Internal Oversight Service UNESCO’s Decentralized Evaluation System Evaluation Office Internal Oversight Service UNESCO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategies and Perspectives to Address HIV and AIDS in the Workplace Regional experiences Ana Catalina Ramírez Abarca HIV/AIDS Focal Point ILO Subregional.
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
1 Professionalising Programme & Project Management Developing programme & project management capacities for UNDP and national counterparts External Briefing.
SEPTEMBER 2013 PREPARED FOR: UNDG TASK TEAM ON GENDER EQUALITY CHAIRED BY UN WOMEN PREPARED BY: UNDG SUB-GROUP ON “ACCOUNTING FOR RESOURCES FOR GENDER.
Management Response to the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function in UN Women in 2014.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
AFROSAI-E COOPERATION WITH WGITA African Organisation of English-speaking Supreme Audit Institutions.
Monitoring & Evaluation Of Delivering as One By Cyra Syed M&E Coordination Officer RCO.
Overview of UNDAF process and new guidance package March 2010 u nite and deliver effective support for countries.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
HIV/AIDS COORDINATION AND FAITH BASED ORGANISATIONS: EXPERIENCES FROM UGANDA JOHN RWOMUSHANA, MD, MSc Director, Research and Policy Development UGANDA.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia Bangkok, Thailand 7-8 April 2009 Tracking national portfolios and assessing results.
UNAIDS Response to the Second Independent Evaluation.
1 The United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Housing, Utilities & Urban Development General Organization for Physical Planning “GOPP” Participatory.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Title Consultation on the 7 th replenishment of IFAD’s resources IFAD’s operating model : overall structure and components Consultation on the 7th replenishment.
Evaluation Office EVALUATION THE INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME REFLECTIONS ON CONTRIBUTION TO TRANSPARENCY,
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Revised January 9, 2015 UNDP Policy & Programme Priorities Bureau for Policy and Programme Support Induction workshop for UNDP.
Global Task Team: Improving AIDS Coordination Among Multilateral Institutions and International Donors Briefing for Theme Group on HIV/AIDS 1 November.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
OIOS OIOS/Inspection and Evaluation Division Office of Internal Oversight Services RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Peacekeeping evaluations of the Inspection.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
COOPERATION AMONG EVALUATION UNITS IN MULTILATERAL IFIs Gregory K. Ingram Chair, Evaluation Cooperation Group Marrakech – February, 2004.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
UNESCO’s RELATIONS WITH NATIONAL COMMISSIONS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED RESULTS FOR Presentation by Mary-Louise Kearney Director of the.
0 United Nations Capital Development Fund Summary of Strategic Partnership Between UNDP and UNCDF Moving Closer Together in the Context of the UNDP Strategic.
Knowledge Management April Background  Agreement signed between Spain and UNDP on 18 December 2006  Euros 528 million + 90 million (24 Sept. 2008)
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
M&E in the GEF Carlo Carugi Senior Evaluation Officer Expanded Constituency Workshop Dakar, Senegal - July 2011.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Data for managing development Identifying gaps and setting priorities African.
Presented by CIDA on behalf of the Task Team on Multilateral Effectiveness.
Business and human rights
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Corporate Evaluation Plan Joint informal Executive Board Meeting May 2014 New York, NY Marco Segone Director, UN Women independent Evaluation.
GEF Evaluation Office. Two overarching objectives:  Promote accountability for the achievement of GEF objectives through the assessment of results, effectiveness,
FOLLOW UP TO THE 9 th ROUND TABLE Riccardo del Castello Communication for Development Officer FAO.
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
2013 Report on the Evaluation Function of UN-Women Informal Executive Board Meeting June 2014 New York, NY Marco Segone Director, UN Women independent.
SUDAN: Multi Donor Trust Funds Norway-World Bank Third Workshop Dialogue Washington, DC May 26, 2005.
2009 An Overview of programmes. Overview Current country programmes – Ghana, Rwanda Transitioned country programmes – Namibia Potential new country programmes.
1.1.Recovery strategic planning capacities are strengthened. 1.2.Local capacity for ER planning and implementation strengthened in areas of expertise where.
Updates on the Implementation of the ASEAN Strategic Plan of Action on Water Resources Management DR. SEVILLO D. DAVID, Jr. Executive Director National.
Making Evaluation Work for Effective Policy Reform and Revision Chris Nelson, Director, Quality and Performance Systems Branch Sophie Davies, Manager Evaluations.
Advocacy and Partnerships for the MDGs. Context and Rationale The MDGs were created in 2000 as a concrete means to help improve the lives of poor people.
Governance Partnership Facility (GPF) Overview and Application Process Presented by: Piet Hein van Heesewijk Senior Operations Officer GPF Secretariat.
UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM IN MADAGASCAR Coordination of the UNDAF Process and the Role of the United Nations system Organizations Joint session of UNDP/UNFPA,
Rooting evaluation independence in the context of multilateral development organizations Oscar A. Garcia Director, Independent Office of Evaluation of.
Independent Evaluation Office UNEG EPE - Strengthening decentralized evaluation functions New York March 11, 2015 Alexandra Chambel and Hicham Daoudi,
Andrea Cook, Evaluation Office of UNFPA Geneva April 2016 UNEG Decentralized Evaluation Interest Group.
Messay Tassew, Evaluation Specialist UN Women Independent Evaluation Office New York March 11, 2015 UNEG EPE - Strengthening decentralized evaluation functions.
Evaluation Practice Exchange Seminar 13 th March 2015 Anne-Claire Luzot Senior Evaluation Officer, WFP Office of Evaluation The enabling factors and challenges.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Perspectives from a GEF Implementing Agency
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Your partner in service delivery and development
Accountability and Internal Controls – Best Practices
UNICEF Plan for Global Evaluations
Road map and outline of the revised evaluation policy of UNICEF
THE independent evaluation office of Undp Independence, credibility and use IPDET, 30 June 2014 Indran A. Naidoo Director.
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Quality in Evaluation: the international development experience
AFROSAI-E COOPeRATION WITH WGITA
Experiences in Developing Statistical Quality Frameworks
Mrs.Dharshana Senanayake Director General
106th Evaluation Committee 2 September 2019
11 July 2019 APP Presentation to the Joint Standing Committee on Financial Management of Parliament June 2019.
cooperation in statistics Proposal for the organizational structure
Presentation transcript:

