September 2012. Background LACORS scheme published in 2004 to Address concerns about inconsistency of risking between authorities Rationalise existing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction of the new Canada Consumer Product Safety Act Technical Briefing January 29, 2009.
Advertisements

Regulation of Low Level Waste Management
Regulators’ Code July Regulators’ Code A statutory Code Came into effect in April 2014, replacing the Regulators’ Compliance Code All local authorities.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
Performance management guidance
Health and Safety Risk Assessment (RA) End presentation Risk Assessment (RA)
Inspection and regulation from September The government’s vision for early years with a revised Early Years Foundation Stage provides the timetable.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Reform of UK Occupational Health and Safety Regulation Mike Cross 3 June 2014.
The UK Deregulation agenda – Importance of risk management in design and delivery of regulation Gordon Maddan Programme Manager - Business.
Helping the people of Canada maintain and improve their health Aider les Canadiens et les Canadiennes à maintenir et à améliorer leur état de santé Path.
SEN 0 – 25 Years Pat Foster.
Proposed Regulated Waste Framework Julian Chan - EHP.
Acute Quality Standards Dan Beckett Acute Physician CMO Advisor for Acute & General Medicine.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
BASIC PRINCIPLES IN OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE Day ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RISKS.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive General update, current issues and future challenges in the health and social care sectors. RCN.
Win Win Win: can we have regulation that protects people, supports business and costs less? Graham Russell Director Better Regulation Delivery Office.
September Matthew Walters – Derbyshire Sophie Leney – Norfolk Kate Bailey – Surrey.
Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) Supporting the improvement of social care, child care and social services in Wales.
Supporting young and young adult carers under the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 A training resource.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Contestability in Connections Contestability Working Group Meeting NIE/SONI Joint Presentation 9 September
Regulation of Statutory National Assessments l. Contents ■Ofqual Responsibilities ■Regulation at GCSE ■The Regulatory Framework □Statutory Objectives.
Partnership in Action – Keeping Children Safer
Risk Assessment Beginning an Analysis Date by Jim Bowman.
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
BUSA PRESENTATION ON MINIMUM WAGES
CUSC Panel – 19th July 2016 Binoy dharsi
The new (0-25) Special Educational Needs Code of Practice
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RISKS
CQC Inspections: seeking assurance of good practice
Supporting young and young adult carers under the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 A training resource.
The Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions (RES) Act 2008
Risk management - HIRAC awareness presentation
UK Link Technology Refresh
Structure of the Code – Phases 1 and 2
SWOE Scheme Coordinator, Public Health, Bristol
Structure of the Code – Phase 2 TF Comments and Proposals
A Blueprint for Change: The West Wales Area Plan
BSBWHS304 Participate effectively in WHS communication and consultation processes.
EXECUTIVE – LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FORMULATION
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
Jennifer Stradtman, Director, Technical Barriers to Trade
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
The Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions (RES) Act 2008
Review Care Act 2014 This overview forms part of the suite of learning materials that have been developed to support the implementation of part one of.
BASIC PRINCIPLES IN OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE
Key Value Indicators (KVIs)
Procurement Reform Bill & New EU Procurement Directives
Objectives, Scope and Structure of Country Reports
CoMC 14th March 2018 Michele Downes
Adherence to Evidence Based Medicine Programme Evidence Summary Pack (Version 2) Correction of Ptosis Local commissioners working with local people for.
Future Strategy and Work Plan
Maureen McAteer, Scottish Government
Health Service R&D permissions
Introduction of the new Canada Consumer Product Safety Act
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
The Early Help Assessment Journey. Request for Early Help Support Form. Support for OUR Early Help Partner Agencies.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
An Integrated Decision Making Process for Children with Complex Needs
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Driving effective compliance
CEng progression through the IOM3
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
Presentation transcript:

September 2012

Background LACORS scheme published in 2004 to Address concerns about inconsistency of risking between authorities Rationalise existing discipline based risking to a single risk for a business Introduce a generic risk based on the nature of the business allowing for desktop risking Introduce alternative enforcement activities to advance the next due date A review of the 2004 scheme was led by an OFT facilitated working group and commenced with widespread consultation

Consultation Issues The scheme was inflexible with the local confidence element not allowing for a reduction in risk for a well managed business Resources required to meet the intervention frequencies determined by the scheme meant significant numbers of businesses were showing as overdue Authorities were moving to intelligence led enforcement and some were introducing lean systems thinking

Considerations Common approach to risk assessment BRDO have been represented on the group and have made significant contributions in terms of the structure of the scheme and defining the elements Food standards risk scheme FSA have been kept informed of progress and have provided comments on the compatibility with the Code of Practice within the guidance document Animal health risk Scheme The animal health risk scheme was based on the 2004 scheme however the smaller range of business categories means the main issue of inflexibility is not as great

Considerations Variations Within Trading Standards Authorities The group consisted of representative from England, Scotland and Wales and represented a range of different types of authority Resources The development of a new scheme had to balance the desire to achieve the most effective outcome with the resources available within authorities to implement it and undertake the risking National Trading Standards Board have been updated on progress and consulted on specific resource issues Software systems The scheme needs to be implemented on a range of software systems and the major suppliers have been kept informed of developments

The Revised Scheme In September 2012 the National Trading Standards Board accepted the proposed revised scheme which suggests the following bandings and frequencies Risk CategoryRisk BandRecommended Activity Frequency AHighAnnually B1Upper MediumTwo-yearly B2Lower MediumFive-yearly CLowNo recommended frequency UnratedAssessment required

Elements of the Scheme Hazard – “Anything with the potential to cause harm” A business’ hazard is assessed by 4 questions What is the maximum potential for harm to the public posed by the business To what extent do the activities of the business affect the hazard What volume and complexity of legislation does the business have to comply with How many consumers are likely to be affected by the business failing to comply

Elements of the Scheme Likelihood of Compliance (LOC) – “The likelihood that a business will achieve compliance” A businesses systems of risk management is assessed by a single question What confidence does the assessor have in the business’s control systems based on the previous and current compliance and knowledge of management’s systems of control Risk – “A function of the level of a hazard and the likelihood that the hazard will cause harm” Risk is determined by combining the Hazard and LOC

Risk Assessment Matrix

Key Changes The Likelihood of Compliance when combined with the hazard allows for the risk band to be lowered from the default business category risk Medium risk band has been split into upper and lower medium Recommended intervention frequencies for low risk businesses have been removed The business\trader types for agriculture have been completely revised to correspond to registration categories and businesses will need to be mapped accordingly

Significant Points The use of a specific LOC category of “Not yet assessed” allows for authorities to identify businesses where no assessment has been made The scheme allows for an authority to create additional business categories to meet local priorities or circumstances Areas of variance from the Food and Feed Codes of Practice are highlighted within the guidance document

Implementing the Scheme Details have been provided to the main software suppliers who will issue system specific guidance A spreadsheet to enable authorities to assess the impact of the scheme on their database has been issued with the guidance Authorities will need to determine when to implement the changes to ensure returns, reporting and planning are not adversely affected The working group will provide support to authorities during the implementation process and collate any issues or new business categories as they arise on a dedicated TSI Information Hub The working group has suggested that NTSB may wish to oversee a review of the scheme six months after it is implemented

Challenges The increased impact of the likelihood of compliance in the risk assessment brings the scheme closer to other regulatory risk assessments and with the work being carried out on a common approach may allow for effective sharing of information One issue raised in the initial consultation was the relevance of the risk scheme to businesses and the possibility a revised scheme may offer in engaging with them.