2  Containment and negotiation, normally associated with standoff incidents may not be useful  Often better armed than initial responding officers 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRIMES IN PROGRESS An examination of the procedures and techniques for handling crimes in progress. Emphasis is given to the use of safety precautions.
Advertisements

Active Shooter Incidents The Community Response
Active Shooter on Campus. Training Objectives Define various shooting situations Define various shooting situations List measures that can be employed.
RESPONSE TO ACTIVE SHOOTERS
STAGE 1: FAILED ROBBERY T4 T5 T9 S6 S7 T3 T8 T1 T2 P2 P3 P1
Single Officer Response to Active Threats
CEDAR RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT CEDAR RAPIDS IA ACTIVE SHOOTER RESPONSE AND AWARENESS.
An active shooter event involves one or more persons engaged in killing or attempting to kill multiple people in an area occupied by multiple unrelated.
1 Rapid Response to Active Shooters in Schools and Public Buildings Presenters: Tom Canta Bubba Jones Bubba Jones Eddie Helmert Eddie Helmert.
Critical Incident First Responder Responsibilities & Tactics.
1. Possible Circumstances Terrorist Hostage/Barricade Situation Crime in Progress Domestic Violence Prison/Detention facility Suicidal 2.
 Special Operations Units in the military have utilized TEMS for years  Recognize the value in immediate treatment.
Violence on Campus Prevention & Response. Active threat defined An active threat can be defined as: A person whose immediate activity can cause death.
Practical Response to Active Shooters. Purpose of Training: Primary objective is to SURVIVE Developing a Survivor Mindset Practical Responses to Threats.
Active Shooter Response
Resolving Conflicts & Preventing Violence
Mainstream and Crosscurrents, Second Edition Chapter 7 Issues in Policing.
POLICE, FIRE, AND EMS Rapid Treatment for a Hostile Action/Active Shooter Response Introduction and Overview v1.0 The Rapid Treatment Model of.
Module 2 Tactical Overview.
03/07Foothills Special Enforcement Team 10 Things for Patrol…When SWAT is on the way. Presented by the Foothills Special Enforcement Team (FSET)
PRIORITIES OF FORCE CONDITIONS GIVEN IN A CONFERENCE PRESENTATION ON THE PRIORITIES OF FORCE.
VIOLENT CRIMES 1ST DEGREE MURDER SECOND DEGREE MURDER MANSLAUGHTER
ACTIVE SHOOTER.  An Active Shooter is an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area and there.
Active Shooter Captain Donald Lang. Training Objectives Define various shooting situations Define various shooting situations List measures that can be.
School Safety Staff / Students / Visitors
Instructional Goal To teach Fire Department personnel how to effectively respond to an Active Shooter situation and operate cooperatively in the “warm.
School Safety Mr. Steven Nedlik, Director of Operations & Security.
Workplace Violence and Security Planning 2014
Introduction to the Public Safety System Created by Curt Harrell & Jesse Kuzy for.
Technician Module 2 Unit 2 Slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 2 Planning, Assessment & Analysis.
Shooters in Schools School District & Law Enforcement Joint Response.
SCHOOL VIOLENCE. THE BATH SCHOOL DISASTER OF 1927 – 45 VICTIMS 38 schoolchildren, aged 7-14, were killed when a series of bombs went off in Bath Township,
The Law Governing the Use of Force. The Use of Force The use of force on another is unlawful unless it is justified Justification requires a showing that.
Campus Guide to Active Shooter MCLNO Police Department.
Crime Prevention COUNTERING TERRORISM In Our Schools ©This TCLEOSE approved Crime Prevention Curriculum is the property of CSCS-ICJS SBLE CERTIFICATION.
Crimes Against the Person. Personal Crimes Crimes against the person include: Homicide, assault, battery, and rape.
Crisis Response at SMU Overview and Training May 9, 2012 Town Hall Crisis Response Team.
Violence on Campus Prevention & Response. Active threat defined An active threat can be defined as: A person whose immediate activity can cause death.
Wait for the Police? Is this a sufficient defensive strategy for an Active Killer event? Tragic events in schools, churches, hospitals, malls, and workplaces.
1 Active Assailant. 2 Performance Objectives By the end of this training, you will be able to: 1. Describe two past Active Assailant incidents and their.
Active Shooter Incidents
Unit Five Criminal and Juvenile Justice Unit Five Crimes are made up of certain elements –The conditions that make up a crime ie Robbery –Taking of goods.
The defendant may present evidence to show that (1) no criminal act was committed: –Example: he did not commit rape because he woman consented. (2) no.
Chapter 13 Lessons Three & Four (Pages ) VIOLENCE PROTECTION & OVERCOMING ABUSE.
Active Shooter on Campus. Active Shooter is Not a New Phenomenon  May 18, 1927 in Bath Township, MI  School board member Andrew Kehoe  Three explosions.
UCSF Police and Campus Community Response to Critical Incidents “Active Shooter….Prepare to Survive!”
Facilitated by: Charlie Bunn RN CEN CCRN. A History Lesson. Law Enforcement procedural change after the Columbine tragedy. List measures that can be employed.
Surviving an Active Shooter Presentation to the Mott Community College Faculty January 26, 2016.
Civilian Response. Sergeant Dan Gomes 10 years Law Enforcement 9 years assigned to SWAT Active Shooter Instructor NTAC Officer Past assignments in Narcotics,
Active Shooter on Campus
The Community Response
Active Shooter Preparedness
Responding To An Active Shooter Campus Community Training Session
ACTIVE SHOOTER RESPONSE
USE OF NON- LETHAL WEAPONS IN SRI LANKA
Active Shooter Survival
Instructor : Scott A. Farally
Be Pioneer Prepared: Active Shooter Awareness
Violence on Campus Prevention & Response.
Mitigating the Loss of Life: The Rescue Task Force Approach
Active Shooter Response Training
ACTIVE THREAT RESPONSE
Active Shooter How to survive. Lt. James Reese
Active Shooter on Campus
The Definition of an Active Shooter
The International Legal Rules on the Use of Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials Model Presentation.
Disaster Medical Operations — Part 1
Active Shooter on Campus
This presentation is provided by the Monterey County Fire Training Officers Association. It intended for use by Monterey County public safety personnel.
Disaster Medical Operations — Part 1
Presentation transcript:

