Macon County Winter District Data Meeting February 2014 Macon County Transportation Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.
Advertisements

Early Literary Success: Effective Intervention for Kindergarten Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties Washington Education Research Association 22nd.
Two-Way Bilingual Immersion (TWBI) Program Update Presented to the Board of Trustees By Maria Wetzel, Assistant Superintendent Nora Guerra, Director of.
1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.
1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2008)1 Oregon Reading First Conference Call Data-based Action Planning Winter 2008.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading II Planning Core/Benchmark, Strategic, & Intensive Interventions.
Kindergarten Math Fact Fluency Goal
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
School Wide Goals Goal 1: Students will demonstrate higher competencies in the areas of Reading/ELA, Math, Science, and Social Studies. Goal.
Assessment Dashboard January 2013 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
EOY Reading 3D NC Comparison Templates The following slides contain a combination of state-level EOY mCLASS reports paired with blank templates.
MTSS Math Assessment Protocol and Progress Monitoring Guidance Shawnee Mission School District Spring 2011.
Basic Math Facts Program Mt. Lebanon School District.
Program Effectiveness in GARF: Where Have We Been and Where Do You Need to Go?
RTI 2 Murfreesboro City Schools Lessons Learned Linda Gilbert, Director of SchoolsLinda Gilbert, Director of Schools Caresa Brooks, Coordinator, Reading/InterventionCaresa.
School Improvement Specialist Meeting
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
Read to Achieve Updates Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education Meeting January 30, 2014 Dr. Janie Costello.
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
Wake County Public School System
California Mini-CorpsOctober 10, Writing SMART Goals In order to become a team – a group of people working interdependently to achieve a common.
State of the School Midway Elementary Antonio Ingram, Principal.
Monitoring Basic Skills Progress (MBSP) Training Presentation
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
An exposition by Stephanie Stevens. What is DIBELS? DIBELS stands for Dynamic Indicators of Basic Literacy Skills. It is a form of assessment that is.
Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.
Using handheld computers to support the collection and use of reading assessment data Naomi Hupert.
The Early Learning Success Initiative Michigan State Board of Education September 14, 2010 Bob Sornson, Ph.D. Earlylearningfoundation.com.
Intensive Summer Literacy Program Kindergarten - Third Grade Davenport Community School District.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
Tallassee Elementary Summary of Effectiveness DIBELS Report Data Meeting May 9, 2012 Presenter: Cynthia Martin, ARI Reading Coach.
Interpreting data for program evaluation and planning.
K All Some Few System of Support Map.
Shades Mountain Elementary – 2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (A.Y.P.) Hoover City Schools State of the Mountain Shades Mountain Elementary August 2009 Shades.
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Elementary Middle School Expectation and Goal Setting Meeting June 26, 2009.
Early Literacy Implementation Reporting for Non-FAST Districts DECEMBER 15, 2014.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
STUDENT DATA Sixth Grade Language Arts. STUDENT DATA Fifth Grade Language Arts.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Central Intermediate Bixby Public Schools Goals Update “Greatness is the path we travel!
Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal.
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
Assistant Principal’s Meeting Miami-Dade County Public Schools
North Elementary Building Goals Mid-Year Review
Module 10 Assessment Logistics
Data-Based Leadership
Elementary Word Processing
Leveled Literacy Intervention
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Slides for Trainers The following images are available for training purposes. They are the copyrighted material of the DIBELS Data System, Center on Teaching.
STATE OF THE SCHOOL Northwest Elementary
Meadowlake Elementary
Griggs Elementary 1st Quarter ACIP Review Meeting November 2, 2016
Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Colchester Public Schools
Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Program Effectiveness in DERF: State-Level Action Plan
November 2017 Principal’s Report.
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
Literacy Updates.
Progression of Text Levels Expected in Grades 1 - 5
Presentation transcript:

Macon County Winter District Data Meeting February 2014 Macon County Transportation Center

Outcomes  Review School Mid-Term DIBELS Next Data  Revisit Progress Monitoring  Review Second-Nine Weeks District High Frequency Word Data  Make Connections between DIBELS Next, High Frequency Words and Progress Monitoring

Discussion What were the highlights of your school’s data meeting from January 2, 2014? Each school share out. Discussion What were the highlights of your school’s data meeting from January 2, 2014? Each school share out.

