Territorial and urban dimension 1Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Territorial Investments
Advertisements

The political framework
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Cross-border cooperation and regional development
Viimsi Spa, Estonia 15th September, 2011 LEADER approach today and after 2013 – new challenges Petri Rinne ELARD CLLD as a Successful Story in the Czech.
SOCIAL POLIS Vienna Conference Vienna, May 11-12, 2009 Working Group Session “Urban labour markets and economic development” Building a “Social Polis”
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
1 Final Report Results of the on-line Public Consultation of the Conclusions of the 5th Cohesion Report Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward.
Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case
Regional Policy European Cohesion Policy closely linked with EU th Insuleur Forum - Malta 8 November 2013 M Haapakka DG Regional and Urban.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
The Urban Dimension of Romania’s Cohesion Policy REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Gabriel.
ESPON – Open Seminar Gödöllő, 21 st June, Tamás Gordos, PhD. head of planning.
ESPON Selected Results of Final Report Luxembourg, May 2005 Sabine Zillmer, IRS.
Kamila Matoušková, PhD. ESPON MC Member ESPON Workshop Rural regions in Europe: territorial potentials and main challenges 15 December 2010 Kamila Matoušková,
V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Partnership Agreement and programmes Czech Republic 16 – 17 June 2014 Budapest.
European Social Fund Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF Franz Pointner, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
Investment and integrated strategies supporting towns Raivis BREMSMITS Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General.
LITHUANIAN REGIONAL POLICY 2014–2020 Dr. Gediminas Česonis Head of Regional Policy Strategic Coordination Division Ministry of Interior of the Republic.
Possibilities of Business Support within the Operational Programme Enterprise and Innovation for Competitiveness May 2015.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Directorate General for Regional Development and Structural Adjustment Ministry of Development Redefining Turkey’s Regional Policy.
The Territorial Dimension in the legislative proposals for cohesion policy Zsolt SZOKOLAI Policy Analyst, Urban development and territorial cohesion.
Regional Policy Priorities of Latvia until 2020
EU funds for South East Europe: IPA II Cross-border Cooperation Programme BULGARIA-SERBIA Sofia, 2015.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
EU Territorial Agenda and aspects related to the Baltic Area Content: Chapter I: Tomorrow´s Territorial Challenges to be tackled today.
Regional Policy ESI Funds' Policy in European Trade Unions Confederation Brussels – 13 March 2014 Diego Villalba de Miguel – DG Regional and.
The Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic (MRD) Urban dimension in Czech Operational Programmes Josef Postránecký Department.
Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic MEETING OF DIRECTORS GENERAL “Territorial Cohesion” The Implementation of Action 1.1a (Urban –
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 10 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
The Perspectives and Challenges of Transnational Cooperation in the next European Funding Period Fontwell Park, 17 October 2006 Julia ERIPRET,
How to focus CLLD on the things it does best? Clarifying the strategic role of CLLD in the Partnership Agreements Seminar on Community-led Local Development.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Main elements of the templates for the Partnership Contract and the operational programme.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) Zsolt SZOKOLAI European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION LSE/CASE Weak Market Cities Programme LSE/CASE Weak Market Cities Programme Why do declining cities matter to the EU.
Regional Policy as a Tool of Regional Development Support Chapter IV. Pavol Schwarcz Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.
IRS Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning Sabine Zillmer ESPON Pre-accession aid impact analysis - Third Interim Report - ESPON.
EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS – GENERAL REVIEW. EU's funding structure and the associated instruments and programmes  Pre-Accession Assistance:
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Metropolitan areas within EU Multi-Level Governance Cities of Tomorrow and the future urban dimension European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
INTERCO Workshop Investigating storylines on territorial cohesion MC meeting Liege ESPON Seminar , Liege ESPON Seminar ,
ESPON Open Seminar 14 June 2012, Aalborg Hy Dao, Pauline Plagnat Cantoreggi, Vanessa Rousseaux University of Geneva INTERCO Indicators of Territorial Cohesion.
Strategic Planning and Future of Cohesion Policy after 2020 Panel 1 “ESI Funds 2014 – 2020 and best practice” (Conference V4+4; Prague January 27, 2016)
LEADER approach in 2007 – 2013 in Slovak Republic.
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies ISMERI EUROPA Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes Work Package 1: Coordination,
URBACT INFODAYS PORTUGAL TOWARDS URBACT III Lisbon 21st January 2015.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 11 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
Regional Policy Integrated Territorial Approaches Madrid, 22 February 2013.
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
CLLD in Portugal Minha Terra Network (Member of ELARD)
European Union’s Regional Development Policy
dr Paweł Wais Deputy Directort Department for Regional Development
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Practical information and implementation
URBAN - Mission “economic and social regeneration of cities and neighbourhoods in crisis” Lewis Dijkstra, Ph.D. DG Regional Policy.
Purpose of the presentation
Cohesion Policy, using geospatial information and statistics
European needs for urban statistics Mireille Grubert
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
Wallis Goelen – October 2019
Presentation transcript:

