Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.

Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.

Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.

AYP Status Determination in Smart Accountability Six Steps to Status.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP). AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS  Reading/ELA  Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate  Participation: 95% Participating.

Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)

Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.

Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.

Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.

ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.

AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.

2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.

School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.

Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.

August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.

Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.

Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.

Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.

School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.

University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

2012 Adequate Yearly Progress Preliminary Answers & other Important Information…

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.

NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.

2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.

Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check percent proficient.

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

The Implementation of House Bill 22

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Understanding AYP Campus Data

Texas State Accountability

How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement

MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.

Presentation transcript:

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA Math – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math Other – Attendance Rate For elementary and middle school campuses Districts not offering 12 th grade – Graduation Rate For high school campuses Districts offering 12 th grade

Standards for Performance % Proficient Math Reading % of students must pass in 2014

Student Groups Evaluated Performance Accountability Subset Participation All Students Enrolled Other Indicator Attendance & Graduation All Students Group African American* Hispanic* White* Economically Disadvantaged* Special Education* Limited English Proficient* All Students Group African American* Hispanic* White* Economically Disadvantaged* Special Education* Limited English Proficient* All Students Group only Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement. 200 = Always Evaluated | = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group *

AYP Status Labels Met AYP Missed AYP – (Reason) Reasons include: Math (Proficiency and/or Participation) Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation) Attendance Rate Graduation Rate

2 3 1 Accessing the AYP Report

2011 AYP Report Overview Page One Performance: Reading/ELA – 80% Proficient Reading Performance, – Used to demonstrate proficiency. Reading Performance, – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

Performance: Mathematics – 75% Proficient Math Performance, – Used to demonstrate proficiency. Math Performance, – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor) AYP Report Overview Page Two

Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics – 95% Participation Reading/ELA & Math Participation, – Used to demonstrate participation. Reading/ELA & Math Participation, – Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed AYP Report Overview Page Three

Graduation Rate (75%) or Attendance Rate (90%) Graduation or Attendance Rate, – Used to calculate whether or not the campus or district met the target rate. Graduation or Attendance Rate, – Used to demonstrate improvement. 5 Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate, – Class of AYP Report Overview Page Four

AYP Explanation Table Summarizes the results of the AYP report 2011 AYP Report Overview Page Five

2011 AYP Status [Our School District] Campus Name2011 StatusStage Sample Campus A Met AYP (Reading) Missed AYP (Math Stage 1, Year 1 Math Sample Campus BMet AYPNone

2011 AYP Performance Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

2011 AYP Performance Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

2011 AYP Participation Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

2011 AYP Participation Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

2011 AYP Graduation Rate For High Schools and Districts with a 12 th Grade

2011 AYP Attendance Rate For Elementary & Middle Schools and Districts Not Offering 12 th Grade