2  Containment and negotiation, normally associated with standoff incidents may not be useful  Often better armed than initial responding officers  May have planned attack to include sustained confrontation with police  Escape from police is usually not a priority  May employ some type of diversion

3  Usually suicidal, either by self-inflicted wound or by “suicide by cop”  Some degree of familiarity with the location they choose for their attack  Event may turn from active to static and back again  May become barricaded subject if access to victims is stopped

4  Barricaded Suspect/Hostage Taker  In a position of advantage, is armed, and has displayed violence  Suspect may or not be holding hostages and there is no indication that suspect is causing death or serious bodily injury. A STATIC SITUATION  Active Assailant deployment is NOT to be used in this situation or similar situations  Traditional response (perimeter negotiation)

 In the case of an Active Shooter event, an Incident Command system will be setup in order:  Get officers needed to respond  Emergency Care  Control of movement  Communication between agencies involved  One point of contact in order to deal with situation

HOSTAGE/BARRICADED SUBJECT VS. ACTIVE SHOOTER

One or more terrorists or criminals hold people against their will and try to hold off authorities by force, threatening to kill the hostages if provoked or attacked.  The 5 Cs:  Contain  Control  Communicate  Call SWAT  Create a Plan

 “One or more subjects who participate in a random or systematic shooting spree, demonstrating their intent to continuously harm others. An active shooter’s overriding objective appears to be that of mass murder, rather than criminal conduct such as robbery, kidnapping, etc.” - NTOA

 Texas Tower – 1966 – resolved by patrol – created need for SWAT.  Columbine High School – 1999 – recognition that these events need to be resolved by patrol.  Beslan, Russia – 2004 – 49 Terrorists took over school. 314 hostages killed (186 children), 21 soldiers killed, 32 terrorists killed (17 escaped).  Mumbai – 2008 – 10 Terrorists gunned down 172 people over a 60 hour time span  Each incident has been taken into consideration in how we deal with and tactics involved in resolving situations.

 Stay Together  540 Cover/Security Around the Team  Communicate  Cover Angles  Threshold Evaluation (Slice the Pie)  Speed

 Innocent Civilians  First Responders  Actors/Suspects  Property

 Team Movement Techniques  Deliberate – slow/unknown location  Direct to Threat – known location

 Solo (extigent, no back-up, actionable intel)  2 (Tethered & Side by Side)  3 (Tethered & Side by Side)  4 (Diamond, T, Y, Box, Heavy Head)  5 (Special Skills/Double Rear Guard)

TETHERED SIDE X SIDE

TETHERED

DIAMOND T Y

BOX HEAVY HEAD

SPECIAL SKILLS DOUBLE REAR GUARD

 Security – Isolate, Distract & Neutralize Gunman.  Immediate Action Plan – Establish hallway security and follow-on plan.  Medical – identify, triage & treat injured

 “Bomb Cover” – appears that bomb thrown will stop 15’ or more from team  - seek cover, 90 degree offset/ create air gap  “Bomb Go” - when thrown device lands within 15’ of team  - move quickly past device and engage suspect throwing the device.

 Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Tactics (ALERRT) 