CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 20 Electricity.
Advertisements

Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CANNON. Question  A solenoid can be used to fire a small ball. A capacitor is used to energize the solenoid coil. Build a device with.
One Dimensional Steady State Heat Conduction
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.
CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
P5 Electric Circuits Electric charge – objects become charged when electrons are transferred to or from them, for example, by rubbing Two types of charge.
Lecture - 4 Inductance and capacitance equivalent circuits
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
Spectrometer solenoid quench protection
P5 – Electric Circuits. Static Electricity When two objects are rubbed together and become charged, electrons are transferred from one object to the other.
3 Nov 2006S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection of the 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. 3 November 2006.
A novel model for Minimum Quench Energy calculation of impregnated Nb 3 Sn cables and verification on real conductors W.M. de Rapper, S. Le Naour and H.H.J.
3 rd /4 th form – Electric circuits. Conductors and insulators An electric current is a flow of charge. These charges are often electrons. Electrons carry.
Superconducting R&D – Now Strand and Cable R&D FERMILAB Magnet Systems Department – Now SC Materials Department (TD) HTS Insert Coil Test in External Solenoid.
 a measure of how difficult it is for electric current to travel through a material  good conductors (metals) have low resistance, while insulators.
CHAPTER 5 MESB 374 System Modeling and Analysis Thermal Systems
QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013.
Workshop on Beam Induced Quenches Summary of session 4 “Heat Transfer R&D” SpeakersTopics Pier Paolo Granieri Steady-State Heat Transfer in the LHC Superconducting.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
Thermal and electrical analysis of superconducting magnets Some available tools and results L. Bottura Review on the Thermal Stability of Superconducting.
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
One-Dimensional Steady-State Conduction
Application of QuickField Software to Heat Transfer Problems i j k By Dr. Evgeni Volpov.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
LQ Quench Protection – G. Ambrosio 1 LQ DS video Mtg – May. 23, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Quench Protection Giorgio Ambrosio LQ DS.
1 Feb 2007S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection for Very High Field Magnets using HTS Conductors Stephen Kahn Muons Inc. NFMCC UCLA Meeting 1.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
Flower, a Model for the Analysis of Hydraulic Networks and Processes L. Bottura (  ), C. Rosso (  ) (  ) CERN, Switzerland (  ) CryoSoft, France CHATS,
WAMSDO-2013, New Techniques, GdR WAMSDO, January 2013 Gijs de Rijk CERN 1 NEW TECHNIQUES.
1 Heat load for a beam loss on the superconducting magnet Yosuke Iwamoto, Toru Ogitsu, Nobuhiro Kimura, Hirokatsu Ohhata, Tatsushi Nakamoto and Akira Yamamoto.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
Stellarator magnet options. Electrical/winding issues Elegant solution for ARIES-AT does not extrapolate well for ARIES-CS –High Temperature Superconductor.
Quench modelling for accelerator magnets L. Bottura and S. Izquierdo Bermudez CERN TE-MSC Boston October 9 th -11 th, 2013 A Case Study and Various Other.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
1 Modeling of heat transfer in an accelerator superconducting coil with a ceramic insulation in supercritical helium S. Pietrowicz, B. Baudouy, CEA Saclay/
P. P. Granieri 1,2, M. Breschi 3, M. Casali 3, L. Bottura 1 1 CERN, Geneva, CH 2 EPFL-LPAP, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, CH 3 University.
TE-MPE –EI, TE - MPE - TM 8/12/2011, Antonopoulou Evelina RQS circuit Simulation results Antonopoulou Evelina December 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
J. Polinski, B. Baudouy -The NED heat transfer program at CEA CEA Saclay, January 11th NED heat transfer program at CEA NED heat transfer program.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
The most likely cause of death for a superconducting magnet Input data for thermal modeling of Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Magnets by Andrew Davies Find the.
Milan Majoros, Chris Kovacs, G. Li, Mike Sumption, and E.W. Collings
Status of QLASA Tool Adapter
One Dimensional Steady State Heat Conduction
MQY-30 Test Result Report
HO correctors update Massimo Sorbi and Marco Statera
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals
MMI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed
Port-Hamiltonian Description of Electro-Thermal Field-Circuit models
Nb-Ti Strand and 2D magnet coil
Protection Database Tool
Using the code QP3 to calculate quench thresholds for the MB
Jeremy Weiss & Danko van der Laan Chul Kim & Sastry Pamidi
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
PANDA solenoid quench calculations
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
On behalf of the STEAM team
BBQ (BusBar Quench) 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
Lab: AC Circuits Integrated Science II.
Presentation transcript:

CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura, Marco Calvi CRPP, CERN, PSI

CHATS-AS 2011clam2 Outline Introduction Model From 1D to 3D (THEA) POWER, SUPERMAGNET Results Reference case Parametric studies Summary

CHATS-AS 20113clam Problem Quench in coupled solenoids Given a system of magnetically coupled SC solenoids protected without external dump resistor, i.e. stored energy dumped in He Further to heat perturbation and quench in one coil Compute the evolution of currents, voltages and temperatures in all coils taking into account turn-to-turn and layer-to-layer thermal contacts #1 #2 #3

Wilson, 1983 CHATS-AS 2011clam4 Normal zone propagation in solenoids Longitudinal and transversal propagation Growth of normal zone bounded 1D, 2D and 3D Thin vs. thick solenoid Analytical solutions Propagation speed ? Large energy stored ? Coupled systems ?

