1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstrating the Legal Sustainability of Effective STEM Diversity Programs Wanda E. Ward Ph.D., Discussant Sr. Advisor to the Director Office of the Director.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics A DOE EPSCoR Proposal Submitted by a consortium of University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, Langston.
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
I/UCRC Annual Directors’ Meeting January 8, 2009 Anne Emig Supplemental Funding Options at NSF: Supporting International Research & Education.
Maury Goodman for Harry Weerts Leader, ANL-HEP Group NO A Collaboration Meeting Welcome 8 July 2013 Argonne National Lab.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
Meeting Expectations Gary Jedlovec Purpose of review SPoRT Mission and Vision Role of Science Advisory Committee Charge to Committee members transitioning.
1 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Amber Boehnlein October 18, 2011.
Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Kathy Yelick Associate Laboratory Director for Computing Sciences.
Serving MERLOT on Your Campus Gerry Hanley California State University and MERLOT Seminars on Academic Computing August 7, 2002 Snowmass CO Copyright Gerard.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
M. Bardeen, Homestake Feb Lessons We Have Learned. Marge Bardeen Fermilab Education Office Homestake DUSEL Workshop,
The Future of US Accelerator Science – Comments from NSF Tony F. Chan Assistant Director MPS/NSF AAAS Chicago February 13, 2009.
Oregon Department of Education Oregon Department of Community Colleges & Workforce Development Bureau of Labor and Industries September 2011 CTE Overview.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting Bernard M. Grant, Assistant Program Coordinator for the Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences Division May 2012 NSF.
FY Division of Human Resources Development Combined COV COV PRESENTATION TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 7, 2014.
3/6/2006FY07/08 DOE Budget Briefing1 FY07/08 Budget Briefing Jonathan Dorfan Director Persis Drell Deputy Director SLAC.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Office of High Energy Physics View on Dark Energy Collaborations Kathleen Turner Office of High Energy Physics (HEP) Office of Science (SC), U.S. Department.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Long Range Planning Pier Oddone September 24, 2007.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC Catherine Pink Institutional.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 1 SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing Remarks David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Directory for PPA.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
The Future of High Energy Physics R. Aleksan CPPM/IN2P3 and DAPNIA/CEA EPS HEP2005 Lisbon, July 23,
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
National Science Foundation Bonnie H. Thompson Office of International Science and Engineering
Light Source Reviews The BES Perspective July 23, 2002 Pedro A. Montano Materials Sciences and Engineering Basic Energy Sciences BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES.
IGERT at the National Science Foundation Carol Van Hartesveldt, Ph.D. Program Director, IGERT National Science Foundation.
THE ATTRACT INITIATIVE Marzio Nessi, Markus Nordberg CERN.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
1 M. Barnett – October 2008 DOE Review 2006 Report Recommendations from the 2006 report. Many recommendations have been implemented, and are not listed.
DESY Photon Science XFEL official start of project: 5 June 2007 FLASH upgrade to 1 GeV done, cool down started PETRA III construction started 2 July 2007.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC The Role of the LHC in US HEP Dan Green US CMS Program Manager January 28, 2003.
Research at UMR Serving the needs of Missouri and our Nation Wayne Huebner Interim Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO
1 FY09 PPA Budget Kick Off Rafael Alva Charlotte Chang Oct 22, 2008.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
Workshop on Women in Science and Engineering Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab November 16, 2009.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
NASA Office of Education STEM Education and NASA Employ Educate Engage Inspire Joyce L. Winterton, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator for Education National.
Immaculate Conception School’s Updated Technology Plan Updated – 2015.
NSF Middleware Initiative Purpose To design, develop, deploy and support a set of reusable, expandable set of middleware functions and services that benefit.
Budget Outlook Glen Crawford P5 Meeting Sep
Argonne Accelerator Institute Activites Rod Gerig Argonne May 18, 2007 Presentation to the Fermilab-Argonne Directors’ Collaboration Meeting.
Budget Briefing March 2013 for Argonne National Lab H.Weerts, R. Yoshida HEP Division Argonne National Laboratory March 1, 2013 Open all spreadsheets.
Directorate for Education and Human Resources Photo credits (from left) : U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Intel Free Press, Kate Ter Haar, Woodley Wonder.
University Research Model Committee - Key points/issues - Other points/issues - New ideas - “University Model” issues in the report - Findings and Recommendations.
RISE Proposal. Acronym: JEPIF: Japan-Europe Physics at Intensity Frontier ??? Merge WP 1 & 3 ? – Sell as cross-fertilization and networking of flavour.
The Argonne High Energy Physics Division H.Weerts Argonne HEP Division May 22, 2013 Comparative review of laboratory Intensity Frontier programs, May 20-23,
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
CMS Crosscut Operations and Research, Theory, Computing, University Involvement C. Young and B. Zhou.
CPAD Instrumentation Frontier Meeting October 5-7, 2015 Glen Crawford, Helmut Marsiske Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy DOE Office of High.
Workshop Goals and Project Management “120A ” – FY15 Budget Request Steve Holmes PIP-II Budget Retreat July 22, 2014.
Page 1 Coles – Operating the Observatories PAC 9 Dec. 13, 2000 G L Operating the Observatories Mark Coles.
J. Templon Nikhef Amsterdam Physics Data Processing Group “Grid” Computing J. Templon SAC, 26 April 2012.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Preparing Mechanical Engineering Students for Collaborations Across Distance and Disciplines (CADD) Nina Robson California State University, Fullerton.
Scrum BUT Research Adapting Agile principles in a research environment Gary Morgan Chief Science and Technology Office March 16, 2009 PNNL-SA
Image courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory Eric R. Colby † Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science-Led.
Upgrade of the GlueX Spectrometer for Physics with Strange Final States Nuclear Physics Yi Qiang Nov. 13, 2011.
Presentation transcript:

1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 2 Main theme for Argonne HEP 2 ENABLE Approach for Argonne HEP in short: Actions and activities are driven by “ enabling ” future of HEP Enable : Enabling US participation in ATLAS/LHC Developing new “ technologies ” for accelerators & detectors to enable experiments Interact with & use material science, photon science, computing, nano scale, accelerator expertise at Argonne to do this ( interact with other sciences); enable new technologies Transfer HEP expertise to other fields ( detector & accelerator expertise for example) Direction for future of field ( theory & roles in Snowmass 2013) Connections & collaboration with/resource for universities Connections to industry with new technologies Uniqueness: Basic development of new tools like: sensors, detectors, acceleration methods, computing …… driven by HEP needs & use non-HEP expertise at Argonne UNIQUE future HEP and do it in a way that is Reach out to expertise and technologies that other divisions at Argonne have; do it so both benefit and at some point pay for it

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 3 Budget & people in group Year/k$FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16 KA231,2001,3901,4251,400 Early Career500 For beyond FY14 assume for each year ( Scenario A) For this budget: Get this

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 4 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios FY13 projected to end of the year; copy of spreadsheet that you have FY13 support (Actual)Cosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Select Activity:SPTDESVERITASCTASelect TOTAL Permanent Ph.D Temporary Ph.D Graduate Students Engineer / Computing Professional Administrative / Technician Other DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Actual, in $) 610, , ,899 29, ,647,303 M&S (Actual, in $) 153,500 16,000 5, ,500 Travel (actual, in $) 12,000 25,000 35, ,000 TOTAL 775, , ,899 29, ,893,803 Just for information. Show same numbers but in slightly different arrangement Note: Funding for FY13 was 1, = 1,925k$ Number in spreadsheets: 1,894k$ was estimated actual in August 2013

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 5 Scenario C -- wish list Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Contains Early Career Assumes SPT-3G will be next ANL investment thru LDRD (FY13- FY15); $3.6M Support for Computational Cosmology at ~50% level of group. Other sources for funding: Theory, ASCR, Computing, etc Assume VERITAS program transitions into CTA & CTA will be part of US HEP program DES analysis & development of OH suppression and LSST New group for DOE HEP CF

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 6 Scenario C -- wish list Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Summary of Scenario C Evolution of total request

