Knowledge Management Challenges for Question Answering Vinay K. Chaudhri SRI International White Paper Co-authors: Ken Barker (UT), Tom Garvey (SRI), Ken Murray (SRI), Bruce Porter (UT), Tomas Uribe (SRI)
Outline Interest in QA Similarities and differences to AQUAINT Comments on AQUAINT
Interest in QA Co-chaired AAAI Symposia Question Answering Systems (Fall’99) Mining Answers from Text and KBs (Spring 2002)
Interest in QA Associated with DARPA projects High Performance Knowledge Bases Knowledge bases by knowledge engineers Rapid Knowledge Formation Knowledge bases by domain expert
Rapid Knowledge Formation Piece of knowledge Knowledge Entry Tool Knowledge Base Solve Problems
Rapid Knowledge Formation Piece of knowledge Knowledge Entry Tool Knowledge Base Solve Problems Text Answer questions
Rapid Knowledge Formation Piece of knowledge Knowledge Entry Tool Knowledge Base Solve Problems Text Answer questions Biology textbook Questions at the back of the book
Rapid Knowledge Formation Piece of knowledge Knowledge Entry Tool Knowledge Base Solve Problems Text Answer questions Biology textbook Questions at the back of the book We never work with text while answering questions
Rapid Knowledge Formation Piece of knowledge Knowledge Entry Tool Knowledge Base Solve Problems In the head of a human - Course of Action - Critiquing knowledge Simulation
Similarities and Differences Similarities Knowledge can come from text QA as an evaluation technique Differences Reducing the cost of hand crafted KB construction Logical representations for masses
Comments on AQUAINT Breadth Synergy Evaluation
Comments on AQUAINT Breadth Impressed by breadth Free Text Media Language Structured Data
Comments on AQUAINT Breadth Impressed by breadth Large amount of text is fundamental Free Text Multi-media Multi-lingua Structured Data
Comments on AQUAINT Synergy Numerous synergies by combining free text with structure Handcrafted KBs (Cyc, Wordnet, Framenet,..) Learning from Text (ISI, LCC,..) Annotations (Time markup language – NERC) More is possible …
Comments on AQUAINT Evaluation Opinion Questions Well-defined tasks Clearly articulated technical problem Clear statement of issues Well executed
Finally…. AQUAINT seems like a very well-managed program Friendly PM Executive Committee Strong participation from Intelligence Community
Thank You!
What Could Be Done? Enhance Annotations Knowledge Resources Modality Independent Tools
Enhance Annotations Look for places where manual annotation effort is already being invested XML documents Intelligence report summarization Corpus construction Use RKF tools to do annotations Annotations come from a KB Not limited to keywords Can do inference with background knowledge
Knowledge Resources SHAKEN incorporates significant general knowledge We give our system for free for research use We can scale it to cover sizable text Will be fun to combine it with large text/multi-media collections for fixed- domain QA
Modality Independent Tools QA Management Managing interaction Managing the lifecycle of a question Answer fusion Source validity