STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Michelle Helmer IES Staff Development Specialist Erie 2 BOCES IES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives “SLOs 101” March 2012 Presentation developed by Cheryl Covell, TST BOCES Data Analyst & Heather Sheridan-Thomas,
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
Student Growth Objective (SGO) Evaluating SGO Quality
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
September 5,  Be present  Demonstrate Active Listening  Help ensure a balance of voices  Respect time boundaries  Use electronics respectfully.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Putting the Pieces Together…. Understanding SLOs.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Student Learning targets
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
Student Learning Objectives: Considerations for Teachers of Career and Technical Education Courses Name Title Date 1 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Student Learning Objectives 101 Presented by: Angelique Johnson-Dingle Evidence Based Observations SLO CCLS State Provided Growth Measures Locally Selected.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR). What are the components of APPR? Teacher Evaluation –60 points (observation*/goal setting) –20 points (State.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND YOUR TEACHER EVALUATION NYSUT Education and Learning Trust NYSUT Field and Legal Services NYSUT Research and Educational.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
ANALYSIS AND ATTRIBUTES OF APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENTS Coastal Carolina University.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Last Revised: 10/01/15. Senate Bill 290 has specific goal-setting requirements for all licensed and administrative staff in the State of Oregon. In ,
Sample Science SLO’s Grades Student Growth Goal Setting Process (SLO’s) Y Central School District Science Points Grade Level/Subject.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Student Growth Goals Professional Learning Jenny Ray, PGES Consultant (KDE) 1.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center *Please see caveat © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Student Learning Objectives OCM.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives How to Create an SLO.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation: Writing SLOs August 2014 Presented by Aimee Kirsch.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Student Learning Objectives!
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Welcome! Teacher Evaluator Training Session 5
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Implementing Race to the Top
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning.
Presentation transcript:

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Michelle Helmer IES Staff Development Specialist Erie 2 BOCES IES

Learning Targets I can understand the NYSED regulations for requirements regarding SLO development I can understand NYSED expectations for assessment development I can begin the work of building a balanced assessment system in development of our District’s APPR decisions

Data Boot Camp Data have no meaning without context.

State --- Student Growth on Assessment Local --- Measure of student Achievement Multiple Measures aligned to Teacher Practice Rubric Composite Score Assessment Practice Total - 100

Multiple Measures Matter Using decisions with vision of long term system

20 25 } } } 4-8 Math and ELA State provided Growth number based on State Assessments (MGP) State --- Student Growth on Assessment

20 25 } } } 3 rd grade, 6-8 SS/Science, All courses ending in NYS Assessment SLO based on approved assessment. (must use State Assessment if one exists) State --- Student Growth on Assessment

20 25 } } } All other courses Group SLO based on State Assessments or individual SLO based on Course specific assessment. State --- Student Growth on Assessment

What are SLO’s A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning for the year (or, semester, where applicable). It must be specific and measurable, based on available prior student learning data, and aligned to Common Core, State or National standards, as well as any other school and district priorities. Teachers’ scores are based upon the degree to which their goals were attained. Definition according to NYSED guidance

Template All SLOs MUST include the following basic components: Student PopulationWhich students are being addressed? Learning Content What is being taught? Course name and source of Standards associated with this SLO and specify the exact standards, performance indicators, etc, that will be taught, learned, and assessed. Interval of Instructional Time What is the instructional period covered Evidence These are the assessments used for determining students’ levels of learning. Baseline This is the level of students’ knowledge and sill in the targeted learning content at the beginning of the interval of instructional time. Target(s) This is the numeric achievement goal which articulates the amount that students will have to grow during the interval of instructional time. HEDI Criteria This is how different levels of student growth will translate into one of four rating categories: Highly Effective, Effective, Developing, and Ineffective Rationale This describes the reasoning behind the choices regarding learning content, evidence, and target.

Learning Content This is the content to be taught in the SLO. Task: Identify the course name and source of standards (Common Core, national, state, local) associated with this SLO, and specify the exact standards, performance indicators, etc., that will be taught, learned, and assessed.

Considerations Approximately what percentage of the course’s standards is selected? How is the current knowledge and skill of the targeted students informing the selection? What are the most critical aspects for the development of these students in this content this year? To what extent is the learning content specific and measurable? 12 Learning Content

Considerations To what extent is the content central to this and future coursework, as well as college and career readiness? How deeply and thoroughly will the standards be reflected in the teaching, learning, and assessment? What instructional approaches are prioritized? Why are these instructional approaches most likely to support the targeted students in mastering these standards? 13 Learning Content

