Working Group B How to Deal with IPR Issues for Performing Arts Content Lotte Belice Baltussen Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision 10 April 2013|

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rightsrouter and DOI Presentation to IDF Members Meeting 22nd June 2004 Gordon Rintoul - Director of Operations.
Advertisements

Orphan works and the cultural sector. A governmental organisation perspective Rossella Caffo Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali – Italy Coordinator.
1 Licences for Europe Working Group 3 Sub-group: Scope of potential for the WG to promote solutions with regard to television archives Helen Keefe, April.
JISC Collections 01 April 2014 | CASPER | Slide 1 CASPER - how it will run, what to expect RepRODUCE Projects Start up Meeting.
Open Educational Resources- a short guide With thanks to the Unicycle project.
Pre Workshop Quiz –TRUE/FALSE. 1. Copyright is the only law relevant in OER. 2. As long as we have a licence for a work, we can include it. 3. Fair Dealing.
Rethinking Copyright in the Name of
Accessing Cultural Heritage Out-of-Commerce Works MoU Olav Stokkmo, CEO of IFRRO Licence for Europe WG 3 4 March 2013,Brussels.
Accessing Cultural Heritage The Role of Collective Management Olav Stokkmo, CEO of IFRRO ARIPO-IFRRO-NCC-Repronig-WIPO conference, 17 September 2013,Lagos.
How can best the EU support the European film heritage institutions? Mari Sol Pérez Guevara Unit Audiovisual and Media Policies European Commission
Information Systems Unit 3 – Outcome 3 Legal Obligations of Programmers Student Lecture.
Web 2.0 and IP Training Module Name of presenter: 19/05/20151www.web2rights.org.uk.
Piero Attanasio Associazione Italiana Editori Access to books – European publishers’ view Krakow, 5 April 2011 Conference: Use of Books and.
Web 2.0, IPR and You Naomi Korn & Dr Neil Witt 02/06/20151www.web2rights.org.uk.
P OA Week: Open Access & Copyright Seminar 23 October 2014 Dr. Tobias Schonwetter Director: UCT IP Unit.
Building Digital Museums, Libraries and Archives David Dawson Senior Policy Adviser (Digital Futures)
HSC: All My Own Work Copyright.
ER-0317/2/99 G R U P O S G A E Intellectual Property Rights in digitisation of education Part 1. Current problems in the face of digitisation. Massive.
Preserving and Accessing Our Cultural Heritage – The Role of Copyright Law, Digitisation and the Internet The Community Dimension Dr. Jens Gaster King’s.
Clearance of rights for availability on demand of heritage feature films RAI CINEMA EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTIES IN RIGHTS CLEARANCE FOR FILMS PUBLIC DOMAIN.
Intellectual Property and Copyright What is it and why does it matter?
Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage at the crossroads of law, technology and business: a view from WIPO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL.
Supporting further and higher education Digital Preservation: Legal Issues Chinese National Academy of Sciences July04 Neil Beagrie, BL/JISC Partnership.
New copyright challenges for the users digital works Dragutin Nemec Library of the Faculty of law in Zagreb LIBRARIES IN THE DIGITAL AGE (LIDA) 2007.
Copyright and Digitisation Alastair Dunning Arts and Humanities Data Service, King’s College London i am not a lawyer do not take any legal responsibility.
Nordic PPI Net Legal Practices and Recommendations.
Legal and Business Considerations of Legislating Collective Rights in the U.S. Lois F. Wasoff Kernochan Center Symposium 2011.
Enhancing the Culture of Reading and Books in the Digital Age - ARROW Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 13 October 2009IFLA-IFRRO-WIPO-IPA-EWC Conference;
Accessing Cultural Heritage The Role of Collective Management Rainer Just, President of IFRRO August 2013Bangkok, Thailand.
The Changing Face of Exclusive Rights on Digital Cultural Content after the 2013 PSI Directive 3 rd LAPSI 2.0 Meeting – 10 th October 2014.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
MoU On Out of Commerce Books and Learned Journals Jerker Rydén Senior Legal Adviser National Library of Sweden.
