The IP Transition – What is it, and why is it important? Prepared for NASUCA Mid-year meeting, New Orleans, LA June 7, 2016 David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of Type II Interconnection Policy Press Conference 6 July 2004.
Advertisements

FCC to keep in mind... In determining what UNEs to make available, must consider whether –Access to proprietary elements is necessary –Failure to provide.
Broadband and Wide Area Network Services Carrier Gigabit Ethernet Multi Protocol Label Switching Vs. IP VPNs T-1 & T-3 SIP Trunks Security Network Topology.
Earl Comstock President and CEO COMPTEL. The World Has Changed FCC adopts Cable Modem Order and Supreme Court upholds FCC in Brand X FCC adopts Wireline.
WHAT THE IP TRANSITION MEANS FOR CONSUMERS AND A UBIQUITOUS, AFFORDABLE, RELIABLE NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy Consulting.
The status of broadband FCC defines –High-speed lines that deliver services at speeds in excess of 200 kbps in at least one direction –Advanced services.
Telecommunications and Natural Gas Industry. Telecommunications Voice (landline, wireless) Video (cable, satellite) Data (cable, wireless) Convergence.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
Federal Communications Commission Intergovernmental Advisory Committee
“Meet the Regulator” Network Reliability P.J. Aduskevicz ATT FCC Network Reliability & Interoperability Council Wireless Developments Dale Hatfield, Chief.
SCAMS, CRAMS AND LAMBS: A Lamb’s-Eye View (NARUC Annual Meeting, San Francisco CA 11/16/14) David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy Consulting for Consumers
Broadband ? Bob Loube NASUCA 2011 Thanksgiving Loube NASUCA
ABCs of Small Business Customer Acquisition. Welcome Small Business Customer Acquisition Series How to Approach How to Sell to Small Businesses Increase.
©Ofcom Voice – the need to take a long term view on sector evolution Chris Rowsell 18 October 2007.
FCC Rural Broadband Trials: Funding to Connect Rural America Panelist: Jonathan Chambers, Chief Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis Federal.
1 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Lawful Intercept Case Study Harvard Law School November 12, 2003.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
E-rate Modernization December 2, E-rate Basics Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-rate) – Authorized by the 1996 Telecommunications.
Policies for the Broadband Digital Migration Barbara A. Cherry Senior Counsel Office of Strategic Planning & Policy Analysis Federal Communications Commission.
New Networks The Man-Made Perfect Storm. Sound the Alarm! Join with us to protect the rights of alarm companies and customers.
Federalism in the 21 st Century New England Conference of Public Utility Commissioners June 11, 2013 Groton, Connecticut Susan M. Baldwin.
Multiservice Data Networks R. Jayanthan. Kithsiri Gunasekara. 17 th National Information Technology Conference 1998.
Minnesota Telecom Alliance Customer Service Conference April 8, 2010.
12/09/2015 NGN Broadband Access: TIA Broadband Drivers, Principles, and VoIP Contact: David Thompson, TIA Dan Bart, TIA SOURCE:TIA, TITLE:NGN Broadband.
Support For Rural America William Maher Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau July 2, 2003 Universal Service and The FCC.
The FCC and the Internet Robert Cannon Senior Counsel for Internet Issues FCC Office of Plans and Policy.
Questions about broadband What do we do about broadband services? –Why didn’t the ILECs deploy DSL faster? Could regulation be to blame? –How do we get.
ITA FCC WORKSHOP MARCH 14, Appreciate being here, but... I’d rather be playing Guard for the New York Knicks 2.
Voice over Internet Protocol and its implications in Oregon SOMMER TEMPLET STAFF ATTORNEY JUNE 10, 2013.
© 2005 Calix Calix Confidential & Proprietary Service Provide Issues and Trends Frank Wiener – Vice President, Field Marketing.
Internet Basics Monopoly Concerns & Review TC 310 May 22, 2008.
57 6. CALNET CALNET 2 - What is it and how does it fit with E-rate? Contract (s) held and administered by State –CALNET 2 Contract effective date:
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL. INTRODUCTION SCENARIOS IN INTERNET TELEPHONY VOIP GATEWAYS IMPORTANCE OF VOICE OVER IP BENEFITS & APPLICATIONS ADVANTAGES.
NASUCA June TELCO COMPETITION: THE LACK OF ESSENTIAL CONSUMER PROTECTIONS Barbara R. Alexander Consumer Affairs Consultant 83 Wedgewood Dr. Winthrop,
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
What will the Internet industry look like in 2007? Thursday 09 th September 2004 Internet Week ISPA Internet Week ISPA What will the Internet industry.
1 NASTD 34 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE James Arden Barnett Jr., Rear Admiral (Ret.) Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Federal Communications Commission.
Implications of VoIP TC 310 May 28, Questions from Reviews Duty to Interconnect Reciprocal compensation Line of business v statutory line of business.
Wireless Services TC 310 June 2,2007. Why Regulate License Legacy Substituting Wireline  Regulatory Parity Network Effects  Interconnection  Standards.
Universal Service and USF Reform: Establishing a Rational and Efficient System Presentation to NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Antonio, TX June 28, 2011.
Figure 2.1 A hybrid system with circuit switched PBX and Voice over IP capabilities.
Applying the 1996 Act TC 310 May 21, Current Event FCC investigating cell phone contract termination  Cancel early  Reduce over time  Take state.
The Three Rs: The Need for Reliable, Redundant and Resilient Telecommunications in the New Age Presentation for the National Association of State Utility.
Reliable, Redundant and Resilient? Presentation of Stefanie A. Brand, Director New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel to the National Association of State.
Chapter 1: Introduction Business Data Communications, 4e.
Objective This presentation covers the Generation of Telecom Network Evolution. Basically the presentation aims on the evolution from 1G to 4G and some.
State of Kansas Senate Bill 350 Telecom Reform Bill Overview David Kerr AT&T Kansas.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
t What is VoIP? t How this technology is changing business model in telecom industry?  How this theme has been discussed in the world ? t What are the.
Competition Policy for the new U.S. Telecoms Market: Background and Outline Howard A. Shelanski, U.C. Berkeley Nanterre, Paris X November 9, 2006.
PRESENTED BY : P:MARREDDY07681A0453 WIRELESS SYSTEM WIRELESS SYSTEM.
Introduction to Information Networks COMT 625 Hans Kruse.
4G WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY. ABSTRACT 4G refers to the fourth generation of cellular wireless standards. It is a successor to 3G and 2G families of standards.
ITS 602 Purposes of the course
Rural Communities Broadband Roundtable October 24, 2013 Tupper Lake NY
NITRD Complex Engineered Networks Panel II: What are the grand challenges in networking methodologies? Robert Doverspike (AT&T Labs – Research) Sept 20-21,
Discussion of Operating Expense Caps and Other Expense Considerations Resulting From the FCC’s Universal Service Fund Reform Order Prepared by Doug Kitch,
The End of the World For Telephones Part 2 Stephen Tondini & James Quisenberry University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
The Business Value of SIP Trunking
FCC National Broadband Plan (NBP) and Rural Universal Service Reform
IMS & Wireline to Wireless Convergence
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
Statewide Migration to an Emergency Services IP Network
Very High Capacity and 5G Networks: from the EU code to the EU market
Chapter 2 – Networks and how they link
Do You Have Multiple Amazon Seller Accounts? Amazon Knows it! By EsellersCare Contact : +1 (855)
Presentation transcript:

