Radiation Protection Standards for Prompt Radiation Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHMs commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
Advertisements

Safety Software QA at BNL’s Collider-Accelerator Department (C-AD) Accelerator Safety Workshop E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department August 12-14,
Radiation Safety & Compliance External Beam –Electrons (linacs) –Photons (linacs, Gamma Knife) –Protons (Summer 2013) Brachytherapy –Sealed Sources –Radiopharmaceuticals.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
Industrial Radiography
FAC 4/20/06 D. Schultz 1 The SAD and ARR for Commissioning The Status of the SAD Being written as a part of the SLAC Linac SAD The Status of the ARR Design.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
Gauges and well logging
Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
Radiation Safety Training WSU Radiation Safety Program Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
Supervisor of Summer Students Training Class Training Group ESHQ Section.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Personal Radiation and Occupational Safety – CT Policy This policy is in both paper form in the lab’s compliance manual, and on a Power Point presentation.
Posting of Accelerator Enclosures Vashek Vylet and Keith Welch DOE Accelerator Workshop SLAC, August 17 – 19,
ALPHA Project Safety Assessment Document Vladimir Anferov.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
Health and Safety Policy
Radiation testing in facilities outside CERN EDMS document version 2.0 Heinz Vincke - RadWG meeting 6/7/2010.
OSU-CHS ALARA Statement The OSU-CHS radiation safety program will be conducted in such a manner so that exposure to faculty, staff, students, the public,
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Standards, administrative controls, programs and processes, procedures, 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, INPO , NRC Guide 1.33.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Edward T. Lessard ESHQ.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
RSSO refresher meeting J. Pedersen M. Tavlet, T. Otto.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
September 19-20, 2007 E. Lessard EBIS Safety EBIS Project Safety Ed Lessard September 19-20, 2007 DOE Annual Review.
Tulane University - Office of Environmental Health & Safety (OEHS) Environmental Health & Safety Compliance Management System & Departmental Safety Representative.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
Scott Davis, Team Leader March 13,  SC DDFO established fiscal year 2009 Annual Performance Plan and assessments objectives, which included this.
Collider-Accelerator Department EBIS Commissioning Accelerator Readiness Review (ARR) Conduct of Operations Administrative Controls Ray Karol May 2010.
J. Donald Cossairt Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL Operated by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
January 4, 2007 RHIC II Project Internal Cost Review Ed Lessard ESH D R A F T Project Overview.
Accelerator Safety Workshop SLAC John Blaikie Health Physics Program Manager – SC Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Access Control and.
James C. Liu 1 and Lawrence S. Walker 2 1. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, CA, USA 2. Brookhaven National Laboratory, NY, USA 1. Introduction ANSI.
Practice of HOF regulatory oversight E.G. Kudryavtsev Department of Safety Regulation of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Marine Nuclear Power Installations.
Slide 1/5 Safety of Operations Jefferson Lab operates the accelerators in accordance with the Accelerator Safety Order, DOE O 420.2B, guided by DOE G
Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.
Standards for Technical Educators Occupational Safety & Health.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Radiation protection of the public IAEA Regional Training Course on Radiation Protection of patients for Radiographers,
Mu2e Target Hall Remote Handling - Contamination Control, Schedule, Risk & Conclusions Ryan Schultz Deputy L3 Manager Target Station 11/17/2015.
1 Service Coordinator Orientation FN R. CollESH SectionX8518.
Audits & DOE Walkthroughs ISO and OHSAS surveillance audits August 18 th – 20 th –CD, ESH&Q, and FESS organizations to be audited Software.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
MI Shielding Machine Protection Credit D. Capista March 7,2010.
Overview of FESHCom Subcommittees Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.
1 Interfaces, Engineering and Standards. 2 Interfaces LoKI Interface document description for deliverables Elements: PBS number, Deliverable description,
Recent Recordable Injuries A FESS Property Management employee suffered a shoulder injury. The employee reported to the Medical Office on 10/6/14 that,
Planning for Succession
Shielding Design for LCLS Injector Operation – Phase one
Industrial Radiography
Health and Safety Policy
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Transposition of Requirements set out in the Basic Safety Standards for Nuclear Facilities in Lithuania Gintautas KLEVINSKAS Albinas MASTAUSKAS Radiation.
Issue Entry Permit Training.
Louisiana State University Radiation Safety Office
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
Updates on ESS Handbook for Radiation Protection
Understanding the Space Park Requirements
Radiation protection organisation
Module 5 RASP Regulations.
Non-Radiation Worker Training
Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office
ESS Handbook for Radiation Protection
Radiation Protection Handbook
Radiation Protection Updates
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Presentation transcript:

Radiation Protection Standards for Prompt Radiation Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013

A Little Bit of Organization Structure…  Central ESH&Q Organization  Provides primary interface with DOE and regulatory agencies.  Primary reporting interface to DOE and others as needed.  Provides centralized services; e.g., dosimetry program, radiation safety instrumentation, general training, waste management, specialized expertise in some areas, construction supervision, review of radiation safety interlocks.  Central assessment function.  The longstanding QA program was added to the ESH&Q Section in Spring  Home of the Senior Laboratory Safety Officer/Senior Radiation Safety Officer (SRSO).  Division/Section/Center ESH Groups  Full time ESH experts in line organizations, not “other duties as assigned” added to other “day jobs”.  Not matrix assignment of ESH&Q!  Primary responsibilities to assure ESH requirements are implemented in their organizations day-by-day.  Scaled in size to ESH needs of respective, AD is largest.  Teamwork is encouraged, indeed expected! 2

