Moving away from the fish-eye view Integrating Surveys for the Ecosystem Approach 29 May 2013, Ingeborg de Boois (WGISUR)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Coordination actions ICT Calls Jan- March 2012.
Advertisements

Consultative Group of Experts OTHER INFORMATION CONSIDERED RELEVANT TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE OF THE CONVENTION Jack Fitzgerald Workshop on the.
Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
CONTACT SEMINAR November 2008 Project management tools.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
United Nations Statistics Division
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
WWF – World Bank Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool What is Management Effectiveness Evaluation? Sue Stolton.
AdriaMed Expert Consultation Interactions between capture fisheries and aquaculture Rome, Italy November st Coordination Committee (2000)
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
HELCOM HOLAS II ESA WS, Helsinki EU Horizon 2020 Coordination and support action Ville Karvinen / SYKE Enhancing ecosystem services mapping for.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
Module 2 National IEA Process Design and Organization Stakeholder’s consultative workshop/ Training on Integrated assessments methodology ECONOMIC VALUATION.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Institutional Strengthening Support
New EU Multi-Annual Programme
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
The International Plant Protection Convention
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
JRC’s Follow-up work to improve GES assessment
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
Civil Protection Financial Instrument – Prevention Projects
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
LUCAS Task Force 30 September 2015 Item 4 – Update on the Knowledge Innovation Project on Accounting for Natural Capital and ecosystem services (KIP INCA)
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
WG GES Workshop Art. 8 MSFD Assessment
Draft CIS work programme
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Proposal for MSFD risk-based approach project in OSPAR region
European Commission DG Environment
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Pilot River Basin Activity
WG DIS May 2016 Based on a presentation prepared by
New EU Data Collection Multi-Annual Programme (EU DC-MAP)
Working Group on Data, Information and Knowledge Exchange
WFD, Common Implementation Strategy   Water Scarcity and Droughts Expert Network Brussels, July 2, 2009.
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Information on projects
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
A Sea for Life MSFD related projects under Integrated Maritime Policy
European Marine Strategy
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Draft CIS work programme
OSPAR progress on use of the decentralised option for reporting on monitoring programmes required under Article 11 of the MSFD.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Joint meeting of WG’s DIKE, GES, POMESA 27 April 2017, Brussels
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Date and venue: 23 September, MSFD PCG, DG Environment, Brussels
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

Moving away from the fish-eye view Integrating Surveys for the Ecosystem Approach 29 May 2013, Ingeborg de Boois (WGISUR)

Fish surveys: main purpose

1. How to create a survey that can provide information for ecosystem management 2. Supplying information from surveys to MSFD

Surveys for the ecosystem approach mEarth.htm Add to current fish survey Design ecosystem survey from scratch Maagbe monste ring +...

Add to current fish survey many tasks can be added to a fish survey; additional resources might be required selection of specific tasks is necessary, as we cannot carry out all tasks at the same time

Surveys for the ecosystem approach mEarth.htm Add to current fish survey Design ecosystem survey from scratch Maagbe monste ring +...

Design ecosystem survey from scratch 3. Survey objectives (detailed) 4. Survey design 5. Pilot study 6. Survey 7. Use of results 1. Problem identification (Issues) 2. Framework (settings, logistics) Preparation is (almost) everything

The difference Priority=sampling for fish stock assessment No guarantee for additional information, unless additional money is provided Priority=sampling for ecosystem assessment Guarantee for data suitable for ecosystem assessment, but maybe not sufficient information for specific topics (like fish stock assessment) Add tasks to current fish surveys Design ecosystem survey from scratch Money rules the priorities, weather might rule the survey

1. Problem identification (Issues) Define objectives (e.g. deliverables (data or processed indicators), description of data-use, knowledge gaps) Prioritise objectives Define ecosystem, including pressure factors 2. Framework (settings, logistics) Define resources (e.g. money, ship time, expertise, storage facilities available) Define constraints (e.g. regulations, international agreements) Define timetables (e.g. for data processing and delivery) Define operational priorities (based on step 1, and resources and constraints). 3. Survey objectives (detailed) Define variables/ecosystem-components/processes Define methods to match objectives and fill knowledge gaps Define timing of survey (e.g. frequency, duration) Define expertise needed Define final operational prioritisation of tasks for survey Check if design matches the output of phase 1 4. Survey design Create survey plan in the context of primary and ecosystem data collection priorities Define primary sampling units and their allocation Create detailed sampling plan Discuss plan with all parties involved and adapt plan where necessary Check if plan is in line with the output from phase 1 and 2 Literature review Analyse available data Use available models Consult experts in each appropriate discipline Consult experts Agree with primary customers on minimum survey requirements Determine achievable goals for a single vessel survey Determine operational approach with vessel (crew and managers) Be aware that the first version of the plan might have to be adjusted based on the results of phase 5 Take into account precision., bias and potential incompatibility Think about communication channels for collaborating parties, stakeholders, as well as the wider audience Consider (inter)national collaboration with governments, research institutes, universities, stakeholders, etc. Consider expert consultation regarding the development of ecosystem surveys

5. Pilot study Test sampling plan at sea (exploratory survey) Test collected information: e.g. analyse samples, test data infrastructure, analyse data, run models. Take into account different primary units for different sampling strategies 6. Survey Carry out the survey following the plan 7. Use of results Quality check data Analyse samples Use data (take into account the different primary units) Information exchange with collaborating parties If data/samples are not immediately used: store sustainably Evaluation and review (internal/external) Disseminate information collected (including survey report) Communication about the survey, the progress and first results is highly recommended. Information exchange between collaborating ships is required Coordination of the sampling is required, also to be adaptive to e.g. weather circumstances, technical problems The results of the analysis might lead to a change in survey design. If major changes occur, go back to phase 3 or 4 and consider if a test is required Keep in mind this phase might result in an iterative process as: The result of the test at sea might change the sampling plan. Additional testing of the new sampling plan might be required The result of the analysis of the information collected might change the sampling plan. Additional testing of the new sampling plan is required

1. How to create a survey that can provide information for ecosystem management 2. Supplying information from surveys to MSFD

MSFD & (fish) surveys ICES survey WG OSPAR EU National governments National institutes What scale do we manage, research and monitor? Scaling to national priorities in MSFD a threat to Regional approach?

Challenges “A major challenge in the implementation of the MSFD is to attain the necessary scientific knowledge of the elements that define the state of the marine environment (.....)” “Challenges for successful implementation (.....)  Enhanced participation of stakeholders at all levels: national, regional, European and international. The organisation of major events could contribute to this end.” From:

How to match scaling? National MSFD assessment areas (source EEA) National MSFD assessment areas (source EEA)

When can we jump on the running train? Preparation is (almost) everything many tasks can be added to a fish survey; additional resources might be required selection of specific tasks is necessary, as we cannot carry out all tasks at the same time Article 11(1);(b) programme of measures: development, by 2015 at the latest, of a programme of measures (....) entry into operation of the programme provided for in point (i), by 2016 at the latest (...)