The IP Transition – What is it, and why is it important? Prepared for NASUCA Mid-year meeting, New Orleans, LA June 7, 2016 David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy Consulting for Consumers tpc4c.net;

What is the “IP transition”? What is usually referred to as the IP transition is multiple interdependent transitions But specifically, it’s a change from time division multiplexing (TDM) to Internet protocol (IP) transmission on telecom networks; circuit-switched TDM vs. packet switched IP Not all changes in this transition are IP-related 2

TDM 3

IP 4 An IP network is multi-use. It can carry video and voice and text. It is thus a “converged” network. It is a more efficient and flatter network – instead of a network of central offices for every neighborhood, and a trunk and branch structure, an IP network can have fewer “meet points” and should have flexible routing. Thanks, Chris Witteman

Networks and services 5

What is the IP Transition NOT? NOT necessarily a change in network wireline facilities NOT a change from copper to fiber o Copper can handle IP transmission NOT an excuse for ILECs to slough off customers NOT a reason for removing consumer protections Does NOT require elimination of voice-only service See posting on my blog, “A Transition to WHAT? And where are we now?”* 6

The key for customers: The distinction between facilities and/or services ILECs seek retirement of facilities, i.e., copper lines – with and without ceasing services o AT&T – retiring copper and not replacing it with a wireline service o Verizon – That plus retiring copper in favor of fiber or wireless Withdrawal of services, esp. of basic service (e.g., OH statute) o Can basic service be offered over fiber? Yes, according to Verizon. Time Warner Lifeline in NY – basic service over coax o Does it matter whether the facilities are IP-enabled? No. 7

How can we look at these changes? Which facilities retirements and service withdrawals are necessary parts of the IP transition? Which are not necessary parts but instead only part of a particular firm’s business plan? Does the public interest allow such changes? o AT&T grandfathering Is the trial working? Was it a forgone conclusion? o Verizon? “Customer choice”? Migrate or lose service? 8

POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE IP TRANSITION ON CONSUMERS, COMPETITION, UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY Consumers o Loss of services o Increased cost for basic service; upselling to bundles (triple play +) o Disadvantages to customers on legacy facilities (i.e., neglect) o Excuse for deregulation Universal service o We’re now talking about TWO essential services: voice and broadband (see Broadband Lifeline Order) o Needs to be ubiquitously available, at reasonable and affordable prices Consumer protections available to all o § 254 Public safety o Focus on 911 sunny-day and rainy-day problems with the IP network E.g., 4/14 multi-state outage caused by oversight 3/16: Erie County NY; Honolulu HI Competition o Harm to competition is harm to consumers 9

The § 214(a) protection In the CAF II Order 1, the FCC forebore from ETC general responsibilities for price cap (large) ILECs where they receive no high-cost support. Did not forbear from Lifeline or for non-price cap (small) ILECs. But even where there is ETC forbearance, service must continue until a § 214(a) petition has been granted by the FCC o CAF II Order stressed the continuing importance of § 214(a) 2 o See 13-5 FNPRM (8/7/15) 3 o AT&T grandfathering proposals in 13-5 (October 30, 2015) 4 No withdrawal of basic service yet o Note slide in AT&T Report 5 FCC process; state notice and processes o E.g., OH (burden on customers) § 214(a) facilities retirements without service withdrawal o Remember Verizon and basic service See my blog, “A Relinquishment Briefing”** 10

Is losing basic service a true loss? Depends on what replaces it! Service without obligation to serve Service without consumer protection o Arbitration clauses? Service without back-up power Service without access to medical alerts, alarms, faxes 11

QUESTIONS? FURTHER DISCUSSION? Contact info Telecom Policy Consulting for Consumers tpc4c.net (614)

Links * ** Id A2.pdfhttps://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC A2.pdf A1.pdf. 190A1.pdf A1.pdfhttps://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC A1.pdf