Step Advancement Based on Satisfactory Performance Departmental Human Resources Group Meeting July 28, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
Advertisements

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MANUAL REVISIONS 8/1/11.
THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOR CENTRAL MICHIGAN CONSUMER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
1 POSTDOCTORAL SCHOLAR (PX) Contract Implementation Training October 2012 UC Irvine.
Medicaid1 SANDHILLS CENTER PARTICIPATING PROVIDER VIOLATIONS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS (Medicaid & State Funded)
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Know your Contractual Rights By The United School Employees of Pasco.
Annual Review Process for Academic Staff
A Joint Labor/Management Effort Spring “Training on the principles and procedures associated with evaluation and merit distribution shall be conducted.
1 Major Changes in Non-Senate Instruction Unit (Unit 18) MOU Department Chairs Forum October 23, 2003.
CSAIO12 Job security at the ECB 22 September 2011 Maria Ståhl Deputy Spokesperson 7th Staff Committee of the European Central Bank.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Chapter #07 Labor or work Discipline. Article 90 : Procedures for application of labor discipline Employees shall be obliged to follow the labor discipline.
Statutory Groupings Who is where and what rights are attached.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
LECTURER’S EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (LEO) REVIEW PROCESS.
POST-TENURE REVIEW University Senate July 8, 2008.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
 This presentation does NOT replace reading the Updated for Student Success Initiative Manual.
Agenda Welcome & Introductions Process Overview Preparation Submission Evaluation Considerations Resources Q&A Clinic.
ADR UNDER LABOUR CODE 2006.
PALESTINIAN LABOUR LAW. Ahmed T. Ghadour.. FIFTH CHAPTER. WORK’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
City and County of San Francisco Department of Human Resources City and County of San Francisco Department of Human Resources 1 City and County of San.
Impasse Dos and Don’ts FEN 36 th Annual Conference May 18, 2016 Prepared by Leonard J. Dietzen, III, Esquire © 2016 Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
Administrator Contracts 101: Your Rights as a School Administrator in Ohio Beginning Administrators Academy September 12, 2016.
CHAIRS AND DIRECTORS ORIENTATION CUPE Local 4207 Unit 1 Collective Agreement Information Session August 16, 2016.
Chairs and Directors Orientation
THE PENSION (TEACHERS) ACT 1947 AND
Nebraska Construction Prompt Pay Act and Healthcare Reform
Hot Topics: Ten Things You Need to Know
ESSA Updates: Non-public / Private Schools Equitable Services
2017 January – July Proposed Bylaws Revisions
House Bill 2542 Next Steps Board of Governors Training August 16, 2017
S , F.S., Requirements for Employee Compensation and Salary Schedules Florida Department of Education May 23,
TOPS TRAINING.
Sexual Harassment Seminar
Crouse Health Hospital
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
AFSCME Contract 7/1/17 Paid Time Off
FLORIDA EDUCATIONAL NEGOTIATORS
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Performance Evaluation
T.O.P.S
সরকারী কর্মচারী(শৃঙ্খলা ও আপীল) বিধিমালা, ১৯৮৫
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Introductions and Concepts
University of California AB 168 Implementation
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
2018 UCPEA One-time Performance Awards
SSA Adverse Decisions and Administrative Finality
A Managers Guide to Parental Leave
Employees’ Guide to Parental Leave
May be used for: Sick Leave Personal illness.
University of California AB 168 Implementation
Multi-year Contract Amendment
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
House Bill 2542 Next Steps Board of Governors Training August 16, 2017
UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE COMPLAINTS
Full-Time Faculty Contract
Pay progression Employee briefing pack
VAT Module 10 (b) VAT Administration and Compliance
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
Sabbatical and Difference-in-Pay Leaves Office of Faculty Advancement
Chairs and Directors Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Step Advancement Based on Satisfactory Performance Departmental Human Resources Group Meeting July 28, 2006

Step Advancement Based on Satisfactory Performance Civil Service Reform May 2005

Civil Service Reform Report “We need merit based raises. I consistently get ‘exceeds standards’ on my evaluations but get the same raise (or no raise) as people who get ‘met standards’ or ‘does not meet standards.’”

Civil Service Reform Report “My perception is that employees are retained and well compensated even when they are inefficient and lacking enthusiasm for the job. I don't think the City really has a pay for performance culture.”

Civil Service Reform Report “The City promotes high levels of mediocrity by only rewarding longevity of service rather than excellent job performance. The civil service rules don't allow managers to reward their high performing employees.”

Step Advancement Based on Satisfactory Performance Effective July 1, 2006, step advancement will be based on satisfactory performance. Please check each MOU (Article III. Seniority Increments) for specifics!!!!!

Step Advancement Based on Satisfactory Performance In general, an employee will receive the step increase on his/her anniversary date, unless the department determines to withhold the step increase because the employee’s performance has not been satisfactory.

Notice to Employees Recommend 60 days’ advance notice to the employee of any intention to withhold step increase, even if there is no specific MOU requirement to provide advance notice. Providing an employee with adequate notice of the department’s intent to withhold a step increase allows the employee an opportunity to improve his/her performance in the area of deficiency.

Managing Performance!!!! NEED NEED to have current performance evaluation on file NOT MUST Decision to withhold a step increase should NOT come as a surprise and MUST be fact- based

Grieving Step Advancement Denials Employees may grieve a denial of step increase, but the performance evaluation itself is not grievable. Evaluations may be used as evidence by the parties Expedited arbitration process to resolve disputes

Anniversary Dates Unchanged Under no circumstances will an employee’s “step increment due date” or “step increase anniversary date” change.

