10. FY10 Region MWR Standards AA GG RR NIAD Standard: NIAD $ is greater than or equal to $0 (Monitor NIAD) NIAD $< $0 NIAD $ > $0 N/A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FY09 Region MWR Standards 09. FY09 Region MWR Standards AA GG RR Contribution to IMCOM Level NAFMC Funding Standard: NIAD $ is greater than or equal to.
Advertisements

Ratio Analysis Chapter 5 Ratio Analysis - Help for Users n n Is There Sufficient Cash to Meet the Establishment’s Obligations for a Given Time Period?
Financial Statement Analysis
TOWN OF KITTERY BUDGET OVERVIEW MARCH 14,2011. BUDGET SUMMARY 2.
Financial Review Year Ended June 30, Plante/Moran Audit Results of the Audit Presented to the Finance and Audit Committee on October 6 Unmodified.
Did you know…?. NAF Annual Operating Budget (AOB) Process.
Connecticut’s Spending Cap is in Need of Repair Update February 2007.
Maintaining Sustainable Water and Waste Disposal Services Copyright 2011 Community Resource Group, Inc. No part of this presentation may be copied or.
1 Planning and Evaluating Operations. 2 Occupancy Ratios Measures the success of the front office in selling rooms. –Common data includes: Number of Rooms.
FIRMS Edit Changes FY Fyle Cabagnot Financial Management Services May 23, 2004.
Safety  Quality  Service  Relationships  Performance SOMC Performance Dashboard – FY 12 SOMC Performance Dashboard – FY 12 Patient-Centered Perfection.
1 School FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas.
Bandera Independent School District An Overview of Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas Presented by: Tish Grill.
Managing Business Finance
Financial Analysis Ag Management Chapter 3.
US Army Garrison Picatinny Arsenal MASTER PLANNING – LOOKING BACK ( ) YEAR Facility Fund Source Cost 1997 New Child Development Center (99 capacity)
2015 Fiscal Year-End Activities for Recharge Centers Internal / External Sales Office.
Govt. Reporting - 1 GOVERNMENTAL REPORTING City Council Budgetary Hearing.
25,000Estimated Rounds used in Projection $29.00Estimated Revenue Per Round Advisory Board Projections Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year.
Budgeting for BOSS Allocation of Resources Specific to BOSS.
Galion City Schools Financial Summary General Operating Fund 3 rd Quarter FY Presented to the Board April 17, 2013.
City of North Miami Beach Quarterly Financial Analysis Second Quarter – FY 2015 Data as of March 31, 2015.
Eileen Johnston Angie Stattman. Financial Terminology o Fund Balance o Assets o Liabilities o Full Time Equivalents (FTE’s) o Revenues o Expenditures.
The board of each community college district shall within or before the first quarter of each fiscal year, adopt an annual budget which it deems necessary.
USES AND ADVANTAGES OF THE CASH FLOW BUDGET (1) FORMALIZES THE ENTIRE PLANNING PROCESS BY PROVIDING THE “BEST ESTIMATE” OF HOW THE BUSINESS PLANS TO OPERATE.
HFT 2403 Financial Statement Analysis & Presentation Chapter 18 Chapter 18.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS.
2011 USDA Ag Outlook Forum USDA Outlook for the 2011 U.S. Farm Economy Timothy Park Farm and Rural Business Branch Resource and Rural Economics Division.
1 April 22, Q 2003 Earnings. 2 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities.
11 NIBD Limit $0.000 Enclosure 4. FY11 Region MWR Standards AA GG RR All Operating Groups Displayed on Commander’s Mission Box Standard: NIBD is greater.
Cash Flow Budget What is it?What is it? –It is a summary of the cash inflows and outflows over a given period of time. –It is an important forward planning.
EFECS Application of New Salary Cap MRAM - March 13, 2014 Michael Anthony Management Accounting & Analysis University of Washington.
|
Transfer Payment and Financial Reporting Branch Ministry of Education New Reporting Model TPFR Information Sessions Fall 2007.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS – part 2.
1.  Senate Bill No. 875  Developed by Commissioner together with Comptroller of Public Accounts  Proposal presented to Legislature December 2000 
THE RAILROAD ORGANIZATION (CHAPTER 18). All Shapes, All Sizes, and All Revenue Levels STB / AAR Class I / Class I Class II / Regional Class III / Local.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
FY 2011 Compendium of Financial Information Arizona Board of Regents Enterprise Initiatives, Finance and Strategic Planning Committee December 1, 2011.
2012 – 2013 PROPOSED BUDGET Presented by: Tish Grill.
Secretary/Treasurer’s Report AASHTO Annual Meeting 2011 Detroit, Michigan October 15, 2011.
INDIANA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2012.
DISTRICT STATUS DETAIL Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas.
Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year CEANY FY2015 FINANCIAL SUMMARY * Actual reflects cash basis of accounting Budget Actual to Date Budget vs. Actual.
Natividad Medical Center Board of Trustees February 1, 2013 Financial Statements For December 31,
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 FY 2017 County Administrator’s Recommended Budget.
F.I.R.S.T. Bandera Independent School District An Overview of Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas Presented by: Tish Grill.
Building Division FY2011 Second Quarter Report. 2 nd Quarter Revenues October$93,154 November$53,049 December$50,033 Average Monthly Revenues$65,412 Total.
Supplemental Information 19. Sources & Uses of Tier 1 Capital ($ in billions) Sources of Tier 1 Capital: Cash Operating Earnings Less Dividends $0.9$4.0.
Resolution 2014R-100 December 18,  Board Direction ◦ Establish a “Stabilized” cost-of-service rate of $ for FYs 2015 & 2016 that includes.
Resolution 2014R-099 December 18,  Board Direction ◦ Establish a monthly cost-of-service rate of $ for FY 2015 and utilize a General Fund.
Berkeley County School District Debt Service & Referendum Millage Ms. Brenda Blackburn, Superintendent Brantley Thomas, CFO March 8, 2016.
Cedar Sinai Park FY 2015 Financial Report and FY2016 Budget Report Sandra C. Simon, Chief Operating Officer Bobbie J. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer.
Resource Management Team Members: Madie McAdoo, Business Manager Pamela Morris, Financial Analyst.
Dawn Lund Vice-President Utility Financial Solutions 1.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Senior Vice President Ashley Venturoni – Project Consultant Presented by: FY 2013 Water, &
State Higher Education Finance Fiscal Overview.
Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date March 31, 2017 May 12, 2017
Performance in Support of Readiness
Intermediate Cost Analysis and Management
Back to Indexes, the Original Culprit !
Fiscal Year-End Activities for Internal/External Sales
Financial Management from a CRD’s Seat
Year End, FY 2018 Financial Reports
Staffing Mix impact on Labor Expense and NIBD
Board of Regents Meeting
7 Did The District’s Academic Rating Exceed Academically Unacceptable? WFISD rated Academically Acceptable 5/13/ Was The Three-Year.
2016 Fiscal Year Budget Amendment I
Exeter Township December 31, 2016 Audit Results
2019 Second Quarter Financial Report Period Ending June 30, 2019
Presentation transcript:

10

FY10 Region MWR Standards AA GG RR NIAD Standard: NIAD $ is greater than or equal to $0 (Monitor NIAD) NIAD $< $0 NIAD $ > $0 N/A

FY10 Region MWR Standards AA GG RR Cash Generation for Reinvestment Standard: NIBD % is greater than or equal to 8 percent of Net Revenue; Variance is within + 10% of Budget NIBD < 4% of Net Revenue NIBD > 8% of Net Revenue NIBD > 4% and < 8% of Net Revenue Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15%

FY10 Region MWR Standards RR A GG Category A* NAF Standard: NIBD is greater than or equal to $0 for Category A programs in the aggregate; Variance is within + 10% of Budget * Excludes Unit Activities NIBD > $0 NIBD < $0 N/A Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15%

FY10 Region MWR Standards RR A GG Category B* * Excludes Child Development Services (CDS) NAF Standard: NIBD is greater than or equal to $0 for Category B programs in the aggregate; Variance is within + 10% of Budget Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% NIBD > $0 NIBD < $0 N/A

FY10 Region MWR Standards G R A G R Child Development Services (CDS)* Standard: NIBD is greater than or equal to $0 for CDS programs in the aggregate; Variance is within + 10% of Budget NIBD > $0 NIBD < $0 N/A Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% *Program Codes: PC, PD, PG, PL, QA, QC, QL, & JG

FY10 Region MWR Standards EACH Category C Program* Standard: NIBD is greater than or equal to $0; Variance is within + 10% of Budget A GG RR * Except Golf, Bowling, Clubs, Theme & FBE Programs NIBD > $0 NIBD < $0 N/A Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15%

FY10 Region MWR Standards AA GG RR Clubs, Theme & FBE NIBD > 8% NIBD < 4% NIBD > 4% and 4% and < 8% Standard: NIBD % greater than or equal to 8%; Variance is within + 10% of Budget Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% *Program Codes: KE, KF, KG, KL, & KM

FY10 Region MWR Standards A A GG RR GOLF Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% Standard: NIBD % greater than or equal to 15% Variance is within + 10% of Budget NIBD > 15% NIBD < 8% NIBD > 8%

FY10 Region MWR Standards Bowling > 16 Lanes A A GG RR Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% NIBD > 15% NIBD < 8% NIBD > 8% Standard: NIBD % greater than or equal to 15% Variance is within + 10% of Budget

FY10 Region MWR Standards Appropriated Fund Execution APF Execution: Direct APF support for MWR and Family programs* will be executed between: 65 and 100 percent at third quarter end, and 90 and 100 percent at the end of the fiscal year G R A 65% EXECUTION AT END OF 3 RD QTR; 90% EXECUTION AT FY END 60% AND < 65% EXECUTION AT END OF 3 RD QTR; 80% AND < 90% EXECUTION AT FY END < 60% EXECUTION AT END OF 3 RD QTR; < 80% EXECUTION AT FY END *MDEP QDPC, AMS CODES: LA, LB, LC, LD, LE, LH, LI, LJ, LK, LL, LM, LN, LP, LQ, LV, LW,. LX, LY, LZ; MDEP QYDP, AMS CODES: 19.29,19.30,19.31,19.32,19.33,19.34; MDEP QCCS, AMS CODES: 19.21, 19.22, 19.23, 19.24, 19.25, 19.26, 19.27, 19.28; MDEP QACS AMS CODES: 20.1A, 20.11, 20.12, 20.13, 20.14, 20.15, 20.16, 20.17, 20.18, 20.19,20.20 > > > >

FY10 Region MWR Standards A G R CPMC/Local Payments NAFMC Execution Standard: CPMC* and Local payments for NAFMC will not exceed NIBD at the Army-wide level. 70% of Budgeted combined payments are executed, payments executed do not exceed Region aggregate NIBD or as changed by “Plus/Minus” transfers. Execution* > NIBD**, or Cash to Debt NIBD**, or Cash to Debt < 1:1 Execution* < NIBD** and Cash to Debt > 1:1 Executed* > 50% and < 70% of Budget Executed* > 70% of CPMC Budget Executed* 100% of Budget, or Cash to Debt < 1:1 * Includes payments for Capital Leases ** As adjusted by transfer N/A N/A

FY10 Region MWR Standards Cash to Debt >1:1 and $0 Cash to Debt > 1:1 and $0 Solvency Standard: Cash to Debt ratio is greater than or equal to 1:1 and less than or equal to 2:1, and NIBD is positive Cash to Debt 4:1 A G R Cash to Debt > 1:1 and 1:1 and < 2:1 and NIBD < $0, or Cash to Debt > 2:1 and 2:1 and < 4:1

10

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards Garrison Field Roll-up Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15%

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards Category A* * Excludes Unit Activities Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards Category B* * Excludes Child Development Services Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards G R A G R Child Development Services (CDS)*NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget *Program Codes: PC, PD, PG, PL, QA, QC, QL, & JG

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards Category C programs* Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% * Except Golf, Bowling, Clubs, Theme & FBE Programs Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards CLUBS, THEME AND FBE Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget *Program Codes: KE, KF, KG, KL, & KM

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards GOLF Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards BOWLING > 16 LANES Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15% Standard: NIBD $ are greater than or equal to Region approved Budget Variance is within +10% of Budget NIBD  Budget N/ANIBD < Budget

