Integrated Marketplace Why? What is it? Impacts to SPP Members Richard Dillon Director, Market Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Advertisements

MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
GPA Renewable Energy Resource for Guam Power Authority
Copyright 2003 PJM 1 PJM’s Annual FTR Auction.
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
Convergence Bidding Overview Margaret Miller Manager, Market Design & Regulatory Policy CPUC Convergence Bidding Workshop August 26, 2010.
Concerns with RUC Capacity Short Charge and Energy Trades.
Topics The Midwest ISO The Midwest Market Market Design Process
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Session 4 Discussion of Alternatives and Implementation Activities for Real- Time.
NV Energy Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Presentation to ISAS
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Challenges for the SEM.  Day-ahead price coupling is a key feature of the final draft Framework Guidelines on congestion management issued by ERGEG in.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Transition Plan Technical Conference #2 July 15, 2010.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 14, Agenda Discussion of SMD-style DAM review questions posed by the DAM WG and Coral regarding the SMD-
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
PRS - RPRS Task Force Status Summary - August 14, PRS RPRS Task Force Status Summary Prepared for WMS and PRS August 2006.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Presentation to House Regulated Industries Committee Chairman Phil King Trip Doggett Chief Operating Officer The Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
Updated 1/28/2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Congestion Revenue Rights (CRR) EDS 3 Release 7 - Overview EDS 3 Phase 2 MP Planning.
Transmission Congestion Management – IDC Granularity Option 3A Larry Kezele and Jeff Norman June 28, 2005 NERC/NAESB TLR Subcommittee.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
1 Pacific Northwest Hydro-Thermal System and RTO West Market Design FERC Market Design Workshop January 23, 2002.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Midwest ISO Discussion February 5, 2009 Greg Levesque Manager – Regional Relations & Policy.
Transmission Congestion Rights – Credit Perspective April 17, 2014.
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
G&T Update – Western Farmers Electric Cooperative OAEC MR/PR Fall Meeting (2015)
2013 Wind Conference. Transmission Service Study Process Steve Purdy.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission MISO/Alliance Companies’ RTO Status Reports Presented by: Joseph Power Tony Ingram Rahim Amerkhail Patrick Clarey.
SPP: A Closer Look Heather Starnes Manager, Regulatory Policy 2.
Congestion Hedging Process Transmission Planning Summit September 21-22, 2011.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
Texas Nodal Team Cost Benefit Group Background to Standard Market Design in New England March 2, 2004 Michael Taniwha Manager, Market Administration ISO.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Commercial Operations Subcommittee Meeting April 13, 2010 Update to RMS April 14, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Market Working Group Update Presentation to CAWG March 29, 2011 Jim Sanderson, KCC.
Market Redesign Update ERCOT Board of Directors Meeting April 18, 2006 Ron Hinsley Chief Information Officer
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Readiness Liaison Update Erin Jester September 26, 2013.
Retail Workshop ERCOT Nodal Update October 06, 2010.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Market Trials Structured/Unstruc tured Test Overview December 14, 2012 Casey Cathey ·
1 A Conversation about MISO Paul Spicer November 8, 2007.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
The Texas Nodal Market Trip Doggett ERCOT Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Mike Cleary ERCOT Chief Technology Officer Executive Briefing 28.
August 11, 2008 TPTF EDS Sequence and Durations Discussion Daryl Cote.
SPP.org1 1 MOPC Workshop Series on Future Markets: Session I August 24, 2010.
Wind Management at MISO
Integrated Marketplace Why. What is it
Integrated Marketplace Why. What is it
Presentation transcript:

Integrated Marketplace Why? What is it? Impacts to SPP Members Richard Dillon Director, Market Design

Key Dates in Integrated Marketplace History 2 Key MilestoneCompletion Date Cost-Benefit Analysis for Future Markets CompletedApril 2009 RSC Endorsement of Cost-Benefit AnalysisApril 2009 Board Approval of Implementation BudgetApril 2011 SPP Stakeholders developed detailed Market Design MWG Finalized Baseline ProtocolsSeptember 2010 MOPC Approval of Baseline ProtocolsOctober 2010 Board Approval of Implementation BudgetJanuary 2011 SPP Contracted VendorsMay

