Accountability Report Example Elementary/Middle Level ELA Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the Accountability Report & Report Card Timothy Johnson David Scalzo Erie 1 BOCES Data Analysis Team. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
Understanding the Role of Data in the RttT Initiative Copyright Erie 1 BOCES RttT Network Team Presentation. January 2013.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Alternate Accountability Understanding the Alternate Accountability Process in Wisconsin June
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
WIDA MODEL™ Measure of Developing English Language.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
A Primer on Growth Percentiles Elementary/Middle School Progress Reports January 29, 2010.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Update on Middle Level Accountability May “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
New York State’s Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Presented by Walter Woodhouse December 7, 2012
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Using Data to Make Decisions Regarding Professional and Personalized Learning: WV General Summative Assessment – Part 1 County Chief Instructional Leadership.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Growth. 10/17/2015Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Growth. Growth Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student achievement and equity. Objectives.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
OAASFEP Report Card Update Marianne Mottley – October 13, 2015.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
February 2016 Our School Report Cards and Accountability Determinations South Lewis Central School District.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Subgroup Performance Evaluation Using NYSED Accountability Data Elem/Middle Level Version Timothy Johnson Erie 1 BOCES.
Top to Bottom and Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Lists Federally Approved Requirements for Identifying Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools August.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
The New York State Education Department
School Accountability Report Cards
Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Academic Growth Model Indicator Update
Understanding Learning Gains
Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress
Data Review CST (AYP) inserted into your SPSA by DTS
Celebration using Galileo Data
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Ohio’s Experience with AYP
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Growth Last updated: 08/20/09.
Starting Community Conversations
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Report Example Elementary/Middle Level ELA Performance

Elem/Middle Level Performance According to the Accountability Report our district did not meet AYP for ELA at the Elem/Middle Level for All Students, White, or SWD categories for There are large numbers of Students Scoring Level 2 not on track to proficiency How did this happen?

How is On track to Proficiency Determined?  Accountability Determinations FAQ April 2013 document #1 to #11  12AccountabilityDeterminationsFAQ.pdf 12AccountabilityDeterminationsFAQ.pdf  Which students get a student growth percentile and on-track designation?  Students in grades 4 through 7 receive a growth percentile and on- track designation, except for those students noted in Question 6. Students in grade 3 and 8 cannot receive an on-track designation and their performance is included in the PI based solely on their achievement level (i.e. Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, or Level 4).

Source: New Directons in Assessment, Data Use, and Accountability New York State Education Department Office of Accountability Ira Schwartz, Assistant Commissioner for DATAG Friday, July 13, 2012

Why do some students not have an on-track designation? Students who are Level 3 or 4 in the current or prior year do not receive an on-track designation; Students missing one or both assessment scores necessary to calculate growth between two years; Students in grade 3 do not receive a growth percentile or designation because there is no baseline assessment score from which to calculate growth; Students in grade 8 are not considered for on track to proficiency because this is the horizon for the designation, meaning students are either proficient or not in grade 8; Students with atypical grade progressions (students who skip or are retained in grade) are not included in growth percentile calculations o A student who is retained in grade cannot receive an on-track designation for the year in which the student was retained in grade (e.g., a student who as enrolled in the same grade in both and cannot get an on-track designation for ) o A student who skips a grade cannot receive an on-track designation for the year in which the student skipped the grade (e.g., a student who was in grade 4 in and grade 6 in ).

How do we see these students? To identify students who are considered on track and not on track in , review the Accountability Verification Reports available in the Level 2 Reporting (L2RPT) environment. For information on how to access these reports in L2RPT, see IRS - Level 2 Reports.

Drill on 223 to see student names

One way to Analyze In looking at these students figure out which ones are in this category based on the criteria of three years of data. To do this mark students who are in grades 3 and 8. Mark students who have fewer than 3 assessments. The rest should get AIS. Do the same for Level 1 Not on track to proficiency.

One way to Analyze Go back and look at the 3 rd and 8 th grade students and place them in AIS based on their performance on this year’s assessment (Level 1 and 2). Review the atypical students who have missed an assessment and use prior scores to determine AIS needs.

So….. – The bottom line is that you have to look at each student and ask “Will AIS help the student move into the on track to proficiency category?” – This process needs to involve educators who know your students. – You can’t give AIS to all the students in the “Not on track to proficiency category” as it is too costly!