Territorial and urban dimension 1Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague

2Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Regional disparities March 20, 2013, Prague

regional disparities among regions are significant –in terms of unemployment rate and economic development dynamics –significant and increasing regional disparities inside individual regions –tendencies for creating poles of growth (in economic centres) forming of regional centres rather than regional axes –weak and problem areas emerged – “inner peripheries” (economically weak areas inside well prospering regions, alongside regional borders) –a successful (favorable) regional development of metropolitan areas can conceal some problems in specific areas at lower level (when assessing regional level) deepening of regional disparities at subregional level regions with concentrated state support –economically weak regions and regions with high unemployment rate lagging behind regional average (as to economic development) 3Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Regional disparities March 20, 2013, Prague

GDP per capita in regions (2010) CZ = index 100 4Informal Dialogue with the European Commission GDP per capita March 20, 2013, Prague

GDP (Municipalities with extended powers) expert analysis 5Informal Dialogue with the European Commission GDP per capita March 20, 2013, Prague

6Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Index of regional competitiveness March 20, 2013, Prague

7Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Index of Competitiveness of Municipalities with extended powers March 20, 2013, Prague

8Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Migration balance March 20, 2013, Prague

9Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Unemployment rate – municipalities with extended powers March 20, 2013, Prague

Classification of CR municipalities by size groups 10Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Settlement structure March 20, 2013, Prague

11Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Territorial typology of the Czech Republic March 20, 2013, Prague

1.Developing areas –Metropolitan areas (areas with concentration above 300,000 inhabitants) –Agglomerations – (concentration 100,000 – 300,000) –Regional centres (incl. surroundings) – 25,000 – 100,000 2.Stabilized areas – not belonging to agglomerations and regional centres (and their surroundings) and peripheral areas 3.Peripheral areas – geographically remote areas with a long-term accumulation of problems (borders areas, mountain areas, „inner peripheries“ or areas with specific issues). 12Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Territorial typology of the Czech Republic March 20, 2013, Prague

Criteria: -GDP - unemployment rate - indebtedness - benefits in material needs -migration balance 13Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Regions with state aid March 20, 2013, Prague

14Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Social excluded localities – potential of social exclusion March 20, 2013, Prague

to substantially reduce the differences in the socio- economic level of the Czech regions; to contribute to the utilization of the Czech regional potential; to strengthen local competitiveness of regions, cities and municipalities; to support long-term development of labor market; to improve conditions for sustainable and balanced development and the quality of life in the CR; to increase the resource efficiency in achieving ESIF objectives based on territorial-oriented actions/interventions; to effectively promote regional and local development based on the principles of partnership and multi-level governance; to strengthen the urban-rural linkages. 15Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Territorial dimension objectives March 20, 2013, Prague

Territorial Dimension setting markedly different in individual (Operational) Programmes NUTS II and III level and particularly at lower administration level Common principles: thematic (sectoral) territorial integrated 16Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Approaches to TD March 20, 2013, Prague

Scheme of Territorial Dimension

a)by defining axis, priorities/actions where territorial principle (based on typology) will be applied (i. e. actions mainly in selected types of regions) b)by defining axis, priorities/actions where territorial principle will partly be applied – percentage ratio for selected types of regions to all territorial scope c)by setting contribution to integrated principle – define tools (instruments) and mechanisms that secure coordination among ESIF + determine financial allocation of OP/priority axis… (specific calls for proposal focused on projects within integrated strategies d)by defining different types of territory (protected landscape areas) and modification of evaluative (assessment) criteria and types of criteria e)by representation of regional partners within coordination role, main target groups or beneficiaries 18Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Thematic principle March 20, 2013, Prague

Result from typology of Regional Development Strategy of the CR 2014 – 2020: Type A: focus on developing potential 1.Developing areas –Metropolitan areas (areas with concentration above 300,000 inhabitants) –Agglomerations – (concentration 100,000 – 300,000) –Regional centres (incl. surroundings) – 25,000 – 100,000 2.Stabilized areas – not belonging to agglomerations and regional centres (and their surroundings) and peripheral areas 3.Peripheral areas – geographically remote areas with a long-term accumulation of problems (borders areas, mountain areas, inner peripheries or areas with specific issues). plus Type B : focus on regions supported by state regions supported by the state (regions with economic problem, social exluded areas) 19Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Thematic principle March 20, 2013, Prague

based on relevant instruments preliminary proposal: ITI – metropolitan areas (fulfilment of 5% of sustainable urban development requirement) ITDP – developing areas, regions supported by the state --- successor of IUDP CLLD – based on the Rural development programme aimed at peripheral areas priority and selected stabilized areas, supported also by other thematic OPs … 20Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Integrated principle March 20, 2013, Prague

21Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Scheme of the integrated instruments March 20, 2013, Prague