Development of a New Inspection Regime by the Paris MoU Panama Maritime IX 8-11 February 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMO Goal Based New Construction Standards Seminar in Heraklion 17 October 2005 Dragos Rauta INTERTANKO.
Advertisements

TITLE 5 – PORT STATE CONTROL
SESSION 9 TITLE 5 - COMPLAINTS RP.
SESSION 3 TITLE 5 – FLAG STATE INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION.
Structure of dangerous goods Maritime Office in Gdynia.
How will the regulation work? How to follow up the regulation?
Transport EU Maritime Security Policy and legislation Christian DUPONT Deputy Head of Unit for Maritime & Land Transport Security DG Mobility and Transport.
TANKER DAMAGE STABILITY
Port Reception Facilities Curtis A Roach Regional Adviser (Caribbean) International Maritime Organization FIRST HEMISPHERIC CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL.
Strategic Directions in Port State Control Benefits of Assessing Ship Risk Chris Barnes Maritime Operations
“Are Port Reception Facilities Adequate?” By: Joan M. Bondareff Counsel, Blank Rome LLP NAMEPA Norfolk, VA April 16, 2015.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Port State Control.
EU Maritime Security Policy and legislation
Legal aspects of the marine environment protection and oil transportation: example of the Baltic Sea.
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Bulk Carrier Benchmarking Mr Rob Lomas 13 October 2006.
SSTP GlobalMET Deck Cadet Structured Shipboard Training Program
Classification Societies – Contribution to Martime Safety Gesa Heinacher-Lindemann LL.M., Legal Director.
Online Learning 1 Marine Facility Personnel with Security Responsibilities Canaport LNG
USCG Port State Control and Qualship 21 Programs Presented by Commander Paul Thorne, USCG Chief, Foreign and Offshore Vessels Division U.S. Coast Guard.
Concerns of a Coastal State by Christian Breinholt.
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (IMS) OCT 2011 R. Nahon.
Seminar K M A 12 – 13 June 2007 Christer Bergquist – Kalmar Maritime Academy1 SAFE TRANSPORTATION AT SEA A Baltic Sea perspective – Requirements on vessels.
special training requirements for personnel on certain types of ships
2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code – Port State Control Perspective Jeff Lantz Director, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards.
Mediterranean MoU 7th Committee Meeting on PSC Alexandria, EGYPT 31st January - 2nd February A Presentation by INTERTANKO Port State Control Capt.
PORT STATE CONTROL The Singapore Experience Tan Kim Liang Senior PSCO, MPA 2 December 2003.
Cefic Workshop Good Practices for Ship Vetting Brussels 12 October 2011.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
4 th BRUSSELS SEMINAR MAY 6 th /7 th “THE CURRENT STATE OF PLAY” A review of ECASBA activity over the past year JONATHAN C. WILLIAMS FICS GENERAL.
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Presentation to the Public Forum, Anchorage March 29th, 2005.
1 The statistical approach for monitoring maritime safety used and developed by EMSA Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production and development of maritime.
Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO HELLENIC - MEDITERRANEAN PANEL Athens, March 2012 Update on the Environmental Committee’s Activities by.
HZS ISPS ISPS 2. Maritime Security Policy.
Prevention of pollution by harmful substances in packaged form
Tripartite Meeting Seoul, Korea, September 2009 Safety & SOLAS Agenda item 4.1 Goal-Based Standards --- application and compliance --- Toshiro Arima.
Safety and Marine Environment Protection; prospects we face - the EU perspective Marten Koopmans Permanent representative of the European Commission to.
1 Production of reliable and comparable statistical information in EMSA: from raw data to maritime knowledge Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production.
Statistics for Tankers in Paris & Tokyo MOUs vs B/C – All ships Period 2003 –
| 1 European Maritime Day 2010 Gijon Workshop 2.9 Shipping in the Common European Maritime Space Gijón, 21 May 2010 European maritime transport space without.
Mutual concerns of oil transporters and a coastal state - a Danish perspective Andreas Nordseth, Director, Danish Maritime Authority.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
One Inspection, Two Inspections, Three Inspections, More Peter M Swift.
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS 1 Under the new regime established by Directive 2009/16 in the UK. The new EU directive came into force in June 2009 It.
Tripartite Discussions Beijing 2005, 31 st Oct – 1 st Nov Agenda Item Europe 3 rd Maritime Safety Package Speakers: Chris Horrocks Secretary General.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 6: Port State Control.
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
1 Oil Transfer on the Baltic Sea – Conflicts and Solutions. CCB Conference 2004, May 2004, Nelijärve, 22 May 2004, Nelijärve, Estonia Estonia May.
CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN – CREW FAMILIARISATION ON ENCLOSED SPACE ENTRY Pat Dolby Inspection Operations Manager UK MCA.
ENTRY INTO DANGEROUS/ ENCLOSED SPACES Changes to UK regulations Julie Carlton Seafarer Safety and Health Manager February 2016.
INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Mumbai 19th September 2005 Port State Control Related Issues Capt Howard N. Snaith. Master Mariner. M.N.I. Director, Marine,
MLC Compliance for the Yachting Sector - Workshop Chamber of Commerce 23 rd March 2016 Dr. Nicholas Valenzia PORT STATE CONTROL An Introduction.
To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.
SOLAS and SAR JIHOON WI.
Tim Wilkins Helsinki 7th March 2006
BWM Updates William Burroughs |February 23, 2017 Houston, TX.
Chapter 6 Question-and-Answer.
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS
GCC CODE “THE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR SHIPS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS” THE CABINET RESOLUTION NO.(29) OF 2013.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
Mr. Fredrik Larsson Marine Manager
Open Forum for Exchanging Views with Industry
Environmental concerns
PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS
BACKGROUND 1987 Joint MSC/MEPC working group on:
IMO MSC 96 Summary Report London, 11 to 21 May 2016 BUREAU VERITAS
Training Policy in the Paris MoU
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
Noor Vergeer, Wojtek Kalocinski Border management and Schengen
Presentation transcript:

Development of a New Inspection Regime by the Paris MoU Panama Maritime IX 8-11 February 2009

Paris MOU on Port State Control New Inspection Regime – NIR In force 1 January 2011 Developed by Paris MoU Task Force 31 Recasting of EU Directive 95/21/EC in parallel

Paris MOU on Port State Control New Inspection Regime – NIR System of risk based targeting, selection and inspection based on following principles: Ensure full coverage of ships visiting ports and anchorages Adhere to provisions of IMO and ILO Conventions Establish risk profiles for ships Define intervals between inspections Reduce inspection intervals for LRS Increase inspection intervals for HRS

Paris MOU on Port State Control New Inspection Regime – NIR Principles (continued): Include performance of company in risk profile Extend refusal of access to all ship types Share total inspection commitments fairly Extend reporting requirements of pilots to deep sea pilots Target ships which carry noxious and dangerous cargo Prevent ports of convenience Maintain quality and efficiency of current regime Use resources efficiently Establish areas of inspection based on risk

Paris MOU on Port State Control Ship Risk Profile Final version agreed in December 2008: Instead of a target factor every ship has a risk profile based on: Type, age, flag, RO Company – an important new development Detentions and deficiencies A ship will be either High, Standard or Low Risk

High Risk Ship (HRS)Low Risk Ship (LRS) Criteria Weighting points Criteria Type Oil, Chemical, Gas Bulk, Passenger 2All types Age> 12 yrs1All ages Flag BGW-list Black - VHR, HR, M to HR 2 White Black – MR 1 IMO-Audit - -Yes Recognized Organisation Performance H--High M--- LLow 1 - VLVery Low- EU recognised--Yes CompanyPerformance H--High M--- LLow 2 - VLVery Low- Nr of def. recorded in each insp. within pr. 36 months DeficienciesNot eligible- ≤ 5 (and at least 1 insp. carried out in pr. 36 months) Nr of detentions within pr. 36 months Detentions≥ 2 detentions1 No Detention HRS = 5 points* LRS = all criteria* SRS = not HRS or LRS

> For example the following combinations have 5 points: a) Oil tanker (2 pts.), black listed flag, HR (2 pts.), and low RO performance (1 pt.) b) Container ship (0 pts.), more than 12 years old (1 pt.), black listed flag, MR to HR (2 pts.), very low RO performance (1 pt.), and ≥ 2 detentions in last 36 months (1 pt.) c) Bulk carrier (2 pt.), black listed flag, VHR (2 pts.), and ≥ 2 detentions in last 36 months (1 pt.) d) General cargo ship (0 pts.), more than 12 years old (1 pt.), low RO performance (1 pt.), low company performance (2 pts.), and ≥ 2 detentions in last 36 months (1 pt.) Ship Risk Profile

Paris MOU on Port State Control Company performance Company Performance Formula: Taking into account detention and deficiency history of all ships in a (ISM) company’s fleet Calculated daily over a 36 month period ISM deficiencies 5 points. Others 1 point Refusal of access (banning): above average detention index Performance: high, medium, low, very low

> Every ship eligible for a periodic inspection as follows: High Risk Ship (HRS) every 5-6 months Standard Risk Ship (SRS) every months Low Risk Ship (LRS) every months Periodic Inspections

Periodic Inspections continued When the “inspection window” opens it is Priority II it may be inspected When the “inspection window” is closed it is Priority I it must be inspected

Additional Inspections Other factors can trigger an additional inspection  Overriding factors are Priority I – for example: collision illegal discharge unsafe manoeuvring suspended or withdrawn class not in database >

Additional Inspections continued  Unexpected factors are Priority II – for example: outstanding deficiencies previously detained ships (after 3 months) complaint cargo problems Recommended pilotage scheme not followed in entrance to Baltic Sea

Expanded Inspections Periodic inspections will be expanded for all HRS and risky types (tanker,bulker,pax)>12 years old Additional inspections may be expanded according to the professional judgement of the PSCO if HRS or risky type >12 years old

Scope of inspections Initial checks overall condition as with current regime Expanded checks: overall condition in a list of 14 risk areas e.g. weather tightness, emergency systems, living conditions PLUS a list of specified items for each ship type >

Scope of inspections continued More detailed checks: the risk areas where clear grounds are established the risk areas relevant to any overriding or unexpected factors other risk areas at random The depth of inspection in each area or on each specified item remains the professional judgement of PSCO

Simplified banning procedures Applies to ALL ship types (currently only oil, gas, chemical bulk and passenger) >2 detentions in 3 years if black flag >2 detentions in 2 years if grey flag Plus minimum period of ban 3 months for 1 st ban 12 months for 2 nd ban 24 months for 3 rd ban, conditional 4 th ban will be indefinite >