Chair: Linda Miller, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Statewide Systems of Support: The RCC & State Story.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Head teacher Performance Management
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Parent Engagement: The Law, Assessment, Strategies and Evaluation District (LEA) and School/Building Expectations and Requirements.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
Next Generation Science Standards Adoption and Implementation Workbook.
Strengthening the Statewide System of Support Center on Innovation & Improvement
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Parent Involvement in the Title I Law Title I State Parent Advisory Council (SPAC) PAFPC Conference April 3-6, 2011.
The Power Of Partnership: Maryland’s Historic Memorandum of Understanding on the Use of Student Learning Objectives Webinar with David Volrath,
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
How Does Solid Foundation Work?. Thank you for considering Solid Foundation® as your tool in building strong school communities that support student success.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Open Forum Educational Master Plan (EMP) Toyon Room June 4, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
1 The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Planning Requirements Update Governor’s Workforce Development Board September, 2015 Meeting Edina, MN Rick.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Northern Michigan Cross Jurisdictional Sharing Team National Association of Local Boards of Health Salt Lake City, Utah August 14, 2013 Shelley Pinkleman,
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Overview – Indistar® SSOS Online Web Tool in comparison to the publication “ Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” Assessment Process Planning Process.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Developing State Systems To Support School Improvement And Restructuring Lauren Morando Rhim Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Putting Data to Good Use: The Regional Educational Laboratories (RELS) Ruth Curran Neild National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Angela M. Denning State Special Education Director Nancy Konitzer State Title I Director Authentic Stakeholder.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
2007 Institute for School Improvement and Education Options Statewide Systems of Support: The State of Research.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Top Ten Policy Tips for Special Education Carol Ann M. Hudgens, Ed.S Section Chief: Policy, Monitoring and Audit Exceptional Children Division April 2015.
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Statewide Systems of Support
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Parent Involvement and No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Research on UTeach: Past, Present, and Future Research
Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support
Using Data for Program Improvement
Using Data for Program Improvement
School Leadership Team Conference
The Statewide System of Support The Ten Roundtables: Supporting all school districts September 2009.
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Chair: Linda Miller, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Statewide Systems of Support: The RCC & State Story

A Big Job for State Education Agencies “ This transition in the state role from oversight to capacity building requires states to redesign existing support systems or create new ways to ensure that districts and schools have the resources needed to bring all students to proficiency” (CCSSO Policy Brief 9-06).

The Big Picture NCLB defines statewide systems of support, but we propose that definition should be the floor not the ceiling of state’s role in improving schools. State boards, legislatures, and governors can create incentives and opportunities. State departments of education are primarily charged with building systemic and local capacity, but they can also create incentives and opportunities. Besides technical capacity, a key role for SEA should be to establish “reform press;” a strong sense of urgency that change must occur.

The Big Picture (Continued) Strategic approach may require state-level policy changes and advocacy and a reconsideration of the “givens” (e.g., state laws and policies, and distribution of human capital). Efforts to improve schools should be driven by school and district needs rather than expediency given existing structures/systems. Critical goal is to implement systems that move beyond existing SEA/LEA improvement efforts and serve as a catalyst for meaningful change that alters the educational opportunities for children in low-performing schools.

The State Context States utilize a variety of approaches and theories of action to provide support, but they must develop a common language and process for oversight and delivery of services. States often must organize their agencies to provide leadership and vision.

Request for Comprehensive Center Support In 2007 the CII Institute highlighted state efforts: – It jump-started many projects across the nation. – Each state and regional comprehensive center determined when and how to use the CII resources provided.

Ten Steps to Strengthen SSOS Step 1: Contact is made between the SEA and the Comprehensive Center and an agreement to engage in the assistance process is reached. Step 2: The SEA forms a self-assessment team consisting of 3 to 5 key personnel responsible for major components of the SSOS. Step 3: The Comprehensive Center orients the SEA self-assessment team to the Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support and the SSOS Assessment and Planning Process. The orientation may be conducted in person or by webinar and takes about two hours. Step 4: The SEA self-assessment team reviews Strengthening the Statewide System of Support, completes the SSOS Self-Assessment Inventory, and assembles documents requested prior to the interview.

Ten Steps to Strengthen SSOS Step 5: The Comprehensive Center staff interviews the SEA self- assessment team, completing the SSOS Self-Assessment Interview Form. At the SEA’s discretion, the Comprehensive Center staff interviews LEA representatives to obtain a customer perspective related to SSOS services currently provided. Step 6: The Comprehensive Center staff uses the data collected on the SSOS Self-Assessment Inventory, key documents, SSOS Self- Assessment Interview Form, and interviews with LEAs to prepare an analysis report (SSOS Self-Assessment Report) intended to inform a plan for strengthening the SSOS. This report contains sufficient descriptive information to illustrate the sections of the framework.

Ten Steps to Strengthen SSOS Step 7: The SEA convenes a wider group of personnel and partners already involved in the statewide system of support to discuss, comment on, and amend, as necessary, the content of the SSOS Self- Assessment Report. Step 8: The Comprehensive Center staff revises the SSOS Self- Assessment Report based on the feedback from the wider group. Step 9: The Comprehensive Center staff meets with the SEA self- assessment team for a day to identify strengths and weaknesses from the report, as revised, and develop a Plan to Strengthen the Statewide System of Support, including a monitoring plan. Step 10: The Comprehensive Center staff continues to provide assistance to the SEA related to plan implementation, monitoring progress, and evaluation as specified in the plan.

Overview The 3 primary components of the 10 step process include: –The SSOS Self-Assessment Inventory –The creation of the SSOS Self-Assessment Report –Plan to Strengthen the SSOS

Where Do We Go From Here? Possible Future Work – Helping state to monitor the implementation of the plan – Assisting state in identifying or working with PD providers – Supporting state in development of long-term plan for support – agency strategic plan – Supporting state in building a cross division team – building trust both internally and externally with districts, schools, and providers

The States Respond Purpose: Why we did it Process: How we did it Lessons Learned & Next Steps – RCC – State

Contact Information Sam Redding, Marilyn Murphy, Linda Miller, Visit the CII website at