Integration Open Questions (some urgent questions only … ) ◊Position of the couplers ? ◊Will there be a separate cryoline? ◊Architecture of the RF power:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XTCAV X-Band Transverse Deflecting Cavity Project Overview Patrick Krejcik Yuantao Ding, Joe Frisch.
Advertisements

Progress and Plan for Superconducting RF Cavity RF Group.
SPL Integration Layout Impact on cryo and vacuum sectorisation ◊ Underground obstacles, constraints on slope and length of the SPL ◊ Continuous cryostat.
MuCool RF Status MICE Collaboration Meeting June 7-10, 2006, Fermilab A. Moretti June 9, 2006.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
Possible Assembly and Test of the Crab cryomodule in SM18 at CERN P. Maesen LHC Crab Cav meeting, 17 Sep’ 09 LHC-CC09Cryomodule Assembly & Test Stand.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
Christopher Nantista ILC 2 nd Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC January 18, …… …… …… … ….
STF Plan & Schedule H. Hayano, KEK. Superconducting RF Test Facility Comprehensive Test Facility dedicated to ILC SC-RF R&D (expandable to FEL, ERL) for.
Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL CERN, 9 th -10 th November 2009 Workshop Organisation and Goals Vittorio Parma TE-MSC.
High Power RF Systems, Control and Distribution in the HINS Alfred Moretti, Brian Chase, Chris Jensen and Peter Prieto Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee.
STF plan overview H. Hayano, KEK LCPAC 02/25/2005.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
STF status Mar.22,2005 H. Hayano, KEK. STF Phase 1 Test Accelerator DC gun : 200kV CsTe photocathode for quick start UV(262nm) Laser (337ns spacing, 2820bunches)
Linac R&D Update May 15, L-Band Source Consists of a LLRF system (VME/Epics based), a SNS High Voltage Converter Modulator (on loan), a Thales 2104C.
Cryogenics in SPS & LHC (2 K / 4.5 K) LHC-CC11, 14 November 2011 L. Tavian, CERN, TE-CRG With the contribution of N. Delruelle, G. Ferlin & B. Vullierme.
W. 3rd SPL collaboration Meeting November 12, 20091/23 Wolfgang Hofle SPL LLRF simulations Feasibility and constraints for operation with more.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
Orsay, Sergio Calatroni - CERN 1 CERN facilities for Superconducting RF S. Calatroni, J.-P. Delahaye, J. Tückmantel, B. Vullierme.
1 SPL Collaboration Meeting dec 08 - WG1 Introduction First SPL Collaboration Meeting Working Group 1 High Power RF Distribution System Introduction.
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan; H. Hayano ILC10 GDE meeting.
CLIC08 workshop CLIC module layout and main requirements G. Riddone, on behalf of the CMWG Home page of the TBM WG:
ESS RF System Design Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP2 4-May-2012.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Experience with LEP (and LHC) cryo-modules Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL O.Brunner – November ’09.
Road map of the workshop Machine availability: – “work-horse” in the injection chain – 100% availability not viable,.What is achievable? And at which cost?
Test plan for SPL short cryomodule O. Brunner, W. Weingarten WW 1SPL cryo-module meeting 19 October 2010.
BCD input from WG2 WG2 12/08/2005 H. Hayano Chris Adolphsen Terry Garvey Hitoshi Hayano.
cern.ch 1 A. Samoshkin 28-Feb-2011 Progress on CDR module design.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
Cryogenics for crab cavities – SPS/LHC 2 nd HiLumi LHC meeting – Frascati (Italy) 15 November 2012 K. Brodzinski and L. Tavian on behalf of cryogenic team.
Status of the SPL study R. Garoby – 25/11/2010 Fifth SPL Collaboration Meeting November 2010 / CERN.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
SLHC WG3 (Cryomodule) summary & plan with recommendation to the CB V.Parma, CERN TE-MSC P. DUTHIL, IN2P3-CNRS 3rd SPL collaboration meeting, CERN
Dimensions, pressures and temperatures of cryogenic circuits for the SPL U. Wagner TE-CRG.
LHC Cryostat evaluation Nikolay Solyak Thanks Rama Calaga, Tom Peterson, Slava Yakovlev, Ivan Gonin C11 workshop. FNAL, Oct 27-28, 2008.
High power RF tests places at CERN O. Brunner, CERN 4th SPL Collaboration Meeting jointly with ESS.
MAIN LINAC CRYOMODULE DESIGN REVIEW INPUT COUPLER September 5, 2012V. Veshcherevich.
ESGARD – OMIA 10 & 11/09/2007 JRA on Sc cavities and Cryomodule for a Pulsed proton Linac Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources R. Garoby for S.
Cryogenic Cooling Schemes for the SPL U. Wagner TE-CRG.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Low Beta Cryomodule Development at Fermilab Tom Nicol March 2, 2011.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
Workshop on cryogenic & vacuum sectorisation of the SPL Vacuum Sectorisation Paul Cruikshank, CERN Technology Department (TE) Vacuum Surfaces & Coatings.
Survey for SPL Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP/SU. Outline 12/11/2008 Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP-SU, Survey for SPL 2  Scope & Main Parameters  Technical Description.
ILC R&D Activities at KEK Superconducting Linac Development Beam-handling Technology Development.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
Linac 4 SPL tunnel Material access and services shaft Personnel and material access shaft Klystron gallery Emergency exit shaft Transfert line to PS2 Personnel.
FCC Infrastructure & Operation Update on the cryogenics study Laurent Tavian CERN, TE-CRG 28 October 2015.
SPL RF coupler: integration aspects
Cryogenics storage and distribution
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
WP5 Elliptical cavities
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
ILC-SCRF Test Facilities considerations
BA6 – crab cavity activities in EYETS
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
A frequency choice for the SPL machine: Impact on hardware
Project X: Cryogenic Segmentation Issues
Second SPL Collaboration Meeting, Vancouver May 2009
SPL Collaboration Meeting PAC2009
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
Wolfgang Anders, BESSY, Berlin
Overview of Day One – 29 Feb 2016
Cryostats Some ideas for the new Q1 to Q3 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting
ILC - Global Design Effort
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
LINAC 3 Meeting ICL machines Injectors
Presentation transcript:

Integration Open Questions (some urgent questions only … ) ◊Position of the couplers ? ◊Will there be a separate cryoline? ◊Architecture of the RF power: ◊Number of cavity per klystron ? ◊Size of the modulators for LP-SPL and HP-SPL versions ? ◊In case of one klystron for 2 cavities (or more?), where do we install the waveguide splitting? ◊Can we have 80m long waveguides?

Position of the couplers ? ◊Coupler should be vertical: ◊Reduces stress on ceramic during transport ◊Improved stability of the antenna ◊Arguments for locating the coupler below the cavity ◊Couplers are more complex and difficult to clean than cavities: experience from SNS and Jefferson Lab is that dust particles keep falling from the couplers … ◊Couplers below allows to better optimize the space for the cryogenics headers after the introduction of the cavity train with mounted couplers inside the cryostat. ◊Still, no reason to support the modules from the ceiling and they will be installed on jacks sealed on the tunnel floor

Will there be a separate cryoline? ◊Heat load of HP-SPL may require a separate cryoline ◊Fine cryogenic sectorisation is very attractive: ◊Fast exchange of module – no need to warm-up a long string ◊Warm sector valves to limit the propagation of air + dust in case of leakage or valve manipulation hiccup ◊Flexibility to re-arrange the modules according to their performances ◊Tunnel size and integration layout will leave the possibility to install a separate cryoline

Architecture of the RF power: ◊Number of cavity per klystron? ◊LP-SPL baseline is IOT (one per cavity) in the β=.65 region and 2 cavities per klystron in the β=1 region ◊HP-SPL would require to double the number of klystrons in the β=1 region ◊Size of the modulators for HP-SPL versions ? ◊Modulator for the HP-SPL would be in the  10m 2 per cavity  difficult to envisage 240 of those underground! ◊Splitting of the modulator (capacitor charger on surface and pulse former in tunnel) still needs to be studied ◊Magnetron power sources could allow a large gain of underground space, but the technique still needs to be verified ◊Can we have 80m long waveguides? ◊Ok for feed-back system ◊Important dissipated heat load (~7% of RF power), should try to use large (WR1150) waveguides ◊One waveguide per cavity is confirmed whatever the layout

Linac 4 SPL tunnel Material access and services shaft Personnel and material access shaft Klystron gallery Emergency exit shaft Personnel passage Emergency exit shaft Transfert line to PS2