Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WFD Stakeholder Meeting 2 February 2007 WFD Environmental Standards Rob Hitchen WFD Team, Defra.
Advertisements

Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions Environmental Objectives Yannick Pochon Afyon, 2015.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
GIS development. Danube Commission+ISRBC meeting Sava GIS Sava GIS establishment –Performed in accordance with the Sava GIS Strategy EU WFD INSPIRE Directive.
Water Framework Directive – Coastal issues Will Akast Catchment Delivery Manager-Suffolk.
CSC 6 February 2008 The Don Catchment as an Opportunity Facilitating Answers to ICM Dr. Jonathan Hillman.
Hydropower and the Water Environment Peter Gammeltoft European Commission DG Environment, D.1 Water 2nd Workshop on Water Management, WFD & Hydropower.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
Water Framework Directive An Introduction David Whiles Anglian River Basin Manager.
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
1. Outline 2 “Pre-Harmonization” Groundwater Management Perspectives EU’s DirectivesWhy Are the New Approaches Needed? Turkey’s Institutional Structure:
1. Outline 2 Earlier Groundwater Management Approaches of Turkey European Union: An Example for Groundwater Management Turkey Current Situation and Distances.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
EU Update/CIS England WFD Stakeholder Forum 4 April 2008.
Identification on Significant Pressures - Surface Water Bodies
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Clearing the Waters for All
Environmental policies in Europe
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
EEA 2017 State of European waters
Principles and Key Issues
Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016
Type of presentation/visualisation
Restoration target values?
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Daughter Directive Groundwater - Working Procedure -
The EU WATER POLICY.
Water Framework Directive and Flood Risk Management
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Guidance on application of Article 4.7
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Integrated Risk Assessment and Management Wouter GEVAERTS Thomas TRACK Dietmar MÜLLER.
CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
EC GUIDANCE ON IWT AND NATURA 2000 CHAPTER 3
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Which is the real scope of the Guidance ?
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Risk Assessment (RA) and
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
IMPRESS Guidance and Policy Summary Water Directors Copenhagen, 21-22nd November 2002 Working Group leaders: Volker Mohaupt, Umwelt Bundes Amt Isobel.
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
UK Technical Advisory Group
State of the Environment reporting Agenda 5.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Article 13 RBMP Schema.
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016

Aims of the session To explain and show how the Environment Agency is building Water Framework Directive (WFD) into its impact assessment processes

Agenda 1.What is WFD assessment 2.Environment Agency core guidance 1.Low risk activities 2.Scoping 3.Assessment 4.Decision making 3.Strategic WFD assessment

What is WFD assessment? Deciding whether or not proposed works support objectives set out in River Basin Management Plans

RBMP objectives The environmental objectives of the WFD are: to prevent deterioration of the status of surface waters and groundwater to achieve objectives and standards for protected areas to aim to achieve good status for all water bodies or, for heavily modified water bodies and artificial water bodies, good ecological potential and good surface water chemical status to reverse any significant and sustained upward trends in pollutant concentrations in groundwater the cessation of discharges, emissions and loses of priority hazardous substances into surface waters progressively reduce the pollution of groundwater and prevent or limit the entry of pollutants

A translation job Impacts on the things that WFD protects (Water quality, biology, hydromorphology etc) Into... Impacts on RBMP objectives (water body status - now and in the future)

Functions of the EA that need to assess works for WFD Flood and Coastal Risk Management Flood Defence Consenting / Flood Risk Activity Permitting Capital Works Asset management programme Planning Planning applications Local Area Plans Hydropower Water resource licensing Marine

Stages of assessment Screening Detailed assessment Decision making

WFD screening Low risk activities Traffic lights

Detailed assessment 1.Set scope 2.Assess impact / risk “Your WFD risk assessment needs to demonstrate with a high level of confidence that your activity supports RBMP objectives.”

Informed by need to make decision Required level of detail Consideration of action to keep risk at acceptable level Avoid Minimise Mitigate Compensate

WFD risk assessment – a risk based and proportional approach How much detail should the assessment go into? How sensitive is the site? How complex or risky is the activity? What should the assessment focus on?

How do we decide what a WFD risk assessment should focus on? Expert judgement Tools HQE risk matrix Links between ecology / morphology technical guide WFD monitoring data Planned WFD improvement actions

WFD assessment – options for assessment investigate the risks using readily available sources of data collect more existing information and analyse gather new information and data

Decision making Deterioration in status? Prevention of getting to good? Article 4(7)

EA position on WFD assessment Element level deterioration Localised impacts High status elements are very sensitive Bad status elements cannot be made worse 2016 RBMPs are the baseline Non-reportable water bodies Good potential treated in the same way as good status

Strategic WFD assessment

Thank you