CHATS-AS 2011clam5 Goal To demonstrate the capability of the model and test its potential to extrapolation to configuration “other” than CICC’s Solution CryoSoft™ codes THEA POWER SUPERMAGNET Procedure Longitudinal and transversal quench propagation Thermal and electrical analysis in parallel GPS Integrated analysis

CHATS-AS 2011clam6 Outline Introduction Model From 1D to 3D (THEA) POWER, SUPERMAGNET Results Reference case Parametric studies Summary

CHATS-AS 2011clam7 From 1-D to 3-D Layer 1, Turn 1 start (X=0) Layer 2, Turn 4 end (X=L) Layer 1, Turn 4 end Layer 2, Turn 1 start Thermal connections between layers and turns are required X=0X=L Layer 1, Turn 1-4Layer 2, Turn 1-4 Example: 2 Layers, 4 Turns

CHATS-AS 2011clam8 Diffusion Longitudinal Joule’s heatInternal(SC physics)Joule’s heatInternal(SC physics) Heat exchange among solids and with coolants Transversal X X+  X X (along conductor length) THEA is a 1-D code with 3-D capability TiTi T0T0 Finite element code for the Thermal, Hydraulic and Electric Analysis of superconducting cables (CICC, also but not only) THEA model

CHATS-AS 2011clam9 9 THEA transversal thermal model User routine T T1T1 T2T2 T3T3 T4T4 Helium bath (T 0 ) P0P0 P 0 = perturbation Example: 7 Turns, 6 Layers L1L2L3L4L5L6 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 P 2 = k ins /th ins X C (T 2 -T) P 4 = k ins /th ins Z C (T 4 -T) P2P2 T4T4 T2T2 T th ins Zc Xc P4P4 P2P2 1D + 2D = 3D

CHATS-AS 2011clam10 SUPERMAGNET model Calvi, Bottura, Marinucci, CHATS-AS 2008 (Tsukuba) This analysis: 3x THEA (1 per coil) POWER SUPERMAGNET SUPERMAGNET joins and manages existing [and validated] tools in a customizable, flexible, and powerful environment for the analysis of superconducting magnet systems

CHATS-AS clam POWER model POWER is a program for the simulation of electric networks (resistances, inductances, current and voltage sources) Protective resistors RD1 & RD2 to limit voltages in system THEA-3 THEA-2 THEA-1 I1I1 I2I2 I3I3

CHATS-AS 2011clam12 Outline Introduction Model From 1D to 3D (THEA) POWER, SUPERMAGNET Results Reference case Parametric studies Summary

CHATS-AS 2011clam13 Squared conductor (all coils) Magnetic field: B = 7 T, constant in time and space (all coils) Inductances: L1 = 0.61 H, L2 = 1.47 H, M12 = 0.69 H (I 0 = 147 A, E = 37 kJ) Protective resistors: RD1 = 0.5 Ohm, RD2 = 1 Ohm Insulation: th INS = 50  m, k INS = W/mK (th. conductivity of Helium bath: T 0 = 4.2K, h = 100 W/m 2 K Perturbation: P 0 = 10 W/m in Coil #1 along 1 m (4 turns) for 10 ms FEM: 5000/4000 elements (Coil #1/Coil #2,#3) Reference case Simple model magnet Coil #1 Coil #2,#3 A cu mm A NbTi mm Xc,ZcXc,Zc mm RRR-100 N layer -18 N turn Ø in mm80120 Lm Z Winding mm23086 X Winding mm #2 #3 Coil #1 Ø in Parametric studies

CHATS-AS 2011clam14 Results of reference case Current and resistance Coil #1 Coil #2 Quench in Coil #2 induced by current overloading (I>I c ) Quench starts at t = 0.14 s Quench in Coil #1 generated by 10 W heat input Quench is instantaneous

CHATS-AS 2011clam15 Results of reference case Temperature distribution in 0.01s < t < 5s (Coil #1) Coil #1 Local normal zones in first 100 ms in all layers 1 layer = 255 turns (278 elements) N layer N turn N layer Full normal length after 200 ms X [m]

CHATS-AS 2011clam16 Results of reference case Temperature in Coil #1 Heat exchange to helium

