Www.adas.co.uk WAgriCo – UK update and overview Dr Jodie Whitehead 17 th July 2008 Insert image here.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Lessons learned – success factors for biodiversity projects Peter Tramberend Environment Agency Austria.
Advertisements

1 A localised development of organic farming as a response to the problem of water quality : a new challenge Audrey VINCENT ISARA-Lyon Committee of the.
1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. DAVID SMALL DIRECTOR OF FOOD, FARMING AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY.
Costs and efficiency of manure application systems Ken Smith, ADAS Wolverhampton, UK Insert image here UNECE Expert Group on Ammonia Abatement, Braunschweig,
Presentation to CIWEM South Western Branch South West Water, Exeter 15 July 2008 WAgriCo - UK.
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
(Görans Manure management presentation here). BAAP THE BALTIC SEA AGRICULTURAL RUN-OFF ACTION PROGRAMME.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Croatia Agricultural Pollution Control Project Hrvoje Horvat Project coordinator.
LAKE OHRID MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA Experiences with Nutrient Management and Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control.
GHANA Developing CSA within the National Agriculture Sector Investment Plan while reinforcing inter-sectoral consistency: progress, bottlenecks and support.
Project Work Waste management in Chinese Village Chen Rui.
1 Integrating water issues in farm advisory services The English Experience FAS and Water Workshop 21 st October 2009.
Agriculture’s Dual Challenge of Delivering Food While Protecting the Environment Tamsin Cooper A Future for a Strong CAP – European Symposium.
RISE improving sustainability of agricultural production Response - Inducing Sustainability Evaluation.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
Rural Economy Research Centre Rural Development Conference Agricultural (Mini) Catchments Programme Cathal Buckley 26 th January 2009.
GroPro, September 2008 Applying Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Select Measures for Groundwater Protection Andrew Lovett School of Environmental Sciences,
Water Framework Directive and the SRDP Jannette MacDonald Land Unit, SEPA.
Overview of World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control Projects in ECA Jitendra Srivastava, Meeta Sehgal & Gary Baker.
1 GEORGIAN EXPERIENCE – and Strategy for Future DAVID NAKANI Environmental Pollution Control Program DAREJAN KAPANADZE World Bank Office Tbilisi Georgia.
Soil Fertility and Fertiliser Plans Skaidrite Rulle Director of Agrochemical Department State Plant Protection Service of Latvia
Workshop on Agricultural Nutrient Reduction,Vilnius September 2004 HELCOM- on the way to nutrient load reduction Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
1 AFO or CAFO: Evaluating environmental issues on your farm Winter Dairy Management 2009 Karl Czymmek PRO-DAIRY Cornell University and Greg Albrecht NYS.
Questionnaire Response Analysis David Cliffe FWAG National Resource Protection Specialist.
PUTTING WATER COMPANY INTERVENTIONS TO TACKLE DIFFUSE POLLUTION FROM AGRICULTURE INTO A BIGGER CONTEXT FOR GREATER EFFECTIVENESS Patrice Mongelard Catchment.
The NFU champions British farming and provides professional representation and services to its farmer and grower members The Farmer Connection – Engagement.
WagriCo UK Launch, Dorchester 5 May 2006 Tackling Diffuse Pollution: an integrated approach to improving water quality Bob Harris Environment Agency.
Kingston Maurward College Dorchester 5 May 2006 WAgriCo - UK Project Launch.
1 AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITY Financed by USAID APRA ROMANIA PROJECT Project implemented by: Assistance project for MAFWE International Resources.
1 AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITY Financed by USAID APRA ROMANIA PROJECT Project implemented by: Assistance project for MAFWE International Resources.
Dr. Vladimir Mamaev UNDP Regional Technical Advisor Integrated Natural Resource Management in the Baikal Basin Transboundary Ecosystem Russian Federation.
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
Projects, Events and Training
The cost of reducing nutrient loss from agriculture
MODELOS DE GESTIÓN DE CALIDAD
Problems and solutions
Monitoring and Programme of Measures Results
The Netherlands: manure policy and request for a derogation to the livestock manure limit of 170 kg N/ha per year for dr. ir. Cindy.
Evaluation : goals and principles
The Nitrates Directive implementation in the EU Blue Waters and Green Agriculture Conference 10 May 2017 Bucharest Marco Bonetti ENV D1 – Land Use & Management.
WAgriCo An NFU Perspective
SoilCare introduction
1 Queen Anne’s Gate, London
SCOPE OF MULTIPLICATION STRATEGY
Hidefumi Imura Professor, Nagoya University
Croatia Agriculture Pollution Control project
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC)
A new financial instrument
SCOPE OF MULTIPLICATION STRATEGY
Soil Gross Nutrient Balances
Thomas Dworak Ecologic Institute
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
In association with University of Cranfield and RPA
Is the cost benefit analysis alone, relevant to conclude on disproportionate costs? The example of the evaluation of of PoMs in the Sèvre Nantaise river.
Relevance of GNB for CAP monitoring and evaluation system
8-c) Expert Group & River Basin Network on WFD & Agriculture
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
HELCOM and the Baltic Sea
Dr Carla Turner Objectives Overview Our case study….
CIS Expert group on WFD & Agriculture Nitrates Directive and Water Framework Directive Edinburgh 10th October 2012 Luisa Samarelli DG ENV Agriculture,
WFD and agriculture Putting policy linkages into practice
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Andrea Tilche Unit Head of the Water Key Action
Presentation transcript:

WAgriCo – UK update and overview Dr Jodie Whitehead 17 th July 2008 Insert image here

Overview The study areas Catchment characterisation Sampling programme Mitigation measures Farmer feedback Economic analysis Key messages WAgriCo phase 2

What we are doing Trying to develop ‘best practice’ Understanding farming and interactions with water farm practice data soil and water measurements Identify possible solutions Work with farmers Evaluate effectiveness: lessons learnt Identify issues Identify solutions Implement solutions Monitor effectiveness

UK delivery team Field support interfacing with the farmers providing sound technical advice Technical support developing technical information monitoring data management, reporting Outside support contracts for separate elements of the project Steering Groups and management

Study areas Key points: 650 km 2 Arable/grassland Mix of soil types No water protection zones NVZ area Catchment Sensitive Farming - priority catchments

Catchment characterisation Farm audits Farm Pollution Risk Category High Medium Low

Catchment characterisation Nutrient budgets

Sampling programme Water quality/level sampling Soil mineral N sampling Routine soil sampling Grain N sampling Manure sampling

Water quality results vary: Between catchments Within the catchments Over the course of a year Long term trends shows that average nitrate levels are still increasing Water level data shows a yearly cycle of winter highs and summer lows Water quality results

Soil Mineral N Results

Measures Based on initial farm audits Soil and fertiliser management Ideas, feedback, discussion ….

Six Measures Fertiliser recommendations Manure management advice on rates (analysis) advice on timing Cover crops Fertiliser spreader calibration Spring manure application N balance/N efficiency

Measure Uptake Measure% Uptake by Farmers Fertiliser recommendations81 Manure management plans & waste audits52 Cover crops19 Fertiliser spreader calibration44 Moving from autumn to spring application for slurries & poultry manures 10 Use of on-farm N-efficiency27

Farmer feedback on measures Fertiliser spreader calibration Only small amount of fertiliser used on the farm so not worth it Already calibrate the spreader every year Just brought a new machine Moving from autumn to spring application of manures Not enough storage to cover the no application period Cover crops No spring crops in the rotation Manure management plan and waste audit No manures on the farm

Fertiliser spreader calibration – Why calibrate? % CVSpreader condition Increase in N leached <10Excellent4% Respectable6% Poor – can be improved 8% >20Serious13%

Fertiliser spreader calibration - Results % CV before calibration % CV after calibration % CV before calibration % CV after calibration Average Median8383 Max Min220.30

Fertiliser spreader calibration - Example

Cover Crops

Economic analysis The aim was to calculate the private cost to farmers of adopting each measure A population sample of 20 was selected Obtained basic information on farm size and enterprises, and the cost to the farm business of implementing each of the six measures.

Economic analysis results Type of measureNet CostNo. of farms relevant Cost for the pilot area catchments (£m) Fertiliser recommendations -£3.72 per ha (benefit) 190 Manure management -£9.3 per ha (benefit) 170 Cover crops£68.8 per ha Fertiliser spreader calibration -£14.2 per ha (benefit) 170 N efficiency calculation £600 per farm (£2.0 per ha)

Cost - benefit

Farmer feedback on the project WAgriCo has created an awareness that will remain in place for the future We have provided a lot of information to WAgriCo, but what will be the conclusions and how will this information be used? Would like a 'clone’ of WAgriCo' to be available at on-farm situations in the future Until WAgriCo, hadn't fully appreciated the financial value of what [slurry] was a waste product There is no one right way to do anything in farming WAgriCo has provided farm advisors with an agricultural background so they understand the farming system.

Key messages No single approach will achieve large reductions in N losses to the environment, but a range of smaller, cost effective N management measures may have a significant effect The use of catchment advisors is essential, feedback from farmers has indicated that advice is a key element in tackling diffuse pollution Farmers are keen to learn and use nutrients more efficiently on their farms The value of WAgriCo is making sure that our experiences are used and built upon

WAgriCo – Phase 2 Comprehensive monitoring network in place providing further evidence for farmers and stakeholders In depth farming tool working at the farm scale Research and development tool for policy Nitrates Directive Water Framework Directive Natura 2000

WAgriCo – Phase 2 Considers the practicality, economic and effectiveness of mitigation measures Strong relationship with farmers which has resulted in the changing farm practice Sustainable framework that provides a market solution based on environmental and water quality objectives

Funding for this work was through the EC LIFE demonstration fund and is gratefully acknowledged