The motivation to use image recognition techinques in investigations of solar photosphere Kasia Mikurda, Friedrich Wöger Kiepenheuer Institut Für Sonnenphysik.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of Sunspot Motion Associated with the 2006 Dec. 13 X3.4 Flare Shuo Wang Advisor: Chang Liu Haimin Wang.
Advertisements

Small-scale solar surface fields M. J. Martínez González Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
IHY General Assembly, Paris, January 2006 Photospheric flows around sunspots and pores Michal Sobotka Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 16 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Stokes profiles Swedish 1m Solar Telescope, perfect seeing.
Modelling X-ray Bright Points on the Quiet Sun. Parameter fitting to a Coronal Heating solution. Matthew Chantry Mentor: Aad van Ballegooijen University.
Hexagonal generalisation of Van Siclen’s information entropy - Application to solar granulation Stefano Russo Università di Tor Vergata – Dipartimento.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Magnetic Waves in Solar Coronal Loops Ryan Orvedahl Stony Brook University Advisor: Aad van Ballegooijen Center for Astrophysics.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 17 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
LWS Science Team Meeting, 23 Mar 2004, Boulder1 Using HMI to Study Facular Contrast Functions Thomas Berger SDO Workshop 14 Feb 2006 HMI.
Variation of the mm radio emission in the polar zones of the Sun. A.Riehokainen, J.Kallunki.
Modeling and Data Analysis Associated With Supergranulation Walter Allen.
What stellar properties can be learnt from planetary transits Adriana Válio Roque da Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie.
Solar Rotation Lab 3. Differential Rotation The sun lacks a fixed rotation rate Since it is composed of a gaseous plasma, the rate of rotation is fastest.
Adriana V. R. Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie COROT /11/2005.
Fraser Watson, University of Glasgow Lyndsay Fletcher, University of Glasgow Stephen Marshall, University of Strathclyde SIPwork V, Wed September 15th.
Georg Buscher German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Knowledge Management Department Kaiserslautern, Germany SIGIR 07 Doctoral Consortium.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
3D SLAM for Omni-directional Camera
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
1 The Spots That Won’t Form Leif Svalgaard Stanford University 3 rd SSN Workshop, Tucson, AZ, Jan
SOTERIA WP András Ludmány Debrecen, Hungary 5th ESWW 2008, Brussels
Differences between central and peripheral umbral dots Michal Sobotka 1 Jan Jurcak 2,1 SXT seminar, 2008/10/10, NAOJ Astronomical Institute, Academy of.
1. Twist propagation in Hα surges Patricia Jibben and Richard C. Canfield 2004, ApJ, 610, Observation of the Molecular Zeeman Effect in the G Band.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 14
Valentina Abramenko 1, Vasyl Yurchyshyn 1, Philip R. Goode 1, Vincenzo Carbone 2, Robert Stein Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT, USA; 2 – Univ.
Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Philip R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT SH31C-18 06: Size and Lifetime Distributions of Bright Points.
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Active Region Photosphere as Revealed by High Angular Resolution B. W. Lites et al. 2004, Sol. Phys., 221, 65 Solar.
High resolution images obtained with Solar Optical Telescope on Hinode
Small magnetic elements Judith Palacios USO-SP SCHOOL Stockholm-Tammsvik, 2010.
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
New Insights into the Sun’s Photosphere Dynamics Offered by New Solar Telescope of BBSO Big Bear Solar Observatory Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn,
Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Jun Zhang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators: Sami Solanki and Jingxiu Wang.
Thomas Hackman: Stellar differential rotation1 Detecting stellar differential rotation NORDITA – Solar and stellar dynamo cycles Thomas Hackman,
Organization and Evolution of Solar Magnetic Field Serena Criscuoli INAF,OAR In Collaboration with Ilaria Ermolli, Mauro Centrone, Fabrizio Giorgi and.
Nov. 8-11, th Solar-B science meeting Observational Analysis of the Relation between Coronal Loop Heating and Photospheric Magnetic Fields Y. Katsukawa.
Photospheric Flows and Structures Mark Rast Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences University.
DOT tomography of the solar atmosphere Leenaarts, J. and Wedenmeyer-Böhm, S A&A 431, 681 Comments on the optimization of high resolution Fabry-Pérot.
Measurements of photospheric magnetic field within and around sunspots Rolf Schlichenmaier, Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik ENS, 29.Mai 2006 Image:
2. Method outline2. Method outline Equation of relative helicity (Berger 1985): - : the fourier transform of normal component of magnetic field on the.
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
How to forecast solar flares?
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Efficient tracking of photospheric flows
Wave heating of the partially-ionised solar atmosphere
Hyewon Jeong, Jongchul Chae Seoul National University
HMI Investigation Overview
The Sun Our Nearest Star
On the nature of moving magnetic feature pairs around sunspots
Motions of isolated G-band bright points in the solar photosphere
The Moat Flow Observed in Two Different TRACE-Filters
Observations of emerging and submerging regions with ASP and Solar-B
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
Long-term trends of magnetic bright points: The evolution of MBP size and modelling of the number of MBPs at disc centre D. Utz [1,2,3], T. Van Doorsselaere.
Structure and Dynamics in Sunspot Light Bridges
Model of solar faculae А.А. Solov’ev,
Institute for Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Meteorology
Presentation transcript:

