservationMedium

Murata OKR-T Parameter nameDescriptionValueComments regarding choice of parameter value, especially if you had to make assumptions. C1Die complexity.011 to 100 Linear MOS gates πTπT Temperature coeff..71Assume linear temp 50 C C2Package Failure Rate.0025 Pins, Nonhermetic πEπE Environmental Factor4.0Ground Mobile πQπQ Quality Factor10Commercially Manufactured component πLπL Learning Factor1More than 2 years in production λPλP Part Failure Rate.207Failures /10^6 hours MTTF 551 Years

H-Bridge Failure No.Failure ModePossible CausesFailure EffectsMethod of Detection CriticalityRemarks E1Unable to control motors One of the Resistors R21- R26 fails or one of the six 4n33 optical isolators fails Motor behave randomly and cannot be controlled ObservationHigh E2H-bridge failureFailure of the L298 H-bridge Unpredictable, motors cannot be controlled and robot might run into someone resulting in injury ObservationHigh

L298 dual H-Bridge Parameter nameDescriptionValueComments regarding choice of parameter value, especially if you had to make assumptions. C1Die complexity.011 to 100 Linear MOS gates πTπT Temperature coeff.2.8Linear MOS at 70C C2Package Failure Rate Pins, Nonhermetic πEπE Environmental Factor4.0Ground Mobile πQπQ Quality Factor10Commercially Manufactured component πLπL Learning Factor1More than 2 years in production λPλP Part Failure Rate.548Failures /10^6 hours MTTF Years

Battery Charging Circuit Failure No.Failure ModePossible CausesFailure EffectsMethod of Detection CriticalityRemarks F1Current source failure LM-317 failureThe battery does not charge ObservationLow F2Failure of charging IC Failure of BQ2002/F chip Failure to detect when battery is charged which can lead to destruction of battery. Batter can also explode. ObservationHigh F3Failure of Q1Failure of the Q1 transistor Unpredictable. Unable to start charging or stop charging the battery. Battery can explode or ignite. ObservationHigh F4Failure of Q2Transistor Q2 fails This is in place only in case other components fail. Its failure might in the worst case make the battery unable to be charged. ObservationLow F5Current soure > 1 A Resistors R5 or R6 fail. LM317 current source breaks ObservationLow F6Current soure <1A Resistor R5 or R6 failure The battery doesn’t fully charge ObservationLow

BQ2002 Parameter nameDescriptionValueComments regarding choice of parameter value, especially if you had to make assumptions. C1Die complexity to 1000 Linear MOS gates πTπT Temperature coeff..71Assume linear temp of 50 C C2Package Failure Rate Pins, Nonhermetic πEπE Environmental Factor4.0Ground Mobile πQπQ Quality Factor10Commercially Manufactured component πLπL Learning Factor1More than 2 years in production λPλP Part Failure Rate.278Failures /10^6 hours MTTF 410 Years

Questions?