Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #9 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance May 27, 2016 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

E.F.F.O.R.T. Every Federal Fish Ought to Report Time Presented by Julia Clay, Monica Ornelas & Crystal Hernandez Federal & State Programs Ector County.
Campus Improvement Plans
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
A--133 Audit Compliance Requirements February 22, 2013 Helen R. Jordan, Management Analyst Office of Grants Management and Compliance.
Is My Organization Ready?  Financial Management.
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Region 11 Education Service Center January 28, 2015.
Exercising Greater Flexibility in Administering Federal Grant Funds Nora Hancock, EdD Associate Commissioner Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance Association.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Title I, Part A Flexibility: Addressing Barriers to Improving Student Achievement Anita Villarreal State Coordinator, Title I, Part A Division of Federal.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Updates and Fixed Awards.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
05/31/2012 Page 1 Financial Management: Timekeeping.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Segregation of Duties– Sponsored Programs APM
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
9/12/2008 Page 1 MDE and ISD Partnership: Darkening the Dotted Lines Monitoring and Compliance Training: Financial Management.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
FISCAL OFFICER Financial Policy I-1 Role of Fiscal Officer, Account Manager, and Account Supervisor.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers (Part 1) Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University,
Coordinators’ Academy Friday, July 24, :15-10:30 a.m. & 10:45-12 p.m. Shared Responsibilities for Title I, Part A, Grant Management at the School.
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
TIME AND EFFORT NEW FLEXIBILITY GUIDELINES. ALLOCATING PAYROLL COSTS: TIME DISTRIBUTION Rules set out in OMB Circular A-87  Must demonstrate that employees.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Copyright© Texas Education Agency April 2011 FAR (Financial Accounting and Reporting) Coding System: –Mandatory Account Codes for School Districts,
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
©2015, Region One Education Service Center Curriculum Advisory Council Meeting March 26, 2015 EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance Office of School Improvement,
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #8 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance May 13,
Kay Townsend, Fiscal Consultant Title I, IIA, VI, & X Oklahoma State Department of Education (405)
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #4 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance March 18,
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
Title I, Part A Allowability of Costs Association of Compensatory Educators of Texas (ACET) Conference-Austin, Texas April 7, 2015 Anita Villarreal, State.
Implementing TAACCCT Round 2 Consortium Grants Management September 27, 2013.
Subrecipient Monitoring
TAA-CCCT Round 2 New Grantee Fiscal and Administrative Q&A
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Federal Programs Department: Plan4Learning
Presented by Jean Fecteau OEO Fiscal Analyst
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
2016 AmeriCorps Texas All-Grantee Meeting February 25-26, 2016
Uniform Guidance Discussion
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Fiscal Monitoring in eGrants Management System (eGMS) July 26, 2018
Title I, Part A - Parent & Family Engagement Compliance Monitoring Review Training The Federal Programs Department September 26, 2018.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Federal Programs Department: Plan4Learning
Office of Federal and State Accountability
Universal Review: Fiscal Requirements
Title I, Part A and The Grants Accounting Approval Process
Managing Federal grants
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Fiscal Compliance for Title III
Uniform Guidance Audit: Overview, Timeline and Contacts
Department Administrator Session #11
Presentation transcript:

Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #9 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance May 27,

Goals of Webinar Series 1.To review the basic concepts of schoolwide programs. 2.To encourage you to begin planning now for the 2016–2017 school year. 3.To answer specific questions. 4.To share what we’ve learned. 2

Agenda I.Key points from previous sessions. II.Subrecipient monitoring of schoolwide programs. III.Subrecipient monitoring steps. 3

I.Key Points from Previous Sessions Condensed list of planning steps: Budget (LEA). Comprehensive needs assessment (campus). Campus improvement plan (campus). Supplemental funds test (LEA). Consolidation option (LEA with campus). o TEA recommends federal only. 4

Planning for Schoolwide Programs Schoolwide program budget (campus). o Incorporated into campus improvement plan. Accounting methodology (LEA). o TEA recommends proportionality at the campus level. NCLB Consolidated Federal Grant Application (LEA). o Schedule BS6001 using 8911 Operating Transfer Out code. 5

Step-by-Step Planning Full details of step-by-step planning, with multiple examples, available on three web pages, beginning with tea.texas.gov/grants/ schoolwidefundingandaccounting1/. Focus on maintaining required documentation for auditing and monitoring purposes. 6

Step-by-Step Accounting Full details of step-by-step accounting procedures for schoolwide program expenditures, with examples of general ledgers, available on three web pages, beginning with tea.texas.gov/grants/ schoolwideaccountingforexpenditures1/. 7

II.Subrecipient Monitoring of Schoolwide Programs If your LEA is selected for federal subrecipient monitoring by TEA, you can expect different procedures from TEA monitors. TEA monitors conduct their reviews based upon schoolwide program guidelines. TEA monitors the LEA, not individual schoolwide campuses, but both the LEA and the schoolwide campuses are responsible for maintaining the required documentation. 8

Reminder about Flexibility Consolidated pool of funds can pay for any activity that improves the schoolwide campus’s educational program. but Campus must develop and maintain required schoolwide program documents. Campus and LEA must maintain adequate documentation for schoolwide program expenditures. 9

III.Subrecipient Monitoring Steps Monitors verify that: Campuses actually operated schoolwide programs and consolidated funds, as indicated by the LEA on Schedules SC5000 and BS6001 of the NCLB Consolidated Federal Grant Application. LEA can confirm with a written statement. 10

Supplemental Funds Test Monitors verify that: The LEA passed the supplemental funds test. Failing the test can negate schoolwide programs on all campuses. LEA must supply documentation of the calculations used, and its general ledger must reflect that sufficient state and local funds were allocated to all campuses using the same methodology. 11

Required Documents Monitors verify that: Each schoolwide campus completed the comprehensive needs assessment, campus improvement plan (CIP), and annual evaluation. Each schoolwide campus must provide adequate and current needs assessment, CIP, and annual evaluation. 12

Accounting Methodology Monitors verify that: LEA developed and followed an acceptable accounting methodology for its schoolwide program expenditures. LEA must show documentation of its methodology (for example, its proportionality table); its general ledger must show that the methodology was followed consistently. 13

General Ledger Monitors review general ledger to verify that: LEA met parental involvement set-aside requirement (if applicable). LEA properly planned and maintained schoolwide budgets in the general ledger. LEA properly accounted for payroll and maintained appropriate records for employees (requirements determined by the consolidation option selected). LEA complied with basic requirements for the financial administration of federal grant awards (FASRG, GAAP, EDGAR). 14

Allowability For a random selection of schoolwide program expenditures, monitors verify that: The expenditures are documented in the campus’s CIP as part of schoolwide program activities that, as a whole, support the intents and purposes of each consolidated grant program. 15

Other Expenditures For campus expenditures from funds that are not consolidated, monitors test to ensure that expenditures are allowable under individual grant programs. 16

TEA Contact Information Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Programmatic issues: Division of Federal and State Education Policy Anita Villarreal, Fiscal issues and TEA federal flexibility initiative: Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance James Connolly, Terry Reyes, 17