UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Does owning a solar array make you a utility?...and other questions A presentation to the Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Andrew Melnykovych.
Advertisements

Energy Storage in California’s Grid of the Future Don Liddell, Douglass & Liddell Co-Founder and General Counsel, California Energy Storage Alliance ​
Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Discussion Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Meeting September 21, 2012 Discussion of.
Net Metering and Interconnection A Policy Perspective Brad Klein Staff Attorney Envt’l Law & Policy Center March 28, 2007.
Containing the Cost of California’s RPS Yuliya Shmidt, Senior Analyst February 2, 2012.
Net Metering and Interconnection Requirements IMUA 2015 Annual Conference May 8, 2015 Delia Patterson General Counsel, APPA.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Large Generator Interconnection Final Rule RM July 23, 2003.
Small Farm Profitability: Is Wind Energy the Answer? 1
Energy Policy Levers. 2 State as a Taxing Authority Income tax credits or deductions Income tax credits or deductions Residential Alternative Energy Tax.
The Alternative Energy Policy Landscape Surrounding AR.
Introduction to Bonneville Power Administration
Discussion of Feed-in Tariff Pilot Programs September 18, 2013 Presentation to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly 1.
Creating A Cleaner Energy Future For the Commonwealth Focusing on Solar PV: Technology, Siting Considerations, Incentives Natalie Andrews Renewable Energy.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Selling Residential Solar—A Market Based Approach Presented by: Gerald Bernstein, Stanford Transportation Group and Claire Starry, TDS Economics Presented.
California’s Renewable Energy Credits (REC) Market Update
Wind Incentives and Regulations. US Department of Energy National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO.
Creating A Greener Energy Future For the Commonwealth Procurement of Renewable Energy on Landfills January 19, 2010 Courtney Feeley Karp, Esq.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Small Renewable Generators Tony Marciano Public Utility Commission of Texas May 2, 2007 (512)
Net Metering Fall 2009 Customer Meetings. What is Net Metering?  Net metering allows the meter to “run backwards” and record generation in excess of.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
Energy Advisory Board February 2, 2005 Act 213 Proposed Technical Guidance Overview PA DEP.
Sec. 5 RE-REGULATION- EPAct 1992 FERC Orders 888 and 889 (1996) EPAct 2005 In short these three laws move the power industry towards an increase in competition.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Renewable Generation Interconnection Ken Brunkenhoefer Distributed Generation Consultant
Distributed Generation Task Force November 29, 2007 TAC Report.
Reasons for Pursuing DG in Ontario Presented by: Mark Wolnik Markham Energy Corp -Director March 5, 2003.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Role of the Commission and Recent Policy Actions Interconnection Workshop Carol Revelt Utah Public Service Commission December 4, 2007.
Chelan County PUD PURPA Hearing Fuel diversity Fossil fuel efficiency Chelan County PUD November 19, 2007.
Utah Geothermal Power Generation Workshop Regulatory Issues August 17, 2005 Presented by Becky Wilson Utility Economist Utah Public Service Commission.
1 Distributed Renewable Generation Legislation as of 5/02/07  SB 483 by Fraser- Relating to the regulation of electric generation capacity ownership in.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Legal Disclaimers and Admonitions PROTOCOL DISCLAIMER This presentation provides a general overview of the Texas Nodal.
Overview of the Grid Clean Power Plan and Tribes October 15, 2015 webinar.
Utility Procurement: What’s Next? IEP 2015 Annual Conference
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
Demand Response
Renewable Energy Act of 2008
Vermont Public Service Board October 15, 2010 Vermont RPS Study Overview.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
ROK-PH Partneship: Exploring Cooperation in Renewable Energy Mr. Ariel D. Fronda Division Chief, Geothermal Energy Management Division Renewable Energy.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Renewable energy support schemes in the Republic of Moldova
Distributed Generation Task Force
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
3rd ELIPTIC webinar 9 April 2018 Hartwig von Bredow
Current as of 12/12/2017 RES-BCT.
Advancing Solar PV at Lower Cost: Performance Based Incentives, Price Certainty, and Equitable Rate Treatment Ronald Gerwatowski – Senior VP, National.
Net Metering John McComb: P.E.
The Need for Compensatory Standby Rates
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Environmental Sustainability Manager
Future Energy Jobs Act: Public Sector Impacts
Net Metering John McComb: P.E.
Clean Energy Options for GRC Communities
NYS Department of Public Service
Arizona Public Service Company 2012 Renewable Energy Standard Implementation Plan Arizona Corporation Commission Open Meeting August 17, 2011.
Herb Stevens Jeff Lesk Genevieve Hulick
Maine’s Look at Distributed Generation
Solar Energy Commercialization Utility Scale Business:
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Application to PV Systems
Commissioner Anne C. George
Presentation transcript:

UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission UTC’s mission is to protect consumers ensuring that utility and transportation services are fairly priced, available, reliable and safe. Regulates rates and services offered by investor- owned utilities (IOUs), including electric and natural gas utilities. 2

Washington State Utilities 3 23 Public Utility Districts 19 Municipal Utilities 16 Cooperative Utilities 3 Investor- Owned Utilities