CHATS-AS 2011clam17 Results of reference case Current and voltage Current overload in Coil #2 due to inductive coupling

CHATS-AS 2011clam18 Results of reference case Quench induced in Coil #2 Coil #2 0.01s < t < 0.10s, NO QUENCH 0.10s < t < 1s, QUENCH Quench in Coil #2 is current driven -> full length is normal from start of quench

CHATS-AS 2011clam19 Outline Introduction Model From 1D to 3D (THEA) POWER, SUPERMAGNET Results Reference case Parametric studies Summary

CHATS-AS 2011clam20 Parametric studies # 1. Thermal conductivity of insulation k INS = 0.0 – W/mK reference case: W/mK, glass epoxy at 20K # 2. Heat transfer coefficient to He bath h = 0 – 500 W/m 2 K reference case: 100 W/m 2 K # 3. Protective resistor RD1 and RD2 multiplying factor = 1 – 5 reference case: 1 (RD1 = 0.5 Ohm, RD2 = 1.0 Ohm)

CHATS-AS 2011clam 21 Parametric study #1 Current vs. Time For lower k INS (worse thermal coupling between layers and turns) * Longer current decay time constant * Quench in Coil #2 starts at a later time (no quench for k INS = and 0.0 W/mK) Coil #1 Coil #2 k INS = W/mK Recovery in Coil #2

CHATS-AS 2011clam22 Parametric study #1 T vs 0.01s < t < 0.10s (Coil #1) Coil #1 k INS = W/mK k INS = W/mK

CHATS-AS 2011clam23 Parametric study #1 T vs 0.10s < t < 5s (Coil #1) k INS = W/mK k INS = W/mK * Less uniform temperature distribution in X for lower k INS * Hot spot temperature not strongly dependent on k INS (except for k INS = 0) Coil #1 k INS = 0.0 W/mK h = 100 W/m 2 K T max = 190 K k INS = W/mK

CHATS-AS 2011clam24 Parametric studies # 1. Thermal conductivity of insulation k INS = 0.00 – 0.20 W/mK reference case: 0.10 W/mK, glass epoxy at 20K # 2. Heat transfer coefficient to He bath h = 0 – 500 W/m 2 K reference case: 100 W/m 2 K # 3. Protective resistor RD1 and RD2 multiplying factor = 1 – 5 reference case: 1 (RD1 = 0.5 Ohm, RD2 = 1.0 Ohm)

CHATS-AS clam Parametric study #2 T vs 0.1s < t < 5s h = 100 W/m 2 K Adiabatic BC’s * Less uniform temperature distribution in X for larger h (same qualitative results in Coil #2) * Hot Spot temperature is independent of h (also in case of adiabatic BC’s) h = 500 W/m 2 K Coil #1

CHATS-AS clam Limiting case k INS = 0 W/mK and h = 0 W/m 2 K Coil #1 No quench in Coil #2 k INS = 0 W/mK h = 0 W/m 2 K T max = 250 K T max = 68 K (Ref. case)

CHATS-AS 2011clam27 Parametric studies # 1. Thermal conductivity of insulation k INS = 0.00 – 0.20 W/mK reference case: 0.10 W/mK, glass epoxy at 20K # 2. Heat transfer coefficient to He bath h = 0 – 500 W/m 2 K reference case: 100 W/m 2 K # 3. Protective resistor RD1 and RD2 multiplying factor = 1 – 5 reference case: 1 (RD1 = 0.5 Ohm, RD2 = 1.0 Ohm)

CHATS-AS 2011clam28 Summary for T max (Coil #1) Hot spot temperature not strongly dependent on 3 parameters investigated (except k INS = 0) Magnet protection: Safe conversion of magnetic energy into thermal energy without risk of damaging components, i.e. minimize T max,  T max and V max Reference case

CHATS-AS 2011clam29 Summary for MIITs (Coil #1) Reference case

CHATS-AS 2011clam30 Summary for V max (Coil #1, #2) Quench voltage Reference case

CHATS-AS 2011clam31 Summary Quench in coupled solenoids is a typical SC magnet design problem, and it can be analyzed using a tailored assembly (SuperMagnet) of selected CryoSoft™ codes (THEA, POWER). The topology is obviously not a limiting factor. User routines were included in the THEA code to take into account the transversal heat transfer and propagation. The quenching coil resistance was used in a circuital model with lumped parameters (POWER). Other features (e.g. variable magnetic field) can be included easily. Modeling provides access to hidden parameters (e.g. internal voltage) and parametric analysis in a homogeneous and self- consistent framework

Thank you for your attention CHATS-AS clam

CHATS-AS 2011clam33 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam34 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam35 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam36 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam37 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam38 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam39 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam40 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam41 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam42 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 SUPERMAGNET model

CHATS-AS 2011clam43 SUPERMAGNET POWER THEA t0t0 …and so on SUPERMAGNET model