Internal Oversight Service UNESCO’s Decentralized Evaluation System Evaluation Office Internal Oversight Service UNESCO

Internal Oversight Service DECENTRALIZED EVALUATIONS (project level / national) DECENTRALIZED EVALUATIONS (programme / sub-regional or regional) CORPORATE (cross-cutting, programme, thematic, impact) System- wide, joint UN, JIU, partners IOS EO conducted strategic evaluations submitted to Executive Board Sector conducted evaluations submitted to donor Evaluation System in UNESCO

Internal Oversight Service Diagnostic of current state Context: UNESCO currently revising its Evaluation Policy provides unique opportunity System of decentralized evaluations recognized as weak (c.f. IEE and JIU findings) Limited inter-linkage between corporate/decentralized Lack of a corporate knowledge bank for evaluations Mixed performance for decentralized evaluations Poor resourcing for DE despite XB guidelines of 1% + Support requested on ad-hoc basis from IOS Evaluation Office Weak implementation of existing guidance 3

Internal Oversight Service Diagnostic of current state Use mostly for donor reporting but not for learning, organization- wide knowledge management or to influence design of new policies and programmes Mostly commissioned by those who designed the programme (independence issue) Absence of quality control mechanism affects credibility and utilization Lack of a consistent management response mechanism, follow-up and accountability on DE IOS EO annual report provides limited synthetic insight into evaluation results & use of DE 4

Internal Oversight Service Proposed new approach EO will develop DE plan with the Programme sectors; DE Plan is rolling, subject to change Programme sectors responsible for its implementation To strengthen Quality Assurance, the EO: - provides common framework (methodology and criteria) - provides guidance notes & training - releases funds for evaluation upon its approval of ToR - creates network of M&E focal points To strengthen use, EO: - conducts annual meta-evaluation of DE reports & annual synthesis reviews of completed DE - MR and action plans are mandatory & all DE reports publically available 5