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 7 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A Phase out VERITAS/CTA program FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14= $1.9M/yr including Early Career How did we arrive at choices that we made? Need to make choices/priorities Assume an outcome of P5/where program is going –- our best guess Fold in what we think is best for US HEP & Argonne Where will Argonne contribution have largest impact Do not simply spread pain i.e. do not reduce every program Keep programs at sustainable level Take into account Early Career award –- enable it However: We are a national lab Need to support national program Feedback from this review Support HEP direction from P5 roadmap

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 8 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A Phase out VERITAS/CTA FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14= $1.9M/yr including Early Career Assume SPT-3G Reduce funding from Scenario C. More other sources for funding: Theory, ASCR, Computing, etc DES analysis & development of OH suppression and LSST

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 9 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14= $1.9M/yr including Early Career Summary all years:

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 10 Questions & Comments….. Postdocs -- numbers Students Staff

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 11 THE END

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 12 Backup Slides

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 13 Facilities ( within division) 13 Electronics: Mechanical: All groups are in the HEP division  Group Resources (14 people, 12.5 FTEs) : –( engineers to techs) –ASICS at Fermilab Serves several divisions; In FY12: ~50% work for HEP  Group Resources (7 people) : –Engineers to techs ( From Nova, telescopes to DES support) Unique capabilities HEP only  Division expanded into more space; added all of Building 360 ( 2 floors, labs, conference rooms + offices) Space: 23K sq ft buildings + labs Close interactions: science  engineering 2007  2009 Upgrade of lab 2011  2012 AWA extension

Vision for Argonne HEP:  We think investments in building strong connections both inside and outside HEP will have the strongest impact in revitalizing HEP.  More efficient research –Increase collaboration with and among universities Universities take better advantage of the lab infrastructure (beyond HEP!) Lab gains collaboration and broadens their portfolio of expertise  Better serve the young people in HEP –Give opportunities to students of gaining experience in Hardware, computing Other Frontier areas –Opportunities to connect with industry  HEP should better integrate into other scientific/technical community as well as industry. –Work across disciplines -- multidisciplinary. –Leads to better understanding and support for HEP  Promoting more collaboration in diverse areas: this will lead, ultimately, to better communication and coherence in the HEP and the science community. CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 14

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 15 Scenario C -- wish list Evolution of program for different funding scenarios FY14 - Scenario CCosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY14=FY13 + new requests prioritized) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Select Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D Temporary Ph.D Graduate Students Engineer / Computing Professional Administrative / Technician Other DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Actual, in $)564,357587,619392,210330,23930,7661,905,190 M&S (Actual, in $)297,00020, ,000 Travel (actual, in $)40,00030,00060,00025, ,000 TOTAL901,357637,619452,210355,23930,7662,377,190 FY15 - Scenario CCosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY14=FY13 + new requests prioritized) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D Temporary Ph.D Graduate Students Engineer / Computing Professional Administrative / Technician Other DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Planned, in $)579,594603,485371,203649,08563,1932,266,559 M&S (Planned, in $)292,00020, ,000 Travel (Planned, in $)40,00030,00060,00025, ,000 TOTAL911,594653,485431,203674,08563,1932,733,559

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 16 Evolution of program for different funding scenarios Scenario A All reduction taken in VERITAS/CTA FY14 - Scenario ACosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY13-2%) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Select Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D Temporary Ph.D Graduate Students Engineer / Computing Professional Administrative / Technician Other DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Actual, in $) 504, , , ,542 30,766 1,518,533 M&S (Actual, in $) 282,000 10, ,000 Travel (actual, in $) 35,000 15,000 25, ,000 TOTAL 821, , , ,542 30,766 1,900,533 FY15 - Scenario ACosmic Frontier - experimental research funding (KA230102) (FY15=FY14) Personnel Support from DOE/HEP (in FTEs) Activity:SPTDESVERITAS Computational CosmologyCTATOTAL Permanent Ph.D Temporary Ph.D Graduate Students Engineer / Computing Professional Administrative / Technician Other DOE/HEP Funding including overhead (per activity): SWF(Planned, in $) 518, , ,268 31,596 1,488,595 M&S (Planned, in $) 292,000 20, ,000 Travel (Planned, in $) 40,000 30,000 25, ,000 TOTAL 850, , ,268 31,596 1,895,595 Fix budget: FY14= FY13-2% FY16=FY15=FY14

CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts 17