Monitoring Motorist Compliance in an I/M Program – A Novel Approach of Using Speed Camera Citations Data Abdullahi A. Asimalowo & Charles E. Williams Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION.  PURPOSE OF NUISANCE ORDINANCE:  It is the purpose of the nuisance ordinance to establish means whereby the City may remove.
Advertisements

STORMWATER PERMITTING Requirements for the Solid Waste Industry in Colorado 5/04.
GEOG Introductory GIS for the Social Sciences 15 September 2014 Neil Hanlon.
Objectives Look at Central Limit Theorem Sampling distribution of the mean.
The District of Columbia Department of Public Works
1 Case Study 1: How to Deal with Estimates with Low Reliability 2009 Population Association of America ACS Workshop April 29, 2009.
Spring Sampling Frame Sampling frame: the sampling frame is the list of the population (this is a general term) from which the sample is drawn.
Estimating the Population Mean Assumptions 1.The sample is a simple random sample 2.The value of the population standard deviation (σ) is known 3.Either.
Congestion charges explained With thanks to Michelle Yip.
California Car License Plate Recognition System ZhengHui Hu Advisor: Dr. Kang.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Estimating the Value of a Parameter Using Confidence Intervals 9.
The new HBS Chisinau, 26 October Outline 1.How the HBS changed 2.Assessment of data quality 3.Data comparability 4.Conclusions.
Emissions Inventory and Air Quality Planning National Urban Air Quality Workshop Lahore, Pakistan December 13, 2004.
1 CHAPTER 7 Homework:5,7,9,11,17,22,23,25,29,33,37,41,45,51, 59,65,77,79 : The U.S. Bureau of Census publishes annual price figures for new mobile homes.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Estimation of Statistical Parameters
Using the American Community Survey (ACS) Maryland Sate Data Center Affiliate Meeting April 4, 2007.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
1st meeting: Multilevel modeling: introduction Subjects for today:  Basic statistics (testing)  The difference between regression analysis and multilevel.
Chapter 7 Estimation Procedures. Basic Logic  In estimation procedures, statistics calculated from random samples are used to estimate the value of population.
Survey on Land Administration Systems A Presentation on findings and conclusions Dr. Elshad Khanalibayli UNECE WPLA Chair Dr. Gulnara Roll Ms. Amie Figueiredo.
Consumer Taxation Program Branch IFTA Fraud Part 1 - Administrative Focus September 22, 2005.
6.3 THE CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM. DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE MEANS  A sampling distribution of sample means is a distribution using the means computed from.
1 Chapter 6 Estimates and Sample Sizes 6-1 Estimating a Population Mean: Large Samples / σ Known 6-2 Estimating a Population Mean: Small Samples / σ Unknown.
Confidence Intervals. Examples: Confidence Intervals 1. Among various ethnic groups, the standard deviation of heights is known to be approximately.
Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Lan Guo Lane.
6.1 Inference for a Single Proportion  Statistical confidence  Confidence intervals  How confidence intervals behave.
Institute of Transportation Engineers Presentation on Automated Enforcement.
AP Statistics Section 10.1 C Determining Necessary Sample Size.
Michelle Bruce, Report Assessment & Compliance Compliance monitoring NGER –
Ch. 12 Notes Pages 25 P : Standard Deviation.
HOW LARGE OF A SAMPLE SHOULD YOU USE? The larger the sample size, the more likely: o It will be representative of the whole population o The conclusions.
1 Probability and Statistics Confidence Intervals.
Sec 6.3 Bluman, Chapter Review: Find the z values; the graph is symmetrical. Bluman, Chapter 63.
Hua Yang Arash Mirzaei Zhen Ding North Central Texas Council of Governments Travel Model Development and Data Management.
Sampling: Distribution of the Sample Mean (Sigma Known) o If a population follows the normal distribution o Population is represented by X 1,X 2,…,X N.
GUIDED SELF-REGULATORY (GSR) APPROACH ON MOTOR VEHICLES EMISSION CONTROL Control of Emission From Motor Vehicles Air Division Department of Environmental.
Share The Road Traffic Safety Program Sausalito Police Department’s.
Chapter 6 Inferences Based on a Single Sample: Estimation with Confidence Intervals Slides for Optional Sections Section 7.5 Finite Population Correction.
Sampling Why use sampling? Terms and definitions
Social Research Methods
Significance Test for the Difference of Two Proportions
MOVES-Based NOx Analyses for Urban Case Studies in Texas
Estimates and Sample Sizes Sections 6-2 & 6-4
Using Census of Canada Small Area Dissemination Data
Graduate School of Business Leadership
Social Research Methods
Central Limit Theorem General version.
Sample vs Population comparing mean and standard deviations
Data Analysis and Statistical Software I ( ) Quarter: Autumn 02/03
Exploratory Analysis of Crash Data
ESTIMATION
GEOG 204 Introductory GIS for the Social Sciences
2016 Traffic Records Forum Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Statistical Analysis and Dashboards to Support DOT Decision Making Ms. Qingxin Fang.
Sample Size and Accuracy
Geology Geomath Chapter 7 - Statistics tom.h.wilson
Section 2.5 notes Measures of Variation
Confidence Intervals: The Basics
Market Research Sampling Methods.
Peng-jun Lu, MD, PhD1; Mei-Chun Hung, MPH, PhD1,2 ; Alissa C
Objectives Students will learn how to use tables to estimate areas under normal curves and recognize data sets that are not normal.
Calculating Probabilities for Any Normal Variable
Sampling and Power Slides by Jishnu Das.
Sampling.
New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics 2017  Estimation of Response Propensities and Indicators of Representative Response Using Population-Level.
Social Research Methods
Week 9 Sampling a population
Chapter 7 Lecture 3 Section: 7.5.
2016 Traffic Records Forum Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Statistical Analysis and Dashboards to Support DOT Decision Making Ms. Qingxin Fang.
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring Motorist Compliance in an I/M Program – A Novel Approach of Using Speed Camera Citations Data Abdullahi A. Asimalowo & Charles E. Williams Monitoring and Assessment Branch, Air Quality Division District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment Washington, DC

Disclaimer This presentation and the analysis therein, do not necessarily represent or express the opinion of the Department of Energy and Environment or the District of Columbia Government.

Background Vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program helps identify high emitting vehicles that require repair, helping in improved air quality – Mandatory, based on air quality classification – population and/or – geographic location The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments make I/M mandatory for states and jurisdictions in non-attainment status This study is a survey component of I/M program compliance

Location: District of Columbia The study was carried out for the District of Columbia (DC). DC covers 61 square miles area and is bounded in the north, northwest and east by the State of Maryland and in the south and southwest by the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Study Methods Three different datasets used: – Speed limit and traffic light camera photo tickets issued in 2015 – Vehicle registration database – Parking lot surveys (shopping malls, garages, public parking areas, etc.)

Findings: CY2015 Photo Tickets Data Table 1: Non-Compliance within Year Range Sample size, n=37,269 CI=95% Model YearSample Size Non- Compliance% Pre % % 1996-up % TOTAL %

Findings: CY2015 Photo Tickets Data Model YearSample SizeNon-Compliance% Pre % % 1996-up % TOTAL % Table 2: Non-Compliance relative to Sample population n=37,269 CI=95%

Findings: Vehicle Registration Data Model YearRange SumNon-Compliance% Within Range Pre % % % TOTAL % Table 3: 2013 Non-Compliance within Year Range

Findings: Vehicle Registration Data Table 4: 2014 Non-Compliance within Year Range Model YearRange SumNon-Compliance% Within Range Pre % % % TOTAL %

Findings: Vehicle Registration Data Table 5: 2015 Non-Compliance within Year Range Model YearRange SumNon-Compliance% Within Range TOTAL

Findings: 2015 Parking Lot Survey Table 6: Non-Compliance within Year Range Model YearRange SumNon-Compliance% Within Range Pre TOTAL n=2012; margin of error=±2.2

Discussions

Discussions: Photo Violations Photo violation tickets represents randomized survey >30,000 sample size; >10% of total registered vehicle within DC This sample size provides a good representation with minimal error margin (±0.5) in compliance rate estimate Sample size is well distributed and substantial as this is drawn from all loci in DC

Discussions: Parking Lot Survey Results vary with sample size Sample size in the hundreds gives a higher non-compliance rate (9% to 12%) and a higher error margin, compared to larger sample size More time and labor demanding As sample size increases, compliance increases and non-compliance decreases Validates use of photo enforced tickets, which provides a larger sample size, lower error margin and hence, greater accuracy

Discussions: Registered Vehicles Status Non-compliance rate is high, using this method (11 to 15%) Margin of error is lower compared to the other methods (0.04 or less); This was the lowest of the study, aside photo tickets data Registration data contain records of vehicles no longer in use

Conclusions Amongst all three (3) methods, parking lots survey and the photo ticket results were close (between 2% and 3%) Smaller sample size is associated with a higher error margin Some vehicles that are no longer in use are still in registration database. This can influence the result from using this method Road user bias is not taken into consideration, especially if they have violated one or more rules on the same vehicle; or have restrictions on their license

Conclusions Photo enforced violations allows for greater sample size, but do not take into consideration, road user biases Photo tickets and parking lot provides proof of vehicles actively in use Camera distribution covers all sections of the city and hence provide greater opportunity for data gathering Data gathering for I/M survey should not be devoid of sampling design and associated biases