Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Advertisements

School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Scaling up and Sustaining Evidence-based Practices Glen Dunlap, George Sugai, Tim Lewis, Steve Goodman, Rob Horner
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Building Effective Coaches to Expand & Sustain PBIS Implementation.
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
The Importance of Coaching in Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2011
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2010
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Support systems and sustained implementation of a data-driven, problem-solving model Margie McGlinchey MAASE Summer Institute August 11, 2009 Steve Goodman.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Current assumptions/research about coaching Define the experience with coaching in SWPBS implementation.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
Strengthening Positive Classroom Management in Elementary Schools Judy Arthur, First Steps to Success Coordinator, Tigard Tualatin School District Sally.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Providing Technical Assistance for Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner OSEP TA-Center on PBIS
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
Coaching Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org December 6, 2010.
COACHING PLC Skill Up to Scale Up. Why?What? How?Who?
Scaling & Sustaining Evidence-Based Practices Glen Dunlap, Steve Goodman, Tim Lewis, Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS OSEP Project Directors’
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
Iowa Behavior Alliance: School-wide PBS Third Annual State Conference October 2-3, 2007.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
State and District Role in
Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller

Coaching Defined Coaching is the active and iterative delivery of: (a) prompts that increase successful behavior, and (b) corrections that decrease unsuccessful behavior. Coaching is done by someone with credibility and experience with the target skill(s) Coaching is done on-site, in real time Coaching is done after initial training Coaching is done repeatedly (e.g. monthly) Coaching intensity is adjusted to need (Horner) 2

Outcomes of Coaching Fluency with trained skills Adaptation of trained concepts/skills to local contexts and challenges And new challenges that arise Rapid redirection from miss-applications Increased fidelity of overall implementation Improved sustainability Most often due to ability to increase coaching intensity at critical points in time. (Horner) 3

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Effective Coaching Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Leadership Implementation Drivers Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathy Schallmo 4

Planning Questions 1.What elements, structures, activities, etc. define the implementation approach of your organization? 2.What is the purpose of coaching in the implementation approach of your organization? 3.How are coaching functions or activities conducted within your implementation approach? 4.Who engages in above coaching functions within your implementation approach? 5.What are expected outcomes of effective coaching for your organization? 6.How does your organization evaluate implementation integrity of your coaching approach? 7.What resources are needed to implement sustainable & scalable coaching capacity? (Sugai) 5

1. What elements, structures, activities, etc. define the implementation approach of your organization? Challenge, need, problem, issue Measurable goal/outcome Evidence-based practice/solution Materials, resources, funding Implementation infrastructure, activities, coordination, leadership (Sugai) 6

2. What is the purpose of coaching in the implementation approach of your organization? Who is “coached?” Why needed? Other implementation supports or drivers? (Sugai) 7

3.How are coaching functions or activities conducted within your implementation approach? Internal vs. external coaching Classroom, grade, school, district, regional, state Continuity of intensity based on responsiveness Data based reporting, decision-making, evaluation (Sugai) 8

4.Who engages in above coaching functions within your implementation approach? Content fluency Experience with practice implementation Ongoing coaching opportunities Established engagement skills (Sugai) 9

5.What are expected outcomes of effective coaching for your organization? Implementation accuracy & fluency of evidence- based practice Maximum student outcomes Durable & generalizable implementation Implementation-outcome accountability (Sugai) 10

6.How does your organization evaluate implementation integrity of your coaching approach? Specified outcomes Formative self-assessments & checklists Data-based supervision & integrated PD Reporting, monitoring, performance feedback (Sugai) 11

7. What resources are needed to implement sustainable & scalable coaching capacity? Professional development Supervision & coordination Time & scheduling Performance monitoring & informative feedback (Sugai) 12

Lessons Learned Implementation cannot be faster than your school staff capacity to implement Teams need to be taught how to analyze and use data Emphasis on directing resources to need and removing competing activities (Horner) 13

Big Ideas Coaching capacity is defined as activities or functions, not person End goal of coaching is to maximize adoption, durability, & scalability of evidence-based practice experienced by students Coaching functions have varied levels of intensity Coaching functions are shared responsibilities Coaching capacity at multiple organizational levels (teacher, school, district, region, state) Coaching implementation capacity should be planned, formal, continually monitored, and systematically evaluated (Sugai) 14

Slides borrowed from… (with permission) Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS; Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut June and Coaching for Competence: Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon Portland SPDG Regional Meeting