ESS Beam Diagnostics Overview Andreas Jansson / BI Group Beam Diagnostics Mini-workshop 2012-3-20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
Advertisements

R Scrivens, CERN, ABI Workshop, 12/2008 The Feschenko Bunch Shape Monitor User experience at CERN Developed by INR, Troitsk. High resolution bunch shape.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Linac4 BPM and Phase Pickup L. Søby08/ LINAC4 Beam Position, Phase and intensity Pick-ups.
Beam Instrumentation for HPM -with a strong focus on ESS Andreas Jansson Paris, France,
TUPD02 BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE ESS BLM BPM Trans Profile Bunch Shape BCM Preliminary System Count A. Jansson, L. Tchelidze, ESS AB, Lund, Sweden Hybrid.
BI SW for LINAC4 On behalf of BE/BI/SW BI software development process Specifications List of BI Systems – Not covered: PSB ring systems Conclusions Lars.
Project X RD&D Plan Instrumentation Manfred Wendt AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS MEBT : Beam Dynamics, Diagnostics, Performance. Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
ORNL-SNS Diagnostic Group SNS Beam Loss Monitors and HARPs Machine Protection System FDR September 11,2001 Presented by Saeed Assadi.
Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements:
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Injector Setup/Mini-phase  Description of injector setup  sources of drift  Mini-phase procedure for injector  Checking the rest of the machine. Stephen.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy SNS Beam Diagnostics: Ten Years After Commissioning A. Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Beam diagnostics control for J-PARC LINAC Guobao SHEN J-PARC Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Mar
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Overview of Beam Instrumentations for High-Power Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source Saeed Assadi.
Linac-4 current situation and outlook U. Raich, F. Roncarolo, F. Zocca.
Experience from the Spallation Neutron Source Commissioning Dong-o Jeon Accelerator Physics Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory May 9, 2007.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
Beam diagnostics in the beamlines
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
G5 Beam Instrumentation D. Gassner, E. Pozdeyev 4-09.
EBIS ARR Jim Alessi May 4- 7, 2010 Technical Overview.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Report from Task Force on Beam Instrumentation Stephen Molloy.
Beam Instrumentation for the HIE-ISOLDE linac Francesca Zocca ISOLDE Workshop and Users Meeting December CERN Instituto de Estructura de la.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
October, 2009 Internal Review Beam Instrumentation David Gassner.
HIE-ISOLDE diagnostic boxes Esteban D. Cantero CERN BE-BI-PM HIE-ISOLDE meeting for BE/BI 28 March 2014 The research leading to these results has received.
Commissioning of REX Jose Alberto Rodriguez, BE-OP-PSB (167538) on behalf of the ISOLDE operations team.
K.Hanke / TDR Meeting / 13 June 2006 Linac 4 Diagnostics L4: K. Hanke, M.Pasini (requirements, specifications, integration) AB/BI: U.Raich et al. (technical.
3 MeV instrumentation commissioning U. Raich, Federico Roncarolo, F. Zocca Linac-4 Beam Coordination Committee CERN, 18.December 2013 Uli Raich.
ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
SNS Beam Diagnostics A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Beam on Target Diagnostics Beam on Target Meeting 2013 March Tom Shea.
LINAC4 emittance measurements BI Day Divonne, 24 th November 11/24/2011 B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, D. Gerard, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI 1.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.
ESS wire scanner Benjamin Cheymol
PBI task force intermediate report Stephen Molloy.
Machine Protection Systems (MPS) Arden Warner, and Jim Steimel Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update Vic Scarpine Weekly PIP-II Meeting June 7, 2016.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
PIP-II Beam Instrumentation Vic Scarpine PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee Meeting March 2016.
ESS Front End diagnostic
European Spallation Source Diagnostics Challenges Lali Tchelidze AD retreat, Lund, Sweden,
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Experience with beam instrumentation at Linac4
HIE-ISOLDE Report Jose Alberto Rodriguez on behalf of Yacine Kadi and the HIE-ISOLDE project team.
BE-BI Software for LINAC4
1- Short pulse neutron source
Tom Shea Front End Meeting Catania
CSNS Accelerator Control and Beam Instrumentation JIN Dapeng, XU Taoguang … June 9, 2015
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
Considerations on Beam Diagnostics Physics
commissioning and measurements
Beam Commissioning at ESS
RF systems introduction
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
(Beam) Commissioning Plan
Beam Commissioning Planning
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

ESS Beam Diagnostics Overview Andreas Jansson / BI Group Beam Diagnostics Mini-workshop

Diagnostics Group Current group members: –Andreas Jansson (GL) –Lali Tchelidze (BLM, currently on maternity leave) –Hooman Hassanzadegan (BPM, BCM, Electronics, HW coordination) –Christian Boehme (Noninvasive profile, SW coordination) –Benjamin Cheymol (Frontend specific diagnostics) –Tom Shea (target spot size & costing, ~one year visit) Open positions: –1 Postdoc (Focus on longitudinal diagnostics) –2 Marie Curie Fellows (EU funded through oPAC network, ad closed) Remaining posts 2012: –Engineer (EE) Expect we will need around 30FTEs at the peak –Need to continue hiring during possible hiatus before construction. –Plan for the long term (some collaborations, in-kind and contractors)