Making cultural heritage available to the public Managing Orphan and Out-of-Print Works Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 5 April 2011Polska Kziaska.
Coping with Copyright IPR and Third-Party Copyright: the HumBox Perspective Dr Erika Corradini Subject Centre for LLAS University of Southampton IPR and.
Copyright for Authors Jenny Delasalle, Academic Support Manager (Research), Library.
ER-0317/2/99 G R U P O S G A E DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION/ OPTIONS EdReNe Seminar March 2008 Paul Sire Sociedad Digital de Autores y Editores.
OERs, copyright and licenses Embedding OER "Team Six" workshop, Wednesday 22 February 2012.
Why the Data Protection Act was brought in  The 1998 Data Protection Act was passed by Parliament to control the way information is handled and to give.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF DIGITAL LIBRARIES By TALWANT SINGH ADDL DISTT. & SESSIONS JUDGE; DELHI.
COMBINING ACCESS TO CULTURAL HERITAGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Brussels November 2010 Victor Vazquez Senior Legal Counsellor, Digital Future.
IP LibCMASS, 5th September 2011 Librarians and cultural professionals as protectors of copyright and users’ rights Aleksandra Horvat University of Zagreb,
Licences for Europe WG 3: Public Broadcaster Perspective 4 March 2013, Helen Keefe Audiovisual and film heritage institutions.
Co-funded by the Community programme eContentplus Arrow Plus Project Use of Book and Press s. Rights of Authors and Publishers Kraków,
Contents: 1. The copyright context 2. Image copyright and teaching 3. Image databases: copyright clearance 4. Image databases: copyright management 5.
WP5: Legal Aspects Overview. 2 Content  Task Overview  Results  Privacy  IPR  Copyright  Trademark.
Press clipping and other information services: Legal analysis and perspectives By Loreto Corredoira y Alfonso Professor Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Frankfurt, ACCESS TO COPYRIGHT WORKS THROUGH COPYRIGHT LICENSING Tarja Koskinen-Olsson Honorary President IFRRO.
HSC: All My Own Work What is copyright and what does it protect? How does it relate to me?
Licensing of Orphan Works Olav Stokkmo, Chief Executive, IFRRO 26 October 2009European Commission, Orphan Works hearing.
Clearing Permissions for my manuscript What do I need to know and what do I do? Emily Hall Rights Manager
Directorate INFSO E meeting The public domain in the information Society.
IPR Issues and Web2.0 Engagement Naomi Korn & Dr Charlotte Waelde 18/02/20161www.web2rights.org.uk.
“Every European Digital” N. Kroes 8 pillars – 101 key actions 1.Digital Single Market 2.Interoperability and standards 3.Trust and security 4.Very fast.
Copyright for teaching. 2 katelyncollins/category/week-5 CC BY.
IP and the working archive Issues arising from the use of Mass Observation Elizabeth Dunn Gaby Hardwicke - Solicitors & Trade Mark Attorneys.
E XTENDED C OLLECTIVE L ICENSING : DIFFERENT MODELS AMONG S CANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES AND LONG TERM PRACTICES OF STATES Warsaw, March 16, 2016 Johan Axhamn,
Copyright and the public domain: contradictory or complementary notions? Irini Stamatoudi, LL.M., Ph.D., General Director, Hellenic Copyright Organisation.
Intellectual property (IP) - What is it?. Intellectual property (IP) Refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works;
How the DLF Works. DLF Storyboard A digital entrepreneur comes up with an innovative and exciting idea involving the use of copyright protected.
Out – of – commerce works in Polish legislation Ministry of Culture and National Heritage Mr Karol Kościński Departament of Intellectual Property and Media.
Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
COPYRIGHT AND DIGITISATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
« Out of commerce works » The French system
Professor Niklas Bruun
CREATIVE COMMONS FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE
The Strategic Content Alliance
NCA “Best Practices in Fair Use in Scholarly Research”
Everything you wanted to know about Creative Commons Licenses
The Strategic Content Alliance
Digital Citizenship Power Up PD Module 2.
Presentation transcript:

Working Group B How to Deal with IPR Issues for Performing Arts Content Lotte Belice Baltussen Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision 10 April 2013| Porto, Portugal| ESMAE IPP

1 Or: IPR does not have to be a net in which you get caught Title: Scene from the performance O quadrate No.2/4 From collection: Muzeum. License: CC BY-NC-ND

2 Aims of WG-B Identifying IPR and Business Models issues and solutions Gathering examples of Best Practices Collecting input on the BPs from the performing arts community Writing step-by-step BP guides on WG topics

3 Structure How to deal with IPR issues? Short introduction to IPR Overview of the ECLAP WG-B three-step guide Discussion: what works, what are your experiences, and what else do you need to know?

4 Short introduction to IPR Image source: JISC Digital Media

5 Image source: European Commission Short introduction to IPR

6 Examples of copyright protected works Image source: JISC Digital Media

7 Other key terms Public domain Extended collective licensing Orphan works and out-of-print works

8 General rules Copyright: expires 70 years after death of the author or when a work was made available to the public if the author is unknown. Related rights: expires 50 years from the date of the performance, the publication or communication of the fixation (but: soon 70, not retroactive).

9 Exemptions? Three-step-test National exceptions Educational exemptions Not really... No real EU harmonisation Image source: p2p weblog

10 Calls for change “When it comes to our common cultural heritage, there is no bigger challenge, there is no more urgent question than to secure the access of current and future generations to this heritage.” (p. 9) The New Renaissance, 2011

11 Calls for change

12 Calls for change Hargreaves report, May 2011 “Our intellectual property framework will face further significant pressure to adapt in the coming years, as we make our way into the third decade of the commercial internet.” (p. 1)

13

14 Three-step guide Step 1: What kind of access does my institution wants to provide? Step 2: Who are the rights holders? Step 3: Which methods can I use to clear the rights?

15

16 1. What kind of access do I want to provide? Keep in mind: Distinguish between metadata and content The more generic and open agreements are, the better. More work on the short-term, but benefits are great in the long term.

17 2. Who are the rights holders? The institution holds all the rights Clearing process = fast and easy. and step 3 is not even necessary. However, most institutions do not hold all rights for all collections Title: Yes nurse, no nurse (Ja zuster, nee zuster). Ep. 15; Cast From collection: Sound and Vision. License: CC BY-SA

18 2. Who are the rights holders? The institution holds some of the rights Title: Abbraccio tra Dario Fo e Franca Rame From collection: Dario Fo e Franca Rame Archive

19 2. Who are the rights holders? (All) rights belong to third parties In performing arts, there are many rights layers (especially for video: Director (in almost all EU countries the rights holder) Composer of the music used in the performance (in most EU countries designated as co-author) Author of the screenplay (in most EU countries designated as co-author) Author of the dialogue (in most EU countries designated as co-author) Choreographer Graphic designer Recorder of the piece (e.g. camera person) Producer (related rights: often has the exploitation rights) Performers (related rights)

20 2. Who are the rights holders? The work is out of copyright (= Public Domain) Tool: Public Domain Calculator ( ≠ out of print work Title:Borcsa István, díszletterv From collection: OSZMI. Public Domain Mark

21 2. Who are the rights holders? The rights situation is unkown or work is out of print Orphan works: “rights holders cannot be identified or, if they are identified, they cannot be located in order to ask the necessary permissions.” [Koskinen-Olsson, 2010, p. 256] For a work to be classified as an orphan work, a diligent search must be performed first [ARROW, 2010 (a), p. 15] If the rights holder(s) still cannot be traced after a diligent search the work is considered to be an orphan.

22 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights?

23 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Individual licensing agreement One-on-one agreements with the rights holders They might request a remuneration

24 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? CMOs Great number of works => high transaction costs for individual licenses. In many European countries, rights holders have their rights voluntarily managed by Collecting Manamgement Organisations. Interesting and less costly than individual agreements, if CMO is well-organised and many rights holders are represented.

25 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Extended Collective License Combination of voluntary rights management by CMOs and a legal expansion ences to right-holders not represented by the CMO. Advantage: protection from those not represented by CMO. Prerequisitie: has to be very transparant and well-organised. Mostly used in Scandinavia, still often geo-blocking.

26 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Open licenses Make it possible to openly access and (re)use a work without having to ask the rights holder for permission each time by applying so-called open licences to a work. Will take a lot of time and effort to convince rights holders. CC licenses often used for content, CC0 for metadata.

27 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Dilligent search Diligent search principles are defined as follows: The search is done prior to the use of the work The search is done title by title or work by work The relevant resources would usually be those of the country of the work’s origin. Advantage: will be possible to use content after search. Disadvantage: very time-consuming, EC still working out the details, differences per jurisdiction.

28 3. Which methods can I use to clear the rights? Public Domain Mark Use CC Public Domain mark when a work is out of copyright. Note that EU legislation not harmonised!

29 DO THESE STEPS MAKE SENSE TO YOU? and: How do you approach rights clearance? Which steps have you taken? Who have you approached when clearing rights? What are your experiences? What is missing in our three-step guide? In short: help us to help you!