1 ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES PROPOSED FEDERAL STANDARDS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS OHIO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE JENNIFER MILLER NOVEMBER 7, 2012.
Advertisements

Negotiated Rulemaking – What You Need to Know and How You Can Participate David Bergeron U.S. Department of Education 1.
ASTM Changes in Presented By Dan Richardson BB&T Roundtable Nashville, Tennessee July 2013.
Slide 6- 1 CERCLA Chapter 6 Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA”
Brownfields Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of.
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
Environmental Liabilities New Risks and Solutions Cynthia J. Bishop Gardere Wynne Sewell, LLP Dallas, Texas A&WMA Annual Conference June.
REVITALIZING CONTAMINATED LANDS: ADDRESSING LIABILITY CONCERNS Susan Kunst Boushell EPA’s Office of Site Remediation Enforcement March 25, 2015.
Federal Legal Liability Concerns when Acquiring Contaminated Property
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
PREPARED WORKBOOK Kathy Castagna, EPA Region 1 Mark Lewis, CT DEEP John Podgurski, EPA Region 1 March 25, 2015.
1 DEAL OR NO DEAL? ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process Presented By: Joel R. Burcat,
23 rd Annual Real Estate Symposium Snowmass Village, Colorado The New Rules for Environmental Assessments in Real Estate Transactions by John R. Jacus.
1 UNITED CONSULTING Presentation to
1 P.L Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of January 11, 2002 U. S EPA, Region 5 Deborah Orr May 2010 Laidlaw,
Farm and Forest Land Preservation with Conservation Easements.
1 Environmental Due Diligence: A Practical Guide to Survival Scott D. Hubbard (616)
THE BEST OF CLE NOVEMBER 30, 2011 IDENTIFYING AND RESPONDING TO ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN TRANSACTIONS.
Land Transaction Screening Blake Velde Sr. Environmental Scientist USDA Hazardous Materials Management Group October 2006.
Managing HAZMAT Liability in Easement Acquisitions Gary Fremerman NRCS Easement Programs Division Workshop Denver, Colorado October 31, 2006.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
FEDERAL “ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRY” RULE: A NEW PHASE IN PHASE Is? August 2004.
All Appropriate Inquiry The New Rules SARA BETH WATSON Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C. American Bar Association Teleconference Wednesday, November.
1 It’s not Greek any more Changes Required by the Final All Appropriate Inquiry Rule and ASTM 2005 Standard Presented by Pat McGuckin December 14, 2005.
Do It Right or Pay the Price! AAI Property Transfer Environmental Assessments.
EPA’s Brownfields Program Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment (OBCR) September 2005.
All Appropriate Inquiry International Right of Way Association Appraisal Institute Federal Agency Update, January 15, 2009 Presented by Richard A. Maloy,
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
U.S. EPA Brownfields Grants An Overview Karla Auker U.S.EPA Brownfields Region V.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
2008 SPCC Rule Amendments 2008 SPCC Rule Amendments Donald P Smith US Environmental Protection Agency Region VI May, 2009 Current Status.
THE GEORGIA BROWNFIELD PROGRAM MAY 22, BROWNFIELD: FEDERAL DEFINITION Real property, the expansion, development or reuse of which may be complicated.
Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser – How to be a BFPP Linda C. Martin and Michael C. Wofford Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Today’s Lecture Announcements Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Brownfields and Community Gardens. Purpose  The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the Brownfields Program and how it can service.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Lands: EPA Perspective.
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties Sabine E. Martin, Ph.D., P.G. Center for Hazardous Substance Research Kansas State University.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
AAI Rulemaking and Minimizing Environmental Liabilities Charlotte Neitzel Holme Roberts & Owen LLP.
1 The Brownfields Grant Program and Opportunities for Revitalization of RCRA Sites Linda Garczynski, Director Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
FDIC Perspective on Environmental Risk Presented by: Gordon Stoner Legal Division Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation May 6, 2008.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
November Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for All Appropriate Inquiries Patricia Overmeyer EPA Office of Brownfield Cleanup and Redevelopment.
©2004 Warner Norcross & Judd LLP THE MOST BASIC, SHORT-COURSE INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH BROWNFIELDS TRANSACTIONS Brownfields 2004: Gateway.
Environmental Site Assessments in Waste Cleanup Cases July 29, 2012 Risk Assessment.
EPA P-1 The CERCLA Law and Policy of “Involuntary” and Eminent Domain Acquisitions Brownfields 2006 November 15, 2006.
1 Mission Impossible: Redeveloping the Most Complex Brownfield Sites The Legal Perspective Brownfields 2006 November 15, 2006 James B. Witkin Linowes and.
ASTM E1527 (Phase I Environmental Site Assessments) ASTM E1528 (Transaction Screen Process) ASTM 1903 (Phase II Environmental Site Assessments) ASTM Standards.
Brownfields 101: Liability EPA Brownfields 2006 Conference November 12, 2006 Barbara Kessner Landau, Esq. Bernstein, Cushner & Kimmell, P.C.
Who I am Darren Bowling Phone: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Remediation and Redevelopment.
Overview of Part 213 Amendments Senate Bill 717 – Act 381 of 2016
Apalachee Regional Planning Council BROWNFIELDS 101 9/28/2017.
An Overview of the Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Process
The Prepared Process: The Next Generation
Kane Russell Coleman Logan PC
The BUILD Act & EPA’s Brownfields Program
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
All Appropriate Inquiry
EPA Brownfields Funding Opportunities
Introduction to Brownfields
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties
P.L Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of January 11, 2002 U. S EPA, Region 5 Deborah Orr April 2010 Laidlaw,
Every Acre of Brownfields Developed
Presentation transcript:

1 ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES PROPOSED FEDERAL STANDARDS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment

2 What is “All Appropriate Inquiries?” “All Appropriate Inquiries,” or due diligence, is the process of evaluating a property for potential environmental contamination and assessing potential liability for any contamination present at the property.

3 Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act Congress mandated that EPA promulgate regulations establishing federal standards for all appropriate inquiries Statute lists ten criteria EPA must include in regulations Statute establishes interim standard

4 Applicability The All Appropriate Inquiries standards will apply to: Property owners asserting CERCLA liability limitations Persons receiving brownfields grants for site characterization and assessment under CERCLA 104(k)(2)(B)

5 CERCLA Liability The Brownfields Amendments provide liability limitations for landowners who qualify as: contiguous property owners, bona fide prospective purchasers, or innocent landowners.

6 CERCLA Liability (cont.) To qualify for the liability limitations, landowners must: Meet certain threshold criteria Satisfy certain continuing obligations.

7 Threshold Criteria No affiliation with liable party Conduct all appropriate inquiries prior to date property is acquired

8 Continuing Obligations Comply with land use restrictions Do not impede effectiveness or integrity of institutional controls Take “reasonable steps” Provide cooperation, assistance and access Comply with CERCLA information requests and subpoenas

9 Innocent Landowner Did not know and “had no reason to know” of contamination prior to purchase Must acquire property after all disposal of hazardous substances at the property

10 Contiguous Property Owner Did not cause, contribute, or consent to any release or threatened release of hazardous substances No reason to know of contamination prior to acquiring property Contamination from real property that is not owned by same person

11 Bona fide Prospective Purchaser Can purchase property with knowledge of contamination Must have bought property after January 11, 2002 All disposal of hazardous substances must occur prior to acquisition of the property

12 Property Owners Must Comply with ALL Criteria Must comply with all Statutory Criteria to obtain liability protection Failure to identify a release or threatened release during conduct of AAI does not relieve property owner from compliance with continuing obligations

13 Interim Standard for AAI Congress established an interim standard that is in effect until EPA issues a final rule. Interim standard was clarified in final rule published May 9, 2003 (68 FR 24888). Interim standard is ASTM E (or E ) for properties purchased after May 31, 1997.

