Reviewing [Ros07] T. Roscoe. Writing reviews for systems conferences. Technical report, ETH Zürich, Mar 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SOHA HASSOUN COMPUTER SCIENCE TUFTS UNIVERSITY Mentors and Advisors CRA-W Graduate Cohort: 2011.

Advertisements

Research Seminar Course For MRes and first-year PhD students Spring term January-March Up to 10 weeks, ca.1-2 hours per week

Writing an effective assignment in A-Level Leisure Studies.

Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada

MSc Dissertation in Economics

GETTING PUBLISHED Chapter 18.

Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Send.

Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.

Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL

Project Workshops Assessment. 2 Deadlines and Deliverables No later than 16:00 on Tuesday, Week 21 in the Easter Term (second Tuesday) This is a hard.

Experimental Psychology PSY 433

Reasons of rejection Paolo Russo Università di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Fisica Napoli, Italy 8th ECMP, Athens, Sep. 13th,

Peer revision. Initial Reaction Read the entire essay. Do not mark anything on the paper. At the end of the paper, comment on your initial response to.

Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Sends.

Dr. Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam Department of Library and Information Studies, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch

SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.

788.11J Presentation “sensors for phishing” (i.e., your short name of the paper’s title) Presented by Student Name.

CompSci 725 Handout 7: Oral Presentations, Projects and Term Reports Version July 2009 Clark Thomborson University of Auckland.

Today’s Objectives  Complete a job application.  Compose a letter of application (cover letter) for employment.  Create or update a resume.

September1999 October 1999 Publicity: Networking, CVs, and Websites Marie desJardins CMSC 601 March 26, 2012.

Submitting Manuscripts to Journals: An Editor’s Perspective Michael K. Lindell Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University.

QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.

1 How to review a paper by Fabio Crestani. 2 Disclaimer 4 There is no fixed mechanism for refereeing 4 There are simple rules that help transforming a.

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 7, 2015  Review Service Section  Discuss Clinical Section  Discuss Peer Evaluations of Contributions.

A review of peer assessment tools. The benefits of peer assessment Peer assessment is a powerful teaching technique that provides benefits to learners,

Stage-426-Feb-991 Ways to Excel as a Stage-4 Student Professor Clark Thomborson Computer Science Department Auckland University.

Morten Blomhøj and Paola Valero Our agenda: 1.The journal NOMAD’s mission, review policy and process 2.Two reviews of a paper 3.Frequent comments in reviews.

How to write a professional paper. 1. Developing a concept of the paper 2. Preparing an outline 3. Writing the first draft 4. Topping and tailing 5. Publishing.

Navigating a Professional Meeting Maria Gini Dept of CSE, University of Minnesota.

What Does it Take to Publish in the AJAE? Get a good idea. Turn the idea into a well-posed, answerable question. Do the research right. Write Effectively.

How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.

FOR 500 The Publication Process Karl Williard & John Groninger.

Writing a Publishable USENIX/SAGE Technical Paper Joshua S. Simon Collective TechnologiesApril 8, 1998.

Ch 1 Special Project Common Chemistry. 1. The project will be done in groups of 3 members each (maximum of 4 members if class size is not a multiple of.

The Reviewing Process Marie desJardins AAAI-13 Panel Conference Reviewing Best Practices.

Technical Writing: An Editor’s Perspective Michael K. Lindell Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University.

Scientific Peer Review Yixin Chen, Associate Professor Computer & Information Science University of Mississippi April 9, 2013.

June REU 2003 How to Conduct Research Some Rules of Thumb.

Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.

Cyber-crime Science Pieter Hartel & Marianne Junger.

Scientifi c Method Chapter 1: The World of Earth Science.

UEF // University of Eastern Finland How to publish scientific journal articles? 10 STEPS TO SUCCESS lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.

Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.

Revising Your Paper Paul Lewis With thanks to Mark Weal.

DATABASES. Learning outcomes for today By the end of this session you will be able to: ◦ Use boolean operators ◦ Understand the structure of information.

Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.

Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success

02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University

Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional

Using this Communications Template

This presentation is best viewed in Slide Show mode

Writer’s Workshop (for a written poem, short story, etc.)

ECE361 Engineering Practice

02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University

EXPECTATIONS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY APPLICANT

Oral Presentation Due: November 7th

Publicity: Networking, CVs, and Websites

Merrilyn Goos University of Limerick, Ireland

CSC 682: Advanced Computer Security

Experimental Psychology PSY 433

Essay #1: Your Goals as a Writer

Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees

The Process of Getting Published: Reviews and Rejection

Publicity: Networking, CVs, and Websites

Mid-term assignment Read the paper “Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion” Answer the following questions (2-6 pages total): In your opinion, what were the.

Staff Review and Development (SRD): for all staff

SURE Network Conference 2019

Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees

Mid-term assignment instructions

Presentation transcript:

Reviewing [Ros07] T. Roscoe. Writing reviews for systems conferences. Technical report, ETH Zürich, Mar

Cyber-crime Science 2 Research is a creative process 1.Study the literature 2.Think of a research question 3.Find an answer 4.Evaluate the answer 5.Write paper using standard format 6.Submit to conference or journal 7.Several Reviewers read the paper 8.The PC or Editor decide verdict 9.Celebrate if accept, else...

Cyber-crime Science 3 Purpose of the review Quality assurance Justification of accept/reject Feedback to the authors Communicate your thoughts to the rest of the PC An opportunity to clarify your own thoughts

Cyber-crime Science 4 Steps writing the review Read the paper first, scribbling notes in the margin Lookup references if needed Write the review »Summarise the paper in your own words »What in your opinion is the contribution? »How well does the paper fit the conference? »Write helpful comments for the authors on the basis of your scribbles (more...) Be cautious and constructive

Cyber-crime Science 5 Types of comments Have the authors missed relevant related work? Is the paper well written? Any technical flaws? Anything important that is missing? Anything especially cool? Would this lead to a good presentation? Potential for a best paper award? Evidence of plagiarism and fraud?

Cyber-crime Science 6 Program Committee Meeting Preparation »Reread the papers and your reviews »Be sure to be able to explain your standpoint »Try to understand the standpoint of other reviewers »Have a look at the papers you did not review Meeting »Be fair »Be concise »Try to reach a consensus »Above all else be professional!

Mini-conference Must attend, 14 Jan,13:30-17:30, WA 4 5 min pitch (slides via ) A3+ poster (bring on paper) Best paper awards Selected papers can be published Cyber-crime Science 7

Final mark We will mark pitch and poster We will read each paper and set aside unfair reviews Paper mark is a weighted average of the overall evaluation and the reviewers confidence Final mark based on all of the above Cyber-crime Science 8

9 Exercise Write a review of “Overcoming the Insider” [Wil09] R. Willison and M. Siponen. Overcoming the insider: reducing employee computer crime through situational crime prevention. Commun. ACM, 52(9): , Sep [Har09] P. H. Hartel. Review of: “Overcoming the insider: reducing employee computer crime through situational crime prevention" by Willison R., Siponen M". Computing Reviews, page CR137444, Nov