Defining “Distributed Generation” RCW (10): “Electric generation connected to the distribution level of the transmission and distribution grid, which is usually located at or near the intended place of use.” U.S. Department of Energy: “Small-scale electric generation that feeds into the distribution grid, rather than the bulk transmission grid, whether on the utility side of the meter or on the customer side.” For purposes of qualifying for multiple renewable energy credits in Washington, RCW (9): “An eligible renewable resource where the generation facility or any integrated cluster of such facilities has a generating capacity of not more than five megawatts.” 4

UTC Interim Study on Distributed Generation At the request of the House TEC Committee, Rep. Deborah Eddy invited the UTC to conduct a study of distributed generation issues applicable to IOUs. Purpose: Provide background information about distributed generation; Identify opportunities and challenges facing IOUs and their ratepayers in developing distributed generation; and Offer recommendations on available options to encourage the development of cost-effective distributed generation in areas served by investor-owned utilities. 5

Regulatory Structure – Washington Net-Metering Law RCW requires large utilities to offer consumer generators of renewable resources the option for net metering for projects up to 100 kW. Up to 0.25% of a utility’s peak capacity available for generation projects (will increase to 0.5% in 2014). Program allows a consumer-generator to offset electricity provided by the utility to that customer, and any excess energy produced by the customer in excess of use within a given billing period is credited equally to the following billing period. Consumer-generators are responsible for meeting safety, power quality, and interconnection requirements, and must pay all costs of installing generating and metering equipment. 6

Regulatory Structure – EIA and RECs The Energy Independence Act (EIA) requires utilities to use “eligible renewable resources or acquire equivalent renewable energy credits (REC), or a combination of both, to meet annual targets” of at least 3 percent of load by January 1, 2012, 9 percent by January 1, 2016, and 15 percent by January 1, The EIA gives distributed generation resources special treatment. To meet the RPS targets, the statute allows a utility to: Count distributed generation at double the facility’s electrical output if the utility: (i) Owns or has contracted for the distributed generation and the associated renewable energy credits; or (ii) has contracted to purchase the associated renewable energy credits. 7

Regulatory Structure – PURPA The Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) of 1978, Section 210, created a market for the output of “qualifying small power production facilities” by requiring electric utilities to purchase the output under rules adopted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). For qualifying facilities with a design capacity of 100 kW or less, state regulators must establish standard rates, and they may also do so for larger qualifying facilities. By UTC rule, PURPA qualified facilities with a generation capacity of one megawatt or less may accept a purchasing utility’s standard published rates, i.e., a standard offer contract, without filing a bid, regardless of the generating technology used. 8

Regulatory Structure – UTC Interconnection Rules 2005 PURPA amendments obligated state commissions to consider whether to require electric utilities to offer “interconnection service” to the consumers they serve, using procedures that “promote current best practices of interconnection for distributed generation.” The UTC adopted two sets of rules addressing electrical standards to ensure safety and reliability, and responsibility for the costs of interconnection. The first set governs facilities with a generation capacity of 300 kW or less. The second set applies to facilities with a generation capacity of 300 kW to 20 MW. 9

Laws and Rules Related to Distributed Generation 10

Structure of Report Introduction – Overview of the DG landscape (interaction between DG, PURPA, net metering, renewables and RECs). Issues in relationship between generators and utilities, e.g., interconnection, contracts. Issues involving financial incentives – PURPA avoided cost contracts, feed-in tariffs, net metering, tax incentives, consumer incentives, and RECs. Appendices – DG potential for certain renewable technologies; Literature guide – list of useful resources. Available at – ID= ID=

UTC Options Review Interconnection Rules (WAC ). Initiate a rulemaking to determine whether to amend certain rules governing the interconnection of generation facilities with utility electric systems, including requirements for external disconnect switches and insurance, and whether to adopt unique interconnection rules for generators between 300 kW and 20 megawatts (MW). 12

UTC Options Clarify ownership of RECs under PURPA contracts between developers and utilities through petitions for declaratory ruling, policy statements or rulemaking. 13

UTC Options Provide greater certainty for developers of distributed generation through longer duration standard offer PURPA contracts established under utility tariffs, such as Puget Sound Energy’s Schedule

Legislative Options Amend RCW 80.60, Net Metering, to increase the cap from 100 kilowatts (kW) and clarify whether third-party ownership of generation facilities results in the third-party owner being an electric company subject to UTC regulation. This occurs in circumstances where the third party develops and installs the generating resource on a utility customer’s property, and sells the electric output to the customer, who engages in net metering with the utility. 15

Legislative Options Amend definitions in the Energy Independence Act, RCW , of “eligible renewable resource” to include combined heat and power resources, and “distributed generation” to clarify the meaning of the term “generating capacity.” 16

Legislative Options Review comprehensively the existing financial incentives for distributed generation, e.g., cost recovery mechanisms, tax credits, tax reductions and exemptions, net metering, and multiple renewable energy credits to determine whether the incentives are consistent and work together in promoting cost- effective distributed generation. 17

Legislative Options Gather Information to Analyze the Costs and Benefits of Varying Levels of Distributed Generation. Request a group of utilities, representative of utility systems in Washington, to perform initial cost/benefit analyses of distributed generation resources assuming different levels of system peak load (e.g.,.25,.50 and 1.0 percent) to provide legislators and other decision-makers with better information to shape state policies. 18

QUESTIONS? 19