14 Negotiated Rulemaking EPA developed proposed AAI regulatory language using a Negotiated Rulemaking process Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Composed of interested stakeholders Decisions made by consensus

15 Benefits of Negotiated Rulemaking Solicit direct input from informed, interested, and affected parties prior to publishing proposed rule Make good use of outside expertise Reduce number of significant public comments Increases ease of implementation

16 Negotiated Rulemaking Committee for AAI 25 members representing a balance of interests EPA has one seat and represents all federal government interests

17 Committee Members Representatives from: Environmental interest groups Environmental justice community Tribal governments State government Local government Real estate developers Bankers and lenders Environmental professionals

18 Schedule Negotiated Rulemaking Committee reached consensus on recommended regulatory language on November 14, Winter 2004 – EPA drafted preamble and regulatory impact analysis Proposal to OMB Spring 2004 Publication of proposed rule – July 2004 (tentative)

19 Schedule (cont.) 60-day public comment period following publication of proposed rule in Federal Register Final rule will be developed by EPA after considering and responding to all public comments

20 Highlights of Consensus-based Language Structured around 10 statutory criteria Objectives and performance standards Report of findings

21 Objectives of AAI Identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases Identify particular information: Uses and occupancies of property Uses of hazardous substances Waste management activities Corrective actions and response activities Institutional and engineering controls Nearby and adjoining properties with environmental conditions

22 Performance Factors Gather information that is: Publicly available Obtainable from its source within reasonable timeframe and cost constraints Can be practicably reviewed Review and evaluate thoroughness and reliability Identify data gaps and their significance

23 AAI Report of Findings Results of AAI must be documented in report that is signed by EP Report must include: Opinion regarding conditions Identification of releases or threatened releases Data gaps and their significance Signature of EP Declaration of EP qualifications

24 Highlights of Consensus-based Language (cont.) AAI must be conducted within one year prior to acquiring property (title transfer) May use information contained in previous inquiries (must be collected in compliance with regulations) AAI may be conducted by third party Person acquiring property responsible for specialized knowledge and purchase price requirements

25 Highlights of Consensus-based Language (cont.) Certain aspects of AAI must be updated after 180 days: Interviews Cleanup liens Government records Visual inspection Changes in conditions of property must be noted

26 Highlights of Consensus-based Language (cont.) Definition of Environmental Professional Interviews Current and past owners and occupants Neighbors, if property abandoned On-site Visual Inspection Purchase price and property value Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information No requirements for sampling

27 Definition of Environmental Professional Recognizes P.E., P.G. and other state- certified or licensed environmental professionals with 3 years experience as environmental professional Education and experience qualifications for others Degree in relevant discipline of science or engineering, plus Five years of relevant full time experience Persons with 10 years experience grandfathered

28 Interviews Must interview current and past owners and occupants Must interview owners or occupants of neighboring properties, if purchasing an abandoned property

29 On-site Visual Inspection Must conduct on-site visual inspection Limited exemption from “on-site” inspection, if good faith efforts result in no access to property Must document efforts taken Must conduct inspection from nearest vantage point Must document impacts of limited access

30 Purchase Price versus Value of Property Persons must consider whether the purchase price reflects the fair market value of the property, if not contaminated If price does not reflect value, persons should consider whether differential is due to presence of contamination

31 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Must consider information that is commonly known and reasonably ascertainable information within the local community Information may be obtained from: Current owners or occupants Local and state government officials Other sources (e.g., newspapers, local libraries, historical societies)

32 Sampling and Analysis No requirements to conduct sampling and analysis AAI must include documentation of data gaps Sampling and analysis may be used to address data gaps – not required

33 Additional Information Information on Negotiated Rulemaking, including consensus-based language can be found on our website: For additional information, contact Patricia Overmeyer at

34 Thank You After viewing the links to additional resources, please complete our online feedback form. Thank You Links to Additional Resources