QSE Managers Working Group October 12, 2010 Base Point Deviation Issues – Short Term and Long Term Solutions Nodal Settlement & Billing Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bill Blevins Management of the West-North Stability Limit Under the Nodal Market.
Advertisements

INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Proposal on Ancillary Service Deliverability Requirements QMWG January 6, 2012.
ERCOT Draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC RATF July 8, ERCOT draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC Draft NPRR will include the following clarifications or additions: Updates.
191 Drawing Statistical Inference from Simulation Runs......the "fun" stuff!
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Rule 6.6 Recommendation Update January 29, 2009.
QSE Managers Working Group July 11, 2011 Base Point Deviation – NPRR377 ERCOT Settlement & Billing Group.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
Load Resource Inputs to the Multi-Interval Real-Time Market ERCOT is requesting input from LRs and QSEs to enable running meaningful MIRTM simulations.
Sai Moorty ERCOT Integration Options into ERCOT systems.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
NPRR 097 DSR and Small Capacity / Low Operating Level Issues for Compliance Monitoring.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6.1 EDS 3 Release 6 LFC Workshop October 10, 2007.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC November 4 th, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
RPRS TF and QSE Managers Report to PRS 1)Procurement (QSE Managers) 2)Cost Allocation (RPRS Task Force) –PRR 674 –PRR 676 –PRR 678.
GTBD Forecasting Using SCED to Produce Projections of Future LMPs Floyd J. Trefny February 17, 2011.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
Price Correction Process Resmi Surendran QMWG 04/10/2015.
COPS NOVEMBER 2012 UPDATE TO TAC 11/29/2012 Harika Basaran, Chair Tony Marsh, Vice Chair.
Review of Integration of the Requirements of MOD Standard with ERCOT Protocols and Operating Guides S. Looney, Luminant Energy Company For Presentation.
QSE Managers Working Group November 7 th 2011 NPRR 334 – Additional Analysis.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
COPS NOVEMBER 2012 UPDATE TO TAC 11/01/2012 Harika Basaran, Chair Jim Lee, Vice Chair.
PRR525 SCE Method Comparison ERCOT Compliance December 3, 2004.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
1 Cutover Daily Call 10:30 AM November 23, :30.
ORDC Settlements Overview Matthew Tozer & Blake Holt ERCOT CSWG 4/21/2014.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Real Time Operations Energy Settlements Business Requirements.
Analysis for the Determination of X, Y, and Z for Compliance Monitoring NATF.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
GREDP Monitoring QSE Manager’s Working Group December 15, 2010.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Non-Spin Deployment Resmi Surendran. RUC Awarded Ancillary Service Bring Resources On-Line if awarding REG or RRS When awarding Non-Spin – First award.
Generation to be Dispatched(GTBD) Analysis For the purpose of discussion only PDCWG/QMWG Joint Meeting 11/02/2012.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
Nodal RTM Settlement Timeline Snapshot Timing for Load and Gen Data (Follow-Up) Mandy Bauld COPS November 10, 2009.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance Report for June 2017 QMWG 07/10/2017.
Non-IRR GREDP < 85% August 2017
Settlement Update Austin Rosel ERCOT February 27, 2017.
Nodal Program Update to Cops
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
EDS 3 R6.3 Testing Workshop EDS 3 Release 6.3 LFC Web Ex June 11, 2008
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
QSE Managers Working Group July 11, 2011 Base Point Deviation – NPRR377 ERCOT Settlement & Billing Group 1.
May 2012 Generation Resource Energy and Regulation Deployment Performance QMWG 6/8/2012.
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Presentation transcript:

QSE Managers Working Group October 12, 2010 Base Point Deviation Issues – Short Term and Long Term Solutions Nodal Settlement & Billing Group

Base Point Deviation – Overview of Issue  Overview  Proposal for Interim Solution  Proposed options for Post Go-Live 2

Base Point Deviation – Overview of Issue  During the Market Trials phase of the ERCOT Nodal Market, Market Participants and ERCOT personnel became aware that when SCED runs at shorter intervals than every five (5) minutes, it is possible for Resources to receive Base Point Deviation charges, although the Resource may have followed their instructed Base Points based on the Normal Ramp Rate.  Settlement issue only (not an operational issue / no change required to operations)  Within settlements, the protocol-defined AABP calculation assumes that every SCED Base Point is achievable and makes no accommodations for a shortened SCED interval.  The result is an AABP value that is skewed high, which can result in Base Pont Deviation penalties for under-generation. 3

Base Point Deviation – Example of Short SCED intervals SCED Int Base Point Y (Current SCED) Base Point Y-1 (Previous SCED)Telemetered Gen SCED Int (seconds)AABP TWTG (SCED weighted) 120 y y y y y y y y y UnderOver ramp per minute =30 MW95% % 5 MW MW Min - TWTG

Base Point Deviation –Proposed Interim Solution Interim solution for Base Point Deviation (non IRR) – include an exemption for shortened SCED intervals. Settlements would implement by setting the FQDEVFLAG to 3 in intervals with shortened SCED intervals which would exempt all resources. The question becomes: How short is too short? Two options: A defined percentage – if we find a SCED interval that has a duration of less than x% of 5 minutes in the 15-minute settlement interval, then the exemption would apply. A defined number – if the 15-minute settlement interval contains greater than x number of complete SCED intervals, then the exemption would apply. (Not including partial SCED intervals) 5