Where are the standards?  Fermilab ES&H Manual (FESHM)  FESHM 2010 – “Planning and Review of Accelerator Facilities and Their Operations” : Primary implementation of DOE O420.2C and associated Guidance document.  Many other FESHM Chapters are followed to implement details.  Other talks will address specifics covered by this chapter.  Fermilab Radiological Control Manual (FRCM)  Specified as a part of FESHM by FESHM (a 5-line chapter!).  Principal document for implementing 10 CFR 835 [ Occupational Radiation. Protection ] as well as DOE Order [ Environmental Radiation Protection ].  Much of FRCM deals with routine radiation protection procedures familiar at most radiological installations.  Three FRCM chapters bear specifically on “machine-produced radiation”. Chapter 2 “Radiological Standards” Chapter 3 “Conduct of Radiological Work” Chapter 8 “ALARA Management of Accelerator Radiation Shielding” Chapter 11 “Radiation Safety Interlock Systems” 3

What are the standards?  FRCM Chapter 3 “Conduct of Radiological Work”  Covers general radiological work.  Article 362 specifies controls for radiation-generating devices that are not part of the accelerator as defined by DOE O420.2C & not relevant to this ARR.  FRCM Chapter 10 “Radiation Safety Interlock Systems  Specifies requirements for these systems, will be discussed later.  FRCM Chapter 8 “ALARA Management of Accelerator Radiation Shielding”  Article 811 is the “Fermilab Policy on Shielding Design”; no longer required by O420.2C but found to be useful and thus retained.  Gives technical guidance along with a limited bibliography as to where to obtain further information.  Gives general policy statements.  Provides policies on the content and approval of shielding assessments.  Note: Shielding assessments are commonly separate from safety assessment documents but are referenced extensively by SADS. 4

What are the standards?  FRCM Chapter 2 “Radiological Standards”  Chapter implements the dose limits of 10 CFR 835 for all radiological work  Also states the posting requirements of 10 CFR 835.  FRCM Article 236 gives “Posting Requirements for Accelerator/Beamlines for Prompt Radiation”.  Based upon “dose” to be received in some period of time, specifically “effective dose” as defined by 10 CFR 835.  Closely coupled with the use of credited controls.  Accelerator/beamline enclosures to which personnel access is excluded during operations by the radiation safety interlock system are posted for the radiological conditions anticipated when the beam is off and personnel access is permitted.  Defines maximum dose to be that which can be delivered under the worst credible accident taking into account circumstances & controls that limit the beam and/or its duration.  Defines minimal occupancy = not normally occupied > 1 hour out of 8.  Heart of this Article are two hierarchy tables. 5

What are the standards?  Table 2-6 Prompt Radiation Control Under Normal Operating Conditions 6 Dose Rate (DR) Under Normal Operating Conditions Controls DR  0.05 mrem/hr No precautions needed < DR < 0.25 mrem/hr Signs (CAUTION -- Controlled Area). No occupancy limits imposed < DR < 5 mrem/hr Signs (CAUTION -- Controlled Area) and minimal occupancy (occupancy duration of less than 1 hr). 5 < DR < 100 mrem/hr Signs (CAUTION -- Radiation Area) and rigid barriers (at least 4' high) with locked gates. For beam-on radiation, access restricted to authorized personnel. Radiological Worker Training required. 100 < DR < 500 mrem/hr Signs (DANGER -- High Radiation Area) and 8 ft. high rigid barriers with interlocked gates or doors and visible flashing lights warning of the hazard. Rigid barriers with no gates or doors are a permitted alternate. No beam-on access permitted. Radiological Worker Training required. DR  500 mrem/hr Prior approval of SRSO required with control measures specified on a case-by-case basis.

What are the standards?  Table 2-7 Prompt Radiation Control Under Accident Conditions 7 Maximum Dose (D) Expected in 1 hour Controls D  1 mrem No precautions needed. 1 < D < 10 mremMinimal occupancy only (duration of credible occupancy < 1 hr) no posting 1  D  5 mrem Signs (CAUTION -- Controlled Area). No occupancy limits imposed. Radiological Worker Training required. 5  D  100 mrem Signs (CAUTION -- Radiation Area) and minimal occupancy (duration of occupancy of less than1 hr). The Division/Section/Center RSO has the option of imposing additional controls in accordance with Article 231 to ensure personnel entry control is maintained. Radiological Worker Training required. 100  D  500 mrem Signs (DANGER -- High Radiation Area) and rigid barriers (at least 4' high) with locked gates. For beam-on radiation, access restricted to authorized personnel. Radiological Worker Training required. 500  D  1000 mrem Signs (DANGER -- High Radiation Area) and 8 ft. high rigid barriers with interlocked gates or doors and visible flashing lights warning of the hazard. Rigid barriers with no gates or doors are a permitted alternate. No beam-on access permitted. Radiological Worker Training required. D  1000 mrem Prior approval of SRSO required with control measures specified on a case-by- case basis.

Segway…  Normal condition table (Table 2-6) is “easy”, best applied to areas where the radiation hazard is “steady” and always to target stations, applies definitions of 10 CFR 835 (5 mrem in an hour = radiation area, 100 mrem in an hour = high radiation area, etc.).  Accident condition table (Table 2-7) is also tied to definitions of 10 CFR 835 (5 mrem in an hour = radiation area, 100 mrem in an hour = high radiation area, etc.).  Chapter has always allowed credited controls, with approval, to be used to reduce time duration and hence the posting category.  Long realized that many beam loss scenarios do not allow for beam losses at high intensity of one hour duration. Some beam losses do not permit “1 hour duration”; e.g., burn-through vacuum systems circular machines Large accelerators have a multitude of “machine controls” that limit beam loss duration.  Chapter now revised to allow for the use of “machine controls” to reduce the time duration, hence the posting category. John Anderson will discuss this later. 8

? 9