The motivation to use image recognition techinques in investigations of solar photosphere Kasia Mikurda, Friedrich Wöger Kiepenheuer Institut Für Sonnenphysik Freiburg, Germany

Photospheric structures sunspots, active regions (ARs)sunspots granulation faculae photospheric bright points (G-band bright points, filigree...)photospheric bright points

Our goal Our data: G-band images and LOS velocity maps (obtained from the FeI line at nm with TESOS – triple Fabry- Perot interferometer at VTT) Our aims: - to detect the BPs in the G-band images - to find the corresponding structures on the velocity maps - to trace BPs in order to find their horizontal motions - to combine the results in order to get the 3D velocity vector of BPs

Examples of papers sunspots Turmon et al, 2002 granulation Bovelet & Wiehr, 2001 Roudier & Muller, 1986 Hirzberger et al, 1997 faculae Bovelet & Wiehr, 2001 photospheric bright points Berger et al, 1998 Ballegooijen et al, 1998 Nisenson et al, 2003

Sunspots (Turman et al, 2002) investigation of solar cycle (magnetic flux, intensity) identification and labelling of sunspots and ARs on SOHO/MDI images good for searching in large image databases

Sunspots (Turman et al, 2002)

Granulation (Roudier and Muller, 1986; Hirzberger et al, 1997) FBR (Fourier Based Recognition) Investigations of distribution of sizes, and brightness of granules 2-D passband Fourier filter is applied to the data and preserve only those frequencies that are expected to be characteristic for granular structures

Granulation (Hirzberger et al, 1997)

Granulation (Bovelet & Wiehr, 2001) MLT (multilevel tracking) application: mostly the same as previously mentioned method uses iterative tresholding with multiple clip levels recognizes and tags structures unfortunately not yet well documented

Granulation (Bovelet & Wiehr, 2001)

G-band bright points (Berger et al., 1998) G-band bright points are detected on the differential images (G-band image – wideband nm) by thresholding measures the location of the centroid of GBPs tracks the centroid location from one frame to consecutive one

G-band bright points (Berger et al, 1998)

G-band bright points (Nisenson et al, 2003) G-band bright points are recognized visually positions of G-band bright points are traced in a reference frame tied to the solar granulation the GBs are then followed using correlation tracking (only clearly separated BPs are used) only good for smaller amount of investigated structure

G-band bright points (Nisenson et al, 2003)

G-band bright points (Ballegooijen et al., 1998) uses small circular discs (´corks`) to represent the brightenings on G-band images uses ´magnetic images´ (difference images made by substracting the nm images from the corresponding G-band images) in the first step corks are randomly distributed an artificial flow field proportional to the intensity gradient in the magnetic image is introduced corks are driven to the brightest regions in the image the velocities of the corks represent the velocities of GBPs good for statistical investigation of velocities

G-band bright points (Ballegooijen et al., 1998)

References Ballegoijen et al, 1998, ApJ 509, 435 Berger et al, 1998, ApJ 495, 973 Bovelet & Wiehr, 2001, SPh 201, 13 Hirzberger et al, 1997, ApJ 480, 406 Nisenson et al, 2003, ApJ 587, 458 Roudier & Muller, 1986, SPh 107, 11 Turmon et al., 2002, ApJ 568, 396

Discussion What kind of method of recognizing and tracing is the best for us ?

Thank you for your attention !

Sunspots sizes: about few tousands of km in diameter (up to km) lifetime: from hours to weeks

Granulation size: 1-2” characteristic time scale: ~8 min (up to 15 min) contrast between granules and intergranular lanes: ~10-30%

Faculae often associated with sunspots, but can also exist apart from them longer living than spots, lifetimes even up to 90 days important in investigation of solar irradiance variation

G-band bright points sizes: km (up to 600 km) lifetimes: ~8-9 min splitting and merging time scale: ~3-4 min horizontal motion: ~0.8 km/s (up to several km/s)