Japan’s Proposal and Clarification 57th GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 23rd March 2016 JASIC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 2002 Child Restraint Systems A Field study of Misuse Helena Menezes José Dias.
Advertisements

51 st GRSP Session Draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012, agenda item.
GRSP December 2001 Session - P. CASTAING 1 ISOFIX SYSTEMS INTEGRATION IN R14, R16, R44.
Child safety with respect to vehicle protection and booster seats - a proposal for a CRF for children > 4yo 1 Informal document GRSP (55 th GRSP,
Federal Role & Safety Standards Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
ECE Regulation N°129 55th session of GRSP May 2013
Impact-Shield Type CRS in JNCAP National Agency for Automotive Safety and Victims ’ Aid Informal document No. GRSP Rev.1 (43rd GRSP, May 2008.
ECE Regulation N°129 17/12/201354th Session GRSP December th session of GRSP December 2013 Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
49th Session of UN ECE GRSP (Working Party on Passive Safety Provissions) GRSP-49-XX May 16-20, 2011Page 1 Vehicle related requirements for -Size CRS Overview.
GRSP / IWG-CRS Status report for the fifty-seventh session (18-22 May 2015) of GRSP 17/05/2015the fifty-seventh session (18-22 May 2015) of GRSP1 Submitted.
Decision IWG ECRS General If no agreement can be found before the GRSP 56th meeting, GRSP should decide on the chairman proposal.
Status report GRSP IWG ECRS 53rd GRSP Geneva May 2013 Informal document GRSP (53 nd GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 19)
Booster Seats and Booster Cushions
Survey on the actual situation for infant-carrying vehicles Results * Background We distributed questionnaires to countries in Europe and North America.
PROPOSALS THE REVIEW OF THE 1958 AGREEMENT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL (IWVTA) IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session.
ISOFIX FRENCH PROPOSAL (DOCUMENTS TRANS/WP29/GRSP/2001/14Rev1; 2001/15Rev1 and 2001/16Rev1) GRSP 13-17/05/2002.
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008,
Dimensions of Universal Boosters 43th meeting of the GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems 25 th March 2014 Speaker: Franz Peleska.
46th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (46th session, December 2009,
Proposal Regarding Amendment of the CRS Regulation at ECE/GRSP’s CRS Informal Group 2 September 2008 JASIC Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization.
CRS Classification GRSP Informal Working Group on Child safety Paris Meeting, 25 th November 2008 CRS
Draft proposal -R16 handbook from CRS workshop - simplification of the R129 table For discussions during 54 th meeting of UNECE IG CRS 26 th of October.
1 Research on Chest Injury Criteria JASIC 54 th GRSP December, 2013 Submitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
Japan’s Stance for the R129 Phase 2 43 rd GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 25 th Mar JASIC.
Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP
Items to be review for phase 2(1) ISOFIX incentive for booster seats – Safety issue or benefit ? Leader CLEPA (Farid) – Vehicle compatibility for universality.
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
Fatalities and Injuries among Children in Motor Vehicle Crashes in Japan 18 June, 2008 JASIC Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center CRS
TF#4 – Mechanical Integrity Approved Japanese proposal for addition of vehicle mechanical protection structure into mechanical integrity requirement. EVS-11-17e.
GRSP December 2015 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2 Informal document: GRSP (58th GRSP, December 2015, agenda item 15 an 19)
Japan’s Stance for the R129 Phase 2
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
Review of GRSP e Proposal for amendments to R44 11/05/17
Regulation 129 CLEPA response to
Submitted by expert from France
Attestation Concept additional explanation and implementation proposal
OICA WP29 Informal Group on IWVTA
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
ECE R129 Phase 3 Pierre CASTAING - UTAC CERAM
45th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS
Response to ANEC proposal for Booster phase out in R44
Unclear defined items in Regulation No.129
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
Approval categories and stature limits for booster seats
Report and explanation document of SBR-TF
CLEPA analysis of belt contact width measurement (ref. GRSP/2018/6)
Age- and size-appropriate restraint use in the rear seat provides the best protection for all children in motor vehicle crashes. Children properly restrained.
PN Levels in UN Regulation N°83.07
Underlying Principles of Approval Marking for the LSD Regulation
Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129
52nd GRSP, 11 – 14 Decemer 2012, agenda item 14
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
GRSP December 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
based on WP29/2018/157, SLR-28-09rev1, SLR-28-12
GRSP December 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
Summary of Proposed Amendment to gtr 9
8th all TF F2F Meetings EVS Washington DC
Submitted by the expert from Consumers International
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Submitted by the expert
GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-08
Request for Clarifications by IWG-IWVTA
Presentation transcript:

Japan’s Proposal and Clarification 57th GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 23rd March 2016 JASIC

Japan’s Proposal to Amend the CRS Flammability Test Procedures (GRSP-58-34) * Proposal Paragraph , amend to read “ The flammability approval will be checked by one of the following methods Method 1 is applicable only to Enhanced Child Restraint Systems and Method 2 is applicable only to vehicle built-in Enhanced Child Restraint Systems. Method 1... … Method 2 The applicant shall declare in writing that when testing materials in accordance with Annex 23 of this regulation, the materials used shall not burn, nor transmit a flame front across its surface, at a rate of more than mm per minute. Each material used in an enhanced child restraint system shall conform to these requirements. However, … * Justification While these flammability test procedures for built-in CRSs are quoted from FMVSS 302, the standard has been relaxed. As this type of CRS is incorporated in the vehicle and thus can be deemed as part of the vehicle, the standard equivalent to that of FMVSS 302, i.e., 100 mm, is more appropriate.

“ Forward-facing Child Restraint Systems with top tether in the i-Size category are for use in ISOFIX positions marked by the letters “IUF” in Table 2 of Appendix 3 to Annex 17 to Regulation No. 16. Other Child Restraint Systems in the i-Size category may be for use in ISOFIX positions, in the same way that Child Restraint Systems in the semi-universal category may be for use in ISOFIX positions specified in Regulation No.44.” Proposal Add new paragraph to read: Japan’s Proposal to Amend the Provisions for Fitting of i-Size CRSs in the ISOFIX seating position Justification It is not stated in Regulation No. 129, 14 or 16 that the i-Size CRSs may be for use in ISOFIX positions. Therefore, it is necessary to state in the regulations the condition that the i-Size CRSs may be for use in ISOFIX positions in the regulations.

(Reference) Comparison of Performance Between i-Size CRS and R44’s ISOFIX Universal or Semi-universal CRS i-size CRS R44’s ISOFIX universal or semi- universal CRS Front impact performance good= Lateral impact performance good>poor Rear impact performance good= Rearward- facing period 15 months>9 months i-Size CRS is deemed to have safety performance that is equivalent to or better than R44’s ISOFIX CRS.

Regarding the Proposal to Amend the Footnote on the Q10 Dummy for the Lateral Impact Test Current proposal Refine Rev1:“No lateral impact test using the Q10 dummy is required for i-size booster seat with size range over upper limit between 125cm and 135 cm until Q10 dummy injury criteria for the lateral impact test are established.” Japan would like to know the justification for this proposal. Japan thinks the following tasks are essential for Regulation No. 129: * To provide lateral impact protection * To recommend the use of booster seats for children up to 135 cm The Q6 dummy is a tool to evaluate children up to 125 cm. The tool is replaced with the Q10 dummy for children taller than 125 cm. Japan considers it necessary to use the Q10 dummy in the lateral impact test. However, the current proposal to amend the footnote appears to be stating that the lateral impact evaluation is for children up to 125 cm.