Macon County School District DIBELS Next Data Macon County School District DIBELS Next Data Winter Assessment Grade levelNumber Tested FallWinter Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade Third Grade Fourth Grade Fifth Grade Sixth Grade153151

Deborah Cannon Wolfe Elementary School Total Tested by Grades Grade levelNumber Tested FallWinter Kindergarten2526 First Grade1514 Second Grade2528 Third Grade1819 Fourth Grade18 Fifth Grade2625 Sixth Grade15

George Washington Carver Elementary School Total Tested by Grades Grade levelNumber Tested FallWinter Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade108 Third Grade Fourth Graden/a Fifth Graden/a

Notasugla High School Total Tested by Grades Grade levelNumber Tested FallWinter Kindergarten2422 First Grade1918 Second Grade1817 Third Grade16 Fourth Grade14 Fifth Grade16 Sixth Grade2524

Tuskegee Public School Total Tested by Grades Grade levelNumber Tested FallWinter Kindergartenn/a First Graden/a Second Graden/a Third Graden/a Fourth Grade9893 Fifth Grade108 Sixth Grade113111

School Data Review

Deborah Cannon Wolfe Instructional Recommendations by Grades Grade levelCore Benchmark Strategic Below Intensive Well Below KFall 14%416%2080% Winter 14%623%1973% 1stFall 320%213%1067% Winter 321%3 857% 2ndFall 416%1040%1144% Winter 414%725%1761% 3ndFall 211%844%8 Winter 632%526%842% 4thFall 16%00%1794% Winter 739%528%633% 5thFall 28%519%1973% Winter 520%624%1456% 6thFall 00%213%1387% Winter 214%2 1071%

George Washington Carver Instructional Recommendations by Grades Grade levelCore Benchmark Strategic Below Intensive Well Below KFall 4533%1914%7153% Winter 118%3425%9367% 1stFall 4128%2316%8156% Winter 4632%2719%6949% 2ndFall 1514%2624%6762% Winter 1413%3028%6459% 3ndFall 66%1514%8781% Winter 1211%2018%7871% 4thFall n/a Winter n/a 5thFall n/a Winter n/a 6thFall n/a Winter n/a

Notasugla High School Instructional Recommendations by Grades Grade levelCore Benchmark Strategic Below Intensive Well Below KFall 14%625%1771% Winter 418%1150%732% 1stFall 737%526%737% Winter 633%528%739% 2ndFall 16%317%1478% Winter 16%635%1059% 3ndFall 00% % Winter 319%213%1169% 4thFall 17%1 1286% Winter 964%17%429% 5thFall 00%319%1381% Winter 213%319%1169% 6thFall 520%728%1352% Winter 521%625%1354%

Tuskegee Public School Instructional Recommendations by Grades Grade levelCore Benchmark Strategic Below Intensive Well Below KFall n/a Winter n/a 1stFall n/a Winter n/a 2ndFall n/a Winter n/a 3ndFall n/a Winter n/a 4thFall 99%1111%7880% Winter 2325%1516%5358% 5thFall 76%1514%8680% Winter 2826%1817%6157% 6thFall 1816%2724%6860% Winter 5751%1110%4339%

Macon County District Instructional Recommendations by Grades Grade levelCore Benchmark Strategic Below Intensive Well Below KFall 4726%2916%10859% Winter 169%5127%11964% 1stFall 5128%3017%9855% Winter 5532%3520%8448% 2ndFall 2013%3926%9261% Winter 1912%4328%9159% 3ndFall 86%2316%11178% Winter 2114%2719%9767% 4thFall 118%12 9%10782% Winter 3932%2117%6351% 5thFall 96%2315%11879% Winter 3524%2718%8658% 6thFall 2315%3624%9461% Winter 6443%1913%6644%

Observations During Winter DIBELS Next Administration

Connection Between Progress Monitoring and DIBELS Next

Second Nine Weeks High Frequency Word Data Review

Observations During 2 nd Nine Weeks High Frequency Word Administration

Connections Between DIBELS Next, HFW and Progress Monitoring

Recap Outcomes  Review School Mid-Term DIBELS Next Data  Revisit Progress Monitoring  Review Second-Nine Weeks District High Frequency Word Data  Make Connection between DIBELS Next, High Frequency Words and Progress Monitoring