Base Point Deviation – Long Term Solutions Proposal A: The first alternative modifies the AABP calculation by incorporating a methodology to derive what the Base Point should have been for a shortened SCED interval. The derived Base Point is utilized in the AABP calculation rather than the 5-minute based SCED Base Point. Proposal B: The second alternative modifies the AABP calculation by using the data inputs calculated for the GREDP calculations. The GREDP data inputs are on a 5-minute clock basis and would not require the time-weighting and averaging that is currently part of the AABP calculation. Therefore, use of the GREDP data avoids the issue of shortened SCED intervals. Both options require system change for settlements. 6

Base Point Deviation – Proposal A: Derived Base Point Inputs AABP = [(BPSET y - TELGEN (y-1) ) / 300* TLMP y ] + TWAR BPSET y = TELGEN y-1 + ( (BP y - TELGEN y-1 )/300 * TLMP y ) Where: TWAR= ((ARI y * TLMP y ) / ( TLMP y ) {no proposed change} TELGEN y-1 = Telemetered Generation during the prior SCED interval TELGEN y = Telemetered Generation during the current SCED interval TLMP = Duration of SCED interval in seconds (BP y - TELGEN y-1 ) / 300 = Using SCED data (which is based on the Normal Ramp Rate for the Resource) this derives a MW/second ramp rate. This value is applied against the number of seconds in the shortened SCED interval to determine the “achievable” change in generation for that shortened SCED interval. 7

Base Point Deviation – Proposal A: Derived Base Point Once you alter the input AABP, the remainder of the formula is the same. TWTG becomes the incremental difference between the starting and ending Generation in the settlement interval. Over Generation: BPDAMT q, r, p = Max (0, RTSPP p ) * Max [0, (TWTG q, r, p – ¼ * Max (((1 + K1) * AABP q, r, p ), (AABP q, r, p + Q1)))] Where: TWTG = ( (TELGEN y - TELGEN (y-1) )) / 4 K1 = 5 % Q1 = 5 MW Under Generation: BPDAMT q, r, p = Max (0, RTSPP p ) * Min (1, KP) * Max {0, {Min [((1 – K2) * ¼( AABP q, r, p )), ¼( AABP q, r, p – Q2 )] – TWTG q, r, p }} Where: TWTG q, r, p =( (TELGEN y, q, r, p - TELGEN (y-1) q, r, p )) /4 K2 = 5 % Q2 = 5 MW 8

Base Point Deviation – Proposal A: Derived Base Point SCED Point BP y (30 MW/Min Ramp Rate) TELGEN y- 1 TLMP y MW Change (1) BPSET y TELGEN y TWTG (TELGENy - TELGENy-1 ) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y7470 (2) Y Y Total

Base Point Deviation – Proposal B: GREDP Inputs This option utilizes the following data which are inputs into GREDP : o AVGBP_5M o AVG_REG_INST_5M o AVG_REGUP_5M o AVG_REGDN_5M o AVGMW_5M 10

Base Point Deviation – Proposal B: GREDP Inputs AABP q, r, p, i =AVGBP q, r, p, i + TWAR q, r, p, i Where: AVGBP q, r, p, i = (AVGBP y + AVGBP y-1 + AVGBP y-2 )/3 TWAR q, r, p, i = (AVGREG y + AVGREG y-1 + AVGREG y-2 )/3 y = 5-minute clock interval i = 15-minute settlement interval Formula Variables to GREDP translation: AVGBP = AVGBP_5M AVGREG = AVG_REG_INST_5M = AVG_REGUP_5M - AVG_REGDN_5M 11

Base Point Deviation – Proposal B: GREDP Inputs Once you alter the input AABP, the remainder of the formula is the same. TWTG becomes the average telemetered generation for each 5-minute clock interval in the settlement interval. Over Generation: BPDAMT q, r, p = Max (0, RTSPP p ) * Max [0, (TWTG q, r, p – ¼ * Max (((1 + K1) * AABP q, r, p ), (AABP q, r, p + Q1)))] Where: TWTG = ( ( AVGTG q, r, p, i )/3)) * ¼ K1 = 5 % Q1 = 5 MW Under Generation: BPDAMT q, r, p = Max (0, RTSPP p ) * Min (1, KP) * Max {0, {Min [((1 – K2) * ¼( AABP q, r, p )), ¼( AABP q, r, p – Q2 )] – TWTG q, r, p }} Where: TWTG q, r, p = (( AVGTG q, r, p, i )/3)) * ¼ K2 = 5 % Q2 = 5 MW Formula Variables to GREDP translation: AVGTG = AVGMW_5M 12

Base Point Deviation – Proposal B: GREDP Inputs 5-Min Clock Interval Avg MW Avg Base Point (AVGBP) Avg Reg Instruction (AVGREG) 2:35: :40: :45: Total Under 95% MW Min(Under)-TWTG 2.61 Deviation MWh2.61 Over MW TWTG-Max(Over) Deviation MWh = Average BP + Average Regulation Instruction / = Average MW output / 3 13