Responsibility matrix 3 Beam Loss Monitor Beam Current Monitor Beam Position and Phase Faracay Cup Slit Scanner SEM Harp Wire Scanner Non-invasive transverse profile Longitudinal Profile Overall responsibleLTHH BC CBTBD Detector Design AJ Cabling Electronics DesignHH TimingHH Controls Integration Assembly Installation Commissioning Software integration w controlsCB Hardware Integration w controlsHH Front end

The Requirements Dilemma

Prel. ESS Diagnostics Specs The beam loss monitoring system needs sufficient sensitivity to keep average losses below 1W/m, and enough time resolution/dynamic range to protect the machine from damage in case of fast beam loss. The beam position needs to be measured with an accuracy of a couple per cent of the beam size, or about 0.1 mm. The measurement should have a response time to changes of the order of 1 μs or better. The time of arrival (phase) should be measured to a fraction of a degree of RF phase, or about 2-4 ps. A fast response to changes is not needed to phase the cavities, but may be useful for e.g. LLRF studies. The beam size needs to be measured with an accuracy of 10% or better. The beam size is about 2-3 mm at the available locations. The measurement can be an average over the LINAC pulse. The bunch length needs to be measured with an accuracy of 10% or better. The measurement can be taken as an average over the pulse, or on a single bunch in the train. There is no need to measure the bunch length of all bunches individually. Need to measure halo at the level of 10-5 or less of total beam. The beam density distribution on target needs to be measured with an accuracy of 10%.

Diagnostics pulse For some measurements, we plan to use a “special diagnostics beam” with low rep rate (perhaps 1Hz or less) and short pulse (perhaps 100us or less), but nominal bunch intensity. –Lowering beam current changes the optics of the machine, making measurement results less useful –Means nominal bunch charge is unchanged for diagnostics pulse Exception: BPM data from low current beam might be useful for early commissioning (beam threading).

ESS Preliminary System Count tbd 1 - (?) 3 3

8 For LEBT & MEBT & DTL, see Benjamins talk tomorrow.

DTL DTL design concept has moved from Linac4 style to SNS style. Inter-tank diagnostics box In-tank BPMs

10 Tank Tank 2 60 Beam QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QH QT DV DH FC WS BLM VS BPM DTL Layout NEED TO BE UPDATES FOR ESS PARAMETERS!

Tank 3 Tank QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QT DV DH FC WS FC WS BLM BPM DTL Layout cont. NEED TO BE UPDATES FOR ESS PARAMETERS!

12 Tank 5 24 Tank Spoke Module #1 QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QV QH QT DV DH QH FC WS FC WS BLM BPM DTL Layout cont. NEG NEED TO BE UPDATES FOR ESS PARAMETERS!

13 DTL Tank BPM / Phase detector in DT Current Monitor (Toroid) Wire Scanner Quadrupole, Trim Faraday cup (Beam stop) Gate Valve Quadrupole, Vertical Quadrupole, Horizontal Symbol Name Number of units x Symbol Name Number of units Drift tube x x x x x x x x Quadrupole x FC QV QH QT Half drift tube WS x x DH DV Dipole, Horizontal Dipole, Vertical x x Energy degrader x View Screen x Beam Loss Monitor BLM x VS Harp x DTL Legend

14 Beam direction DT L Spoke Linac CM Spoke Outline BLM WS BPM NIP BLM WS BPM NIP BLM WS BPM NIP FC BLM WS BPM NIP BLM BPM BSM BLM BPM BSM BLM BPM BLM BPM

15 Spoke Outline BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM

16 Spoke Cryomodule BPM / Phase detector Current Monitor (CM) Wire Scanner Quadrupole Faraday cup Gate Valve Symbol Name Number of units x Symbol Name Number of units x x x x x x x x x Note: Number of units include the beam diagnostic devices located in CCL/SCL transition region. Beam Loss Monitor x BPM CM FC BLM WS ED Energy Degrader x Beam Box x Spoke Legend BSM NIP Non-invasive profile Bunch length monitor

17 Medium Beta Linac Medium Beta Elliptical Outline BLM BPM BLM WS BPM NIP BLM BPM BSM BLM WS BPM NIP BLM WS BPM NIP BLM BPM BSM BLM BPM BLM WS BPM NIP CM

18 Medium Beta Elliptical Outline II BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM

19 Medium Beta Linac High Beta Elliptical Outline BLM WS BPM NIP BLM BPM BSM BLM WS BPM NIP BLM WS BPM NIP BLM BPM BSM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM WS BPM NIP BLM BPM CM

20 High Beta Elliptical Outline II BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM BLM BPM

21 BPM / Phase detector Current Monitor (CM) Wire Scanner Quadrupole Beam Box Gate Valve Symbol Name Number of units SymbolName Number of units x x x x x Beam Loss Monitor x BPM CM BLM WS Cryomodules, Beta = 0.61 F Fast Valve x x x Cryomodules, Beta = 0.81 x Electrostatic Precipitator x EP Note: Only the number of quadrupole units includes the ones in CCL/SRF transition region. Elliptical Legend

SCL Warm Sections Have agreement to use tungsten wires, but will try to develop noninvasive method!

BLM BPM EP WS BPM HEBT QV1 Beam Direction 32 BLM WS BPM CM NEG HEBT Outline

25 Beam Delivery Outline

Summary This talk just gave an general outline of the distribution of diagnostics More detail to follow in the coming presentations.