Www.sea-eu.net Title of Presentation Subtitle/other information 1 EU-ASEAN S&T cooperation to jointly tackle societal challenges Economic integration and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South-South Cooperation and Public-Private Partnership for Development by Bader Al Dafa Under Secretary General Executive Secretary, UNESCWA October 2007.
Advertisements

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Overview of Regional Investment Promotion and Facilitation Schemes -Possible Applications in the SEE 10 th Meeting of the South East European Investment.
Entrepreneurship and competitiveness for SMEs Dialogue between Brazil and the EU EU Enterprise and Innovation Initiatives Carl James.
2 nd WIPO Inter-Regional Meeting on South- South Cooperation on Patents, Trademarks, Geographical Indications, Industrial Designs and Enforcement Cairo.
Theme 7 Intellectual Property and Economic Development
1 European Policies to Promote EST into the Market INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO RGESD - Research Group on Energy and Sustainable Development Maria da Graça.
Session on the Way Forward 1.  ASEAN Leaders have agreed during 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore on 20 November 2007 to adopt the AEC Blueprint which each.
Entrepreneurship youth
1 OECD/NSF Conference on Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy National Academies, Washington DC January 2005 OECD Work on Knowledge and.
1 Foreign Direct Investment and IP in Knowledge-based Development Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Minsk, 9-10 June 2010.
2013 EDITION Mr. Pierre Vigier Head of Unit Economic Analysis and Indicators.
How to Enhance the Innovation Capability in New Member States? PhDr. Miroslava Kopicová National Training Fund European Innovating Minds,
Turkish Research Area and European Technology Platforms Hüseyin Güler FP6 Deputy National Coordinator
Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam, MOFA
Ari Kokko Industrial policy Why? How? Examples: EU Industrial Policy and Swedish Industrial Policy Sources
Describe the key policy measures that make globalization sustainable.
Dutch Enterprise Policy: Topsector approach OECD CIIE-meeting, March 2015 Henry van der Wiel Ministry of Economic Affairs 26 March 2015.
5 November 2012 PERMANENT MISSION OF THAILAND TO THE WTO 1 Intellectual Property and Development: Thailand’s Experience.
Globalisation Effects on Singapore’s Trade
SMEs Division National IP Action Plan for Entrepreneurs and SMEs March 2008 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
How to Improve Export Competitiveness in Mauritius Marilyn Whan-Kan.
Multilateral Mechanisms for Managing International Development Assistance. The Challenge of Effectiveness and Reform Yuriy Zaytsev National Research University.
Internationalisation of European Businesses and EU Economic Diplomacy
European Commission Enterprise Directorate General Innovation Policy R&D and Innovation in the Regional Operational Programs Meeting with Regions 11 July.
1 CASA ASIA Economic Congress 2004 ‘The Recovery of the Japanese Economy and Its Influence in Asia’ November, 2004 Takashi FUKAYA.
Accelerating the development of world-class Irish companies to achieve strong positions in global markets resulting in increased national and regional.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Facilitating FDI into Europe and Central Asia Working through consulting firms.
European Commission Preparation of the Innovation Union Flagship Initiative European Commission Presentation to ERAC 11 June 2010.
Fraunhofer ISI Institute Systems and Innovation Research Trentino plus 10 Foresight Workshop July 2003 (Trento) Introductory notes on the Fraunhofer.
NOIP: Challenges and Strategies IPRTA forum Mexico City, July 9-11, 2008 Pham Phi Anh Deputy Director General National Office of Intellectual Property.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
ICT policies and the Lisbon Agenda Baltic IT&T 2005 Riga, 7 April 2005 Frans de Bruïne Director “Lisbon Strategy and Policies for the Information Society”
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
NS4301 Political Economy of Africa Summer Term 2015 Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
Erasmus centralised actions and higher education policy Brussels, 23 rd January 2012 Vanessa Debiais-Sainton Endika Bengoetxea Higher Education; Erasmus.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Executive summary Increase and improve investment in Research and Development Facilitate innovation,
Chapter 6 European Industrial Policy. Competitiveness EU share of global economy Ability to generate growth and sustainable employment Based on efficient,
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
FP7 - April The European Research Area in the Age of Globalisation Henri Delanghe DG RTD, C4 (Economic and Prospective Analysis Conference on Knowledge.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
ICTSD/IDRC Symposium ‘Rationalising Regional Arrangements In The South – Before and After Hong Kong’ Towards A Framework For Amalgamation Of East Asia.
The Role of Government in Building Absorptive Capacity Ken Warwick DTI Knowledge Economy Forum VI 17 April 2007.
POINTS COMMUNICATION TO THE SPRING EUROPEAN COUNCIL Working together for growth and jobs A new start for the Lisbon Strategy POINTS
Launching conference of the ClusterCoop Project The future role of clusters in Central Europe Budapest, 13th of July 2011 Polish clusters and cluster policy.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
Commercialization of IP - National Perspective 1 © 2009 Nikola Radovanovic Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia.
HELLENIC REPUBLIC 1 COMPETITIVENESS AND WORLD TRADE.
Patents and IPR in a systemic policy agenda for the EU Prof. Dr. Reinhilde Veugelers BEPA-EC, KULeuven & CEPR.
Strategic Dialogue on Coherence Between Multilateral, Regional and Bilateral Processes on Intellectual Property and a pro-Development Agenda on IPRs 20.
Transport Programme Committee Arnoldas Milukas HoU Horizontal aspects and coordination DG RTD, Transport directorate 20 October 2010.
Title of Presentation Subtitle/other information 1 EU-ASEAN S&T cooperation to jointly tackle societal challenges WP4 – Analysis SEA-EU-NET.
Internationalisation in Education Adam Tyson European Commission DG Education and Culture.
Globalization, Technology and Asian Development Joseph E. Stiglitz Asian Development Bank April 7, 2003 Manila.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
Developed by Cool Pictures and MultiMedia Presentations Copyright © 2004 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. All rights reserved. Developed.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Some Conclusions Fostering Trade through Private-Public Dialogue Expert Meeting on Regional Integration in Asia New Delhi, March 2007.
WAN WADRINA WAN ABDUL WAHAB MINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INDUSTRY MALAYSIA RCEP 1 IMPACT ON EAST ASIA INVESTMENT.
National Innovation Plan. 2 Headline manifesto commitments: -“Making the UK the best place in Europe to innovate, patent new ideas and grow a business”
Regional Integration, Trade and Investment in the Maghreb
ASEAN Economic Community and Cambodian Entrepreneurs
“IP CHALLENGES IN 21st CENTURY”
Presentation transcript:

Title of Presentation Subtitle/other information 1 EU-ASEAN S&T cooperation to jointly tackle societal challenges Economic integration and framework conditions for innovation: Contrasting ASEAN and EU Svend Remøe, RCN Alex Degelsegger, ZSI

Economic integration and framework conditions The SEA-EU-NET analysis work EU Framework Programme participation analysis STI country profiles Bibliometric and co-patenting analysis Innovation support and framework conditions analysis – Material Transfer Agreements – Public procurement for innovation – Intellectual property How does economic integration facilitate innovation? – How are framework conditions for innovation affected by economic integration? – What can be learned from contrasting EU and ASEAN? – What is the role and potential of IP in framework conditions? 2

Expected impacts Economic integration is likely to improve the framework conditions for innovation through a more level playing field and competitive pressures – Reduction or removal of trade barriers – Harmonized product regulations etc – Increased but different competition across sectors Economic integration may lead to subsequent adaptations and processes in the innovation landscape – Increased cooperation between knowledge institutions – Improved knowledge markets – Depends on R&D and innovation intensity Better protection of intellectual property may be expected – Both regions are pro-patent – IP are key ingredients in AEC and Single Market Programme – Generation/protection becomes more important for domestic as well as for foreign companies 3

ASEAN Economic Community and the Single market Programme The AEC is being completed in its current stage in 2015, but differs greatly from the EU Single Market Program Single Market in Europe initiated at the inception of EU, but formalized in 1986 Reforms and degrees of integration depend on degree of supra-national governance Key differences in non-tariff barriers, movement of people, competition policy, standards 4 Source of figure: Woetzel et al Common currency not included in Single Market Programme

Delivering tariff reductions 5 Source: OECD 2015, based on ASEAN tariff database.

Impact on industrial sectors 6

Trade is important, but… Integration needs a broad agenda for flexible movement and utilization of resources (Capital, Services, Labour, etc) Increased competition leads to innovation pressures – Absorptive capacity and boosting knowledge in enterprises a prerequisite Collaborative research and innovation is key! – Collaborative institutions and programmes have boosted the innovation impact from the EU Single Market Programme – More attention to Intra-ASEAN cooperation is needed – Programmatic initiatives expand networking and integration 7

Innovation performance and openness of R&D systems 8 Source: ERA Progress report, facts and figures, 2014

Exploiting the competition-collaboration symbiosis ASEAN University Network and higher education in general in AEC is key to collaborative development – Including nurturing of the «third mission»: innovation and industrial development – Developing indicators for intra-ASEAN cooperation? Public Research Organizations (PRO) often too nationally oriented, need incentives for ASEAN-wide cooperation Promotion of light-footed schemes – COST in Europe : Trans-European networking of nationally funded research activities – Collaborative multilateral funding schemes (like in SEA-EU-NET) 9

Main messages Economic integration provides pressures on innovation – If pushed to the potential Both regions develop STI as part of economic policy and integration – Competition and collaboration go hand in hand STI-integration is therefore crucial: – Free flows of skilled people: Unlock limitations in labour markets – University cooperation – Public research organizations are often more closed, need for reforms? – Dedicated framework condiitions 10

Issues The big questions: – Both regions have a productivity challenge, which balance between competition and collaboration is most useful to stimulate productivity and growth? – To what extent can cooperative programmes and institutions compensate for lack of integration and competition in a regional market? What are the best options for ASEAN-EU cooperation in this respect? – Joint Funding Scheme and beyond – Building on the European Research Area: Bypassing big-budget programmes – ASEAN Research Area for knowledge markets for interaction and productivity 11

IP and innovation Framework conditions for innovation as one element in addressing the productivity challenge Intellectual property regimes as dedicated framework conditions for innovation Types of potentially innovation-relevant IP: – Patents – Utility models – Trademarks – Copyrights – Trade secrets A closer look at patents and innovation: a system of healthy competition resulting in a pool of knowledge ready to be used? 12

IP and innovation Patenting is on the rise, especially in Asia Patent filing by region of receiving office: 13 Source: WIPO 2015

Patents and innovation Most ASEAN and EU countries have pro-patent IP regimes In ASEAN, especially Malaysia and Singapore have invested heavily in promoting patent output – upgrading patent offices, publicly supporting PCT applications Other countries also work on the IPO infrastructure (modernising procedures, training examiners, etc) and put legislation in place. In addition, IP requirements are part of a number of free trade agreement negotiations However, we know that increasing patent output is not enough 14

Patents and innovation Challenges: Turning patents into social and economic value Returns are concentrated on few patents Defensive filing Preconditions for the efficacy of stronger patent regimes in emerging economies: absorptive capacities innovation financing access to foreign markets and public research capacities 15

IP and innovation 16 Source: WIPO 2015 Public sector ownership of patents is a characteristic of Southeast Asia Distribution of PCT applications by type of applicant

Patents and innovation Additional issues in public sector patenting: Appropriate reward and valorisation systems for researchers/entrepreneurs Costs of patent portfolios Justification of risk investments/public backing of IP collaterals IP and cooperation 17

Southeast Asian patent regimes Both weak and strong patent regimes can be a challenge for international research cooperation – for different reasons – Strong regimes can make it less attractive for foreign researchers to collaborate – Weak regimes make it risky to create IP that is then not protected International research cooperation will get more important balance required use and adaptation of existing models exchange of best practices 18

Southeast Asian patent regimes Importance of cooperation at policy level speeding up procedures avoiding fragmentation within ASEAN dealing with IP portfolio investors/patent trolls dealing with FTA requirements, etc innovation activities and taxation competence/transfer pricing ASEAN Working Group in IP Cooperation as a model? ASPEC fast tracking procedure Bilateral agreements 19

Main messages - revisited STI-integration is crucial for balancing competition and collaboration: – Free flows of skilled people: Unlock limitations in labour markets – University cooperation – Dedicated framework condiitions – Public research organizations are often more closed, need for reforms? Bypassing big-budget programmes for joint actions to be ahead of AEC – ASEAN Research Area for internal knowledge markets for interaction, flexibility and productivity!? – AWGIPC model as a suitable model of light-footed regional cooperation also in other areas beyond IP and coordinated with ASEAN COST 20

Issues The big questions: – Both regions have a productivity challenge, which balance between competition and collaboration is most useful to stimulate productivity and growth? – To what extent can cooperative programmes and institutions compensate for lack of integration and competition in a regional market? – Is there too much focus on IP-related issues in innovation cooperation? And: What are the best options for ASEAN-EU cooperation in this respect? – Joint Funding Scheme and beyond 21

Thank you for your attention! 22