Commissioning dei muoni D.Orestano Atlas Italia 2/2/2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Advertisements

Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.
Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Ji Hyun Kim Korea University. Introduction Results of Trigger Study – Event generation – Trigger efficiency Trigger rates and Statistics 25 – 26 Sep.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
Trigger Requirements first thoughts from Alessandro Di Mattia, Giovanni Siragusa, Sergio Grancagnolo, Andrea Ventura, Michela Biglietti, Diana Scannicchio.
Preliminary analysis of p-Pb data update n. 6 Lorenzo Bonechi LHCf Catania meeting – 19 December 2013.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Using direct photons for L1Calo monitoring + looking at data09 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting February 18, 2010.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
The ATLAS Muon Landscape towards a common Muon Reconstruction Rosemarie Aben, Peter Kluit, John Ottersbach, Egge van der Poel, Marcel Raas, Nicole Ruckstuhl,
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
TrigEgamma Note L1 Plots Status Update Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 30/09/2010.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Runione AtlasItalia Milano 17/11/2009
News on quarkonia Laurent Rosselet December 3rd 2008.
Tracking performances & b-tagging commissioning
Status of tracking Thijs Cornelissen, Genova
SM Direct Photons meeting
The University of Manchester
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
ATLAS B-physics important periods
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Search for supersymmetric neutral Higgs bosons in the decay channel A/H->m+m- in the ATLAS detector George Dedes , Sandra Horvat Max-Planck-Institut.
J/   analysis: results for ICHEP
Muon Trigger Software Status
Muons from light meson decays
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Quarkonium production, offline monitoring, alignment & calibration
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

Commissioning dei muoni D.Orestano Atlas Italia 2/2/2010

Muon analysis readiness walkthrough 23/11/2009: Covering: trigger, calibrations and alignment, DQA, data preparation, muon combined activities, first physics Reviewers: –Nick Ellis (chair) –Karl Jakobs –Ludovico Pontecorvo –David Rousseau –Paul Tipton –Michael Wilson

Recommendations General The MCP group needs to be strengthened with a significant injection of new effort. The relationship between the MRATF activity and the MCP group needs to be addressed by the coordinators from the Muon System and MCP communities, in consultation with the management; at least the aspects of the activity that relate to muon combined performance should come under the responsibility of the MCP group. Physics groups should be more involved in the understanding of muon performance with early data; people from the physics community should contribute to commissioning work with early data within the MCP group. The study of the inclusive muon spectrum needs to be addressed with high priority with a view to an early ATLAS result that can be presented to the outside world. The forum for discussing and coordinating the inclusive muon studies needs to be identified; it is recommended to do this within the context of the MCP group. [The RC is pleased to note that, by the time of writing this Report, a conclusion has been reached on this issue.] Suitable offline muon-selection criteria against which the trigger can be optimized need to be defined. Muon-related trigger and data-preparation activities should be discussed in MCP meetings.

Trigger It is extremely urgent to develop and implement a detailed plan for the analysis of the trigger in the 900 GeV data; this is a natural milestone in preparation for the 7 TeV running. More effort is needed for muon trigger studies, and it is critical that new effort be integrated very rapidly and coordinated effectively. Communications between the MCP group and the muon trigger group should be improved; the work and meetings should be planned in close collaboration between the respective convenors. Public tools should be made available for muon trigger analysis. Calibration and alignment There should be a plan detailing all special runs required for calibration and alignment studies. Calibration and alignment work should start as soon as possible with collision data recorded at 900 GeV. Data quality More effort needs to be found for the muon data-quality monitoring shifts. Guidance is needed on the relationship between the detector and the Combined Performance DQ flags. It is recommended that the TOB look at this issue that has also been identified in other Walkthroughs. There should be more input from the physics groups to the definition of the DQ flags.

Data preparation It is recommended to converge on the content of the dESDs with a view to increasing their use. The use of common data formats between the MCP and the muon trigger community is encouraged where appropriate. There is a general need for more attention to the simulation, including rapid feedback based on experience with real data. The community is encouraged to complete the preparation and validation of the full field maps (symmetric and also asymmetric versions) as soon as possible. A group space manager should be identified. Muon combined performance A more detailed MCP work plan, task list and schedule should be produced quickly; it is recommended to break the work down into tasks that can be taken on by individuals; priorities should be established and effort should be assigned. [The RC is pleased to note that the MCP conveners are already working in this direction, as presented in the Walkthrough meeting.] The MCP work plan should include, prominently, the use of the inner detector and the calorimeters in understanding the muon performance (see text in General Remarks and MCP sections). All the MCP code used in performance studies should be put into the official SVN code repository.

