Radiation studies for the MI collimation system and ILC vertical cryostat test area December 13, 2006 Igor Rakhno Accelerator Physics Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Operation of MI8 Collimation Bruce C. Brown All Experimenters Meeting 22 January 2007.
Advertisements

Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Electron Motion in a RF Cavity with external Magnetic Fields Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory RF Workshop – FermiLab October 15, 2008.
Beam current4 A Beam pulse length1.5 ms Power input/structure 35 MW Ohmic losses (beam on)1.6 MW RF power to load (beam on) 0.4 MW RF-to-beam efficiency.
Temporary shielding for the 20" vertical penetration Igor Rakhno November 17, 2008.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
Dark Current Measurements and Simulations Chris Adolphsen 2/4/15.
Collimation System for Beam Loss Localization with Slip Stacking Injection in the Fermilab Main Injector Bruce C. Brown Main Injector Department Accelerator.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
FNAL, May 10, Introduction for Beam Diagnostics Laboratory Main Mission: R&D on charged particle beam diagnostics for e + /e - linear colliders.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Shielding studies for SRF cavities at Fermilab Camille Ginsburg and Igor Rakhno Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA 1SATIF-10, CERNJune 2-4, 2010.
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
ILCTA_IB1_VTS An in-ground vertical test facility for ILC SRF cavities at Fermilab Camille M. Ginsburg ILC SRF Technical Status Meeting 5.May 2006 for.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Highlights of RP activities in support of ISOLDE operation and projects Joachim Vollaire, Alexandre Dorsival and Christelle Saury with material from others.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Overview Satoshi Ozaki Director, Accelerator Systems Division NSLS-II Project March 27, 2007.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
11/15/20051 Radiation Protection Issues for ILC (not exhaustive) A. Fassò, N. Noriaki, H. Vincke Radiation Physics.
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 Future Needs and Future Directions Maximizing the LHC Performances J.M. Jimenez …when Nature persists.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
BOOSTER COLLIMATION AND SHIELDING Proton Source Workshop Fermilab December 7-8, 2010 Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab Accelerator Physics Center.
Summary of radiation shielding studies for MTA Muon production at the MiniBooNE target Igor Rakhno August 24, 2006.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Prompt dose upstream the 12-ft concrete shielding blocks Igor Rakhno May 4, 2007.
Ion Accelerator Activities at VECC
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
Dark Current and Radiation Shielding Studies for the ILC Main Linac
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
? Magnetic Sweet Spots and the eh Machine Detector Interface
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Update on e+ Source Modeling and Simulation
IF Separator Design of RAON
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Background, IBS, gas scattering halo, collimation and etc. *
Polarized Internal Gas Target in a Strong Toroidal Magnetic Field
Update on Dark current generation in ILC Main Linac
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Beam halo and beam losses in IR1 and IR5
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Tertiary Collimators in IP1/IP5: Progress Report
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
LEPTA project Measuring lifetime of positrons
FLUX TRAPPING STUDIES ON LOW BETA CAVITIES
Review of Quench Limits
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Radiation studies for the MI collimation system and ILC vertical cryostat test area December 13, 2006 Igor Rakhno Accelerator Physics Department

2 LARP Main Injector collimation system Vertical RF cavity test IB1

3 MI collimation system at slipstacking injection All that starts at MI230 location – 2 dipoles and 9 quads, 1 primary horizontal collimator and 4 secondary vertical ones. The region is about 120 m in length. Scraping rate for the primary collimator is assumed to be 5% of total intensity which is 5.5×10 13 ppp at 2.2 sec rep. rate. So we have (5.5×10 13 / 2.2) × 0.05 = 1.25×10 12 p/s lost. Primary collimator is a tungsten bar 0.2 mm in thickness. Issues addressed: groundwater activation, absorbed dose in the magnet coils, residual activation. E-cool equipment.

4 MI collimation system at slipstacking injection Dipole cross section

5 MI collimation system at slipstacking injection Primary collimator

6

7 Usually epoxy can survive for absorbed dose up to 400 Mrad = 4 MGy. Our data is 0.1 MGy/yr (front of 1 st dipole) and 0.02 MGy/yr (front of 2 nd dipole). Lifetime of the 1 st dipole ≈ 40 years.

8 MI collimation system at slipstacking injection Secondary collimators

9 Vertical RF cavity test IB1 Three vertical test cryostat facilities for SRF cavities are planned to be installed in IB1 in TD. A single cavity test lasts no less than 18 hours and about 400 cavities are planned to be tested a year. The first facility should be available in The operations will be focused on high accelerating gradients– from 20 up to 50 MV/m. The facility can be a strong radiation source (including neutrons). Contacts and comparisons – JLab and DESY. Major drawback – there is no reliable model describing the amount, spatial, energy, and angular distributions of the field-emitted electrons inside the SRF cavities. Surface imperfections and residual gas contamination. Dark current ≈ 2 µA.

10 Vertical RF cavity test IB1

11 Vertical RF cavity test IB1 Two models were introduced – an electron beam hits the inner wall of the cavity. A conservative approach. Dose attenuation has been calculated. The results of the calculations are normalized using the existing experimental data on measured dose rate in the vicinity of such SRF cavities – the data from DESY. A tradeoff is sought – from operational standpoint people prefer bigger external shielding and stronger motors than small local shielding with lower efficiency of cryogenic operations, reduced level of detector signal inside, and duplication of the local shielding blocks several times. The area will qualify as a controlled area (prompt dose rate under 5 mrem/hr).