Marketplace Timeline 3 FAT: Factory Acceptance Test | SAT: Site Acceptance Test | FIT: Functional Integration Test | PT: Performance Test

Why Integrated Marketplace? Net Benefits ~ $100 million/year Reduce total energy costs through centralized unit commitment while maintaining reliable operations Day-Ahead Market allows additional price assurance capability prior to real-time Includes new markets for Operating Reserve to support implementation of Consolidated Balancing Authority (CBA) and facilitate reserve sharing 4

5 CapabilityEISIntegrated Marketplace Transmission Reservations  Scheduling (internal/external)All ReservationsThird Party Reservations Transmission Congestion Rights  Energy Bilaterals  Day-Ahead Market  Real-Time Balancing Market  Operating Reserves and RegulationSelf-DesignatedMarket Unit CommitmentSelf-CommitmentCentralized Commitment Balancing AuthorityMultipleSingle EIS vs. Integrated Marketplace Features

SPP design leverages proven features from other RTO markets 6 6 CAISOERCOT Nodal MISOPJMSPP Marketplace Day-Ahead Market  Real-Time Market  Marginal Losses  Co-Optimization  Must Offer in Day-Ahead Market  Resource Make-Whole Payment  Transmission Congestion Rights/Auction Revenue Rights (TCR/ARR)  Virtual Energy 

Design was selective for regional differences 7 7 CAISOERCOT Nodal MISOPJMSPP Marketplace Combined-Cycle Special Handling Partial Implementation In Process  5-Minute Settlement  (Operating Reserve only)  Zonal Operating Reserve Cost Allocation  Installed Capacity Market Reliability Must Run 

8 8 SPP Integrated Marketplace Functions Time Day Ahead Reliability Unit Commitment Intra-Day RUC Real-Time Balancing Market Settlement Day Ahead Market Performs unit commitment Sets DA prices TCRs cleared Makes sure enough capacity committed for next operating time frame Real-Time dispatch much like today’s EIS Market ARR/TCR Auction

Day-Ahead Market Scope and Objective Determines least-cost solution to meet Energy Bids and Reserve requirements Participants submit Offers and Bids to purchase and/ or sell Energy and Operating Reserve: –Energy –Regulation-Up –Regulation-Down –Spinning Reserve –Supplemental Reserve 9

Day Ahead market makes regional generation choices 10

11 Benefits of Operating Reserves market Greater access to reserve electricity Improve regional balancing of supply and demand Facilitate integration of renewable resources

Day-Ahead Market to achieve cost-effective unit commitment “Must offer” for physical Resources proposed in market design Includes Offers/Bids for virtual supply and virtual Load Import/Export schedules may also be submitted Co-optimizes Energy and Operating Reserve and produces Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) and Market Clearing Prices (MCPs) to meet Energy Bids and Operating Reserve 12

Day-Ahead Market creates financially binding energy and commitment forecast Preliminary Unit Commitment is performed Creates financially-binding day-ahead schedule for Energy and Operating Reserve for Resources and Load that participate SPP guarantees revenue sufficiency of committed Resource Offers Transmission Congestions Rights are settled with these LMPs 13

Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Scope and Objective Day-Ahead RUC performed following Day-Ahead Market clearing Intra-Day RUC performed throughout Operating Day as needed, at least every four hours RUC ensures market physical commitment and produces adequate deliverable capacity to meet SPP Load Forecast and Operating Reserve requirements 14

RUC is in addition to Day-Ahead Market Every available Resource has to offer SPP guarantees revenue sufficiency of committed Resource Offers 15

Real-Time Balancing Market similar to today’s EIS - balancing Resources and Load. Uses Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) to ensure results are physically feasible Operates on continuous 5-minute basis –Calculates Dispatch Instructions for Energy and clears Operating Reserve by Resource Energy and Operating Reserve are co-optimized Settlements based on difference between results of RTBM process and Day-Ahead Market clearing Charges imposed on Market Participants for failure to deploy Energy and Operating Reserve as instructed 16

