Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Elementary School Counselor
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Reform Implementation Strategies and Success: Learning from the Field Mark Flatau, Cle Elum-Roslyn Pam Estvold, Conway Martin Brewer and Laura Staley,
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
NELA Professional Growth Plan: Growth Analysis C. Miller-Walker Cohort 3.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
FACE Symposium Michele P Brooks M.Ed Assistant Superintendent, Office of Family & Student Engagement Boston Public Schools.
Have you downloaded WSSDA 2014? Search for the app in iTunes or Google Play Store and join the conversation. WELCOME. 1.Tap Agenda 2.Locate this session.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Materials  Wiki 
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Jackie Wilson Gary Bloom Jill Baker Kelly An Damaries Blondonville
The Principal Hiring Process Overview
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
You Are Invited To Apply….
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Promoting Learning and Understanding for Students in Mathematics
Comprehensive Planning
Leading for Change Teacher/Principal Evaluator Student Growth Retraining AA #3002 Facilitator: Patrick Durley Regional Superintendent, ROE #53 This PowerPoint.
Educator Evaluations DARTEP 2017
Melissa Zantello, Executive Director of Program Development
By Pam Rumage and Carmen Carr White Station Middle School
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
State Board of Education Progress Update
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
February 21-22, 2018.
Proficiency & Achievement
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
New Prospect Elementary School
Colorado Department of Education
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District

The mission of AWSP is to support principals and the principalship in the education of all students. Association of Washington School Principals

A professional association for K-12 building leaders Unified relationship with NASSP and NAESP Partner with Washington Association of School Administrators 96+% membership (3,015 principals and assistant principals) Three state-level groups: Elementary, middle level, high school Two national affiliates: NAESP & NASSP

Expectations of Practice Evaluation Systems

Common Focus of Most Frameworks School Community – Environmental components that contribute to student success, such as expectations of interactions, organizational values, safety, celebrations, etc. School Improvement – Organizational data analysis, goal setting, vision creation, action planning, etc. Instructional Leadership – Improving teaching practice, aligning curriculum, instruction and assessment, etc. Management of Operations and Resources – Hiring and assigning staff, aligning fiscal resources with organizational goals, etc. Utilizing the Larger Community – Engaging parents and community as partners in the students’ learning, using the community as a classroom, etc. Equity and Cultural Responsiveness – Closing the opportunity gap for students, promoting culturally responsive practices, etc.

Principals need support so they themselves can support their school. The AWSP Leadership Framework and User’s Guide were created to facilitate principal support.

Defining Support & Authority Effective Conversations Setting the Stage for Growth

NeedsGoalsEvidenceStrategiesTimelineSupports Implement

Data

Establish a Focus Preparing for the Conversation Having Conversations Reflecting Next Steps

Assistant Principals Teacher/ Principal Connection Student Leaders Appendices

Welcome to Seattle Public Schools! 17

18

Why SPS? 19

School Leadership Matters 20 “The influence of school leaders is second only to teaching in potential influence on student learning (Louis, Leithwood, Wahlstrom, & Anderson, 2010).

The Need and the Problem 21 51

Alumni 22 9/18

SPS Lead Up Leadership Development Pipeline 23

If Seattle Public Schools proactively selects, develops, and supports highly effective, skilled, future principals and assistant principals, the quality of principals and assistant principals will increase, which will impact the quality of teaching and create equitable outcomes for each and every student in every classroom. Lead Up Theory of Action

Seattle Public Schools student, teachers, and parents are worthy of school leaders who are highly skilled and effective. Therefore, Seattle Public School’s Leadership Development Department has created the Lead up Program to proactively invest in the development and support of future and current administrators. Further Theory of Action

LearningEquityRespect Relationships ExcellenceReflection Lead Up Core Values

Seattle Public Schools 3,017 Teachers 220 Career Ladder Teachers 28 Coaches/Teacher Mentors 85 Assistant Principals 97 Principals 53,000 Students

Cohort 2! 28

Kelly Aramaki-Southeast Jon Halfaker-Northwest Kim Whitworth-Northeast Sarah Pritchett-Central Is Vela-Southwest Executive Directors of Schools 29

Photos by Susie Fitzhugh

1.AWSP Leadership Framework 5.1, who reminds you that a successful leader “monitors instruction and assessment practices” 2.Data Wise, chapter 5 Tonight’s content brought to you by…

Connections to our Year-long Learning Intentions School leaders will use the Danielson Framework and AWSP Framework to develop shared understanding of effective instruction and instructional leadership practices. School leaders will close achievement and opportunity gaps for all students (Criterion 8, AWSP) by continuing to improve and develop instructional leadership skills that impact teacher practices that impact student achievement.

Connection to AWSP At least 18 components out of 28 are addressed when you support teachers in using meaningful and authentic formative assessments in their practice

Focus Components for Today Danielson Framework: 1f: Designing Student Assessments 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness AWSP: 1.2: Engages in essential conversations for ongoing improvement 3.4 Assists staff to use data to guide, modify and improve classroom teaching and student learning 5.1 Monitors instruction and assessment practices 5.3 Assists staff in implementing effective instruction and assessment practices

Reflect, assess and prepare to share: What are you currently doing to support teachers in monitoring student progress? How does your work align with the AWSP Framework? [Consider thinking about this as evidence of your own leadership growth toward your summative evaluation.] What do you want to further develop in your own practice?

Sharing our practice and tools for progress monitoring What are you currently doing to support teachers in monitoring student progress? How does your work align with the AWSP Framework? What do you want to further develop in your own practice?