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards APPROPRIATED FUND EXECUTION APF EXECUTION: DIRECT APF SUPPORT FOR MWR AND FAMILY PROGRAMS* WILL BE EXECUTED BETWEEN 65 AND 100 PERCENT AT THIRD QUARTER END, AND BETWEEN 90 AND 100 PERCENT AT THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR G R A 65% EXECUTION AT END OF 3 RD QTR; 90% EXECUTION AT FY END 60% AND < 65% EXECUTION AT END OF 3 RD QTR; 80% AND < 90% EXECUTION AT FY END < 60% EXECUTION AT END OF 3 RD QTR; < 80% EXECUTION AT FY END > > > > *MDEP QDPC, AMS CODES: LA, LB, LC, LD, LE, LH, LI, LJ, LK, LL, LM, LN, LP, LQ, LV, LW,. LX, LY, LZ; MDEP QYDP, AMS CODES: 19.29,19.30,19.31,19.32,19.33,19.34; MDEP QCCS, AMS CODES: 19.21, 19.22, 19.23, 19.24, 19.25, 19.26, 19.27, 19.28; MDEP QACS AMS CODES: 20.1A, 20.11, 20.12, 20.13, 20.14, 20.15, 20.16, 20.17, 20.18, 20.19,20.20

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards CPMC/Local Payments NAFMC Execution Standard: CPMC*and Local Payments for NAFMC greater than or equal to 70% of Region approved Budget A G R Executed* > 50% and < 70% of Budget Executed* > 70% of CPMC Budget Executed* < 50% or > 100% of Budget * Includes payments for Capital Leases

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards 10

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards STANDARD: NIBD IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO CPMC REQUIREMENT* BUDGET VARIANCE IS WITHIN + 10% OF BUDGET NIBD < CPMC Requirement* NIBD > CPMC Requirement* NET INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION *Value necessary in current year for long-range CPMC budget as adjusted for FY 10 service charge guidance N/A Budget Variance > 10% and 10% and < 15% Budget Variance < 10% Budget Variance > 15%

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards CPMC EXECUTION STANDARD: CPMC EXECUTION EQUAL OR GREATER THAN 90% OF CPMC BUDGET EXECUTE < 85% OF CPMC BUDGET EXECUTE > 90% CPMC BUDGET EXECUTE > 85% OF CPMC BUDGET, BUT < 90% CPMC BUDGET

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards OCCUPANCY* STANDARD: OCCUPANCY EQUAL OR GREATER THAN 80% OF AVAILABLE ROOM NIGHTS BASED ON TOTAL ROOM INVENTORY/BUDGET VARIANCE WITHIN 10% *Excluding DVQs OCCUPANCY > 80% OCCUPANCY > 70%, BUT 70%, BUT < 80% OCCUPANCY IS < 70% BUDGET VARIANCE OF +/- > 10% AND < 15% 10% AND < 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- > 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- < 10%

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards DVQ OCCUPANCY STANDARD: OCCUPANCY EQUAL OR GREATER THAN 75% OF AVAILABLE ROOM NIGHTS BASED ON TOTAL ROOM INVENTORY/BUDGET VARIANCE WITHIN 10% BUDGET VARIANCE OF +/- > 10% AND < 15% 10% AND < 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- > 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- < 10% OCCUPANCY > 75% OCCUPANCY > 70%, BUT 70%, BUT < 75% OCCUPANCY IS < 70%

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards A G R AVERAGE DAILY RATE (ADR) STANDARD: ADR IS WITHIN 10% OF THE BUDGET BUDGET VARIANCE +/- < 10% BUDGET VARIANCE OF +/- > 10% AND 10% AND < 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- > 15%

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards A G R NIBD PER OCCUPIED ROOM STANDARD: NIBD IS WITHIN 10% OF THE BUDGET BUDGET VARIANCE +/- < 10% BUDGET VARIANCE OF +/- > 10% AND 10% AND < 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- > 15%

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards REVENUE PER OCCUPIED ROOM BUDGET VARIANCE OF +/- > 10% AND 10% AND < 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- > 15% G R A BUDGET VARIANCE +/- < 10% STANDARD: REVENUE IS WITHIN 10% OF THE BUDGET

FY10 Garrison MWR Standards EXPENSES PER OCCUPIED ROOM BUDGET VARIANCE OF +/- > 10% AND 10% AND < 15% BUDGET VARIANCE +/- > 15% G R A BUDGET VARIANCE +/- < 10% STANDARD: EXPENSES ARE WITHIN 10% OF THE BUDGET