17 EIS Market BAs INDN CLEC EES CSWS SPRM EDE KCPL MPS KACY WRSECI OKGE WFEC SPS GRDA NPPD OPPD LES SPA SPP EIS BAs (16) XXX Not in EIS Market SPP is TSP (1) 1 st tier BAs XXX WAUE MEC MISO AMMO MISO AECI WSCC ERCOT

Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) and Transmission Congestions Rights (TCRs)

Annual TCR Auction Annual ARR Awards Monthly TCR Auction ARRs and TCRs allow Resource owners to be indifferent to unit commitment impact on congestion 19

Auction Revenue Right (ARRs) … Market Participant’s entitlement to a share of revenue generated in TCR auctions Allocated to Market Participants based on firm transmission rights (NITS or PTP) on SPP transmission grid Can be a credit or charge based on the TCR auction clearing price of the ARR path ARR HoldersAuction Revenue 20

Transmission Congestion Rights (TCRs) are… Financial Instruments that entitle owner to a stream of revenues or charges Based on hourly Day Ahead marginal congestion component differences across the path -OR- 21

ARRs awarded annually – are basis of TCRs ARRs allocated annually (in April) Market Participants nominate from Firm Transmission Service –Network Integrated Transmission Service agreement –Point to Point Firm Transmission Service Request ARRs awarded –Monthly –Seasonal –On Peak –Off Peak 22

How can I obtain TCRs? Annual TCR auction –Holder converts ARR –Purchase transmission capability Monthly TCR auction –Purchase “left over” transmission capability TCR secondary market 23

TCRs Process Overview 24

Settlement of ARRs/TCRs Net Auction revenues are allocated to holders of ARRs Daily TCR settlements use Day-Ahead Market prices Auction Revenues, congestion revenues, and congestion rights revenues are settled concurrently with the Operating Day. 25

Impact on SPP Members

New Member Activities: TCR Markets Staffing to support mock TCR Markets, starting by 2Q 2012 Staffing to support ARR processes and TCR auctions –Monthly/Seasonal ARR process & TCR auction (42 annual model inputs) –Monthly TCR auction (2 or 4 monthly model inputs) Staffing to support Secondary Market –Bulletin board system –Bilateral trading of existing TCRs 27

New Member Activities: Operations Staffing to support Day Ahead and Real-Time Balancing Market Develop Day-Ahead and Real-Time Decisional Data, including: –Three-Part Offers (Energy, Start Up, No Load) –Operating Reserve Offers (4 products) Work with vendors to develop software for internal use –Lead time is at least one year prior to delivery to MPs –SPP plans to meet with at least OATI, PCI, and ABB in February to review protocols and persuade development to begin 28

29 New Member Activities: Settlements Receive increased settlement statement detail –51 charge types vs. 7 currently and over 120 billing determinants Understand complex calculations involving market-wide totals or rates –Make Whole Payments, Marginal Loss Surplus Analyze Transmission Congestion Settlements Develop new system interactions Review processes for credit –Impacts of TCRs & ARRs Enhance reporting – internally and externally

Summary Although Integrated Marketplace implementation is March 2014, Market Participants need to prepare sooner: –Analyze internal staffing –Develop software products –Develop Offers and Bids 30

Integrated Marketplace: Regulatory Timeline Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1 Program timeline State Commissions SPP FERC NERC 31 Approval letters from State Commissions (10/1)State commission approvals (3/1) RTWG approval of Tariff revisions (11/18) MOPC reviews/approves Tariff revisions (12/6) Board approves Tariff revisions (1/31) File Tariff revisions (2/29) Conditional Order (6/29) Final conditional approval (12/31) File readiness/reversion plans (3/1) File readiness cert. (1/2) Final go-live order (1/31) NERC approves CBA cert. (12/4) Potential compliance filing (8/13)

Market Participant Milestones 32 TCR Market Trials Begins