Properties of nuclear matter from subtheshold strangeness production Christoph Hartnack, Helmut Oeschler, Jörg Aichelin Subatech Nantes and TH Darmstadt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zi-Wei Lin (ECU) 28th WWND, Puerto Rico April 10, Update of Initial Conditions in A Multiple Phase Transport (AMPT) Model Zi-Wei Lin Department.
Advertisements

Marcus Bleicher, Berkeley, Oct Elliptic Flow in High Energetic Nuclear Collisions Marcus Bleicher & Xianglei Zhu FIAS & Institut für Theoretische.
Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
TJH: ISMD 2005, 8/9-15 Kromeriz, Czech Republic TJH: 1 Experimental Results at RHIC T. Hallman Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD Kromeriz, Czech Republic.
Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,
Quark Matter 2006 ( ) Excitation functions of baryon anomaly and freeze-out properties at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (University of Tsukuba) for.
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
Phase transition of hadronic matter in a non-equilibrium approach Graduate Days, Frankfurt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.
First Results From a Hydro + Boltzmann Hybrid Approach DPG-Tagung, Darmstadt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
STAR Patricia Fachini 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Motivation Data Analysis Results Conclusions Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at.
1 Baryonic Resonance Why resonances and why  * ? How do we search for them ? What did we learn so far? What else can we do in the.
Thermalization - up to lowest energies? A view on this question with microscopic transport models C. Hartnack, J. Aichelin, H. Oeschler SUBATECH, Nantes.
Centrality-dependent pt spectra of Direct photons at RHIC F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Resonance Dynamics in Heavy Ion Collisions 22nd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics , La Jolla, California Sascha Vogel, Marcus Bleicher UrQMD.
Marcus Bleicher, CCAST- Workshop 2004 Strangeness Dynamics and Transverse Pressure in HIC Marcus Bleicher Institut für Theoretische Physik Goethe Universität.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
High p T  0 Production in p+p, Au+Au, and d+Au Stefan Bathe UC Riverside for the Collaboration Topics in Heavy Ion Collisions McGill University, Montreal,
Φ and ω decay modes ratios Stavinskiy,ITEP, Why , ω ? If resonance decays before kinetic freeze-out  Possible rescattering of hadronic daughters.
Pornrad Srisawad Department of Physics, Naresuan University, Thailand Yu-Ming Zheng China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing China Azimuthal distributions.
Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.
Shanghai Elliptic flow in intermediate energy HIC and n-n effective interaction and in-medium cross sections Zhuxia Li China Institute of Atomic.
Matter System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.
Jet quenching and direct photon production F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano 平野哲文 University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner University.
M. Oldenburg Strange Quark Matter 2006 — March 26–31, Los Angeles, California 1 Centrality Dependence of Azimuthal Anisotropy of Strange Hadrons in 200.
Study the particle ratio fluctuations in heavy- ion collisions Limin Fan ( 樊利敏 ) Central China Normal University (CCNU) 1.
Roy A. Lacey (SUNY Stony Brook ) C ompressed B aryonic at the AGS: A Review !! C ompressed B aryonic M atter at the AGS: A Review !!
Introduction The statistical model approach is established by analysis of particle ratios of the high energy heavy ion collisions in GSI-SIS to CERN-SPS.
HADES versus DLS: no puzzle anymore ! Elena Bratkovskaya , Workshop ‚Bremsstrahlung in dilepton production‘ GSI, Darmstadt.
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Presentation for NFR - October 19, Trine S.Tveter Recent results from RHIC Systems studied so far at RHIC: - s NN 1/2 = 
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
Ralf Averbeck Stony Brook University Hot Quarks 2004 Taos, New Mexico, July 19-24, 2004 for the Collaboration Open Heavy Flavor Measurements with PHENIX.
Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.
Results from an Integrated Boltzmann+Hydrodynamics Approach WPCF 2008, Krakau, Jan Steinheimer-Froschauer, Universität Frankfurt.
Subthreshold K + production and the nuclear equation-of-state Christian Sturm Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt NUCLEAR MATTER IN HIGH DENSITY.
School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.
Olena Linnyk Charmonium in heavy ion collisions 16 July 2007.
News from ALICE Jan PLUTA Heavy Ion Reaction Group (HIRG) Warsaw University of Technology February 22, XIII GDRE Workshop, SUBATECH, Nantes.
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.
Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.
Christina Markert Hot Quarks, Sardinia, Mai Christina Markert Kent State University Motivation Resonance in hadronic phase Time R AA and R dAu Elliptic.
Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology Strangeness Production at 1 -2 AGeV Erice, September 2008.
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
Diagnosing energy loss: PHENIX results on high-p T hadron spectra Baldo Sahlmüller, University of Münster for the PHENIX collaboration.
Bulk properties at RHIC Olga Barannikova (Purdue University) Motivation Freeze-out properties at RHIC STAR perspective STAR  PHENIX, PHOBOS Time-span.
Helmut Oeschler Darmstadt University of Technology Transition from Baryonic to Mesonic Freeze Out SQM2006, March 28 th, 2006.
Christina MarkertHirschegg, Jan 16-22, Resonance Production in Heavy Ion Collisions Christina Markert, Kent State University Resonances in Medium.
24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.
Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Elliptic Flow of Inclusive Photon Ahmed M. Hamed Midwest Critical Mass University of Toledo, Ohio Oct. 22,
Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.
IOPB Dipak Mishra (IOPB), ICPAQGP5, Kolkata Feb 8 – 12 1 Measurement of  ++ Resonance Production in d+Au sqrt(s NN ) = 200 GeV Dipak Mishra.
1 A simple model to study the centrality dependence of observables from SPS to RHIC energies inspired by the first CuCu results later checked against EPOS.
1 Strange Resonance Production in p+p and Au+Au Collisions at RHIC energies. Christina Markert, Yale University for the STAR Collaboration QM2004,
Highlights from HADES Au+Au collisions at 1.23 AGeV
HADES The Baryon-rich Side of the Phase Diagram
Strangeness Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions at STAR
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Tatsuya Chujo for the PHENIX collaboration
ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002
Charmed hadron signals of partonic medium
Outline Background Global Observables in Heavy Ion Collisions
System Size and Energy Dependence of -meson Production at RHIC
Search for the onset of baryon anomaly at RHIC-PHENIX
Hiroshi Masui for the PHENIX collaboration August 5, 2005
Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Bari (Italy)
Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt
Volume effects on strangeness production
Presentation transcript:

Properties of nuclear matter from subtheshold strangeness production Christoph Hartnack, Helmut Oeschler, Jörg Aichelin Subatech Nantes and TH Darmstadt Outline: ● Subthreshold production, optical potential ● Spectra, temperatures and KN rescattering ● Azimuthal distribution and the KN potential ● Scaling laws and the nuclear equation of state ● Conclusion Calculations performed with IQMD, a semiclassical, microscopic N-body model with quantum features for the description of HICs on an event-by-event basis

Subthreshold kaon production Production of kaons at energies below the kinetic threshold for K production in elementary pp collisions Fermi momenta may contribute in energy Multistep processes can cumulate the energy needed for kaon production Importance of resonances (especially the  ) for storing energy Short livetime of resonance favors early production at high densities Sensitivity to in-medium effects and nuclear equation of state

Time-evolution & kaon production K + : early, multistep induced product. when baryon density is highest K - : prod. later when pion density is highest, strangeness exchange 0fm/c 4fm/c 8fm/c 12fm/c 16fm/c 20fm/c

In medium effects on kaons KN-Rescattering, absorption for K - Optical potential: repulsive for K +, attractive for K - Penalizes K + production at high densities but favors K - production at high densities Effects yields but also dynamics Parametrization from Schaffner-Bielich RMF results

Au-data: Foerster et al, KaoS Ni-data: Uhlig et al., KaoS KN pot No Pot Can we reveal the KN potential from K + yields? Visible difference between calculations with and without KN potential on a log-scale. KN-pot yields less kaons, but incertainties on  induced cross sections discourage a preliminary conclusion.

K - production dominated by strangeness exchange BB +B+B +Y+Y +BY Direct channels BB,  B enhanced by K - potential, similar for exchange channels  Y+BY. The K + potential penalizes hyperon production and compensates in the dominant channels  Y+BY. BB+  B+  Y+BY

Spectra: slopes dominated by KN-rescattering K+K+ K-K- Rescattering potential Strong enhancement of the slope from initial to final mom. Slight effects: enhancement (K + ) or reduction (K - ) K+ rescatter Collision number High K + rescattering less K - rescattering

Temperatures of K + IQMD results with KN- rescattering are in good agreement with KaoS data K + heated up by coll. with expanding nucl.medium K - show systematically lower temperatures. Reason: less rescattering, diff. potentials? KaoS A.Förster et al. PRC75(2007)

Azimuthal distributions Azimuthal distributions are effected by rescattering and by the optical potential. While the rescattering acts in the same direction for K + and K - the optical potential gives opposite effects for K + and K - Azimuthal distribution fitted with a (1+v 1 cos(  ) + 2 v 2 cos(2  )) KaoS and FOPI see opposite signs of v 2 for K + and K - Ni+Ni 1.93 GeV, F. Uhlig et al, KaoS

Excitation function of v 2 for K + Rescattering and optical potential are needed to describe the v 2 of kaons. The effects of the optical potential become dominant with respect to the effect of rescattering when going down in beam energy. This is in agreement with calculations of Li&Ko who found a strong potential effect for Au+Au 1 GeV/A.

Comparison of v 1 (y 0 ) to FOPI data Preliminary data from FOPI (Kim et al. ) favor an optical potential less strong than implemented by us

The original idea of measuring the eos Eos describes the energy needed to compress nuclear matter A hard eos requires more energy for a given density than a soft one For a given density and a given available energy a soft eos leaves more thermal energy to the system than a hard eos R.Stock: This thermal energy could be measured by regarding pion production

At which density can we measure the eos? Different densities are reached for hard and soft eos. A soft eos yields higher densities than a hard eos. The differences in compressional energy and thus in thermal energy become less. The pion number is not sensitive enough. Pions come out late due to reabsorption in dense matter Kaons might be an interesting probe. However the effects of the optical potential and incertainties of the cross section do not allow a direct measure of the eos from kaon yields.

The solution: ratios Au/C Data: Ch.Sturm et al. RQMD: Ch. Fuchs Robust against changes of cross sections, optical potential, Delta lifetimes, etc. KaoS data support soft eos IQMD supports this Symbols: KaoS data Lines IQMD

Au: central versus peripheral Different cross sections and potential parameters may change the global yield. However, the parameter  for the increase of the kaon yield N with the number A of participating nucleons (raising with centrality) N(K)=N 0 A  depends on the eos. central peripheral A soft eos yields higher values than a hard eos.

Determination of the eos from  soft hard The relation between the compression modulus and  is monotonously falling. KaoS data (Förster et al.) favor a value below 200 MeV, i.e. a soft eos. C.H. et al. PRL 96 (2006) KaoS:Förster et al. Same for Au/C ratio

Another scaling systematics: system size 2 independent observables ( centrality scaling and system size scaling) confirm soft eos System size, Kaos Data A part in Au+Au from KaoS agrees with that Scaling with system size in inclusive A+A events

Kaons and density isomers Could reveal density isomers by a sudden rise in the excitation function of kaons - KaoS might measure it Density isomers yield up to factors of 10 in K + production A 2 nd minimum would yield a sudden factor of 10 in the kaon yield MeV C.H. et al. PRL 72 (1994) 3767 Effect related to subthreshold prod.

A density isomer would have needed the strong raise indicated by the arrows. IQMD calculations using a KN optical potential and a soft eos are consistent with KaoS data on Au+Au and C+C of Sturm et al. For higher densities/beam energies we need other particles produced below threshold KaoS DATA: no isomer up to 3  0

Conclusions Kaon spectra reveal strong rescattering of kaons with the surrounding nuclear matter Comparison of flow variables supports the existence of KN optical potential Scaling laws of the kaon production claim strongly for a soft equation of state The KaoS measurements (which can be continued by eos data) contradict the existence of density isomers at moderate densities

Effect of the potential: penalty reimbursed Kaons with did not undergo collisions: No KN potential : final=initial Initial distributions show a difference of calculations with KN-pot and without pot at all energies. This is due to the penalty paid at the production. In the final state the kaons regain the paid penalty and the curves of both calculations become rather close Only at small energies a lack remains stemming from those kaons which failed to be produced due to the penalty.

KN collisions change the spectra Most kaons underwent many collisions before leaving. They show a significant enhancement of the slope. At the time before the freeze out of the kaons (about fm/c) the nucleonic system is still hot and expanding. The kaons carry the temperature of that expansion phase. initial

Comparison to data for K - Less rescattering for the K - yield smaller temperature than for K +

Comparison of spectra for K +

Temperature: centrality dependence

Temperature and collisions

Maxwellian Demon

Au+Au 1.5 GeV azimuthal distribution For Au+Au at 1.5 GeV we needed both potential and rescattering to reproduce the results of Foerster et al.

Influence on v 2 (p T ) at midrapidity Again opposite effect on K + an K - useful for balancing the effect of rescattering FOPI and KaoS see opposite signs of v 2 for K + and K -

V 2 :p T dependence

Polar distributions

Polar distribution: rescattering and potential

Excitation function of K +

A observation which is robust versus effects of production cross sections, KN-potential,  -lifetime  N  Tsushima  N  =.75  NN

Going down in beam energy A soft eos yields   1.4 at E=0.8 AGeV, a hard eos yields   1.2 Limits for lower E: no asymptotic yield for peripheral collisions

System size dependence E inc A soft eos obtains higher kaon yields for heavy systems KaoS: PRC in preparation

A mixture of both N C =0 has a visible fraction to the yield, shows a taller rapidity distribution and strongly negative flow. For N C >2 a positive flow and a wider y-distribution is observed

The potential shifts to negative flow N C =0: initial shadowing boosted by potential to strong neg. flow N C >2: initial bias, enhanced by scattering, reduced by potential Initial vs final Pot vs. NoPot

Final flow a superposition of different flows Initial flow: bias for having collisions or not Final flow: visible shift from the potential

Rescattering enhances potential effect For N C =0 the initial flow is inverted Rescattering adds up more positive flow