Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 CHAPTER 16 Auditory Brainstem Response : Differential Diagnosis 윤 정 희.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SITE OF LESION TESTING:
Advertisements

Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements Christopher A. Shera, John J. Guinan, Jr., and Andrew J. Oxenham.
Statistics Review – Part II Topics: – Hypothesis Testing – Paired Tests – Tests of variability 1.
Modulation Error Ratio and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Demystified Presented by Sunrise Telecom Broadband …a step ahead.
Auditory monitoring for preservation of the function of the auditory nerve Recording of auditory evoked potentials in operations in the posterior fossa.
1 Auditory Sensitivity, Masking and Binaural Hearing.
Agenda Review homework Lecture/discussion Week 10 assignment
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9 Homework: 1-9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics ~
Temporal processing 2 Mechanisms responsible for developmental changes in temporal processing.
Chapter 4 Powerpoint: Hearing
Properties and Detection of Sound
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 2 – Slide 1 of 25 Chapter 11 Section 2 Inference about Two Means: Independent.
Medical Physics Brain.
Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 3 Structure and Function of the Auditory System.
MONITORING OPERATIONS FOR VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA CHAPTER III.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
Bastaninejad, Shahin, MD, ORL-HNS
Clinical Applications
Hearing Chapter 5. Range of Hearing Sound intensity (pressure) range runs from watts to 50 watts. Frequency range is 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, or a ratio.
ICOM 6115: Computer Systems Performance Measurement and Evaluation August 11, 2006.
SOUND & THE EAR. Anthony J Greene2 Sound and the Ear 1.Sound Waves A.Frequency: Pitch, Pure Tone. B.Intensity C.Complex Waves and Harmonic Frequencies.
Modulation Error Ratio and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Demystified Presented by Sunrise Telecom Broadband …a step ahead.
Chapter 4 Sensation What Do Sensory Illusions Demonstrate? Streams of information coming from different senses can interact. Experience can change the.
Auditory Brainstem Response
Otoacoustic Emissions Low-level sounds produced by the cochlea and recordable in the external ear canal. Spontaneous Click-evoked Distortion Product Stimulus.
Dr. Supreet Singh Nayyar, AFMC For more presentations, visit Electrocochleography
Hearing: Physiology and Psychoacoustics 9. The Function of Hearing The basics Nature of sound Anatomy and physiology of the auditory system How we perceive.
Measures of variability: understanding the complexity of natural phenomena.
Otoacoustic Emission Test. What are otoacoustic emissions? These are low intensity sounds produced by the cochlea as the outer hair cells expand and contract.
AEPs Ahmed Khater, MD, PhD Ass. Prof. of audio-vestibular medicine
Otoacoustic Emissions Objective tests of Hearing.
AUDIOLOGY IN ORL DR. BANDAR MOHAMMED AL- QAHTANI, M.D KSMC.
Otoacoustic Emissions
NON-PARAMETRIC STATISTICS
Screening Tests for DISORDERS!!! Or Crusading the Clinic.
19.4 Load-dependent properties of resonant converters
You better be listening… Auditory Senses Sound Waves Amplitude  Height of wave  Determines how loud Wavelength  Determines pitch  Peak to peak High.
Statistics (cont.) Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
HEARING- 3. LEARNING OBJECTIVES LEARNING OBJECTIVES Discuss the principles used in performing tests of hearing Discuss the principles used in performing.
Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 Middle-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials : Basic Issues and Potentials Applications(3/3) 2009.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc t LEARNING GOAL Understand when it is appropriate to use the Student t distribution rather than the normal.
Event-Related Potentials Chap2. Ten Simple Rules for Designing ERP Experiments (2/2) 임원진
김 진 욱 Chap 14. O VERVIEW OF A UDITORY E VOKED P OTENTIALS (3/3)
1 Chapter 1 Section 1 Notes NatureOfScience. 2 What is Science?  A way or process used to investigate what is happening around you.  Not New  Early.
By Breanna Benson. Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) is a form of hearing loss in which: * outer hair cells in the cochlea function normally.
Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 Auditory Brainstem Response : Differential Diagnosis(3/3) 윤준철.
Understanding Populations & Samples
HEADS OF SERVICES TRAINING
Understanding the RUC Survey Instrument
Introduction to Computational Thinking
Hearing tests.
Unit 1.3 Review MI.
Precedence-based speech segregation in a virtual auditory environment
You better be listening…
Middle and long-latency evoked potentials
ABR measures Absolute latency Inter-peak latency Wave amplitudes
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Sadegh jafarzadeh Ph.D Mashhad university of medical sciences
Elementary Statistics
Agenda Review homework Lecture/discussion Week 10 assignment
Hearing.
Biomedical Research.
Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4
Equipment for measuring OAE
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Chapter 10 Introduction to the Analysis of Variance
A Meta-analysis of the effect of medicated health communication campaigns Trent C. Joseph PCH 586.
Presentation transcript:

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 CHAPTER 16 Auditory Brainstem Response : Differential Diagnosis 윤 정 희

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Amplitude Measures Peak amplitudes of components in an ABR depend on two Equally important aspects of neural activity. 1. The number of neural elements activated by the sound stimulus. 2. The degree of synchronization of the activity of those neural elements. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Amplitude Measures Wave V Amplitude Similar to the simple wave V latency measure is the simple wave V amplitude measure. The amplitude is typically determined by the difference in magnitude between the peak of wave V and the succeeding trough (Fig. 16.2) Limitation : The overall conclusion in wave V amplitude measure, it has poorer sensitivity to tumors than do latency measures. 1. ABR electrical fields are weak. 2. ABRs have poor signal-to-noise ratios(SNRs). 3. Both the peak and trough must be identified. 4. Phase cancellation of neural elements can be significant. 5. Cochlear hearing loss complicates the interpretation of amplitude measures. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Amplitude Measures Interaural Wave V Amplitude Comparison This interaural measure compares the wave V amplitude in the suspected ear to the wave V amplitude in the nonsuspected ear and is analogous to the IT5 latency comparison. Limitation : Variable SNRs and correcting or accounting for the effects of cochlear losses are still significant problems for this interaural amplitude measure. This measure is particularly limited when the nonsuspected ear has a significant cochlear loss. As with the IT5 latency measure, this interaural amplitude should not be used in cases where binaural tumors are suspected. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Amplitude Measures Intra-aural Wave V to I Amplitude Ratio This measure is the ratio of the amplitude of wave V to the amplitude of wave I, that is, the amplitude of wave V divided by the amplitude of wave I. In nontumor patients, wave V is typically much greater than wave I. Limitations : This measure has poor sensitivity but good specificity. Other problems with this amplitude ratio are (a) it depends on the presence of wave I, which is often absent in eighth nerve tumor patients (b) it may be more sensitive to variable results in an even more highly variable measure. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Amplitude Measures Interaural Wave V to I Amplitude ratio This is similar to the third amplitude measure noted above, except the reference for the wave V to wave I amplitude ratio is the patient’s nonsuspected ear instead of the distribution of values from a population of nontumor individuals. Limitations : (a) dependence on recording a measurable wave I (b) the effect of the configuration of any cochlear sensory loss because of the differential dependence of wave I and V on different parts of the cochlear, and (c) the increased variability due to the use of a ratio of highly variable measures. One additional problem is determining how to correct for differences in sensory losses between ears. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. CRITICAL EVALUATION OF STANDARD ABR LATENCY AND AMPLITUDE MEASURES Current Status of Standard ABR Measures Early studies reported sensitivity of standard ABR measures in the 95 to 98% range, but these tumors were typically fairly large. Impact of tumor size on sensitivity and concluded that tumors smaller than 1.0cm often go undetected by standard clinical ABR methodology. For tumors smaller than 1.0cm, the sensitivity of standard latency measures varied across studies from 63 to 93%, with corresponding false-negative rates ranging from 7 up to 37%. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Why Standard ABR measures cannot Detect Small Tumors Two requirements for any ABR measure used for tumor detection are that (a) the tumor exerts sufficient pressure to desynchronize, block, or alter the conduction properties of eighth nerve elements. (b) The tumor affects a sufficient number of those neural elements. Two major contributors to this amplitude variability discusses above are (a) the residual noise in the average and (b) phase cancellation of activity related to progressive activation and response time variations across the cochlea. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Why Standard ABR measures cannot Detect Small Tumors An ABR method capable of detecting small tumors with good specificity would be invaluable because it could (a) reduce health care costs, (b) reduce the number of patients having to endure the anxiety and discomfort of an MRI test, (c) provide a screening tool to rural communities and countries with limited access to MRIs, (d) provide an alternate test when an MRI is contraindicated, and (e) provide justification for expensive MRI testing. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Anatomic Considerations CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. Description of the Stacked ABR CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. CAN Lab. INHA University.

Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. CAN Lab. INHA University.