Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Advertisements

Our Institutions CSB/SJU Two schools, one academic program Liberal Arts, Residential, Catholic, Benedictine 3,900+ undergraduates 300+ FTE faculty Distribution.
General Studies Areas Core Areas –Literacy & Critical Inquiry (L) –Mathematical Studies (MA/CS) –Humanities & Fine Arts (HU) –Social & Behavioral Sciences.
How to Use SBP Curricular Criteria for public health bachelor’s degrees in PHP and SPH Reviews March 2015 Arlington, VA.
MISSION, PURPOSE, & COMPETENCIES GENERAL EDUCATION REVISION
General Education Revision. Mission & Purpose Mission Rooted in the tradition of liberal arts education, FGCU’s General Education Program provides students.
Core Curriculum Revision Dr. Don Pratt Associate Professor Biology Chair Core Curriculum Advisory Committee.
Southwest Texas Junior College Core Curriculum Dr. Cheryl Sanchez, Dr. Mark Underwood, Dr. Renee Zimmerman, and Bobby Ayala Southwest Texas Junior College.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
General Education Reform Through the Lens of Student Success Tony Ciccone Bill Keith Jeff Merrick Dev Venugopalan.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
ENGAGING STUDENTS: HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES By Mark Stoner and Vanessa Arnaud.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
Defining Institutional Learning Outcomes: A Collaborative Initiative Facilitated by the Office of Academic and Student Affairs AND the College Governance.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
Curriculum Summit Part II: Curriculum and Student Interface December 11,
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
High Quality of Undergraduate Programs: Perspectives from a US State University 7th China Study Abroad Forum March 12, 2010 Dr. Yenbo Wu.
Promoting Universal Values in the Face of Societal Change The Council of Europe Caryn McTighe Musil November 20, 2007 Association of American Colleges.
Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Beginning in Fall “Given the rapid evolution of necessary knowledge and skills and the need to take into account global, national, state, and local.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
An Integrated Model for Assessing Course and Program SLOs David A. Wood, Jr., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Astronomy San Antonio College.
Del Mar General Education Part 1: Process for establishing the 2014 Core Curriculum.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Learning Outcomes and Assessment APCC Peter Wolf April
Core Curriculum and Transfer Students Summer 2015.
Outcomes-based Education at UC. Created, Implemented, Maintained and Assessed by Faculty (Supported by Everyone!)
Making Sense of the Core Objectives
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Humanities Blogs Rock! Integrating information technology into the School of Liberal Arts and Academic Partnerships Shereen Hassanein.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
MnObe Mini-Immersion August 6, 2009 Information Literacy in the Liberal Arts Barbara Fister.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
General Education at CityU. Framework cu.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
Assessment at City Tech April 17, 2015 Living Lab Associate Seminar Susan Nilsen-Kupsch RDH MPA.
A LEAP Toward an Educated Citizenry: The Role of Public Health APHA Washington, DC November 1, 2011 Susan Albertine Vice President Association of American.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
Using AAC&U’s Learning Tools to Address Core Revision Terrel L. Rhodes Vice President Association of American Colleges and Universities Texas Coordinating.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
C OLLEGIATE L EARNING A SSESSMENT Dr. Pedro Reyes, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs January 2014.
The New Core Curriculum: Learning for Life UTSA Advisors’ Conference, October 19, 2012.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
An Introduction to the UCA Core The UCA Experience Explore. Enrich
CORE + An overview.
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
General Education Review
Placing courses in local GE patterns: Models for Effective Practice
Overview of Learning Outcomes
Faculty Forum on Critical Thinking
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Missouri Core 42 January 17, 2018.
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Learning goals and assessment (MBA)
CORE + An overview.
Authentic Assessment: Texas Core
Phase 1: Core Learning Goals & Objectives
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
General Education Redesign Task Force
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Learning to Learn via Application Cultivating Aspiration via Learning
Presentation transcript:

Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010

Purpose adopted by the UEAC ( )  Through the core curriculum, students will gain a foundation of knowledge of human cultures and the physical and natural world; develop principles of personal and social responsibility for living in a diverse world; and advance intellectual and practical skills that are essential for all learning.

Draft: Core Objectives  Critical thinking skills  Communication skills  Empirical and quantitative skills  Teamwork  Social responsibility  Personal responsibility

Draft: Core Objectives  Critical thinking skills  to include creative thinking, innovation, inquiry, and analysis, evaluation of literacy, and synthesis of information  Communication skills  to include effective written, oral, and visual and digital communication  Empirical and reasoning Quantitative Skills  to include application of scientific and mathematical/ and statistical concepts quantitative literacy  to include applications of scientific and mathematical concepts

Draft: Core Objectives  Teamwork  to include the ability to consider different points of view and to work effectively with others to support a shared purpose or goal  Social responsibility  to include intercultural competency, civic knowledge, and the ability to engage effectively in regional, national and global communities  Personal Responsibility  to include the ability to connect choices, actions and consequences to ethical decision-making

Review: Current Core Framework  42 SCH required for core completion at both bachelor- and associate-program levels  36 SCH Core requirements comprising the foundational courses in the disciplines with the purpose of developing a breadth of knowledge  Component Area Chart I  6-12 SCH Institutionally Designated Options  Component Area Chart II

Proposed Foundational Component Areas  Communication  Mathematics  Life and Physical Sciences  Humanities  Visual and Performing Arts  U.S. History  Government / Political Science  Social and Behavioral Sciences

Workgroup recommendations  Mapping Core Objectives to Component Areas  Three core objectives minimum for each component area  Each core objective should be utilized a minimum of three times  Institutions can add core objective(s) beyond minimum recommendations  DISCUSSION in small groups  Consideration of alternate mapping core objectives to component areas

DRAFT: Core Objectives Mapping Foundational Component Areas Core Objectives (minimum recommendations) Communication Critical Thinking, Communication skills, Personal responsibility Mathematics Critical Thinking, Empirical reasoning, Social responsibility Life and Physical Sciences Critical Thinking, Empirical reasoning, Teamwork Humanities Teamwork, Critical thinking, Personal responsibility Visual/Performing Arts Critical Thinking, Teamwork, Communication skills U.S. History Critical Thinking, Social responsibility, Teamwork Government/Political Science Communication skills, Social responsibility, Personal responsibility Social/Behavioral Science Critical Thinking, Teamwork, Empirical reasoning

Draft: Provisions for All Institutions  Institutions determine courses to fulfill the Core Objectives within the appropriate component areas.  In addition to the subject matter of the course, each selected course must address every Core Objective mapped to that component area.  Institution will assess student attainment of the six Core Objectives.

Further Discussion  Component Area descriptions  Homework for break-out groups  Utilize current Assumptions and Defining Characteristics?  Implementation of Core Objectives  Ensuring that selected courses develop a breath of knowledge  Provide the proper variety and number of courses that students can choose

Further Discussion – Phase II  Guarantee transfer and applicability of core?  Tracks  STEM  Humanities  Social Science  Other  Block core  36 SCH core with no double-dipping  Unique Needs courses?  Senior Level capstone?  A 3 SCH senior-level capstone as part of the general education (but not necessarily core) component of the degree plan;  Each capstone course should cover at least 3 Core Objective s.

Further Discussion – Phase II  Legislative action?  Reduction of Government and History requirements?  Change definition of core curriculum: “academic undergraduate” to “baccalaureate”  Two levels of core complete?  one for AA/AS degrees (e.g. 36 SCH) and a larger requirement (+6 to12 SCH) for baccalaureate degree?  Options for upper-division capstone?  Core Curriculum or General Education?  Institutionally designation option?