Step Increases at a Later Date At the Appointing Officer’s discretion, an employee whose step increase has been withheld may receive it at a later date, based upon improved performance. Based upon a new or supplemental evaluation reflecting satisfactory performance. No change to the employee’s anniversary date for subsequent increases. The “late” granting of a step increase is never retroactive.

SEIU Locals 790, 535 and UHW (Article III.J. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) Each year of satisfactory service normally shall make an employee eligible for consideration for salary advancement within the salary range of his/her classification, except where such employee is in a class for which there is a single rate of pay. If an employee’s service is not deemed satisfactory, based on a written performance appraisal, the employee may not be eligible for consideration for salary advancement.

SEIU Locals 790, 535 and UHW (Article III.J. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) If an employee does not receive a performance appraisal within forty-five (45) days of his/her performance appraisal due date, and a written notice of intent to withhold the increase no later than fifteen (15) days before the step increase due date, and the employee is scheduled for a step increase, the appraisal for said year shall be considered satisfactory and any step increase due will be provided to the employee retroactively to his/her anniversary date. Denial of a step increase is subject to appeal through the expedited arbitration procedure of this Agreement.

Consolidated Crafts Agreement (Article III.N. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) An employee’s scheduled step increase may be denied if the employee’s performance has been unsatisfactory to the City. The Appointing Officer shall provide an affected employee at least sixty (60) calendar days notice of his/her intent to withhold a step increase. However, if the unsatisfactory performance occurs within that time period, the Appointing Officer shall provide reasonable notice of at least 5 days of his/her intent to withhold a step increase at that time.

Consolidated Crafts Agreement (Article III.N. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) An employee's performance evaluation(s) may be used as evidence by the City and/or an affected employee in relation to determining whether an employee has performed satisfactorily for purposes of determining whether a step advancement should be withheld. If an employee’s step advancement is withheld, that employee shall be eligible for a step advancement upon his/her next anniversary (increment) due date. An employee’s anniversary date shall be unaffected by this provision.

Consolidated Crafts Agreement (Article III.N. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) The denial of a step increase is subject to the grievance procedure; provided, however, that nothing in this section is intended to or shall make performance evaluations subject to the grievance procedure. Withholding of step advancement shall not affect an employee’s base wage increases as provided for in Article III.A. Wages.

IFPTE, Local 21 (Article III.E. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) An employee's scheduled step increase may be denied if the Appointing Officer or designee determines that the employee's performance has been unsatisfactory. In the absence of a recommendation to deny a step increase, an employee shall receive his or her scheduled step increase. The Appointing Officer shall provide an affected employee at least sixty (60) calendar days notice prior to the employee’s salary anniversary date of any intent to withhold a step increase and the basis for such withholding. However, if unsatisfactory performance occurs within the sixty (60) days before the employee’s salary anniversary date, the Appointing Officer shall provide the notice and basis for the intent to withhold a step increase within a reasonable time.

IFPTE, Local 21 (Article III.E. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) The denial of a step increase is subject to the grievance procedure. An employee's performance evaluation(s), and any facts underlying the performance evaluation(s) or other relevant information, may be used as evidence by either party in an expedited grievance arbitration; provided, however, that nothing in this section is intended to or shall make performance evaluations subject to the grievance procedure.

Deputy Probation Officers’ Association (Article III.S. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) Satisfactory Performance. For all employees hired on or after July 1, 2006, an employee’s scheduled step increase may be denied if the employee’s performance has been unsatisfactory. The Appointing Officer shall provide an affected employee at least sixty (60) calendar days notice prior to the employee's salary anniversary date of any intent to withhold a step increase. However, if unsatisfactory performance occurs within the sixty days before the employee’s salary anniversary date, the Appointing Officer shall provide notice of intent to withhold a step increase within a reasonable time. The notice shall be in writing and shall provide reason(s) and/or explanation for the denial.

Deputy Probation Officers’ Association (Article III.S. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) The denial of a step increase is subject to the grievance procedure. An employee's performance evaluation(s) may be used as evidence by either party in a grievance arbitration; provided, however, that nothing in this Section is intended to or shall make performance evaluations subject to the grievance procedure. If an employee’s step advancement is withheld, that employee shall next be eligible for a step advancement on the employee’s salary anniversary date the following fiscal year. However, at any time before that date, the Appointing Officer, in his or her sole discretion, may grant the employee the withheld step increase, to be effective on or after the first pay period following the Appointing Officer’s decision, with no retroactive payment allowed.

Deputy Probation Officers’ Association (Article III.S. Seniority Increments, ¶¶ ) An employee’s salary anniversary date shall be unaffected by this provision. In administering this subsection (a), the City affirms its commitment to a meaningful employee performance evaluation and notice process.

SEIU, Local 790 Staff & Per Diem Nurses (Article IV, ¶523 Developmental Plans) If a nurse fails to successfully complete a developmental plan as outlined above, management shall have the option of: 1) extending the developmental plan, subject to the provisions of the paragraph above; 2) delaying a step increase until successful completion of the plan, at which point the step increase shall be implemented and the anniversary date shall remain unchanged; 3) discipline, up to and including dismissal. Any determination to delay a step increase or to initiate disciplinary action for failure to successfully complete a developmental plan shall trigger notification to the Union and shall be grievable pursuant to the provisions of Section I.L. of this Agreement.

Teamsters, Local 856 Supervising Nurses Employees shall receive step increases subject to a “competent and effective” or “meets standards” performance evaluation rating in clinical areas.