Data analysis There is a need for studies of the inclusive muon spectrum involving all relevant communities. This should include involvement from the relevant physics working groups (SMP, B-physics, J/psi, etc), although it is recommended that the activity should come under the responsibility of the MCP group. The analysis needs to plan for data reprocessing to ensure that elements are delivered on time.

Follow-up Meeting on inclusive muon studies started in December. Now meeting every 2 weeks (Tuesday after Atlas Weekly). Pursue both understanding of early data and physics measurement. Working meetings on early data analysis alternating with MAFT on Wednesdays (from February). MAFT will cover MS only, MCP will cover combined aspects. Frequent exchanges with muon trigger signatures group for both activities First definition of DQA MCP virtual flags: posal#Muons posal#Muons need input from physics groups!

Results on cosmics Cosmics analysis still ongoing: still the main source of muons for high statistics studies Results mainly on MS standalone from MAFT group. Very good MS resolution achieved with the latest alignment and recent cosmics (4% up to 30 GeV) Combined studies include –Energy loss and isolation –MS-ID comparison –MS-ID relative alignment

Beam splash Very important for relative timing of the different detector elements In particular MDT t0s from beam spash events (+ global t0 offset obtained from collision candidates) will be used in next reprocessing

Results on 900GeV collisions Very low statistics collected for muon studies Muon distributions for toroid off data approved in December Working towards the approval of toroid on distribution. Results from both collections in agreement with MC, see

Attività dei gruppi italiani

Level-1 Muon Barrel A new tool to validate road from data Proven fundamental to find problem During Christmas hardware work to recover them – sensible validation can be started with ~2000 muons/RoI (L1_MU10). Mu0 Mu6 Programmed Any combination it should be it was it is now! D.Della Volpe

L1 Muon Barrel timing - MdV What about efficiency? We cannot quote the efficiency. Too few muons Toroid Muon tracks RPC Triggers eff. OFF8788 % ON % Trigger efficiency calculation with few thousands of good muons, averaged in phi and in few eta bins, for first inclusive studies

L1 Muon Barrel timing - MdV Maps of Delays trigger tower sector logic trigger tower high pt low pt ± 3 BC as expected 1 BC late than L1A coarse alignment ( ~ BC ) need 100 muon per tower fine alignment (~ 5 ns) needs 1000 muons per tower

J/PSI   Tag&Probe in InsituMuonPerformanece G. Chiodini - INFN Lecce Spagnolo & N. Orlando - INFN Lecce and Università del Salento Basic motivations: – J/PSI  T&P integrated in insituMuonPerformance in order to profit of the high quality and physics analysis oriented package developed by: C. Bini, S. Borroni and S. Rosati – HANDS-ON EARLY DATA AND MUON PERFOMANCE – Interplay with Z  T&P in the overlap region around 20 GeV. Important cross-check of single muon efficiency – Relevant for B-Physics studies – Detailed studies of trigger turn-on curve in low pt difficult regime in an analysis oriented data driven efficiency measurements.

J/PSI  Tag&Probe on collisions 2009 To deal with background is essential in order to boost statistics and use earliest data available. Tag (Combined Muon) and probe (Inner Detector Muon) invariant mass JPSI T&P out of the box removing all cuts. No signal peak above background. “The best way to debug your code and take it seriously is to run on real data” Work in progress

Muon High Level Trigger Validazione e commissioning usano ESD e Ntupla di Trigger Statistica di muoni candidati da collisioni molto limitata, Trigger Reprocessing ancora in corso Reprocessing corregge via sw le RoI, per il problema firmware MuCTPi (risolto al pit da Gennaio) L1 MU6, L2 mu6_Msonly, EF mu6_Msonly, L1_MBTS_1_1_COL Trigger Reprocessing Pilot Run ( Toroid on, Solenoid on, stream MuonswBeam) ntuple analysis:

Pilot Run , MuonswBeam, Analisi della ntupla. Il flusso per le catene definite nel menu e’ quello atteso: Efficienza di MuFast rispetto all’Event Filter (step dell’estrapolazione standalone, EFSA) Catene MSonly_passL2 Black = muFast ok Blue = L2 mu6 passed (Black->Blue: taglio sul p T ) taglio “di puntamento” su EF SA |d0| < 500 mm _passL2MS (MuFast in Pass Through,MuComb,Combinazione con ID all’EF) -> MuComb Commissioning _L2MSonly_passL2 (MuFast in Pass Through, Combinazione con ID all’EF) -> EF Commissioning Mu4 Mu4_MSonly Mu4_ L2MSonly_ passL2 Mu4_passL2MS

Pilot Run : confronto Trigger vs Offline MuidSA (estrapolazione SA) richiedendo il trigger MBTS_1_1_Col, MuonswBeam, analisi della ntupla MuidSA

MuidCB p T < 4, passa solo se MuFast e’ in Pass Through (catena L2_mu4_passL2MS) Pilot Run : confronto Trigger vs Offline MuidCB (combinazione con l’ID) richiedendo il trigger MBTS_1_1_Col, MuonswBeam, analisi della ntupla

Pilot Run : Event Filter vs Offline Moore, data set DESD_COLLCAND Catena EF_mu4_MSonly 16 eventi passano la selezione COLLCAND, di cui 6 passano il L2 e 4 passano l’EF dei muoni La correlazione EFMS (solo spettrometro) – Moore e’ ottima per 3 dei 4 muoni EFMS-Moore: correlazioni in eta e phi

EFMS-Moore: numero di hits per traccia Pilot Run : Event Filter vs Offline Moore, data set DESD_COLLCAND

Conclusioni Il walkthrough ha permesso di far partire la nuova struttura organizzativa per gli studi di performance degli algoritmi combinati e lo studio dello spettro inclusivo Il commissioning degli oggetti muonici risente della bassa statistica raccolta nelle prime collisioni Queste sono comunque state usate per identificare dei candidati offline, per studiare le correlazioni tra offline e online e predisporre gli strumenti per il commissioning delle analisi e del trigger Le attività italiane sono numerose e spesso abbracciano più aspetti, contribuendo significativamente alla connessione tra il commissioning del rivelatore e del trigger, quello del software, ed i gruppi di fisica.

backup

L1 Muon Barrel timing - MdV Road Map LVL1 for final commissioning Timing – The method shown can be easily used with collision – coarse alignment ( ~ BC ) need 100 muon per tower – fine alignment (~ 5 ns) needs 1000 muons per tower Validation of the pT threshold ( trigger roads ) – Defined to maximize trigger efficiency using single muon monte carlo – Depends on modeling of magnetic-field, geometry, materials – Depends on statistics, detector areas with less acceptance have larger coincidence roads – Trigger roads must be validated with data using reconstructed muon – Use MU0 as the maximum acceptance threshold – Use calibration stream as well: no rejection by L2, no prescales – Trigger roads: sensible validation can be started with ~2000 muons/RoI (L1_MU10). Note: need to consider separately for mu+/mu-

L1 Muon Barrel timing - MdV One week at – O(100k) muons with low pT from heavy quark decays – A few 10 k muons from W, few 100 from Z – Important sample of inclusive muons (tag and probe is very statistics limited) With 10 pb -1 large statistics will allow: – Precise determination of parameters: L1 trigger roads – Precise determination of performance: pT resolution, trigger efficiency with tag and probe Level1 muon trigger at 7 TeV

P µ = 3.25 GeV P T µ = 3.02 GeV RPC BM Low pt Confirm RPC BM Pivot IP

J/PSI  Tag&Probe features Specific features: JPSISelectionTool from J/PSI B-Physics analysis code of Samira et al. Two trigger tools for trigger selection and matching fully driven by joboption: – TriggerAnalysisTool – JPSITrigEffTool make possible cross-studies inside the same piece of code. Efficiency extraction with background (under development) Properties inherit from InsituMuonPerformance: Inner detector probe and muon probe (absolute and relative trigger efficiencies) Tag, Probe and Tag&Probe selection cuts driven by joboptions Detailed CBNT ntuple, Histograms and summary efficiency cuts in ascii file in output 3D (pt,eta,phi) APEfficiency matrix generation for each trigger level, hypoalgs and muon track types in COOLDB for benchmark physics analysis.