14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Beam Dampers for Main Injector and Recycler Bill Ashmanskas, Bill Foster, Dave Wildman Warren Schappert, Jim Crisp,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
Advertisements

Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
1 Electron Cloud Measurements at the Fermilab Main Injector Bob Zwaska Fermilab ECloud07 Workshop April 9, 2007.
1 NuMI BEAM POSITION MONITOR via MAIN INJECTOR, and RECYCLER Brajesh Choudhary, 06.Mar.2003 MINOS Collaboration Meeting University of South Carolina, Columbia.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
A Unified Approach to Fast Digital Processing for Beam Dampers, Instrumentation, & Controls Bill Foster Beam Instrumentation Workshop May 6, 2004.
Digital Signal Processing and Generation for a DC Current Transformer for Particle Accelerators Silvia Zorzetti.
1 FermiLab Recycler Ring BPM Upgrade Based on Digital Receiver Technology R. Webber, J. Crisp, P. Prieto, D. Voy, C. Breigel, C. McClure, M. Mengel, S.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Horz V1 H1 H2 V2 Pbars in Recycler Ring Stripline Kickers Split Plate Pickups A-B Vertical Digital Damper Vert Recycler Transverse Damper System Similar.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the hardware components of the upgraded Main Injector BPM system. The figure shows 2 signal channels which produce one position.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Debuncher “phase jump” project Decouple Debuncher RF frequency from MI 120 GeV frequency – MHz could move by ~1-2 kHz –Can center beam in Debuncher.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
Booster Low Level Modules, Timing and some Measurements.
Initial Performance Results of the APS P0 (Transverse Bunch-to-Bunch) Feedback System N. DiMonte#, C.-Y. Yao, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
Digital Phase Control System for SSRF LINAC C.X. Yin, D.K. Liu, L.Y. Yu SINAP, China
The Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Front-End Software Luciano Piccoli, Stephen Foulkes, Margaret Votava and Charles Briegel Fermi National Accelerator.
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
6 Oct 2003Vince Pavlicek1 Make a BPM out of a Damper?
Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00 1 Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00
Summary of Booster Dampers Systems Dave McGinnis December 7, 2010.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
Fast feedback, studies and possible collaborations Alessandro Drago INFN-LNF ILCDR07 Damping Rings R&D Meeting 5-7 March 2007.
F Fermilab July 6, 2005Recycler Damper Stability1 Recycler Damper High Frequency Stability Jim Crisp
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
High Bandwidth damper Input from W.Hölfe Acknowledgement to all collaborators at SLAC, INFN, LBNL and CERNL Presentation of recent MD results (J.Cesaratto):
Accumulator Stacktail Cooling Paul Derwent December 18, 2015.
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
Present Uses of the Fermilab Digital Signal Receiver VXI Module Brian Chase,Paul Joireman, Philip Varghese RF Embedded Systems (LLRF) Group.
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Bunch by bunch feedback systems for KEKB Makoto Tobiyama KEK Accelerator Laboratory.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
12-June-03Concept for Booster LLRF - G. W. Foster A Concept for Using the Digital Damper Board to Upgrade the Booster LLRF Bill Foster June 12, 2003.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
Debuncher Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent March 3, 2016.
Experience and Perspectives of Transverse Feedback Systems for Scrubbing Thanks to: SPS OP crew and colleagues from BE-ABP and BE-RF, for their support.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
17-Mar-03MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Longitudinal Dampers for Main Injector Bill Foster, Dennis Nicklaus, Warren Schappert, Dave Wildman Mar ‘03.
Bunch by bunch feedback systems for KEKB Makoto Tobiyama KEK Accelerator Laboratory.
LFB, LLRF, TFB update Alessandro Drago XIII SuperB General Meeting Isola d’Elba, 5/30-6/
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing
EEE4176 Applications of Digital Signal Processing
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Lock-in amplifiers
M. Mehler1), H. Klingbeil1), B. Zipfel2)
The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
Limits on damping times
New PSB beam control rf clock distribution
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
8.5 Modulation of Signals basic idea and goals
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Beam Dampers for Main Injector and Recycler Bill Ashmanskas, Bill Foster, Dave Wildman Warren Schappert, Jim Crisp, Dennis Nicklaus Oct ‘02

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Wide Variety of Beam Dampers Required in MI & Recycler 1)Transverse (X,Y) and Longitudinal 2)53 MHz, 2.5 MHz, 7.5 MHz, and DC Beam 3)Single Bunches, Full Batches, Short Batches 4)Injection, Ramping, and Stored Beam 5)Pbar and Proton Directions (  different timing)

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster … plus unbunched DC Beam in Recycler…

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Damper Operating Modes X = Operation c = Commissioning & Tuneup BoosterMain Inj.RecyclerTevatron P bar P P P P 53 MHz Full Batches XXC 53 MHz Short Batches XX 53 MHz Coalesced Bunch XXXX 2.5 MHz Batch (4) XCXC 7.5 MHz Batch (12) XC DC Beam XC

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster History of Dampers at FNAL Dampers are essential for maximum performance and forgiving operation. Over the years, many Beam Dampers have been built at Fermilab. Essentially all of these fell into disuse. Some of the most powerful (Superdampers) were deliberately removed from service and not replaced. In contrast, most other large labs have beam dampers on all coordinates on all machines.

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Difficulties in Maintaining Beam Dampers 1)Specialized custom built power amps –e.g. distributed tube amplifier for Superdampers 2)Limitations of Analog Signal Processing –Crates of specialized custom NIM modules Few people can understand & maintain system Many cables, connections to fail Spares/testing problem with custom analog modules –Unique hardware needed for various machines, various RF bunch structures, etc. Difficult to modify for new RF freq. –Diagnostic signals unavailable in control room.

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Damper Design Choices for MI / RR Digital Signal Processing Commercial electronics, with custom firmware –might change for final implementation Common Hardware for MI, RR, (& Booster?) Standard commercial wideband FET power amps (same type used for Recycler RF, Booster (& TeV?) dampers,etc.)

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Advantages of Digital Filters Digital filter can also operate at multiple lower frequencies...simultaneously if desired.  MI will not be blind for 2.5 and 7.5 MHz Beam Digital filters more reproducible (=>spares!) Re-use Standard hardware with new FPGA code –or same code with different filter coefficients Inputs and Outputs clearly defined –filters can be developed & debugged offline

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Generic Damper tolerating frequency sweep FIFO needed due to phase shifts between DAC and ADC clocks as beam accelerates All Logic Inside FPGA

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Echotek Card Used for Dampers 105 MSPS AD6645 Prieto, Meyer et. al. evaluating 65MHz DDC for RR BPM upgrade Asmanskas, Foster, Schappert testing 105 MHz version for RR Dampers

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Digital Signal Processing with FPGA’s Commercial card from Echotek –8 channels of 14-bit, 106 MHz Digitization One card does all dampers for one machine Customized FPGA firmware –Bill Ashmanskas, GW Foster, et. al. Handles Wide Variety of Bunch Structure

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 53 MHz, TCLK, MDAT,... All-Coordinate Damper w/ Echotek Card Monster FPGA(s) Minimal Analog Filter FAST ADC Stripline Pickup Minimal Analog Filter FAST ADC 14 VME 106 / 212 MHz Stripline Kicker Power Amp Minimal Analog Filter FAST ADC Resistive Wall Monitor Broadband Cavity FAST DACs > 27 MHz FAST DACs Power Amp Transverse Dampers Identical X & Y Longi- tudinal (Z) Damper 2-10

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster MI Longitudinal Damper (Ashmanskas, Foster) Single Bunch Digital Kick  using Digital Velocity Filter implemented in FPGA firmware  80 Bunch-by-Bunch synchrotron oscillations (on Pbar Stacking Cycle) measured with Echotek board & custom firmware TURN NUMBER AFTER INJECTION  BUNCH –BY-BUNCH PHASE (w/offset)

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster MI/RR Transverse Dampers (Ashmanskas, Foster)  Bunch-by-Bunch betatron oscillations (Pbar Stacking Cycle) measured with Echotek board & custom FPGA firmware. Single board needed for: Bunch-by-bunch longitudinal & two transverse dampers. 53MHz, 7.5MHz & 2.5MHz. Debunched beam, single bunches and bunch trains. BUNCH–BY–BUNCH BEAM POSITION TURN NUMBER AFTER INJECTION 

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster “Universal-Damper” Application: Signal Processing Steps (transverse) 1) Bandwidth-Limit input signal to ~53 MHz 2) 14 Bit Digitization at 106 MHz or 212 MHz 3) FIR filter to get single-bunch signal 4) Sum & Difference of plate signals 5) Multi turn difference filter (FIR) w/delay 6) Pickup Mixing for correct Betatron Phase 7) Bunch-by-bunch gain, dead band etc. 8) Timing Corrections for Frequency Sweep 9) Pre-Distortion for Kicker Power Amp 10) Power Amp for Kicker Inside FPGA Echotek Board Buy

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Damper Priorities in Main Injector & Recycler 1.Main Injector Longitudinal Dampers 2.Main Injector Transverse Dampers 3.Recycler Transverse Injection Dampers 4.Recycler Longitudinal Dampers 5.Recycler Broadband (DC Beam) Dampers

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 1. Longitudinal Damper in Main Injector 1.Benefits to Bunch Coalescing for Collider –“Dancing Bunches” degrade Proton coalescing and  L –Affects Lum directly (hourglass) and indirectly (lifetime) –We are deliberately blowing  L in Booster 2.Benefits for Pbar Stacking Cycles –Bunch Rotation is generally turned off ! (x1.5 stack rate?) –Slip-Stacking etc. (Run IIb) will require stable bunches 3.Needed for eventual NUMI operation

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Longitudinal Beam Instability in MI Driven by cavity wake fields within bunch train Seeded by Booster & amplified near MI flat top. First Bunch ~ OK 7th Bunch Trashed Occurs with as few as 7 bunches (out of 588) Prevents low emittance bunch coalescing and efficient Pbar bunch rotation see Dave Wildman’s Talk

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Longitudinal Damper Works by Modulating Phase of RF Zero Crossing

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Damping of Bunch Motion by Modulation of Center of Rotation (RF zero-crossing) on Alternate Half-cycles of Synchrotron Motion

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Numerical Examples for Longitudinal Dampers Damping can be made faster by raising V DAMPER and/or lowering V RF

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster MI Longitudinal Damper- Inputs (Ashmanskas, Foster)  80 Bunch-by-Bunch synchrotron oscillations (Pbar Stacking Cycle) measured with Echotek board & custom firmware TURN NUMBER AFTER INJECTION  BUNCH –BY-BUNCH PHASE (w/offset)

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Longitudinal Damper FPGA Logic ADC Resistive Wall Pickup 14 Synchrotron Motion Velocity Filter Bunch-by- Bunch Digital Phase Detector +THRESH -THRESH Multi-Turn Memory Bunch Intensity FIR Filter +THRESH +/- KICK to DAMPER Individual Bunches are kicked + or – depending on whether they are moving right or left in phase

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster MI Longitudinal Damper Kick Calculated in FPGA Firmware (Ashmanskas, Foster) Single-Bunch Phase Signal Single-Bunch Digital Kick (velocity filter)

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster What ADC Clock Speed is needed? ~53 MHz Bandwidth limited signal, sampled by 106 MHz ADC, measures either in-phase (cosine) or quadrature (sine) component –but not both ==> ADC clock phasing matters! 212 MHz sampling measures both in-phase and quadrature components. Phasing is not critical to determine vector magnitude. 212 MHz  built in phase measurement

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Bandwidth Limit Signal Raw signal has high-frequency components which can cause signal to be missed by ADC – “Aliasing” Bandwidth limited signal (to ~50 MHz) cannot be missed by 106 MHz ADC Eliminate low-frequency ripple, baseline shifts, etc. with Transformer or AC coupling –Digital Filtering can provide additional rejection

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Gaussian Filter - Impulse Response Many implementations, e.g. traversal filter Spreads signal +/-5ns in time so it will not be missed by ADC Reduces ADC Dynamic Range requirement, since spike does not have to be digitized

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Gaussian Filter - Doublet Response Filtered Signal can be sampled by 100 MHz ADC Filtered Output Pulse Shape is insensitive to Bunch Length (for Tb < 10ns) Digitized Pulsehight is “A - B”

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Gaussian Filter - Pulse Train Response Filter Output is good sine wave independent of bunch length “A - B” still gives good bunch-by-bunch measurement Can digitally average over many bunches in a batch to get lower noise

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster In-Phase and Quadrature Sampling “A - B” gives bunch-by-bunch “in-phase” signal Vector Sum sqrt(I**2 +Q**2) is insensitive to clock jitter “D - (C+E)/2” gives bunch-by-bunch “out-of-phase” or “quadrature” signal This is the argument for sampling at 2x Nyquist

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 2. Transverse Damper in Main Injector 1.Bunch-by-Bunch 53 MHz Injection Damper –Forgive Pbar injection errors caused by AP3… line drift –Simplify & speed up Shot Setup –Eliminate emittance growth due to waveform defect in Accumulator extraction kicker 2.Bunch-by-Bunch 2.5 MHz Injection Damper –Eliminate emittance growth in RR  MI transfers 3.Suppress RW instability for NUMI & FT operation –May also be needed for slip-stacking intensities (Run IIb)

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster MI/RR Transverse Dampers - Inputs (Ashmanskas, Foster)  Bunch-by-Bunch betatron oscillations (Pbar Stacking Cycle) measured with Echotek board & custom FPGA firmware. FPGA Filter can be reprogrammed for: 53MHz, 7.5MHz & 2.5MHz. Debunched beam, single bunches and bunch trains. BUNCH–BY–BUNCH BEAM POSITION TURN NUMBER AFTER INJECTION 

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Transverse Bunch-By-Bunch Dampers - Results (Ashmanskas, Foster)  Damping active for Bunch #43 BUNCH–BY–BUNCH BEAM POSITION TURN NUMBER AFTER INJECTION  …CAN ALSO ANTI-DAMP TO BLOW ANY SELECTED BUNCHES OUT OF THE MACHINE  Anti-Satellite Device

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Transverse Bunch-By-Bunch Dampers - Results (Ashmanskas, Foster)  Pickup Signal from Bunch #43 BUNCH–BY–BUNCH BEAM POSITION TURN NUMBER AFTER INJECTION  Damping kick shared for Bunches #41 - #51

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Three-Turn Filter for Transverse Damper Damper kick is calculated from single BPM position reading on 3 successive turns. Arbitrary Betatron Phase of Kicker can be accommodated

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster HERA-P Damper uses a 3-turn Digital FIR Filter Klute, Kohaupt et. al. EPAC ‘96

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 3 Turn Filter Coefficients Damper kick is weighted sum of beam positions on the 3 previous turns. 3 Filter Coefficients Uniquely Determined by: –System Gain –Betatron Phase Desired at Kicker –Constraint that sum of filter coefficients = 0 (so that filter does not respond to DC offsets.)

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Transverse/ Injection Damper FPGA Logic (single pickup with 3-turn filter) ADC Pickup 14 Stripline Kicker Power Amp. 106 MHz > 27 MHz ADC Gain Balance FIR Filter 1-turn Delay 1-turn Delay 1-turn Delay Weighted Sum for Arbitrary Betatron Phase Standard BPM Processing3 - Turn Filter Optional Pre-compensation Filter for Cable DAC

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Narrow band vs. Wide band Dampers In some cases instabilities only occur with specific frequency and mode patterns in ring Dealing specifically with those modes lowers the required kicker power and reduces noise. A wide band (bunch-by-bunch) damper can use digital filtering to provide higher gain for specific mode patterns (  lower power amp.) Many digital filters can operate simultaneously inside some device -- ADC and DAC are shared The flexibility of Digital Filtering inside the FPGA is a major advantage of this approach.

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 3. Recycler Transverse Injection Dampers 2.5 MHz Bunch-by-Bunch Injection Damper  Reduces load on Recycler Stochastic Cooling system Eliminate Emittance Growth from Pbar injection errors caused by AP3 line drift Eliminate emittance growth due to waveform defect in Accumulator extraction kicker Simplify & Speed up Accumulator  RR Transfers –Will take place every ~30 mins in Run IIb

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster Differences between Recycler and MI Dampers RR dampers will track 4 bunches (vs. 588 in MI) RR signals will have 21 samples/bunch (vs.5) RR firmware will provide ACNET registers representing the Amplitude, Phase and Bunch length of each of the 4 bunches. RR firmware will also provide registers for phase and amplitude of stacked DC beam.

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 106 MHz Digitization of the Recycler signals is overkill, but allows the same hardware to be used in MI & Recycler

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 4. Recycler Longitudinal Damper Bunch-by-Bunch 2.5 MHz Injection Damper Eliminate Emittance Growth from Pbar injection mismatches caused by Phase and Energy errors –Reduces load on Recycler Stochastic Cooling system Simplify & Speed up Accumulator  RR Transfers –Will take place every ~30 mins in Run IIb THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS DAMPER DEPENDS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE RECYCLER STOCHASTIC COOLING

14-Oct-02MI/RR Dampers - G. W. Foster 5. Recycler Transverse Dampers Instability Control Damper to Suppress Possible Transverse Instabilities of Debunched (DC) Beam in Recycler These instabilities have been seen in Accumulator but not yet in Recycler. Low-noise pickup w/hybrid & preamp in tunnel 1-3 Turn Digital delay filter using Echotek board Kicker amplifier has low power requirement <~20W