Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Estimating the parameters of coalescing black hole binaries (non-spinning) using ground-based detectors Sukanta Bose Washington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
A SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM INSPIRALING NEUTRON STARS AND BLACK HOLES Using data taken between July 2009 and October 2010, researchers from the.
LISA and Beyond Neil Cornish Louis Rubbo, Seth Timpano & Jeff Crowder.
GWDAW /12/16 - G Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
GEO02 February GEO Binary Inspiral Search Analysis.
Magnetars origin and progenitors with enhanced rotation S.B. Popov, M.E. Prokhorov (Sternberg Astronomical Institute) (astro-ph/ )
LIGO-GXX What is LIGO (LSC/GEO/Virgo/…)? Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration.
Black holes: Introduction. 2 Main general surveys astro-ph/ Neven Bilic BH phenomenology astro-ph/ Thomas W. Baumgarte BHs: from speculations.
Gravitational Wave Sources From Dense Star Clusters Cole Miller University of Maryland.
Parameter Estimation Using 3.5 post-Newtonian Inspiral Waveforms GWDAW, December 15-18, 2004, Annecy K. Arun, B.R. Iyer, B.S. Sathyaprakash and P. Sundarajan.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago arXiv:
The Effect of Higher Harmonic Corrections on Non-Spinning Massive BH Binaries for LISA. Ed Porter (AEI) & Neil Cornish (MSU)
The inclusion of sub-dominant modes in the signal brings additional modulation in the strain. This effect is visible on the time-frequency profile as measured.
1 Determination of the equation of state of the universe using 0.1Hz Gravitational Wave Antenna Takashi Nakamura and Ryuichi Takahashi Dept. Phys. Kyoto.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO: A New Window on The Universe Duncan Brown Syracuse University RIT Physics Colloquium November 19, 2007 LIGO-G Z.
1/26 Science case for AdV 1 st project review November 1 st, 2008 A.Viceré for the AdV Team‏
15 Dec 2005GWDAW 10 LIGO-G Z1 Overview of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Inspiral Searches Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO.
S.Klimenko, December 16, 2007, GWDAW12, Boston, LIGO-G Z Coherent burst searches for gravitational waves from compact binary objects S.Klimenko,
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
Population synthesis and binary black hole merger rates Richard O’Shaughnessy Vicky Kalogera, Chris Belczynski LSC LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Observational Results I Patrick Brady University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
Applying Numerical Relativity and EOB to Black Hole Binary Observation Sean McWilliams NASA Goddard Space Flight Center University of Maryland Collaborators:
NSF 21 Oct Science Nuggets Jolien Creighton University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Astrophysics to be learned from observations of intermediate mass black hole in-spiral events Alberto Vecchio Making Waves with Intermediate Mass Black.
LIGO-G v2 The Search For Continuous Gravitational Waves Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration The.
Searching for Binary Black Holes with Spin Aligned with Orbital Angular Momentum 1 Deborah L. Hamm – Northern Arizona University LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:
GWDAW10, UTB, Dec , Search for inspiraling neutron star binaries using TAMA300 data Hideyuki Tagoshi on behalf of the TAMA collaboration.
Introduction Coalescing binary compact objects for a 1.4 M  neutron star inspiralling into a 10 M  black hole would be in-band for ~200 s. We could detect.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
The direct detection of Gravitational Wave Fulvio Ricci on behalf of the LIGO Scientific and VIRGO collaborations What next? – Angelicum – 16/2/2016.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
November, 2009 STAC - Data Analysis Report 1 Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi Università di Urbino and INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
APS Meeting April 2003 LIGO-G Z 1 Sources and Science with LIGO Data Jolien Creighton University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee On Behalf of the LIGO.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan for the LSC-Virgo Burst Analysis Working Group LSC-Virgo Meeting July 23, 2007 Eyes Wide Open: Searching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z Results from the search for spinning binary systems in S3 LIGO data Gareth Jones Cardiff School of Physics and Astronomy for the LIGO.
1 8 th E. Amaldi Conference, New York City, June, 2009 Anand Sengupta California Institute of Technology on behalf of the LSC and Virgo Collaborations.
Gravitational Waves What are they? How can they be detected?
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Craig Robinson On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
Gravitational Wave Astronomy
S3 Spinning Binary Black Hole Search: Status Report
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers
On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO
From Nothing to Everything BBH and the Next Generation of GW Detectors
Stochastic Background
Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO
Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:
OK Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University
Searches for gravitational waves by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
Black Hole Binaries Dynamically Formed in Globular Clusters
Search for Ringdowns in LIGO S4 Data
Presentation transcript:

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Estimating the parameters of coalescing black hole binaries (non-spinning) using ground-based detectors Sukanta Bose Washington State University, Pullman Based on a paper by Ajith, SB, Phys. Rev. D 79, (2009), arXiv: (Supported in part by NSF grants PHY & PHY ) In collaboration with P. Ajith (Caltech/AEI) LIGO-G v1

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Coalescing binary signals in earth-based detectors The 3 Phases in a Binary’s Life… …lasting up to several minutes AdLIGO can detect these sources with a total mass of up to several hundred solar masses. [Figure: Courtesy of Kip Thorne]

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 NR-based hybrid waveforms [P. Ajith et al, PRD ’08]

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Astrophysical reach Effects of waveform extensions (data analysis): »Better template match, –Lower false-alarms / background, Greater signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Event rates & source “variety”: Both will increase Parameter estimation: »Can we determine both component masses? »Any improvements in measuring sky-localization, wave polarization, and distance? Provide impetus for other studies: Do IMBHs really exist? Can such binaries have electromagnetic counterparts?

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Rate estimates Radio observations confirm existence of neutron star binaries: » Hulse-Taylor pulsar » J (both neutron stars are visible as pulsars) Stellar population modelers estimate an upper bound on BNS rates of ~ 1 in a few to several LIGO-I sensitivity Rates for black hole binary coalescences much more uncertain »Population synthesis studies suggest a likely rate of around 0.01 / 0.1 / 30 per year in LIGO-I / eLIGO / AdLIGO for stellar mass BBHs [O'Shaughnessy et al., Astrophys. J. 633, 1076 (2005), astro-ph/ ] »IMBH binaries: the plausible rates for LIGOI / AdLIGO detectors are 10−4 / 0.1 per year [J. M. Fregeau et al., ibid. 646, L135 (2006), astro-ph/ ] »Stellar-mass BHs merging with IMBHs (the so called intermediate-mass-ratio inspirals): plausible event rates for LIGOI / AdLIGO are 10−3 / 10 per year [ I. Mandel et al., arXiv: ]

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Noise PSDs & SNRs The source effective distance is taken to be 100Mpc, except for AdLIGO and AdVirgo, where it is taken as 1Gpc.

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Single IFO (AdLIGO) parameter accuracies (effective distance fixed at 1Gpc)

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Single IFO (AdLIGO) parameter accuracies (SNR fixed to 10)

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Single IFO (eLIGO) parameter accuracies (SNR fixed to 10) The overlap function obtained by running a template bank across twelve different target (simulated) signals.

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Comparing Fisher calculations with Monte Carlo simulations (SNR = 10)

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Comparing Fisher calculations with Monte Carlo simulations SNR 

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Network observations: SNR in an AdLIGO- AdLIGO-AdVirgo network ( Gpc, orientation-averaged)

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Sky-position accuracy in an AdLIGO- AdLIGO-AdVirgo network ( Gpc, orientation-averaged)

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Distance accuracy in an AdLIGO-AdLIGO- AdVirgo network ( Gpc, orientation-averaged)

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Sky-position: Multi-IFO (H1-L1-V1) accuracy 1Gpc; observed in advanced detectors) Inspiral-only accuracies shown in black. Complete-waveform accuracies shown in red. Top row: A Msun system  Bottom row: A Msun system 

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Sky-position: Multi-IFO (H1-L1-V1) accuracy 1Gpc; observed in advanced detectors) Inspiral-only accuracies shown in black. Complete-waveform accuracies shown in red. Top row: A Msun system  Bottom row: A Msun system 

Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Summary of parameter accuracies (in advanced detectors) SNR= %2.58%0.68%1.2% %0.26%0.22%0.81% SNR= % % % % Single detector estimates: AdLIGO-AdLIGO-AdVirgo estimates: