Assessment of UC Policies and Practices to Assess Inclusiveness of Climate Linda Bisson, Associate Director, UCD ADVANCE.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Asking Why: Transforming Our Perspectives on Race and College Completion Haley Pilgrim Mitzi Day Kristen Salomonson November 7, 2013.

Advertisements

Yoly Woo-Hoogenstyn Articulation Officer Helpful Tips from a UC A.O.

Cornell University’s “Toward New Destinations” Institutional Diversity Plan to Address Gender Diversity Lynette Chappell-Williams Associate Vice President,

WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.

Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.

University of California Information Technology Guidance Committee.

What is the Academic Senate? Faculty Voice In System of Shared Governance Exists on All 10 UC Campuses and Systemwide (Office of the President) Organized.

Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Library Evaluation Evaluation by the Valley Library (for new.

Academic Program Review Purposes: Current learning outcomes assessment and program assessment for regional accreditation Chancellor’s requirement for program.

University of California President’s Task Force on Faculty Diversity

Organization, Administration, and Improvement of Graduate Education Daniel Denecke, Ph.D. Program Director, Best Practices and Publications The Council.

PROGRAM REVIEW ORIENTATION LAUNCH MEETING March 25, p.m. - 2 p.m. Department Orientation for Program Review Office of Academic Assessment & Program.

Institution-level mission, vision, and values statements are inclusive of all people, including those with disabilities. Disability is included.

In existence since 1981, the Commission for Women identifies areas of concern to women employees and students of Penn State, and suggests changes in existing.

From Cyclical to Continuous Improvement: Assessment Feedback and Program Metrics Derek J. Herrmann, Coordinator of University Assessment Services Kristen.

Academic Advancement for Clinician-Educators: Secrets from the Dean’s Office 2/26/13 Renee Binder, M.D. Elena Fuentes-Afflick, M.D., M.P.H. SOM Academic.

Office of Faculty Affairs August 25, Office of Faculty Affairs August 25, 2015 Professional.

Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,

Urbana Senate Overview Nicholas Burbules Joyce Tolliver.

UC ADVANCE PAID Roundtable UC ADVANCE PAID Roundtable Mentoring Faculty in an Inclusive Climate April 10, 2013 Sheila O’Rourke, J.D. Director, UC President’s.

Diversity Initiatives. Institutional Diversity Council Membership: Appointed by the Provost, in consultation with the Director of Institutional Diversity.

Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,

1 Capital Union Building – Penn State Harrisburg Administration Building – Penn State Schuylkill.

October 1, 2015 v.0 Vision of the Future Assessment of Current Bench Strength – Talent Review Gap Analysis between Current Skills and Future Needs Gap.

University Assessment Council Presented by: Linda Shaw, CHABSS faculty Regina Eisenbach, Dean of Academic Programs May 6, 2015.

Carmen Suarez, Ph.D. Chief Diversity Officer Associate Vice Provost for Student Affairs.

Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes at Pitt Patricia E. Beeson Vice Provost for Graduate and Undergraduate Studies University of Pittsburgh.

SAMPLE MARCH WORKGROUP PRESENTATION

JSTOR DDA Pilot Overview

Transformational Human Resources Changing Today for a Better Tomorrow

College Applications 101 General Information

Senate Meeting Summary

Better Together: Strategic Assessment Partnerships between Academic Affairs and Student Services at California State University Long Beach Sharlene Sayegh.

New Program Proposal Workflow Chart

Senate Meeting Summary

Student Success and Inclusivity

Student Affairs Assessment

New Program Director Workshop

New Program Director Workshop:

Knowledge Management: Common and Critical resources

Accountability versus Responsibility

Senate Meeting Summary

HLC Day February 13, 9:30am - 2:00pm, TUC Great Hall.

UCR WASHINGTON CENTER PROGRAM

Toward an inclusive campus community:

President’s Report 16 June 2016

Sam Houston State University

Equal Opportunity & Institutional Compliance

DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW

Administrative Review

Role of Academic Services

Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow

Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location

New Certificate Program

Terminate an Academic Unit

Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit

New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program

Report on the Office of Faculty Development

Establish a New Academic Unit

Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program

Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit

Impact on Student Experience and Outcomes

Sam Houston State University

Diversity & Inclusion at UCONN

Administrative Review Committee

Faculty Senate President’s Report

Administrative Committee Review

Interventions Linda Bisson, Associate Director, UCD ADVANCE

Council of Graduate Students Presentation

The Office of Institutional Equity (OIE)

Presentation transcript:

Assessment of UC Policies and Practices to Assess Inclusiveness of Climate Linda Bisson, Associate Director, UCD ADVANCE

Categories of Assessment  General/Sub-Population Surveys Including Assessment of Climate  Climate Assessment in Review Processes  Climate Assessment in Complaint Processes

Climate Assessment in General Surveys  Internal/External  Undergraduate Students  Graduate Students  Postdoctoral fellows/researchers  Staff  Faculty/faculty

Summary of Surveys Conducted Across UC Campuses  Internal: all institutions conduct some type of internal surveys that encompass climate  Systemwide surveys: UCUES, Campus Climate Survey used by all  External: COACHE, other surveys as needed  Subpopulations: Undergraduates: UCUES; UCSD: annual survey Graduate Students: o Exit Surveys: UCD, UCR o Annual survey: UCSD o Other surveys: UCI (DECADE), UCM, UCSB, UCSC

Summary of Surveys Conducted Across UC Campuses  Subpopulations: Postdoctoral fellows/researchers: o Exit surveys: UCD (in development); UCR: PPFP/CFP o Other surveys: UCM, UCSB Staff: o Regular survey: CUCSA survey systemwide every 3 years o Annual survey: UCSD Faculty: o Faculty exit survey: UCD o Faculty retention survey: UCSC o Others as described above: Campus climate survey. COACHE Other: o Focus groups/town halls: UCM

Climate Assessment in Review Processes:  Department Review: Informal and variable: UCD, UCM, UCR, UCSC Formal: UCI, UCLA, UCSB  College/School Review: Formal: UCI, UCM, UCSB, UCSD As part of accreditation review: all  Undergraduate Program Review: Formal climate component: UCLA, UCM, UCSB, UCSD Informal: UCI  Graduate Program Review: UCD, UCI, UCLA, UCM, UCR, UCSB, UCSD  Other: WASC; Stewardship reviews (UCSF)

Climate Assessment in Complaint Processes:  Faculty misconduct (015): UCD, UCI, UCSB  Whistleblower: UCI, UCSB  Research Misconduct: UCI, UCSB  Other: Database tracking Title IX office Vice Provost office Ombuds Senate grievances Website (UCSC); reporthate.ucsc.edu)  Issues: reluctance to report; non-anonymity

Information Analysis:  Complaint/ Survey Database analysis: formal assignment to unit/individual: UCI  Council Review: UCLA  Ombuds Reporting: UCM  External Review Committees: UCSB  Individual offices noting trends/chronic issues: UCSD

Distribution and Follow-up:  OEOD(Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity): UCI  Others: variable by unit/type of complaint/survey

Conclusions  Surveys used extensively to identify non-inclusive climates and other issues  Variable use of review process formally to identify issues but appears there are avenues for reporting issues during review processes  Type of review processes variable by unit and accreditation practices  Complaint processes also path to discovery of chronic climate issues but more informal of a process  Follow-up: few formal polices but most institutions do not report issues needing follow-up