Evidence Summative Baseline/Diagnostic Formative Data Driven Instruction

Targets Set Growth Targets 15 Targets can also be differentiated to meet the needs of students based on the analysis of the baseline data : 80% of students will meet group targets on the Regents exam  85% for students who scored between % on pre-assessment  65% for students who scored between 9-35% on pre-assessment  TIERED/GROUPED 80% of students will meet individual targets on the Regents exam  Student A = 65%  Student B = 55%  Student C = 70%  Student D = 85%  Student E = 65%  Student F = 85%  INDIVIDUAL 80% of students will grow half the distance between pre-assessment score and a score of 100 on Regents Exam Or 80% of students will grow to a score of 80% on the Regents Exam  WHOLE GROUP All content © 2012 Erie 1 BOCES. All rights reserved. Modified with permission by Erie 2 BOCES IES

State --- Student Growth on Assessment Local --- Measure of student Achievement Multiple Measures aligned to Teacher Practice Rubric Composite Score Assessment STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Rigor Valid & Reliable Comparable Vested Interest Security

NYSED defines rigorous …the measure is aligned to the New York State learning standards …to the extent practicable, the assessment must be valid and reliable as defined by the Standards of Educational and Psychological Testing. NYSED APPR guidance F1 pg 46

Centrality of Standards MathPersonal Health and Fitness- Elementary 3.NBT.1 Use place value understanding to round whole numbers to the nearest 10 or 100. (CCLS Math 2011) 1. Students will perform basic motor and manipulative skills. They will attain competency in a variety of physical activities and proficiency in a few select complex motor and sports activities. develop physical fitness skills through regular practice, effort, and perseverance (Health, PE, FACS 1996 )

Centrality of Standards Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take. RI.K.9RI.6.9 With prompting and support, identify basic similarities in and differences between two texts on the same topic (e.g., in illustrations, descriptions, or procedures). Compare and contrast one author’s presentation of events with that of another (e.g., a memoir written by and a biography on the same person). a. Use their experience and their knowledge of language and logic, as well as culture, to think analytically

What type of Assessment? E1.5 Identify and use, in individual and group experiences, some of the roles, processes, and actions used in performing and composing music of their own and others E1.2 Sing songs and play instruments, maintaining tone quality, pitch, rhythm, tempo, and dynamics; perform the music expressively; and sing or play simple repeated patterns (ostinatos) with familiar songs, rounds, partner songs, and harmonizing parts

Validity “How well is the assessment assessing what I want it to?” “Not a property of the assessment, but of the inferences we make based on the information gathered from the assessment.”

Item Map & Test Blueprints

Reliability How consistently an assessment measures its intended target and the extent to which scores are relatively free of error. LCI, Ltd. jborgoli

Threats to Reliability

How do we work to ensure reliability? Watch assessment formatting- final eyes revisions Use multiple choice items when valid Create clear scoring guides and rubrics Develop anchor responses/performances An assessment cannot be valid if it isn’t reliable.

Model Performance

Table of Specifications – Item map 1.What is a “Table of Specifications” ad according to the article what is the purpose of a TOS in assessment development? 2.There are two sources of validity evidence named in the article (Test Content and Response Process) Can you define and describe the implications to assessment development for each?

4 A’s Protocol Agreement What evidence does the text provide for the development of item maps (TOS)? Do you agree with these claims? Why or Why not? Aspirations What did you read about that you aspire to or will need to implement although you aren’t fully doing so yet? What evidence does the text provide that encourages your aspirations? (Mis)alignments What things might keep you from changing or implementing your aspirations or priorities? Adjustments How can you get around or eliminate those barriers? What support do you need? What next steps will you take?

SLO Rigor Tool All SLOs MUST include the following basic components: Student PopulationWhich students are being addressed? Learning Content What is being taught? Course name and source of Standards associated with this SLO and specify the exact standards, performance indicators, etc, that will be taught, learned, and assessed. Interval of Instructional Time What is the instructional period covered Evidence These are the assessments used for determining students’ levels of learning. Baseline This is the level of students’ knowledge and sill in the targeted learning content at the beginning of the interval of instructional time. Target(s) This is the numeric achievement goal which articulates the amount that students will have to grow during the interval of instructional time. HEDI Criteria This is how different levels of student growth will translate into one of four rating categories: Highly Effective, Effective, Developing, and Ineffective Rationale This describes the reasoning behind the choices regarding learning content, evidence, and target.

Six Steps to Effective Feedback: 1.PRAISE: narrate the positive with precise praise 2.PROBE: Use targeted open-ended question and scaffolds to identify the core issue 3.ACTION STEP: state concrete action step 4.PRACTICE: Role play/simulate how to improve current class 5.PLAN AHEAD: Design/revise upcoming lesson plan to implement action 6.FOLLOW-UP: Establish timeline when action step will be completed

Criteria for Right Action Steps: Highest Leverage: Will this help the teacher to develop most quickly and effectively? Clear and Measurable: Can anyone understand the action? Can you easily measure if the teacher has made the change? What evidence will you have of mastery? Bite-sized: If you can’t make the change in a week, the action step isn’t small enough

US History SLO & 3 rd Grade SLO results Use the SLO rigor tool to evaluate the SLO. Calculate results Determine a high leverage action step for this teacher moving forward Develop a plan for this meeting