Goals: WGLC draft-ietf-lemonade-goals-04 Kue Wong

Goals: WGLC Comments (1) Editorial nits –All accepted Clarifications –Section 5.2.1: recipient replies in format of the original message - was not discussed –Section 6.1 restriction to IMAP extension a pragmatic WG decision whereas and are design principles more generally applicable –Goals document is a document of historical record - as such reference (section ) to IMAP channel need not be excised –Section 7.1.2: Keypad is rudimentary keyboard: comment accepted –Section 8.5: update to most recent MMS architecture not necessary -- moving target -- important only to get proper reference

Goals: WGLC Comments (2) Clarifications –Poor phrasing - “support existing service as before” => backwards compatible with Internet Mail -- needs rewording “Mobile” not just “wireless” - accept as better term “without intermediation” means “through use of only Internet Mail (IETF) protocols” NOT “no transcoding” -- needs rewording Issues related to possible misinterpretation of purpose of Goals doc –These driven by desire for definitive “mobile service” functionality (see appendix [next slide] for list) –GOALS document NOT a WG “working” requirements document –Rather a historical record of decisions made and their context –(capture low hanging fruit - extend Internet mail so that it can be used by mobiles NOT create definitive “mobile ”) –Additional functionality and new charter items agreed to by the WG/IESG & rationale for these need to go into a GOALS2 document –This document role may need additional clarification in this doc. ??? Thanks to all!

Goals: WGLC Comments (Appendix) Proposed additional “mobile ” functionality –(perceived as goals doc issues) 1. graceful degradation 2. DRM 3. S2C notification - also inband versus outband notifications 4. e2e security 5. Factoring in support for operators 6. relationship to PIMs 7. handling of firewalls 8. reference to OMA mobile service direction and definition 9. positioning with respect to IM